Search

Background Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) contributes to a high burden of disease and exacerbates factors that promote the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enforceable policies are foundational to curbing inappropriate use of antimicrobials and providing safe WASH. While many countries have established National Action Plans for AMR that include provisions for WASH, few have codified these plans into legally enforceable policy. Here, we provide a comprehensive map and describe the current regulatory environment for WASH.Methods We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the WASH-related policies in 193 countries. Policies were identified, collated, and categorised into a publicly available repository.Results A total of 672 policies met the criteria for inclusion in the dataset. No category of WASH-related policies had been adopted by all countries included in the study. Policy categories that were potentially more difficult to enforce in light of economic and governance limitations tended to be more prevalent and diverse, whereas policies in categories that were highly resource intensive and specific were less universal. Countries with gaps in policy categories also tended to be regionally clustered. While countries in the South Asian and European WHO regions had nearly universal policy coverage across all countries, the presence of policies was inconsistent across countries in the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions.Conclusion While decision-makers should rely on knowing which policies work best to mitigate the burden of WASH-related disease and AMR development, they must first have a comprehensive understanding of the current regulatory environment. Researchers and decision-makers need to know which policies work best and under what circumstances. The global mapping of WASH policies, which may have implications for AMR development, serves as a foundation for future policy analysis for AMR.

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the global capacity for timely outbreak reporting. However, gaps remain in our understanding of barriers and enablers to outbreak reporting, particularly at the local level. Field epidemiology training program (FETP) fellows often participate in the outbreak reporting process as part of both their training and the public health roles they assume after graduating; they therefore represent a potentially valuable source of information for better understanding these barriers and enablers. This study will investigate the barriers and enablers to outbreak reporting through a mixed methods approach that will encompass a review of the existing literature as well as surveying and interviewing FETP trainees and graduates from the Asia-Pacific region.MethodsThis study will begin with a scoping review of the literature to identify existing evidence of barriers and enablers to outbreak reporting. Based on our findings from the scoping review, we will administer a survey to FETP trainees and graduates from the World Health Organization Western Pacific and South-East Asian Regions and conduct interviews with a subset of survey respondents to investigate the survey findings in more detail. We will summarise and compare the survey results according to various country-level economic and political indicators, and we will employ thematic analysis to evaluate the interview responses. Based on the findings from the scoping review, survey, and interviews, we will construct a model to comprehensively describe the various barriers and enablers to outbreak reporting.ConclusionThis study will contribute to our understanding of the determinants of outbreak reporting across several geographic, political, and economic contexts by eliciting the viewpoints and experiences of persons involved with outbreak reporting, particularly at the local level. This information will help improve the outbreak reporting process, allowing for more timely reporting and helping prevent future outbreaks from becoming pandemics.