Search

Macrophages and osteocytes are important regulators of inflammation, osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. However, their interactions under adverse conditions, such as biomaterial-associated infection (BAI) are not fully understood. We aimed to elucidate how factors released from macrophages modulate osteocyte responses in an in vitro indirect 3D co-culture model. Human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured on etched titanium disks and activated with either IL-4 cytokine (anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype) or Staphylococcus aureus secreted virulence factors to simulate BAI (pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype). Primary osteocytes in collagen gels were then stimulated with conditioned media (CM) from these macrophages. The osteocyte response was analyzed by gene expression, protein secretion, and immunostaining. M1 phenotype macrophages were confirmed by IL-1β and TNF-α secretion, and M2 macrophages by ARG-1 and MRC-1.Osteocytes receiving M1 CM revealed bone inhibitory effects, denoted by reduced secretion of bone formation osteocalcin (BGLAP) and increased secretion of the bone inhibitory sclerostin (SOST). These osteocytes also downregulated the pro-mineralization gene PHEX and upregulated the anti-mineralization gene MEPE. Additionally, exhibited pro-osteoclastic potential by upregulating pro-osteoclastic gene RANKL expression. Nonetheless, M1-stimulated osteocytes expressed a higher level of the potent pro-osteogenic factor BMP-2 in parallel with the downregulation of the bone inhibitor genes DKK1 and SOST, suggesting a compensatory feedback mechanisms. Conversely, M2-stimulated osteocytes mainly upregulated anti-osteoclastic gene OPG expression, suggesting an anti-catabolic effect. Altogether, our findings demonstrate a strong communication between M1 macrophages and osteocytes under M1 (BAI)-simulated conditions, suggesting that the BAI adverse effects on osteoblastic and osteoclastic processes in vitro are partly mediated via this communication. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Biomaterial-associated infections are major challenges and the underlying mechanisms in the cellular interactions are missing, especially among the major cells from the inflammatory side (macrophages as the key cell in bacterial clearance) and the regenerative side (osteocyte as main regulator of bone). We evaluated the effect of macrophage polarization driven by the stimulation with bacterial virulence factors on the osteocyte function using an indirect co-culture model, hence mimicking the scenario of a biomaterial-associated infection. The results suggest that at least part of the adverse effects of biomaterial associated infection on osteoblastic and osteoclastic processes in vitro are mediated via macrophage-to-osteocyte communication., Competing Interests: Declaration competing of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Technological and implant design advances have helped reduce the frequency of aseptic total joint arthroplasty failure, but periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a clinical important problem with high patient morbidity. Misinterpreting PJI as aseptic mechanical loosening commonly leads to unsatisfactory revision arthroplasty, persistent infection, and poor long-term results. While there is no single "gold standard" diagnostic test for PJI, recent collaborative efforts by Orthopaedic and Infectious Disease Societies have developed algorithms for diagnosing PJI. However, the efficacy of individual tests as well as diagnostic thresholds are controversial. We review the recommended thresholds for commonly used screening tests as well as tissue histopathology and confirmatory tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. We also update lesser-known laboratory tests, and we briefly summarize rapidly evolving molecular tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. Pathologists hold a critical role in assisting with PJI diagnosis, maintaining laboratory test quality and interpreting test results. Collaboration between clinicians and pathologists is essential to provide optimal patient care and reduce the burden of PJI., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)