Search

In this article, the authors review the approach to infections associated with surgically placed leads, leads placed in unusual locations such as azygous veins, extraction of active fixation coronary sinus leads, and the role of hybrid extractions in difficult cases. The authors also review strategies to mitigate the risk of paradoxic embolism among patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction., Competing Interests: Disclosures None for all the authors., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) become the recommended treatment over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, their effectiveness in reducing cognitive impairment and dementia compared to VKA remains unclear., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, or case-control study that assessed incident dementia between AF patients who received DOAC compared to VKA were selected. Relevant study characteristics and the number of incident dementia diagnosis or hazard ratios (HRs) for incident dementia and each dementia subtypes were extracted. Random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used to estimate effect sizes for continuous data., Results: Twelve cohort studies comprising 1 451 069 individuals were included. The incidence of dementia was lower in AF patients prescribed DOACs compared to VKA (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93, I 2  = 61.2%). A lower incident dementia in DOACs group relative to VKA was significantly observed in those less than 75 years of age (< 65 years, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.97, I 2  = 0%); 65-74 years, HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.92, I 2  = 55.4%); and ≥ 75 years, HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.74-1.55, I 2  = 92.5%)) and for the subgroup of patients with vascular dementia (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.824-0.997, I 2  = 0%)., Conclusions: This meta-analysis reveals a reduction in incidence of dementia in AF patients prescribed DOACs compared to VKA, particularly in those less than 75 years old and in the vascular dementia subtype., Competing Interests: We do not have any financial or nonfinancial potential conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.)

Background: Orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is among the final armamentariums for end-stage heart disease. Many patients who have had OHT require a post-transplant permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation due to an abnormal conduction system. We aimed to evaluate the risk of mortality and acute rejection in patients with OHT who had received PPM compared to patients without PPM and to determine predictors for PPM placement in this population., Methods: We comprehensively searched for studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to September 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on patients who had undergone OHT and PPM implantation post-transplant. Data from each study were combined using a random-effects model. Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or odd ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: A total of 9 studies were included in this meta-analysis incorporating a total of 54,848 patients (3.3% had PPM). The pooled all-cause mortality rate among patients with PPM post-OHT was 26% (95% CI: 19-33%, I 2  = 1%). There were no differences between post-heart transplant patients with PPM and those without PPM in risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43-1.34; I 2  = 45%) and acute rejection (RR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.74-2.00, I 2  = 59%). Bi-atrial anastomosis was associated with an increased risk of PPM implantation post-OHT (OR 7.74, 95% CI: 3.55-16.91, I 2  = 0%), while pre-OHT mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was associated with a decreased risk of PPM implantation post-OHT (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.76, I 2  = 0%)., Conclusion: There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or acute rejection between post-OHT recipients who required PPM compared to those who did not receive PPM. Further, bi-atrial anastomosis portended the need for PPM implantation, while MCS was associated with a decreased occurrence of PPM., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest We do not have any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Several studies suggested the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in screening left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We hence conducted systematic review and meta-analysis comparing diagnostic accuracy of AI to Sokolow-Lyon's and Cornell's criteria. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive overview of the newly developed AI tools for diagnosing LVH. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies until May 2023. Included were observational studies evaluating AI's accuracy in LVH detection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and pooled sensitivities and specificities assessed AI's performance against standard criteria. A total of 66,479 participants, with and without LVH, were included. Use of AI was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy with summary ROC (SROC) of 0.87. Sokolow-Lyon's and Cornell's criteria had lower accuracy (0.68 and 0.60). AI had sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 87%. In comparison, Sokolow-Lyon's specificity was 92% with a sensitivity of 25%, while Cornell's specificity was 94% with a sensitivity of 19%. This indicating its superior diagnostic accuracy of AI based algorithm in LVH detection. Our study demonstrates that AI-based methods for diagnosing LVH exhibit higher diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional criteria, with notable increases in sensitivity. These findings contribute to the validation of AI as a promising tool for LVH detection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: While atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has proven beneficial for heart failure (HF) patients, most reports were performed with radiofrequency ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon AF ablation in patients with HFrEF., Method: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia, complications, NYHA functional class (NYHA FC), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after Cryoballoon AF ablation in HF patients were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model., Result: A total of 9 studies observational studies with 1414 HF patients were included. Five studies had only HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 1 study with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and others with mixed HF types. Freedom from AA in HFrEF at 12 months was 64% (95% CI 56-71%, I 2 58%). There was a significant improvement of LVEF in these patients with a standard mean difference of 13% (95% CI 8.6-17.5%, I 2 99% P < 0.001. The complication rate in HFrEF group was 6% (95% CI 4-10%, I 2 0%). The risk of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was not significantly different between HF and no HF patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.8-2.23, I2 76%)., Conclusion: Cryoballoon AF ablation is effective in HFrEF patients comparable to radiofrequency ablation. The complication rate was low., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia referred for ablation. Periprocedural conduction system damage was a primary concern during AVNRT ablation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block and the success rate associated with different types of catheters in slow pathway ablation., Method: A literature search was performed to identify studies that compared various techniques, including types of radiofrequency ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated) and different sizes of catheter tip cryoablation (4, 6, and 8-mm), in terms of their outcomes related to permanent atrioventricular block and success rate. To assess and rank the treatments for the different outcomes, a random-effects model of network meta-analysis, along with p-scores, was employed., Results: A total of 27 studies with 5110 patients were included in the analysis. Overall success rates ranged from 89.78% to 100%. Point estimation showed 4-mm cryoablation exhibited an odds ratio of 0.649 (95%CI: 0.202-2.087) when compared to nonirrigated RFA. Similarly, 6-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.944 (95%CI: 0.307-2.905), 8-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.848 (95%CI: 0.089-8.107), and irrigated RFA had an odds ratio of 0.424 (95%CI: 0.058-3.121) compared to nonirrigated RFA., Conclusion: Our study found no significant difference in the incidence of permanent AV block between the types of catheters. The success rates were consistently high across all groups. These findings emphasize the potential of both RF ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated catheter) and cryoablation as viable options for the treatment of AVNRT, with similar safety and efficacy profile., (© 2024 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) management in endurance athletes (EA) is challenging due to the paucity of data, especially on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation (CA). The hypothesis is that the efficacy and safety of AF CA in EA are comparable to the non-EA., Methods: Databases from EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane were searched from inception through February 2023. Studies with available information on efficacy and safety profiles were included. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random effect and generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird., Results: Nine observational studies with a total of 1129 participants were identified, of whom 51% were EA. Our analysis found that rate of atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrences following AF CA was not statistically different between EA and non-EA (RR 1.04, I 2  = 57.6%, p = 0.54). The AA survival rates after a single ablation in EA was 60.2%, which improved up to 77% after multiple ablations during the follow-up period. Infrequent complication rates ranging from 0 to 7.6% were observed, with no mortality., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that AF CA is as effective and safe in EA as in non-EA. In the future, AF CA should be considered as a first-line therapeutic choice in this patient group., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Purpose: The prevalence of hyperdynamic left ventricular (LV) systolic function in septic patients and its impact on mortality remain controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the prevalence and association of hyperdynamic LV systolic function with mortality in patients with sepsis., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function in adult septic patients and the associated short-term mortality as compared to normal LV systolic function. Hyperdynamic LV systolic function was defined using LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 70% as cutoff. Secondary outcomes were heart rate, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and E/e' ratio., Results: Four studies were included, and the pooled prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function was 18.2% ([95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5, 25.8]; I 2  = 7.0%, P < 0.0001). Hyperdynamic LV systolic function was associated with higher mortality: odds ratio of 2.37 [95%CI 1.47, 3.80]; I 2  = 79%, P < 0.01. No difference was found in E/e' (P = 0.43) between normal and hyperdynamic LV systolic function, while higher values of heart rate (mean difference: 6.14 beats/min [95%CI 3.59, 8.69]; I 2  = 51%, P < 0.0001) and LVEDD (mean difference: - 0.21 cm [95%CI - 0.33, - 0.09]; I 2  = 73%, P < 0.001) were detected in patients with hyperdynamic LV systolic function., Conclusion: The prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function is not negligible in septic patients. Such a finding is associated with significantly higher short-term mortality as compared to normal LV systolic function., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, there is still a gap of evidence in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients regarding resynchronization therapy., Methods: We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of CHD patients who received CRT implantation. We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to June 2023. Studies that reported response rate to CRT, total mortality rate, change in QRS duration, change in left ventricular ejection fraction, and change in New York Heart Association functional class were included., Results: A total of 14 studies were included in the study. There were 10 studies that reported response rates after implantation. The overall response rate to CRT in CHD patients was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61%-75%, I 2 32%). The response rates in patients with systemic right ventricle (RV), systemic left ventricle (LV), and single ventricle were 58% (95% CI 46%-70%, I 2 0%), 80% (95% CI 74%-86% I 2 14%), and 67% (95% CI 49%-80% I 2 0%). Response to CRT in systemic RV was inferior to systemic LV with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% CI 0.15-0.95, I 2 38%). The total mortality rate from seven studies was 12% (95% CI 8%-18%, I 2 55%). The parameters which represented ventricular dyssynchrony improved after CRT implantation., Conclusion: The overall response rate to CRT in CHD was 68%. Patients with systemic RV had a lower response rate to CRT when compared to patients with systemic LV. The total mortality rate after CRT implantation was 12%., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)