Search

Dental composites are gaining great popularity in restorative dentistry because of their aesthetic appeal and capacity to replicate the natural color of teeth. Nevertheless, their lifespan and durability rely on various factors, such as the polishing technique and the environmental conditions they are exposed to. The study aimed to assess the influence of the method of final polishing of dental composite on the surface roughness and microhardness of materials also considering the environment of different pHs. Disc-shaped samples (5 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) have been prepared for microhardness and roughness tests from two dental composites: A2 Clearfil Majesty ES 2 Classic and A2D Clearfil Majesty Premium. One-third of samples were polished with polishing discs, OptiDisc, another one-third of samples were polished with Eve Diacomp Twist rubbers and polishing brush with diamond particles, and rest of the samples were stored without any polishing (the control group). Tested materials were incubated in distilled water or acidic buffer (pH = 2) for 3 weeks at a temperature of 37 °C. No statistically significant differences were found for roughness for the two materials tested after incubation in liquids. A decrease in Vicker microhardness was found for Clearfil Majesty ES 2 Classic after soaking in a low pH liquid, and no such relationship was found for Clearfil Majesty Premium. The improved resistance of these materials to the negative oral environment may result in the longer survival of composite restorations in patients with poor diet or diseases, causing a decrease in oral pH.

Injuries to the articular cartilage of the human knee joint, commonly resulting from trauma, inflammation, or age- and activity-related wear and tear, have significant implications, primarily leading to osteoarthritis (OA). Conservative treatments for such injuries often yield suboptimal clinical outcomes. Surgical interventions using current methods may not consistently provide satisfactory results, largely due to the formation of low-quality scar tissue lacking the biomechanical properties of hyaline cartilage. In this retrospective study, we compared the results of two promising methods for regenerating cartilage defects in the knee joints using scaffolds soaked with stem cells of different origins: bone marrow aspirate concentrate mesenchymal stem cells (BMAC-MSCs) and human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs). We evaluated 39 patients (39 knees, hUCB-MSCs: 20 knees, BMAC: 19 knees) at the 12-month follow-up using VAS, KOOS, Lysholm scales and radiologically with M-MOCART 2.0 score. The analysis demonstrated substantial overall improvement in both groups, notably reflected in enhanced quality of life for the patients. Interestingly, the final scores in the hUCB-MSCs group were comparable to those in the BMAC-MSCs group, with no statistically significant differences observed, despite variations in preoperative age and lesion size. Notably, the hUCB-MSCs group consisted of significantly older individuals with larger lesion sizes. Both procedures were found to be safe, and improvement was observed in both groups, which holds promise for future clinical investigations.