Search

Background: Clinicopathological differences exist between ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UC-CRC) and sporadic colorectal cancer (S-CRC). However, differences in the prognosis remain controversial, and the reason for these differences remains unclear. We therefore assessed the differences between patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC., Patients and Methods: This was a matched-pair analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC who underwent colorectal resection between January 2000 and December 2021 at two institutions. Patients were matched according to age, sex, date of surgery, tumor location, and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage., Results: A total of 5992 patients underwent surgery for CRC at the two institutions, and 288 patients (48 with UC-CRC and 240 with S-CRC) were matched in this study. Patients with UC-CRC underwent more invasive surgery and had a longer operative time than those with S-CRC, but there was no marked difference in postoperative complications or perioperative mortality. Long-term outcomes showed a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) for UC-CRC and S-CRC (86.5% versus 88.8%, p = 0.742); however, in stage 3 patients, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer 5-year OS than those with S-CRC (51.4% versus 83.8%, p = 0.032). The first recurrence sites in stage 3 UC-CRC were peritoneal dissemination followed by the bones, while those in S-CRC were the liver and pulmonary system., Conclusions: Despite no significant differences in surgical outcomes, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer prognosis than those with S-CRC at stage 3. The recurrence patterns in UC-CRC differed from those in S-CRC, suggesting a possible prognostic difference., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: This study aimed to evaluate perioperative complications and oncologic results for high-risk and oligometastatic prostate cancer patients., Methods: The data of patients who underwent surgery for prostate cancer in the authors' clinic between January 2012 and March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. According to D'amico classification, 28 patients with high-risk prostate cancer and 23 patients in the oligometastatic stage were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (high-risk prostate cancers) and group 2 (oligometastatic cancer). Demographic characteristics, oncologic data, pathologic data, and complications of the patients were recorded., Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.84 years (range, 52-79 years). The average follow-up period was 45.48 months for group 1 and 46.36 months for group 2 (p = 0.84). The mean hemoglobin decrease was 1.53 g/dL in group 1 and 0.69 g/dL in group 2 (p = 0.046). Five patients (17.8%) in group 1 had biochemical recurrence at 14.55 months, whereas three patients (13%) in group 2 had biochemical recurrence at 9.87 months (p = 0.646). According to Clavien-Dindo classification, major complications developed in 7.2% of the group 1 patients and in 8.6% of the group 2 patients. Surgical margin positivity was detected in 6 group 1 patients (21.4%) and 12 group 2 patients (52.2%) (p = 0.023). During the follow-up period, four patients died. Only one of the patients died of cancer., Conclusion: The authors think that oligometastatic and high-risk prostate cancer surgeries do not differ significantly in terms of complications., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and mastectomy alone in locally advanced breast cancer patients., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence. The secondary outcome was the incidence of surgical complications. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3., Results: Sixteen studies, involving 15,364 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that patients underwent IBR were more likely to experience surgical complications than those underwent mastectomy alone (HR: 3.96, 95%CI [1.07,14.67], p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in overall survival (HR: 0.94, 95%CI [0.73,1.20], p = 0.62), disease-free survival (HR: 1.03, 95%CI [0.83,1.27], p = 0.81), or breast cancer specific survival (HR: 0.93, 95%CI [0.71,1.21], p = 0.57) between IBR group and Non-IBR group., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that IBR after mastectomy does not affect the overall survival and disease-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer patients. However, IBR brings with it a nonnegligible higher risk of complications and needs to be fully evaluated and carefully decided., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapy based on genetically engineered T cells derived from patients. The introduction of CAR T-cell therapy has changed the treatment paradigm of patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. However, challenging issues including managing life-threatening toxicities related to CAR T-cell infusion and resistance to CAR T-cell therapy, leading to progression or relapse, remain. This review summarizes the issues with currently approved CAR T-cell therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoid malignancies, including lymphoma and myeloma. We focus on unique toxicities after CAR T-cell therapy, such as cytokine-related events and hematological toxicities, and the mechanisms underlying post-CAR T-cell failure.

Effective cellular therapy using CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells for the treatment of advanced B-cell malignancies raises the question of whether the administration of adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) posttransplant could reduce relapse and improve survival. Moreover, several early phase clinical studies have shown the potential beneficial effects of administration of tumor-associated antigen-specific T-cells and natural killer cells posttransplant for high-risk patients, aiming to decrease relapse and possibly improve survival. In this article, we present an in-depth review of ACT after transplantation, which has the potential to significantly improve the efficacy of this procedure and revolutionize this field., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently remains the only curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Transplant related mortality (TRM) and relapse, remain two significant complications which need to be addressed., Aims: The aim of this manuscript is to review current available reports on changes which have recently occurred, to improve the outcome of MF patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT., Methods: Published papers were used to analyze different aspects of allogeneic HSCT., Results: Changes and updates are provided on selection of patients, prognostic systems, managing splenomegaly, conditioning regimens, predicting transplant outcome, stem cell sources, stem cell donors, graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, patients with blast phase, hematopoietic reconstitution, disease markers, donor chimerism, and treatment of relapse., Conclusions: The review outlines new transplant platforms which are now available for patients with myelofibrosis, together with persisting problems, among which, older age combined with marrow fibrosis and an inflammatory disease. Relapse also requires aggressive monitoring of drivers mutations, and early cellular therapy., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients who progressed following prior systemic therapy in clinical practice in Europe., Design: Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes-Europe (ECHO-EU) is a retrospective patient chart review study., Setting: ECHO-EU is a multicentre study conducted in the UK, Germany, Italy, France and Spain., Participants: Patients with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer who progressed between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2019 following prior first-line systemic therapy were eligible and data were collected until last available follow-up through November 2021., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Data collected included patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed since initiation of second-line therapy to estimate time to treatment discontinuation, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 475 patients were included from EU5 countries. Median age was 69 years at advanced endometrial cancer diagnosis, 78.7% had stage IIIB-IV disease, 45.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≥2 at second-line therapy initiation. In second line, a majority of patients initiated either non-platinum-based chemotherapy (55.6%) or endocrine therapy (16.2%). Physician-reported real-world overall response rate (classified as complete or partial response) to second-line therapy was 34.5%, median rwPFS was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.2 to 8.0) and median OS was 11.0 months (95% CI 9.9 to 12.3)., Conclusions: Patients had poor clinical outcomes with a median OS of <1 year and rwPFS of approximately 7 months, highlighting the significant unmet medical need in pretreated recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients. Novel therapies with potential to improve PFS and OS over conventional therapies could provide significant clinical benefit., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Authors report the following conflicts of interest: SSK, employment with OPEN Health which received consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA (MSD); YQ, former employment with OPEN Health which received consulting fees from MSD, and stock with AstraZeneca; JZ, employment with Eisai; VSP, employment with MSD and stock with Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA; VG and NM, employment with M3 EU; CM, honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, and Seagen, and advisory board participation with GlaxoSmithKline and Karypharma., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background/aim: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment strategy for gastric cancer (GC); however, the clinical impact of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) on survival outcomes remains unclear. We compared the short- and long-term results of LTG with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG)., Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for Stage I/II/III GC between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into those undergoing LTG (n=143, LTG group) and OTG (n=173, OTG group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS)., Results: The LTG group exhibited a higher prevalence of early T and N factors, with pStage I/II/III distribution skewed toward early-stage in a ratio of 86/24/33 compared to 38/65/69 in the OTG group (p<0.001), respectively. Longer operation time (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (p<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (p<0.001) were observed in the LTG than in the OTG group. LTG was associated with survival benefits for patients without indication for adjuvant chemotherapy [5-year RFS rate, 96.3% vs. 73.2%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-0.56; p<0.001]. Among the eligibility criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (Stage II/III excluding pT1 and pT3N0), while the LTG group received more frequently doublet-agent administration (56.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001), conversely, the OTG group exhibited slightly better long-term survival rates (5-year RFS rate, 33.9% vs. 50.2%; HR=1.31; 95%CI=0.82-2.10; p=0.251)., Conclusion: LTG contributed to favorable short-term outcomes and demonstrated improved long-term outcomes in early-stage GC; however, careful consideration of indications is warranted for advanced GC cases., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy leads to durable remissions in relapsed B-cell cancers, but treatment-associated immunocompromise leads to a substantial morbidity and mortality risk from atypical infection. Mucormycosis is an aggressive and invasive fungal infection with a mortality risk of 40-80% in patients with haematological malignancies. In this Grand Round, we report a case of mucormycosis in a 54-year-old patient undergoing CAR T-cell therapy who reached complete clinical control of Mucorales with combined aggressive surgical debridement, antifungal pharmacotherapy, and reversal of underlying risk factors, but with substantial morbidity from extensive oro-facial surgery affecting the patient's speech and swallowing. For broader context, we present our case alongside an US Food and Drugs Administration adverse events reporting database analysis and a review of the literature to fully evaluate the clinical burden of mucormycosis in patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. We discuss epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic tools, and current frameworks for treatment and prophylaxis. We did this analysis to promote increased vigilance for mucormycosis among physicians specialising in CAR T-cell therapy and microbiologists and to illustrate the importance of early initiation of therapy to effectively manage this condition. Mucormycosis prevention and early diagnosis, through targeted surveillance and mould prevention in patients at highest risk and Mucorales-specific screening assays, is likely to be key to improving outcomes in patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KPLC has received honoraria from Kite and Gilead. CR has received honoraria from Novartis, Kite, Gilead, Amgen, and Bristol Myers Squibb. NS has received research grants from Gilead and honoraria from Gilead and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Clear cell meningiomas (CCM) are an uncommon meningioma subtype marked by aggressive growth and high rates of recurrence despite initial resection. The present study evaluates the adjuvant benefit of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual or recurrent tumors., Methods: After review of our prospectively maintained database, we identified 6 patients (3 female) with histologically confirmed Grade 2 CCMs. The median age of the patients at the time of SRS was 45 years. Five patients had undergone prior gross total surgical resection and 1 patient had subtotal resection before SRS. The median SRS treatment volume was 4.7 cc and the median radiosurgical margin dose was 13 Gy (range: 10-15 Gy)., Results: The median follow-up time was 35.5 months (range 6-168 months). Three patients achieved tumor control after the first SRS procedure. Three patients experienced tumor progression at 4, 22, and 32 months after initial SRS. Tumor control was obtained in 2 of these patients after additional SRS. One patient with multiple SRS procedures had suspected adverse radiation effect that was successfully treated with corticosteroids followed by bevacizumab., Conclusions: Tumor control was maintained in 5 of 6 patients after one or more SRS procedures. SRS should be considered for early intervention after surgical resection of CCM. To maximize the tumor control rate, patients with diagnosed CCM should be treated more generously and higher margin dose should be prescribed. Patients with CCM should be counselled that more than one SRS may be necessary to provide sustained tumor control., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis., Materials and Methods: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation)., Conclusion and Recommendations: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: GC1118 is a novel antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with enhanced blocking activity against both low- and high-affinity EGFR ligands. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GC1118 in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (phase 1b) and to assess the safety and efficacy of GC1118 plus FOLFIRI as a second-line therapy for recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (phase 2a)., Materials and Methods: Phase 1b was designed as a standard 3+3 dose-escalation study with a starting dose of GC1118 (3 mg/kg/week) in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2; leucovorin 400 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2,400 mg/m2 infusion over 46 hours) in patients with solid tumors refractory to standard treatments. The subsequent phase 2a part was conducted with objective response rate (ORR) as a primary endpoint. Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type, EGFR-positive, recurrent/metastatic CRC resistant to the first-line treatment were enrolled in the phase 2a study., Results: RP2D of GC1118 was determined to be 3 mg/kg/wk in the phase 1b study (n=7). Common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in the phase 2a study (n=24) were acneiform rash (95.8%), dry skin (66.7%), paronychia (58.3%), and stomatitis (50.0%). The most common ADR of ≥ grade 3 was neutropenia (33.3%). ORR was 42.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.5 to 62.0), and median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.0)., Conclusion: GC1118 administered weekly at 3 mg/kg in combination with FOLFIRI appears as an effective and safe treatment option in recurrent/metastatic CRC.

Objectives: It has been demonstrated that neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy was safe and feasible referred to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing sleeve lobectomy. Nevertheless, no survival data were reported in the previous researches. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by sleeve lobectomy for long-term survival outcomes., Methods: Patients who underwent bronchial sleeve lobectomy following neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively identified. Treatment response, perioperative outcomes, event-free survival and overall survival were compared between groups in the overall and the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted cohort., Results: A total of 139 patients with 39 lung cancer recurrence and 21 death were included. Among them, 83 (59.7%) and 56 (40.3%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, more patients achieved complete pathological response in the neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy group (6.0% vs 26.3%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding overall postoperative complication (23.8% vs 20.2%, P = 0.624) and specific complications (all P > 0.05). Patients receiving neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy had favourable event-free survival (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.85, P = 0.020) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.80, P = 0.021). Multivariable analysis revealed that neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was an independent predictor for favourable event-free survival (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.86, P = 0.020, adjusted for clinical TNM stage)., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was correlated with favourable long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing sleeve lobectomy., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Recurrence of blood malignancy is the major cause of hematopoietic cell transplant failure. HLA class II molecules play a fundamental role in antitumor responses but the role of class II haplotypes is not known., Methods: HLA-DR, -DQ, -DM, and -DO allele variation was determined in 1,629 related haploidentical transplants to study the clinical significance of individual molecules and haplotypes., Results: Outcome correlated with patient and donor variation for HLA-DRβ residue 86 (Gly/Val), HLA-DQ (G1/G2) heterodimers, and donor HLA-DM (DM11,11/nonDM11,11) molecules, and depended on patient-donor mismatching. Risks of relapse were lower for DRβ-86 GlyGly patients when the donor was GlyVal (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.68]; P < .001); GlyVal patients benefited from HLA-DRB1 -matched donors, whereas no donor was superior to another for ValVal patients. G1G2 patients with G1G2-mismatched donors had lower relapse. Transplantation from donors with DMα residue 184 ArgHis was associated with higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.09 to 2.36]; P = .02) relative to ArgArg. Relapse and mortality risks differed across HLA-DR-DQ-DM haplotypes., Conclusion: HLA class II haplotypes may be functional constituents of the transplantation barrier, and their consideration in patients and donors may improve the success of transplantation.

Background: Long-term durability data for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in long-segment (LSBE) and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) is lacking. This study aimed to determine 10-year cancer progression, eradication, and complication rates in LSBE and ULSBE patients treated with RFA., Methods: Single-surgeon prospective database of patients with LSBE (≥ 3 to < 8 cm) and ULSBE (≥ 8 cm) who underwent RFA (2001-2021) were retrospectively analyzed. Ten-year cancer progression calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eradication rates, including complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM), and rates of recurrence and complications, compared between LSBE and ULSBE groups., Results: Ten years after starting treatment, the cancer rate was 14.3% in 56 patients. CR-D and CR-IM rates were 87.5% and 67.9%, respectively. Relapse rates from CR-D were 1.8% and 3.6% from CR-IM. Eradication rates for dysplasia in LSBE and ULSBE patients (90.6% versus 83.3%) and IM (71.9% versus 62.5%) were not significantly different. ULSBE patients required higher mean number of ablation sessions for IM eradication (4.7 versus 3.7, p = 0.032), while complication rates including strictures (4.2% versus 6.2%), perforation (0 versus 0), and bleeding (4.2% versus 3.1%), were similar between ULSBE and LSBE patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, shorter Barrett's segment and baseline low-grade dysplasia were associated with increased likelihood for eradication of IM and dysplasia. A total number of ablation sessions or endoscopic resections ≥ 3 was associated with reduced likelihood for eradication., Conclusion: RFA was durable in maintaining dysplasia and IM eradication in both LSBE and ULSBE over 10 years, and with low complication rates. IM eradication was more difficult to achieve in ULSBE. Late development of cancer occurred in 14.3%., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) are challenging for salvage treatment. Retrospective analysis of own experiences with salvage re-irradiation was performed., Methods: The study included all consecutive patients treated with salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for prostate bed recurrence following RP and postoperative RT at a single tertiary center between 2014 and 2021. Treatment toxicity defined as the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 genito-urinary (GU) or gastro-intestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) was assessed. A PSA response, biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated., Results: The study group included 32 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median follow-up of 41 months, treated with CyberKnife (53%) or Linac (47%) sSBRT. Total dose of 33.75-36.25 Gy in five fractions (72%) was applied in the majority of them. Approximately 19% patients reported grade ≥ 2 GU AEs both at baseline and at three months, and grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity increased from 0% at baseline to 6% at three months after sSBRT. There was some clinically relevant increase in late toxicity with 31% patients reporting late ≥ 2 GU, and 12.5% late ≥ 2 GI AEs. Two grade 3 AEs were recorded: recto-urinary fistulas. The majority of patients showed a PSA response (91% at one year post-sSBRT). The 3‑year BC was 40% and 3‑year OS was 87%., Conclusions: Manageable toxicity profile and satisfactory biochemical response suggest that SBRT in patients with local recurrence following RP and postoperative RT might be a salvage option for selected patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are difficult to treat after failing standard therapies. This phase I study evaluated mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) and gemcitabine in patients with recurrent FRα-positive EOC, EC, or TNBC to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) (primary endpoint)., Methods: FRα-positive patients with platinum-resistant EOC, EC, or TNBC with ≤4 prior chemotherapy regimens (2 for EC) were enrolled. FRα expression requirement varied among eligible tumors and changed during the study., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled; 17 were evaluable for DLT. Half the patients received ≥3 prior chemotherapy lines. Most EOC and EC patients (78%) were medium (50-74%) or high(75-100%) FRα expressors. TNBC patients were low (25-49%) FRα expressors. The MTD/RP2D was MIRV 6 mg/kg AIBW D1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 IV, D1 and D8, every 21 days (Dose Level [DL] 3), where 5/7 patients demonstrated a partial response (PR) as their best response, including 2 confirmed ovarian responses whose time-to-progression and duration of response were 7.9/5.4 and 8.0/5.7 months respectively. Most common treatment-related adverse events at MTD were anemia and neutropenia (3/7 each, 43%), diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia (2/7 each, 29%). DLTs were thrombocytopenia (DL1), oral mucositis (DL4) and diarrhea (DL4). Nine of 20 patients (45%; 95% CI: 21.1-68.9%) achieved PR as their best response, with 3/20 patients or 15% (95%CI, 0-32.1%) confirmed PR., Conclusion: MIRV and gemcitabine demonstrate promising activity in platinum resistant EOC at RP2D, but frequent hematologic toxicities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MC: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (current Regeneron employee); Grant support to institution (National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by ImmunoGen Corp and Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA033572). DS: no conflicts. TS: no conflicts. NR: no conflicts. JM: Consulting fees (GE Healthcare). EW: no conflicts. AJ: no conflicts. SW: no conflicts. GK: Grant support to institution (Lilly, Merck); Consulting fees (GOG Foundation, Mersana, Immunogen); Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events (Speakers bureau GSK, Merck, Immunogen); Payment for expert testimony (Foundation Medicine); Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board (Repare). ME: no conflicts. LK: no conflicts. EH: no conflictsTD: no conflicts. AH: no conflicts. SL: no conflicts. RM: no conflicts. MW: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (current Regeneron employee). PF: no conflicts., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC); however, studies with 10-year survival follow-up are lacking., Methods: Consecutive patients with GC who underwent radical gastrectomy between December 2009-2012 were included retrospectively. Preoperative sarcopenia was diagnosed using computed tomography skeletal muscle index. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis determined the prognostic factors for OS and RFS., Results: In total, 781 patients with GC were included; among these, 207 (26.5%) had preoperative sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had significantly lower 10-year OS and RFS than patients without sarcopenia (39.61% vs. 58.71% and 39.61% vs. 57.84%, respectively). Further, preoperative sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for 10-year OS (HR = 1.467; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.169-1.839) and RFS (HR = 1.450; 95% CI: 1.157-1.819). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of death and recurrence in the first 10 years postoperatively than patients without sarcopenia. Additionally, the risk of death (HR = 2.62; 95% CI:1.581-4.332) and recurrence (HR = 2.34; 95% CI:1.516-3.606) was the highest in the 1st postoperative year and remained relatively stable thereafter. Further, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved 10-year OS (p = 0.006; HR = 0.558) and RFS (p = 0.008; HR = 0.573) in patients with TNM stage II-III GC that presented with sarcopenia., Conclusion: Preoperative sarcopenia remained an independent risk factor for postoperative very long-term prognosis of GC. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improved the long-term outcomes of stage II-III patients with sarcopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This article has not been published elsewhere in whole or in part. All authors have read and approved the content, and agree to submit for consideration for publication in the journal. There are no any ethical/legal conflicts involved in the article., (© 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ∼ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis., Methods: Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis., Results: Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively., Conclusion: Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449., Competing Interests: Kan Yonemori has received lecture fees from Eisai, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Chugai, Fuji Film Pharma, PDR pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (MSD), Boeringer Ingelheim, Ono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Jansen, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca; is a member of the advisory board for Eisai, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Genmab, Gilead, OncXerna, Takeda, Novartis, and MSD; research funding from MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Chugai, Ono, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genmab, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nihon Kayaku, and Haihe; and is principle investigator for MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Merk Biopharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Chugai, Ono, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genmab, Boeringer Ingelheim, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nihon Kayaku, and Haihe., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains an option for patients with myeloma. Given the unfortunate inevitability of the majority of patients, relapsing salvage therapy options are needed. Although there is a potential concern for subsequent T-cell redirection therapy in these patients, Hammons et al. provide a retrospective look at patients treated this way with no new significant adverse safety or efficacy signal. Commentary on: Hammons et al. Chimeric antigen receptor and bispecific T-cell engager therapies in multiple myeloma patients with prior allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2024;204:887-891., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the spatial pattern of locoregional recurrences in patients diagnosed with HPV-associated and HPV-non-associated oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC) treated with definitive radiotherapy., Methods and Materials: Patients who had locoregional recurrence following definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy were identified at a single tertiary institution. Target volumes were delineated according to the latest consensus international guidelines. Recurrences were classified into five categories based on radiotherapy dose distribution and target volume, using a previously validated methodology; type A (central high dose), type B (peripheral high dose), type C (central elective dose), type D (peripheral elective dose), and type E (extraneous dose). The types of failure were compared between p16-positive and p16-negative tumors using the Pearson chi-square test., Results: Fifty-eight locoregional recurrences were observed in 36 patients. The majority of recurrences were in nodal locations (66%, 38/58). Among these, 34 (59%) were classified as type A, 6 (10%) as type B, 9 (15%) as type C, 5 (9%) as type D, and 4 (7%) as type E failure. A significant difference was found in the types of failure between p16-positive and p16-negative tumors (X 2 9.52, p = 0.044). p16-negative tumors were more likely to have recurrences in a peripheral location compared to p16-positive tumors (32% vs. 7%). p16-positive tumor were more likely to have extraneous recurrences (17% vs. 0%)., Conclusion: Our study results identified a significant difference in patterns of locoregional failure among patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer following consensus-based tumor delineation and modern radiotherapy. Further confirmatory pattern of failure studies are required to enable greater individualization of radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal malignancy in the future., (© 2023 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aggressive T-cell lymphomas (TCL) account for 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) with weaker responses and shorter durations to chemotherapy than other types of NHL. Current therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) have limited efficacy, and short durations of response. Gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin have shown single-agent activity in TCL and combined have activity in relapsed B-cell lymphomas. We evaluated outcomes of 18 patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive TCL (13 CTCL, 5 PTCL) treated with a gemcitabine plus liposomal doxorubicin (GemDox) combination and evaluated outcomes with a specific focus on CTCL patients. Significant responses were observed in CTCL patients with an overall response rate of over 80%. In all patients, objective responses were seen in eight patients (50%), with six patients (5 CTCL) able to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Given limited treatment options for r/r CTCL, GemDox should be considered a therapeutic option in relapsed/refractory CTCL.

Background and Objectives: This multicenter retrospective series of consecutive extra-spinal aneurysmal bone cysts aims to identify risk factors for treatment failure., Methods: Aneurysmal bone cysts treated within seven collaborating centers with over 12-months follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Survival analyses were performed to identify variables associated with recurrence using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard regression., Results: One hundred and fifteen (M:F 60:55) patients were included. Median age at presentation was 13 years and median follow-up was 27 months. Seventy-five patients underwent surgical curettage and 27% of these required further intervention for recurrence. Of the 30 patients who underwent biopsy with limited percutaneous curettage as initial procedure, 47% required no further treatment. Patients under 13 years (log-rank p = 0.006, HR 2.3, p = 0.011) and those treated who had limited curettage (log-rank p = 0.001, HR 2.7, p = 0.002) had a higher risk of recurrence/persistence., Conclusions: There is a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment for aneurysmal bone cysts and this risk is higher in young patients. However, the cyst heals in a substantial number of patients who have a limited curettage at the time of biopsy., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Although systemic postoperative therapy after surgery for colorectal liver metastases is generally recommended, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been debated. We used machine learning to develop a decision tree and define which patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases., Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. An optimal policy tree analysis was used to determine the optimal assignment of the adjuvant chemotherapy to subgroups of patients for overall survival and recurrence-free survival., Results: Among 1,358 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases, 1,032 (76.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 28.7 months (interquartile range 13.7-52.0), 5-year overall survival was 67.5%, and 3-year recurrence-free survival was 52.6%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (3-year recurrence-free survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 54.4% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 46.8%; P < .001) but no overall survival significant improvement (5-year overall survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 68.1% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 65.7%; P = .15). Patients were randomly allocated into 2 cohorts (training data set, n = 679, testing data set, n = 679). The random forest model demonstrated good performance in predicting counterfactual probabilities of death and recurrence relative to receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. According to the optimal policy tree, patient demographics, secondary tumor characteristics, and primary tumor characteristics defined the subpopulation that would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusion: A novel artificial intelligence methodology based on patient, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics may help clinicians tailor adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations after colorectal liver metastases resection., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Node-positive prostate cancer is a potentially curable disease. Definitive radiotherapy to the prostate and lymphatic drainage is an effective treatment option but prospective long-term outcome data are scarce. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of definitive radiation therapy for men with prostate cancer and nodal metastases using modern irradiation techniques., Methods: A total of 40 treatment-naïve men with node-positive prostate cancer were allocated to the trial. All patients received definitive radiation therapy at two German university hospitals between 2009 and 2018. Radiation was delivered as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 51 Gy to the lymphatic drainage with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) up to 61.2 Gy to involved nodes and 76.5 Gy to the prostate in 34 fractions. Feasibility and safety, overall and progression-free survival, toxicity, and quality of life measurements were analyzed., Results: During a median follow-up of 79 months, median overall survival was 107 months and progression-free survival was 78 months. Based on imaging follow-up, no infield relapse was reported during the first 24 months of follow-up. There were 3 (8%) potentially treatment-related grade 3 toxicities. Common iliac node involvement was associated with a higher risk of progression (HR 15.8; 95% CI 2.1-119.8; p = 0.007)., Conclusion: Definitive radiation to the lymphatic drainage with SIB to the involved nodes and prostate is a safe and effective treatment approach for patients with treatment-naïve, node-positive prostate cancer with excellent infield tumor control rates and tolerable toxicity. Location rather than number of involved nodes is a major risk factor for progression., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a key treatment option for hematologic malignancies (HMs), although it carries significant risks. Up to 30% of patients relapse after allo-HSCT, of which up to 2% to 5% are donor-derived malignancies (DDMs). DDMs can arise from a germline genetic predisposition allele or clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in the donor. Increasingly, genetic testing reveals that patient and donor genetic factors contribute to the development of DDM and other allo-HSCT complications. Deleterious germline variants in CEBPA, DDX41, GATA2, and RUNX1 predispose to inferior allo-HSCT outcomes. DDM has been linked to donor-acquired somatic CH variants in DNMT3A, ASXL1, JAK2, and IDH2, often with additional new variants. We do not yet have evidence to standardize donor genetic sequencing prior to allo-HSCT. The presence of hereditary HM disorders should be considered in patients with myeloid malignancies and their related donors, and screening of unrelated donors should include family and personal history of cytopenia and HMs. Excellent multidisciplinary care is critical to ensure efficient timelines for screening and necessary discussions among medical oncologists, genetic counselors, recipients, and potential donors. After allo-HSCT, HM relapse monitoring with genetic testing effectively results in genetic sequencing of the donor, as the transplanted hematopoietic system is donor-derived, which presents ethical challenges for disclosure to patients and donors. We encourage consideration of the recent National Marrow Donor Program policy that allows donors to opt-in for notification about detection of their genetic variants after allo-HSCT, with appropriate genetic counseling when feasible. We look forward to prospective investigation of the impact of germline and acquired somatic genetic variants on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization/engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, and DDM to facilitate improved outcomes through knowledge of genetic risk., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Mitral valve repair (MVr) has been associated with superior long-term survival and freedom from valve-related complications compared with mitral valve replacement for primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The 2 main approaches for MVr are chordal replacement ("respect approach") and leaflet resection ("resect approach"). We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis using 3 search databases to compare the long-term end points between both approaches. The primary end point was long-term survival. The secondary end points were long-term MR recurrence and reoperation. After reconstruction of time-to-event data for the individual survival analysis, pooled Kaplan-Meier curves for the end points were generated. A total of 14 studies (5,565 patients) were included in the analysis. The respect approach was associated with superior survival compared with the resect approach in the overall sample (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.024, n = 3,901 patients) but not in the risk-adjusted sample (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.82, p = 0.991, n = 620 patients). There was no difference between the approaches in the rate of MR recurrence in the overall sample (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.08, p = 0.116, n = 1,882 patients) or in the risk-adjusted sample (HR 1.62, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.47, p = 0.211, n = 288 patients). The data for reoperation were only available in the overall sample and did not reveal a difference (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.35, p = 0.663, n = 3,505 patients). In conclusion, the current evidence suggests no difference in long-term mortality, MR recurrence, or reoperation between the resect and respect approaches for MVr after adjusting for patient risk factors. More long-term follow-up data are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Caldonazo was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) Clinician Scientist Program OrganAge funding number 413668513, by the Deutsche Herzstiftung (German Heart Foundation) funding number S/03/23, and by the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research of the Medical Faculty Jena. Dr. Sá receives support from The Thoracic Surgery Foundation (charitable arm of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons) through the TSF Every Heartbeat Matters Global Structural Heart Fellowship Award for the project Structural Heart/Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Dr. Vervoort is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship for work outside this manuscript. The remaining authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Children with relapsed central nervous system (CNS tumors), neuroblastoma, sarcomas, and other rare solid tumors face poor outcomes. This prospective clinical trial examined the feasibility of combining genomic and transcriptomic profiling of tumor samples with a molecular tumor board (MTB) approach to make real‑time treatment decisions for children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors., Methods: Subjects were divided into three strata: stratum 1-relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma; stratum 2-relapsed/refractory CNS tumors; and stratum 3-relapsed/refractory rare solid tumors. Tumor samples were sent for tumor/normal whole-exome (WES) and tumor whole-transcriptome (WTS) sequencing, and the genomic data were used in a multi-institutional MTB to make real‑time treatment decisions. The MTB recommended plan allowed for a combination of up to 4 agents. Feasibility was measured by time to completion of genomic sequencing, MTB review and initiation of treatment. Response was assessed after every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patient clinical benefit was calculated by the sum of the CR, PR, SD, and NED subjects divided by the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), no evidence of disease (NED), and progressive disease (PD) subjects. Grade 3 and higher related and unexpected adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for safety evaluation., Results: A total of 186 eligible patients were enrolled with 144 evaluable for safety and 124 evaluable for response. The average number of days from biopsy to initiation of the MTB-recommended combination therapy was 38 days. Patient benefit was exhibited in 65% of all subjects, 67% of neuroblastoma subjects, 73% of CNS tumor subjects, and 60% of rare tumor subjects. There was little associated toxicity above that expected for the MGT drugs used during this trial, suggestive of the safety of utilizing this method of selecting combination targeted therapy., Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a comprehensive sequencing model to guide personalized therapy for patients with any relapsed/refractory solid malignancy. Personalized therapy was well tolerated, and the clinical benefit rate of 65% in these heavily pretreated populations suggests that this treatment strategy could be an effective option for relapsed and refractory pediatric cancers., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02162732. Prospectively registered on June 11, 2014., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Despite recent advances in frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), at least a third of those diagnosed still will require second or further lines for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) disease. A small minority of these can be cured with standard chemoimmunotherapy/stem-cell transplant salvage approaches. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-19) therapies are increasingly altering the prognostic landscape for rel/ref patients with DLBCL and related aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Long-term follow up data show ongoing disease-free outcomes consistent with cure in 30-40% after CAR-19, including high-risk patients primary refractory to or relapsing within 1 year of frontline treatment. This has made CAR-19 a preferred option for these difficult-to-treat populations. Widespread adoption, however, remains challenged by logistical and patient-related hurdles, including a requirement for certified tertiary care centers concentrated in urban centers, production times of at least 3-4 weeks, and high per-patients costs similar to allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are molecular biotherapies designed to bind and activate effector T-cells and drive them to B-cell antigens, leading to a similar cellular-dependent cytotoxicity as CAR-19. May and June of 2023 saw initial approvals of next-generation BsAbs glofitamab and epcoritamab in DLBCL as third or higher-line therapy, or for patients ineligible for CAR-19. BsAbs have similar spectrum but generally reduced severity of immune related side effects as CAR-19 and can be administered in community settings without need to manufacture patient-specific cellular products. To date and in contrast to CAR-19, however, there is no convincing evidence of cure after BsAbs monotherapy, though follow up is limited. The role of BsAbs in DLBCL treatment is rapidly evolving with trials investigating use in both relapsed and frontline curative-intent combinations. The future of DLBCL treatment is bound increasingly to include effector cell mediated immunotherapies, but further optimization of both cellular and BsAb approaches is needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Radiation therapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery decreases the risks of local recurrence and breast cancer mortality in the multidisciplinary management of patients with breast cancer. However, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and the absolute benefit of post-operative RT in individual patients varies substantially. Clinical trials aiming to identify patients with low-risk early breast cancer in whom post-operative RT may be safely omitted, based on conventional clinical-pathologic variables alone, have not provided sufficiently tailored information on local recurrence risk assessment to guide treatment decisions. The majority of patients with early breast cancer continue to be routinely treated with RT after breast conserving surgery. This approach may represent over-treatment for a substantial proportion of the patients. The clinical impact of genomic signatures on local therapy decisions for early breast cancer has been remarkably modest due to the lack of high-level evidence supporting their clinical validity for assessment of the risk of local recurrence. Efforts to personalise breast cancer care must be supported by high level evidence to enable balanced, informed treatment decisions. These considerations underpin the importance of ongoing biomarker-directed clinical trials to generate the high-level evidence necessary for setting the future standard of care in personalised local therapy for patients with early breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BHC reports in-kind support from Veracyte and NanoString for biomarker testing in clinical trial conduct., (Copyright © 2024 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stomach partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) was introduced to deal with delayed gastric emptying (DGE). This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of SPGJ versus conventional gastrojejunostomy (CGJ)., Method: This cohort study analyzed 108 patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy for unresectable gastric cancer: 70 patients underwent SPGJ, and 38 patients underwent CGJ between 2018 and 2022. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics., Results: After PSM, there were 26 patients in each group. SPGJ group had significantly lower incidence of DGE (3.8% vs. 34.6%), vomiting (3.8% vs. 42.3%), and prokinetics requirement (11.5% vs. 46.2%). SPGJ group had significantly shorter time to solid diet tolerance (4.1 days vs. 5.7 days) and postoperative hospital stay (7.7 days vs. 9.3 days). There was no significant difference in relapse reinterventions, gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) recurrence, conversion surgery, and survival outcomes., Conclusions: SGPJ was associated with lower rate of DGE, prokinetics requirement, and shorter time of solid diet tolerance compared to CGJ in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer patients with GOO., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Drs. Nguyen Viet Hai, Dang Quang Thong, Tran Quang Dat, Doan Thuy Nguyen, Ho Le Minh Quoc, Tran Anh Minh, Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Tran Thien Trung, Nguyen Hoang Bac, and Vo Duy Long disclose any potential or actual personal, political or financial conflict of interest in the material, information or techniques described in the paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Aims: This study aimed to comprehensively assess the impact of stem cell selection between bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. Our objective was to identify specific factors associated with better transplant outcomes., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japanese HSCT registry. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 0-70 years who underwent their first unrelated HSCT with BM or PB, with an 8/8 or 7/8 allele HLA match for hematological malignancies between 2010 and 2020., Results: Among 10 295 patients, no significant difference was observed in overall survival, relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) or non-relapse mortality between the groups. Patients who received PB showed no clear difference in acute GVHD but had a greater rate of chronic GVHD, resulting in poor chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CRFS). Subgroup analyses highlighted the importance of patient-specific factors in source selection. Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a greater hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index showed better CRFS and GRFS when BM was the preferred source. Similar trends were observed among patients with standard-risk disease for CRFS. However, no such trends were evident among patients aged 0-24 years, indicating that both sources are viable choices for young patients., Conclusions: This real-world retrospective analysis showed similar basic outcomes for BM and PB in an unrelated setting. The results support that BM may still be preferred over PB, especially when the long-term quality of life is a major concern. A consideration of individual factors can further optimize transplant success. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term implications of stem cell source selection., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) demonstrated significant efficacy with a manageable safety profile as third-line or later treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 study. Primary end points were adverse events (AEs), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate (ORR) per independent review committee. Key secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). After 2-year follow-up, patients could enroll in a separate study assessing long-term (≤15 years) safety and OS. Liso-cel-treated patients (N = 270) had a median age of 63 years (range, 18-86 years) and a median of 3 prior lines (range, 1-8) of systemic therapy, and 181 of them (67%) had chemotherapy-refractory LBCL. Median follow-up was 19.9 months. In efficacy-evaluable patients (N = 257), the ORR was 73% and CR rate was 53%. The median (95% confidence interval) DOR, PFS, and OS were 23.1 (8.6 to not reached), 6.8 (3.3-12.7), and 27.3 months (16.2-45.6), respectively. Estimated 2-year DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 49.5%, 40.6%, and 50.5%, respectively. In the 90-day treatment-emergent period (N = 270), grade 3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 2% and 10% of patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs in treatment-emergent and posttreatment-emergent periods, respectively, were neutropenia (60% and 7%) and anemia (37% and 6%). Liso-cel demonstrated durable remissions and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals during the 2-year follow-up in patients with R/R LBCL. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02631044 and #NCT03435796., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Data from 200 children with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia who underwent their first haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) between 2015 and 2021 at our institution were analysed. The 4-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 71.9%, 62.3% and 32.4% respectively. The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were 41.1% and 9.5% respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 56.1%, and that of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 27.3%. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (MRD+) status pre-HSCT was significantly associated with lower survival and a higher risk of relapse. The 4-year OS, EFS and CIR differed significantly between patients with MRD+ pre-HSCT (n = 97; 63.4%, 51.4% and 41.0% respectively) and those with MRD-negative (MRD-) pre-HSCT (n = 103; 80.5%, 73.3% and 23.8% respectively). Multivariate analysis also revealed that acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia without Down syndrome (non-DS-AMKL) was associated with extremely poor outcomes (hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, EFS and CIR: 3.110 (1.430-6.763), 3.145 (1.628-6.074) and 3.250 (1.529-6.910) respectively; p-values were 0.004, 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). Thus, haplo-HSCT can be a therapy option for these patients, and MRD status pre-HSCT significantly affects the outcomes. As patients with non-DS-AMKL have extremely poor outcomes, even with haplo-HSCT, a combination of novel therapies is urgently needed., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To assess recurrence according to the type of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 ( MEN1 ) patients and to identify the risk factors for recurrence after the initial surgery., Background: In MEN1 patients, pHPT is multiglandular, and the optimal extent of initial parathyroid resection influences the risk of recurrence., Methods: MEN1 patients who underwent initial surgery for pHPT between 1990 and 2019 were included. Persistence and recurrence rates after less than subtotal parathyroidectomy (LTSP) and subtotal parathyroidectomy (STP) were analyzed. Patients with total parathyroidectomy with reimplantation were excluded., Results: Five hundred seventeen patients underwent their first surgery for pHPT: 178 had LTSP (34.4%) and 339 STP (65.6%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher after LTSP (68.5%) than STP (45%) ( P < 0.001). The median time to recurrence after pHPT surgery was significantly shorter after LTSP than after STP: 4.25 (1.2-7.1) versus 7.2 (3.9-10.1) years ( P < 0.001). A mutation in exon 10 was an independent risk factor of recurrence after STP (odds ratio = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.31; 3.69; P = 0.003). The 5 and 10-year recurrent pHPT probabilities were significantly higher in patients after LTSP with a mutation in exon 10 (37% and 79% vs 30% and 61%; P = 0.016)., Conclusions: Persistence, recurrence of pHPT, and reoperation rate are significantly lower after STP than LTSP in MEN1 patients. Genotype seems to be associated with the recurrence of pHPT. A mutation in exon 10 is an independent risk factor for recurrence after STP, and LTSP may not be recommended when exon 10 is mutated., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While resection remains the only curative option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, it is well known that such surgery is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, beyond facing life-threatening complications, patients may also develop early disease recurrence, defining a "futile" outcome in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery. The aim of this study is to predict the high-risk category (futile group) where surgical benefits are reversed and alternative treatments may be considered., Methods: The study cohort included prospectively maintained data from 27 Western tertiary referral centers: the population was divided into a development and a validation cohort. The Framingham Heart Study methodology was used to develop a preoperative scoring system predicting the "futile" outcome., Results: A total of 2271 cases were analyzed: among them, 309 were classified within the "futile group" (13.6%). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR 1.60; p = 0.005), bilirubin at diagnosis ≥50 mmol/L (OR 1.50; p = 0.025), Ca 19-9 ≥ 100 U/mL (OR 1.73; p = 0.013), preoperative cholangitis (OR 1.75; p = 0.002), portal vein involvement (OR 1.61; p = 0.020), tumor diameter ≥3 cm (OR 1.76; p < 0.001), and left-sided resection (OR 2.00; p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of futility. The point system developed, defined three (ie, low, intermediate, and high) risk classes, which showed good accuracy (AUC 0.755) when tested on the validation cohort., Conclusions: The possibility to accurately estimate, through a point system, the risk of severe postoperative morbidity and early recurrence, could be helpful in defining the best management strategy (surgery vs. nonsurgical treatments) according to preoperative features., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Recently, with the advancement of medical technology, the postoperative morbidity of pelvic exenteration (PE) has gradually decreased, and it has become a curative treatment option for some patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies. However, more evidence is still needed to support its efficacy. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term survival outcome of PE and the feasibility of umbilical single-port laparoscopic PE for gynecologic malignancies in a single medical center in China., Patients and Methods: PE for gynecological cancers except for ovarian cancer conducted by a single surgical team in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between July 2014 and December 2019 were included and the data were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Forty-one cases were included and median age at diagnosis was 53 years. Cervical cancer accounted for 87.8% of all cases, and most of them received prior treatment (95.1%). Sixteen procedures were performed in 2016 and before, and 25 after 2016. Three anterior PE were performed by umbilical single-site laparoscopy. The median operation time was 460 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 600 ml. There was no perioperative death. The years of the operations was significantly associated with the length of the operation time (P = 0.0018). The overall morbidity was 52.4%, while the severe complications rate was 19.0%. The most common complication was pelvic and abdominal infection. The years of surgery was also significantly associated with the occurrence of severe complication (P = 0.040). The median follow-up time was 55.8 months. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 17.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.3 months. The 5-year DFS was 28.5%, and the 5-year OS was 30.8%., Conclusion: PE is safe for patient who is selected by a multi-disciplinary treatment, and can be a curative treatment for some patients. PE demands a high level of experience from the surgical team. Umbilical single-port laparoscopy was a technically feasible approach for APE, meriting further investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: There is no evidence supporting the feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)., Methods: The clinical data of consecutive patients with borderline resectable PDAC who received NACT and underwent either LPD or OPD between January 2020 and December 2022 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed., Results: The analysis included 57 patients in the OPD group and 20 in the LPD group. Following NACT, the LPD group exhibited a higher median CA19-9 decrease rate compared to the OPD group (85.3% vs. 66.9%, P = 0.042). Furthermore, 3 anatomically borderline PDACs in the LPD group and 5 in the OPD group were downstaged into resectable status (30.0% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.069). According to RECIST criteria, 51 (66.2%) patients in the entire cohort were evaluated as having stable disease. The median operation time for the LPD group was longer than the OPD group (419 vs. 325 min, P < 0.001), while the venous resection rate was 35.0% vs. 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.489). There was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, with a median number of 18.5 in the LPD group and 22 in the OPD group, and the R1 margin rate (15.0% vs. 12.3%) was also comparable. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo complications (35.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.018) was lower in the LPD group compared to the OPD group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that a tumor diameter > 3 cm before NACT (HR 2.185) and poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.805) were independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, and a decrease rate of CA19-9 > 70% (OR 0.309) was a protective factor for early tumor recurrence and overall survival., Conclusions: LPD for PDAC following NACT is feasible and oncologically equivalent to OPD. Effective control of CA19-9 levels is beneficial in reducing early tumor recurrence and improving overall survival., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The definition of early recurrence (ER) for right-sided colon cancer patients after complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymphadenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to define the optimal time for ER and clarify risk factors for ER and post-recurrence survival (PRS). A total of 578 right-sided colon cancer patients who underwent CME with D3 lymphadenectomy were included. The minimum p value method was used to evaluate theme optimal time of recurrence-free survival to discriminate between ER and late recurrence (LR). Risk factors for ER were determined by a logistics regression model. The PRS was compared between ER and LR. The optimal time to define ER was 15 months (P = 1.8697 E-7 ). 93 patients developed tumor recurrence, 46 patients had ER (≤15 months) and 47 patients had LR (>15 months). Preoperative serum CA19-9 > 37 U/mL (OR = 3.185, P = 0.001), pathological N+ stage (OR = 3.042, P = 0.027), and lymphovascular invasion (OR = 2.182, P = 0.027) were identified as independent risk factors associated with ER. Age > 75 years (HR = 1.828, P = 0.040), pathological N2 stage (HR = 1.850, P = 0.009), multiple sites of recurrence (HR = 1.680, P = 0.024), and time to recurrence ≤15 months (HR = 2.018, P = 0.043) were significantly associated with worse PRS in patients with recurrence. 15 months was the optimal time to distinguish ER and LR. ER was associated with a poor PRS. Elevated preoperative serum CA19-9 level, pathological N+ stage, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly predictive of ER., (© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)

The current standard-of-care adjuvant treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) comprises a fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) as a single agent or in combination with oxaliplatin, for either 3 or 6 months. Selection of therapy depends on conventional histopathological staging procedures, which constitute a blunt tool for patient stratification. Given the relatively marginal survival benefits that patients can derive from adjuvant treatment, improving the safety of chemotherapy regimens and identifying patients most likely to benefit from them is an area of unmet need. Patient stratification should enable distinguishing those at low risk of recurrence and a high chance of cure by surgery from those at higher risk of recurrence who would derive greater absolute benefits from chemotherapy. To this end, genetic analyses have led to the discovery of germline determinants of toxicity from fluoropyrimidines, the identification of patients at high risk of life-threatening toxicity, and enabling dose modulation to improve safety. Thus far, results from analyses of resected tissue to identify mutational or transcriptomic signatures with value as prognostic biomarkers have been rather disappointing. In the past few years, the application of artificial intelligence-driven models to digital images of resected tissue has identified potentially useful algorithms that stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups. Similarly, liquid biopsy approaches involving measurements of circulating tumour DNA after surgery are additionally useful tools to identify patients at high and low risk of tumour recurrence. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the current landscape of adjuvant therapy for patients with CRC and discuss how new technologies will enable better personalization of therapy in this setting., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Objective: To evaluate pre-operative predictors of early (<30 days) severe complications (grade Dindo 3+) in patients with gynecological malignancy submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients submitted to surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli between 2010 and 2019. We included patients affected by primary or recurrent/persistent cervical, endometrial, or vulvar/vaginal cancers. Post-operative complications were graded according to the Dindo classification. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of complications., Results: We performed 63 anterior PE, 10 posterior PE, and 56 total PE. The incidence of early severe post-operative complications was 27.9% (n=36), and the early mortality rate was 2.3% (n=3). More frequent complications were related to the urinary diversion and intestinal surgery. In univariable analysis, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL (odds ratio [OR]=4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.65-10.7; p=0.003), low albumin levels (OR=3.9; 95% CI=1.27-12.11; p=0.025), diabetes (OR=4.15; 95% CI=1.22-14.1; p=0.022), 2+ comorbidities at presentation (OR=5.18; 95% CI=1.49-17.93; p=0.012) were predictors of early severe complications. In multivariable analysis, only low hemoglobin and comorbidities at presentation were independent predictors of complications., Conclusion: Pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgery characterized by a high rate of post-operative complications. Pre-operative assessment of comorbidities and patient health status are crucial to better select the right candidate for this type of surgery., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has revolutionized the outcomes of relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, CART is still limited by its availability, toxicity, and response durability. Not all patients make it to the CART infusion phase due to disease progression. Among those who receive CART, a significant number of patients experience life-threatening cytokine release syndrome toxicity, and less than half maintain a durable response with the majority relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present pre-CART. Radiation therapy stands as a promising peri-CART and salvage treatment that can improve the outcomes of these patients. Evidence suggests that bridging radiotherapy prior to CART controls the disease during the manufacturing period, augments response rates and local control, cytoreduces/debulks the disease and decreases the severity of cytokine release syndrome, and may prolong disease-free intervals and survival especially in patients with bulky disease. Consolidative radiotherapy for residual post-CART disease alters the pattern of relapse and improves local recurrence-free and progression-free survivals. Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed post-CART disease has favorable survival outcomes when delivered comprehensively for patients with limited relapsed disease and palliates symptoms for patients with diffuse relapsed disease. The biology of the disease during the peri-CART period is poorly understood, and further studies investigating the optimal timing and dosing of radiation therapy (RT) are needed. In this review, we tackle the most significant challenges of CART, review and propose how RT can help mitigate these challenges, and provide The Mayo Clinic experts' approach on incorporating RT with CART., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is the most common histological subtype of malignant tumor affecting the anal canal. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the first-line treatment in nearly all cases, ensuring complete clinical response in up to 80% of patients. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is typically reserved as salvage therapy in those patients with persistent or recurrent tumor after CRT. In locally advanced tumors, an extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE), which entails excision of the anal canal and levator muscles, might be indicated to obtain negative resection margins. In this setting, the combination of highly irradiated tissue and large surgical defect increases the risk of developing postoperative perineal wound complications. One of the most dreadful complications is perineal evisceration (PE), which requires immediate surgical treatment to avoid irreversibile organ damage. Different techniques have been described to prevent perineal complications after ELAPE, although none of them have reached consensus. In this technical note, we present a case of PE after ELAPE performed for a recurrent ASCC. Perineal evisceration was approached by combining a uterine retroversion with a gluteal transposition flap to obtain wound healing and reinforcement of the pelvic floor at once, when a mesh placement is not recommended., (© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)

Background: A promising recent strategy for haploidentical transplantation is the depletion of T lymphocytes based on the selective elimination of T cells by manipulation, which enables a very low incidence of nonrelapse mortality and graft-vs-host disease. It is more expensive than conventional unmanipulated methods and requires dedicated transplant centers and sufficient stem cell processing facilities. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relapse, survival, and clinical data of the patients and to analyze the outcomes of the technique., Methods: The study included 56 adult patients who underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation via αβ T-cell depletion., Results: The median age of the patients at the time of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 41.5 years (range, 20-70 years); 22 patients (39.3%) were women. After the transplantation, half of the patients (50.0%) needed immunosuppressive drugs, and 17.9% of the patients experienced a post-transplant relapse. The mortality rate was 55.4%, and nonrelapse mortality was 25.0%. The 100-day mortality rate was 19.6%. The median overall days was 1101 days (142-3813 days), whereas the median progression-free overall was 302.5 days (11-2479 days). Being older (age >40), having hypertension, having acute liver graft-vs-host disease, and having systemic fungal infection were found as risk factors that significantly increased mortality (with 3.5-, 2.8-, 3.7-, and 2.7-fold increases, respectively)., Conclusion: To conclude, T-cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an effective and reliable technique that has the potential to decrease morbidity and improve relapse-free survival, especially for young patients requiring haploidentical donor transplantation for hematologic malignancy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We investigated whether secondary versus de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) would be associated with poor outcomes in adult acute AML patients in first complete remission (CR1) receiving unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT). This is a retrospective study from the acute leukaemia working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Inclusion criteria included adult at first allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation between 2000 and 2021, unrelated single or double unit CBT, AML in CR1, no ex vivo T-cell depletion and no post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The primary end-point of the study was leukaemia-free survival (LFS). A total of 879 patients with de novo (n = 696) or secondary (n = 183) AML met the inclusion criteria. In multivariable analyses, sAML patients had non-significantly different LFS (HR = 0.98, p = 0.86), overall survival (HR = 1.07, p = 0.58), relapse incidence (HR = 0.74, p = 0.09) and non-relapse mortality (HR = 1.26, p = 0.13) than those with de novo AML. Our results demonstrate non-significantly different LFS following CBT in adult patients with secondary versus de novo AML., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes of patients post-living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) within and outside standard transplantation selection criteria and the added value of the incorporation of the New York-California (NYCA) score., Background: LDLT offers an opportunity to decrease the liver transplantation waitlist, reduce waitlist mortality, and expand selection criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Primary adult LDLT recipients between October 1999 and August 2019 were identified from a multicenter cohort of 12 North American centers. Posttransplantation and recurrence-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Three hundred sixty LDLTs were identified. Patients within Milan criteria (MC) at transplantation had a 1, 5, and 10-year posttransplantation survival of 90.9%, 78.5%, and 64.1% versus outside MC 90.4%, 68.6%, and 57.7% ( P = 0.20), respectively. For patients within the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, respective posttransplantation survival was 90.6%, 77.8%, and 65.0%, versus outside UCSF 92.1%, 63.8%, and 45.8% ( P = 0.08). Fifty-three (83%) patients classified as outside MC at transplantation would have been classified as either low or acceptable risk with the NYCA score. These patients had a 5-year overall survival of 72.2%. Similarly, 28(80%) patients classified as outside UCSF at transplantation would have been classified as a low or acceptable risk with a 5-year overall survival of 65.3%., Conclusions: Long-term survival is excellent for patients with HCC undergoing LDLT within and outside selection criteria, exceeding the minimum recommended 5-year rate of 60% proposed by consensus guidelines. The NYCA categorization offers insight into identifying a substantial proportion of patients with HCC outside the MC and the UCSF criteria who still achieve similar post-LDLT outcomes as patients within the criteria., Competing Interests: G.S. discloses consultancy for Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Evidera, Novartis, and Integra. He has received financial compensation for talks for Roche, Astra-Zeneca, Chiesi, and Integra. Also, he has received a grant from Roche. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Swiss Blood Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Group (SBST) leads a mandatory national registry for all hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT) and cellular therapies. After 25 years, information was available for 11,226 patients receiving an HCT (4031 allogeneic and 7195 autologous), including 925 pediatric patients. We compared patient characteristics and outcome by quinquennia 1997-2001, 2002-2006, 2007-2011, 2012-2016, and 2017-2021. There were numerous changes over time. Allogeneic transplant recipients became older (median age 33.7 vs. 54.3) and had more frequently unrelated donors and reduced intensity conditioning in later quinquennia. Similarly, age increased for recipients of autologous HCT (median 48.3 vs. 59.9). We did not see a significant drop in transplant activity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Analysis of outcome showed overall survival (relative risk (RR) of death 0.664 (0.529-0.832) and progression free survival (RR 0.708 (0.577-0.870) being improved over time comparing the latest to the first quinquennium adjusting for risk factors. Non-relapse mortality decreased in recipients of allogeneic HCT (RR: 0.371 (0.270-0.509)) over time but relapse risks did not. Outcome of autologous HCT improved as well across quinquennia, this improvement was mainly due to decreased relapse risks (RR 0.681 (0.597-0.777)), possibly related to maintenance treatment or rescue treatment for relapse mainly in myeloma patients. Cellular therapies other than allogeneic or autologous HCT, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) treatment have started to increase after 2019, year of approval of the first commercial CAR-T product in Switzerland. Data on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment are too early for comparative analyses. Detailed analyses of changes over time are presented. This study includes all HCTs, and cellular therapies, data useful for quality assurance programs, health care cost estimation and benchmarking. Between 50% and 60% of patients are long-term survivors after both types of HCT, indicating growing populations of surviving patients requiring long-term care., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, surgical treatment, and long-term efficacy of primary right heart tumors., Methods: This study is retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 70 patients with primary right heart tumors admitted to our department between 1980 and 2022 (observation group) and 70 patients with left heart tumors during the same period (control group). The surgical treatment was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass after differential diagnosis by echocardiography, cardiac CTA, and PET-CT before the surgery. The perioperative characteristics, recurrence rate, and long-term survival rates of right heart tumor versus left heart tumor were compared., Results: The most common pathological types of right heart tumors were myxoma (60%), lipoma (8.57%), and papillary elastofibroma (7.14%). During the perioperative period, there were 1 case of systemic embolism in the observation group, compared with 6 in the control group (p = 0.026), 13 cases of malignant tumor in the observation group versus 1 in the control group (p = 0.01). During the follow-up period, there were 15 cases of tumor recurrence and 17 cases of death in the observation group versus 4 (p = 0.002) and 7 in the control group (p = 0.006), comparatively., Conclusion: Compared with left heart tumors, primary right heart tumors had a higher incidence of malignant tumors and a lower risk of systemic embolism during perioperative period. During the follow-up period, primary right heart tumors had a higher rate of tumor recurrence and a lower long-term survival rate., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: We investigated the outcomes of liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma., Materials and Methods: Prospectively, recipients of deceased donor liver transplants from 2007 to 2021 at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, were enrolled into the study. The Milan criteria were applied for selection of liver transplant candidates diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with diagnosis of acute liver failure and who underwent secondary liver transplant were excluded. All patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma were given mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor with calcineurin inhibitor minimization 4 weeks after liver transplant. Patients were assigned to the experimental group (with hepatocellular carcinoma; n = 82) or the control group (without hepatocellular carcinoma; n = 1076). We recorded the etiologies of liver cirrhosis in the experimental group, demographic data from all patients, and postoperative complications., Results: Of 1158 total patients, mean age was 44.15 ± 14.71 years (range, 1-73 years) and 712 were male patients (61.5%). In the experimental group (n = 82), there were 76 patients (92.68%) who were within the Milan criteria; others were excluded intraoperatively. All patients were followed for a median of 65.3 ± 40.8 months (range 10-197 months). Patient survival rates in the experimental group and control group at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 89%, 80%, and 78% versus 84%, 81%, and 70%, respectively (P = .742). Hepatocellular carcinoma reoccurred in 6 patients (7.31%) at mean of 16.83 months postoperatively., Conclusions: Liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the post-Milan criteria era is associated with acceptable outcomes.

Background: To investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent curative reirradiation (reRT), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PT) for unresectable recurrent or second primary head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC)., Methods: Ten patients, mostly KPS 90%, were reirradiated (3/10 with IMRT and 7/10 with PT) at a median maximum dose to the CTV of 64.2 Gy from July 2011 to November 2021. Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the sinus (4/10) and the salivary glands (including the parotid and submandibular gland, 3/10). CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was the time between the end of reRT and the date of last news., Results: The median time between the two irradiations was 53.5 months (IQR: 18-84). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12.5-51.8 months), six patients had developed a locoregional recurrence (LR), of which four occurred within the previously irradiated volume. Two and three-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55.6% [95%CI: 31-99.7%], and 41% [18.5-94%] and 66.7% [42-100%] and 44.4% [21.4-92.3%], respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly better in the subgroup of sinus tumors ( p = .013 ) and the subgroup of patients re-irradiated more than two years after the first course of irradiation ( p = .01 ). Seven patients had impairments before the start of reRT, including hearing impairment (3/10) and facial nerve impairment (3/10). The most severe late toxicities were brain necrosis (2/10), osteoradionecrosis (1/10) and vision decreased (1/10)., Conclusion: Curative reRT for HNACC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of severe toxicity remain high. Improved selection criteria and more carefully defined target volumes may improve outcome in these patients. A further study including larger cohort of patients would be useful to confirm these results.