6 results on '"Nelson, Eugene C."'
Search Results
2. A Web-Based Peer Support Network to Help Care Partners of People With Serious Illness: Co-Design Study
- Author
-
O’Donnell, Elizabeth A, primary, Van Citters, Aricca D, additional, Khayal, Inas S, additional, Wilson, Matthew M, additional, Gustafson, David, additional, Barnato, Amber E, additional, Buccellato, Andrea C, additional, Young, Colleen, additional, Holthoff, Megan M, additional, Korsunskiy, Eugene, additional, Tomlin, Stephanie C, additional, Cullinan, Amelia M, additional, Steinbaugh, Alexandra C, additional, Hinson, Jennifer J, additional, Johnson, Kristen R, additional, Williams, Andrew, additional, Thomson, Ruth M, additional, Haines, Janet M, additional, Holmes, Anne B, additional, Bradley, Ann D, additional, Nelson, Eugene C, additional, and Kirkland, Kathryn B, additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Implementation of a Co-Design Strategy to Develop a Dashboard to Support Shared Decision Making in Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.
- Author
-
Morken, Victoria, Perry, Laura M., Coughlin, Ava, O'Connor, Mary, Chmiel, Ryan, Xinos, Stavroula, Peipert, John Devin, Garcia, Sofia F., Linder, Jeffrey A., Ackermann, Ronald T., Kircher, Sheetal, Mohindra, Nisha A., Aggarwal, Vikram, Weitzel, Melissa, Nelson, Eugene C., Elwyn, Glyn, Van Citters, Aricca D., Barnard, Cynthia, Cella, David, and Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
- Subjects
PATIENT reported outcome measures ,RENAL cancer ,CHRONIC kidney failure ,MEDICAL informatics ,CANCER patients - Abstract
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is the process by which patients and clinicians exchange information and preferences to come to joint healthcare decisions. Clinical dashboards can support SDM by collecting, distilling, and presenting critical information, such as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), to be shared at points of care and in between appointments. We describe the implementation strategies and outcomes of a multistakeholder collaborative process known as "co-design" to develop a PRO-informed clinical dashboard to support SDM for patients with advanced cancer or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Across 14 sessions, two multidisciplinary teams comprising patients, care partners, clinicians, and other stakeholders iteratively co-designed an SDM dashboard for either advanced cancer (N = 25) or CKD (N = 24). Eligible patients, care partners, and frontline clinicians were identified by six physician champions. The co-design process included four key steps: (1) define "the problem", (2) establish context of use, (3) build a consensus on design, and (4) define and test specifications. We also evaluated our success in implementing the co-design strategy using measures of fidelity, acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and effectiveness which were collected throughout the process. Results: Mean (M) scores across implementation measures of the co-design process were high, including observer-rated fidelity and adoption of co-design practices (M = 19.1 on a 7–21 scale, N = 36 ratings across 9 sessions), as well as acceptability based on the perceived degree of SDM that occurred during the co-design process (M = 10.4 on a 0 to 12 adapted collaboRATE scale). Capturing the feasibility and adoption of convening multistakeholder co-design teams, min–max normalized scores (ranging from 0 to 1) of stakeholder representation demonstrated that, on average, 95% of stakeholder types were represented for cancer sessions (M = 0.95) and 85% for CKD sessions (M = 0.85). The co-design process was rated as either "fully" or "partially" effective by 100% of respondents, in creating a dashboard that met its intended objective. Conclusions: A co-design process was successfully implemented to develop SDM clinical dashboards for advanced cancer and CKD care. We discuss key strategies and learnings from this process that may aid others in the development and uptake of patient-centered healthcare innovations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Shared decision-making and disease management in advanced cancer and chronic kidney disease using patient-reported outcome dashboards.
- Author
-
Cella D, Kuharic M, Peipert JD, Bedjeti K, Garcia SF, Yanez B, Hirschhorn LR, Coughlin A, Morken V, O'Connor M, Linder JA, Jordan N, Ackermann RT, Amagai S, Kircher S, Mohindra N, Aggarwal V, Weitzel M, Nelson EC, Elwyn G, Van Citters AD, and Barnard C
- Abstract
Objectives: To assess the use of a co-designed patient-reported outcome (PRO) clinical dashboard and estimate its impact on shared decision-making (SDM) and symptomatology in adults with advanced cancer or chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Materials and Methods: We developed a clinical PRO dashboard within the Northwestern Medicine Patient-Reported Outcomes system, enhanced through co-design involving 20 diverse constituents. Using a single-group, pretest-posttest design, we evaluated the dashboard's use among patients with advanced cancer or CKD between June 2020 and January 2022. Eligible patients had a visit with a participating clinician, completed at least two dashboard-eligible visits, and consented to follow-up surveys. PROs were collected 72 h prior to visits, including measures for chronic condition management self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (PROMIS measures), and SDM (collaboRATE). Responses were integrated into the EHR dashboard and accessible to clinicians and patients., Results: We recruited 157 participants: 66 with advanced cancer and 91 with CKD. There were significant improvements in SDM from baseline, as assessed by collaboRATE scores. The proportion of participants reporting the highest level of SDM on every collaboRATE item increased by 15 percentage points from baseline to 3 months, and 17 points between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Additionally, there was a clinically meaningful decrease in anxiety levels over study period (T-score baseline: 53; 3-month: 52; 6-month: 50; P < .001), with a standardized response mean (SRM) of -0.38 at 6 months., Discussion: PRO clinical dashboards, developed and shared with patients, may enhance SDM and reduce anxiety among patients with advanced cancer and CKD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Improving Parkinson's Disease Care through Systematic Screening for Depression.
- Author
-
Marras C, Meyer Z, Liu H, Luo S, Mantri S, Allen A, Baybayan S, Beck JC, Brown AE, Cheung F, Dahodwala N, Davis TL, Engeland M, Fearon C, Jones N, Mills K, Miyasaki JM, Naito A, Neault M, Nelson EC, Onyinanya E, Ropa C, and Weintraub D
- Abstract
Background: Depression is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) but is underrecognized clinically. Although systematic screening is a recommended strategy to improve depression recognition in primary care practice, it has not been widely used in PD care., Methods: The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) was implemented at 5 movement disorders clinics to screen PD patients. Sites developed processes suited to their clinical workflow. Qualitative interviews with clinicians and patients provided information on feasibility, acceptability, and perceived utility., Results: Prior to implementation, depression screening was recorded in 12% using a formal instrument; 64% were screened informally by clinical interview, and no screening was recorded in 24%. Of 1406 patients seen for follow-up care during the implementation period, 88% were screened, 59% using the GDS-15 (self-administered in 51% and interviewer administered in 8%), a nearly 5-fold increase in formal screening. Lack of clinician or staff time and inability to provide the GDS-15 to the patient ahead of the visit were the most commonly cited reasons for lack of screening using the GDS-15; 378 (45%) patients completing the GDS-15 screened positive for depression, and 137 were enrolled for a 12-month prospective follow-up. Mean GDS-15 scores improved from 8.8 to 7.0 (P < 0.0001) and the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire emotional subscore from 42.2 to 36.7 (P = 0.0007)., Conclusions: Depression screening in PD using a formal instrument can be achieved at much higher levels than is currently practiced, but there are barriers to implementing this in clinical practice. An individual site-specific process is necessary to optimize screening rates., (© 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. A Web-Based Peer Support Network to Help Care Partners of People With Serious Illness: Co-Design Study.
- Author
-
O'Donnell EA, Van Citters AD, Khayal IS, Wilson MM, Gustafson D, Barnato AE, Buccellato AC, Young C, Holthoff MM, Korsunskiy E, Tomlin SC, Cullinan AM, Steinbaugh AC, Hinson JJ, Johnson KR, Williams A, Thomson RM, Haines JM, Holmes AB, Bradley AD, Nelson EC, and Kirkland KB
- Subjects
- Humans, Caregivers psychology, Critical Illness psychology, Internet, Peer Group, Social Support
- Abstract
Background: Care partners of people with serious illness experience significant challenges and unmet needs during the patient's treatment period and after their death. Learning from others with shared experiences can be valuable, but opportunities are not consistently available., Objective: This study aims to design and prototype a regional, facilitated, and web-based peer support network to help active and bereaved care partners of persons with serious illness be better prepared to cope with the surprises that arise during serious illness and in bereavement., Methods: An 18-member co-design team included active care partners and those in bereavement, people who had experienced serious illness, regional health care and support partners, and clinicians. It was guided by facilitators and peer network subject-matter experts. We conducted design exercises to identify the functions and specifications of a peer support network. Co-design members independently prioritized network specifications, which were incorporated into an early iteration of the web-based network., Results: The team prioritized two functions: (1) connecting care partners to information and (2) facilitating emotional support. The design process generated 24 potential network specifications to support these functions. The highest priorities included providing a supportive and respectful community; connecting people to trusted resources; reducing barriers to asking for help; and providing frequently asked questions and responses. The network platform had to be simple and intuitive, provide technical support for users, protect member privacy, provide publicly available information and a private discussion forum, and be easily accessible. It was feasible to enroll members in the ConnectShareCare web-based network over a 3-month period., Conclusions: A co-design process supported the identification of critical features of a peer support network for care partners of people with serious illnesses in a rural setting, as well as initial testing and use. Further testing is underway to assess the long-term viability and impact of the network., (©Elizabeth A O’Donnell, Aricca D Van Citters, Inas S Khayal, Matthew M Wilson, David Gustafson, Amber E Barnato, Andrea C Buccellato, Colleen Young, Megan M Holthoff, Eugene Korsunskiy, Stephanie C Tomlin, Amelia M Cullinan, Alexandra C Steinbaugh, Jennifer J Hinson, Kristen R Johnson, Andrew Williams, Ruth M Thomson, Janet M Haines, Anne B Holmes, Ann D Bradley, Eugene C Nelson, Kathryn B Kirkland. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.05.2024.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.