Search

Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at interval cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer improves overall survival but its role in recurrent disease is uncertain. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients treated with or without HIPEC during surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer., Methods: The multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 CHIPOR trial was conducted at 31 sites in France, Belgium, Spain, and Canada, and enrolled patients with first relapse of epithelial ovarian cancer at least 6 months after completing platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with WHO performance status of less than 2. After six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (and optional bevacizumab), patients amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery were randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio, using a web-based system and a minimisation procedure, during surgery to receive HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 in 2 L/m 2 of serum at 41±1°C for 60 min) or not, stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction score, platinum-free interval, and latterly, planned poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor use. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomly assigned patients. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01376752., Findings: Between May 11, 2011, and May 14, 2021, 415 female patients were randomly assigned (207 HIPEC, 208 no HIPEC). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 6·2 years, IQR 4·1-8·1), 268 (65%) patients had died (126 [61%] of 207 in the HIPEC group; 142 [68%] of 208 in the no-HIPEC group). Overall survival was significantly improved with HIPEC (stratified hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·56-0·96; p=0·024). Median overall survival was 54·3 months (95% CI 41·9-61·7) with HIPEC versus 45·8 months (38·9-54·2) without. Grade 3 or worse adverse events within 60 days after surgery occurred in 102 (49%) of 207 patients receiving HIPEC versus 56 (27%) of 208 receiving no HIPEC, the most common being anaemia (47 [23%] vs 30 [14%]), hepatotoxicity (23 [11%] vs 18 [9%]), electrolyte disturbance (28 [14%] vs two [1%]), and renal failure (20 [10%] vs three [1%]). There were three deaths within 60 days of surgery, all in the no-HIPEC group., Interpretation: Adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery after response to platinum-based chemotherapy at first epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence significantly improved overall survival. When treating patients with late first relapse of high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery at specialist centres, platinum-based HIPEC should be considered to extend overall survival., Funding: French National Cancer Institute and French League Against Cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J-MC reports payment from GSK and support from MSD. PM reports grants from GSK, and payment from Com&Co Events. FL reports support for meeting travel from GSK. GF reports consulting fees from Rand Biotech, support for travel and meetings from GSK, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Olympus EMEA, and advisory board participation for GSK and MSD. FJ reports honoraria or consultation fees from Pfizer, Viatris, Ipsen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis/3A, MSD, GSK, Janssen, and Eisai, and travel support from Eisai, MSD, Ipsen, and Chugai. IR-C reports consulting fees and honoraria from Agenus, Blueprint, BMS, PharmaMar, Genmab, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, GSK, MSD, Deciphera, Mersana, Merck Serono, Novartis, Amgen, Macrogenics, Tesaro, and Clovis. MP reports honoraria from Thermasolutions, support for attending meetings or travel from GAMIDA Tech, IDI Med, and Thermasolutions, and is a past president of the ISSPP. SG reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, and M-Eden. CC reports grants or contracts from MSD, Pfizer, Seagen, and Daiichi Sankyo. LdG reports honoraria from GSK. BA reports consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Servier, and advisory board participation for Gilead, Daiichi, Pierre Fabre, and BMS. OG reports consulting fees from Gamida, is president of the BIG-RENAPE group, and is national coordinator of the RENAPE group. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The 2022 PSOGI (Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International) and RENAPE (French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies) consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was a comprehensive effort aimed at standardizing treatment protocols for various peritoneal malignancies. This initiative is critical due to the wide range of technical variations in HIPEC procedures and the resulting need for standardization to ensure consistent and effective patient care and meaningful audit of multicenter data., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are expected to be synergistic with intraperitoneal (IP) immunotherapy by increasing tumor antigen expression and mutational load. We assessed the feasibility and safety of IP nivolumab following complete CRS and HIPEC in pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03959761)., Patients and Methods: Patients received IP nivolumab (0.5, 1, or 3 mg/kg) using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, starting 5 to 7 days after CRS and HIPEC. Four IP Q2W (once every 2 weeks) nivolumab infusions were planned. The primary objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of IP nivolumab based on dose-limiting toxicity. Secondary objectives were to assess changes in tolerance of CRS and HIPEC., Results: A total of 17 patients were enrolled including 10 patients in the dose escalation and 7 patients in the expansion phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at any dose level in the 9 evaluable patients. Six of the 17 patients (35%) did not complete all planned infusions: 4 (23.5%) due to peritoneal catheter complications and 2 (11.8%) due to early progression. No procedure-related deaths occurred. Eleven patients (65%) experienced serious adverse events (SAE), mainly transitory grade 3 to 4 transaminase elevations (6/11) and surgery-related (9/11). Four SAEs were related to the peritoneal catheter and two to HIPEC. No SAEs/grade 3 to 4 adverse events related to IP nivolumab occurred., Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of IP nivolumab in patients with relapsed advanced ovarian cancer. Further investigation at 3 mg/kg is warranted., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: To analyze the reasons for stopping pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivered for unresectable peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) and to determine survival in a large patient cohort of an experienced PIPAC center., Background: PIPAC alone or combined with systemic chemotherapy was developed to palliatively treat unresectable PSM. Safety, tolerance and promising survival results were already reported, but the reasons for stopping treatment remain unclear and the influence of the number of PIPAC procedures on prognosis has not been evaluated., Methods: A retrospective analysis of PIPAC procedures from a prospectively maintained single institution PSM database was conducted from January 2016 to January 2023., Results: A total of 346 patients underwent 1200 PIPAC treatments in the defined time period. Two-thirds of the patients completed 3 or more PIPAC procedures, and 2 patients had more than 15 treatment procedures. Reasons for PIPAC cessation were disease progression or complication (56%), reorientation to a potential curative procedure (19%), surgical complications of the procedure (13%), death between procedures (8%) and patient request (3%). PSM origin and receiving 3 or more PIPAC treatments were independently correlated with better survival in the overall population, in the group of ultimately unresectable PSM and after propensity score weighting., Conclusion: The main reason for stopping PIPAC treatment in palliative management of PSM is disease progression. When 3 or more PIPAC procedures can be delivered in combination to systemic chemotherapy, survival is significantly improved. Its use should be validated by prospective studies., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ovarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP., Methods: Patients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed., Results: Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively)., Conclusion: These results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for peritoneal metastases. However, HIPEC with cisplatin is associated with renal toxicity. Sodium thiosulfate (ST) has been shown to prevent cisplatin-induced toxicity., Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated curatively for peritoneal surface malignancy, who underwent cytoreductive surgery with cisplatin-based HIPEC between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the management of cisplatin-induced renal toxicity: preoperative hyperhydration alone (PHH), preoperative hyperhydration with ST (PHH + ST), and ST alone. Renal function and complications, in terms of Acute (AKI) and chronic kidney injury (CKI), were monitored and analyzed during 3 postoperative months., Results: This study included 220 consecutive patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were 95, 57 and 61 mmol/L, for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) were 96, 94 and 78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively (p < 0.001). AKI and CKI are respectively for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups were 21 % (n = 46), 1 % (n = 2) and 0 % vs 19 % (n = 42), 0 % and 0 % (p < 0.001), for pairwise analysis did not show any difference between PHH + ST and ST alone combination, regarding nephrological outcomes. All patients were followed 3 months postoperatively., Conclusion: There is no need for preoperative hyperhydration when sodium-thiosulfate is used to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. These findings have implications for improving and simplifying the management of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing HIPEC with cisplatin., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. All authors have no financial or personal relationships with individuals or organizations that could potentially bias or influence the research findings or the interpretation of the data presented in this work., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)