Search

It has been known since the early days of the discovery of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) that there were large species differences in susceptibility to AFB1. It was also evident early on that AFB1 itself was not toxic but required bioactivation to a reactive form. Over the past 60 years there have been thousands of studies to delineate the role of ~10 specific biotransformation pathways of AFB1, both phase I (oxidation, reduction) and phase II (hydrolysis, conjugation, secondary oxidations, and reductions of phase I metabolites). This review provides a historical context and substantive analysis of each of these pathways as contributors to species differences in AFB1 hepatoxicity and carcinogenicity. Since the discovery of AFB1 as the toxic contaminant in groundnut meal that led to Turkey X diseases in 1960, there have been over 15,000 publications related to aflatoxins, of which nearly 8000 have addressed the significance of biotransformation (metabolism, in the older literature) of AFB1. While it is impossible to give justice to all of these studies, this review provides a historical perspective on the major discoveries related to species differences in the biotransformation of AFB1 and sets the stage for discussion of other papers in this Special Issue of the important role that AFB1 metabolites have played as biomarkers of exposure and effect in thousands of human studies on the toxic effects of aflatoxins. Dr. John Groopman has played a leading role in every step of the way—from initial laboratory studies on specific AFB1 metabolites to the application of molecular biomarkers in epidemiological studies associating dietary AFB1 exposure with liver cancer, and the design and conduct of chemoprevention clinical trials to reduce cancer risk from unavoidable aflatoxin exposures by alteration of specific AFB1 biotransformation pathways. This article is written in honor of Dr. Groopman's many contributions in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and post-translationally imported into mitochondria. If the rate of protein synthesis exceeds the capacity of the mitochondrial import machinery, precursor proteins can transiently accumulate in the cytosol. The cytosolic accumulation of mitochondrial precursors jeopardizes cellular protein homeostasis (proteostasis) and can be the cause of diseases. In order to prevent these toxic effects, most non-imported precursors are rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. However, cells employ a second layer of defense which is the facilitated sequestration of mitochondrial precursor proteins in transient protein aggregates. The formation of such structures is triggered by nucleation factors such as small heat shock proteins. Disaggregases and chaperones can liberate precursors from cytosolic aggregates to pass them on to the mitochondrial import machinery or, under persistent stress conditions, to the proteasome for degradation. Owing to their role as transient buffering systems, these aggregates were referred to as MitoStores. This review articles provides a general overview about the MitoStore concept and the early stages in mitochondrial protein biogenesis in yeast and, in cases where aspects differ, in mammalian cells., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)