Search

Hypothesis And/or Background: Extensive, irreparable rotator cuff tears remain a surgical challenge and multiple treatment options are proposed and currently in use. To biomechanically compare superior glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressures, and area in a box-shaped reconstruction using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in an irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear model., Methods: Seven cadaveric shoulders (mean age 61 years; range 32-84 years; standard deviation 22.3) were tested with a custom testing rig used to evaluate superior translation; subacromial contact pressures; and areas at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Conditions tested included the native state; a complete tear of the supraspinatus tendon; a wide box-shaped, double-bundle LHBT superior capsular reconstruction (BS-SCR); and a narrow BS-SCR., Results: Compared with the wide BS-SCR, the narrow BS-SCR had statistically significantly lower median contact pressure at 30° and 60°. The subacromial contact area showed a statistically significant difference at 0° (P = .001) and 30° (P = .004) for the narrow BS-SCR compared with the wide BS-SCR. At an abduction angle of 0°, the narrow BS-SCR could restore superior translation significantly better compared with the wide construct. For all angles, the wide and narrow BS-SCR increased the median subacromial distance statistically significantly. The contact areas in 30° and 60° of abduction were higher for all scenarios, both peaking in the intact state in 30° with approximately 600 mm 2 ., Conclusions: In comparison to a wide BS-SCR, a narrow BS-SCR using the LHBT has biomechanical advantages in regard to subacromial contact pressures, the subacromial contact areas, as well as the acromiohumeral distance. The width of the reconstruction, therefore, has a direct influence on the success of the technique., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM), elbow function and predictors for good elbow function after conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures., Material and Methods: All patients with non-displaced radial head fractures (displacement < 2 mm), that were diagnosed between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021 in a level I trauma center, were included in this retrospective case series and the charts were evaluated for ROM and elbow function. Elbow function was categorized as "good" or "bad" depending on the ROM measured defined by Morrey et al. Overall, 73 patients (33 male, 40 female) with an average age of 38 years (+/- 13 years) could be included., Results: Conservative treatment had good clinical results for ROM and elbow function. After 6 weeks mean flexion was 131° (SD 13°), extension 8° (SD 7°), Pronation 83° (SD 11°) and Supination 83° (SD 13). Patients with a good elbow function after one week showed a good elbow function after completing the treatment., Conclusions: A clinical assessment after one week should always be performed and the study showed that it is a good predictor for good elbow function. In cases of bad elbow function further controls should be considered., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Osteochondrosis dissecans (OCD) at the capitellum is a common pathology in young patients. Although arthroscopic interventions are commonly used, there is a lack of information about the accessibility of the defects during elbow arthroscopy by using standard portals., Materials and Methods: An elbow arthroscopy using the standard portals was performed in seven fresh frozen specimens. At the capitellum, the most posterior and anterior cartilage surface reachable was marked with K-wires. Using a newly described measuring method, we constructed a circular sector around the rotational center of the capitellum. The intersection of K-wire "A" and "B" with the circular sector was marked, and the angles between the K-wires and the Rogers line, alpha angle for K-Wire "A" and beta angle for K-wire "B", and the corridor not accessible during arthroscopy was digitally measured., Results: On average, we found an alpha angle of 53° and a beta angle of 104°. Leaving a sector of 51° which was not accessible via the standard portals during elbow arthroscopy., Conclusion: Non-accessible capitellar lesions during elbow arthroscopy should be considered preoperatively, and the informed consent discussion should always include the possibility of open procedures or the use of flexible instruments., (© 2024. The Author(s).)