Search

Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of 5.0 T MRI in MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging compared to 3.0 T, focusing on detail visualization, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image artifacts. Methods: A prospective study from May to October 2023 involved 20 healthy subjects and 19 with biliary dilation. Both groups underwent MRCP using 3.0 T and 5.0 T scanners. The detail visualization capability of the biliary tree and the SNR of the images were quantitatively evaluated. Two experienced MRI diagnostic physicians assessed the image artifacts qualitatively on a scale of 1 to 5. The t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared the quantitative results of biliary visualization and SNR between 3.0 T and 5.0 T scanners, while the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparing the level of image artifacts between the two scanners. The inter reader consistency was tested using Kappa test. Results: In both healthy subjects and those with biliary dilation, the 5.0 T group exhibited significantly higher numbers of biliary tree branches, along with greater total and maximum branch lengths, compared to the 3.0 T group (P<0.05). Although the maximum branch length was higher in the 5.0 T group among healthy subjects, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). No notable differences were observed in SNR and image artifact levels between the two groups across both field strengths (P>0.05). Conclusions: MRCP at 5.0 T offers superior biliary tree visualization compared to 3.0 T. The performance regarding SNR and image artifacts between the two is relatively comparable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of 5.0 T MRI in MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging compared to 3.0 T, focusing on detail visualization, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image artifacts. Methods A prospective study from May to October 2023 involved 20 healthy subjects and 19 with biliary dilation. Both groups underwent MRCP using 3.0 T and 5.0 T scanners. The detail visualization capability of the biliary tree and the SNR of the images were quantitatively evaluated. Two experienced MRI diagnostic physicians assessed the image artifacts qualitatively on a scale of 1 to 5. The t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared the quantitative results of biliary visualization and SNR between 3.0 T and 5.0 T scanners, while the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparing the level of image artifacts between the two scanners. The inter reader consistency was tested using Kappa test. Results In both healthy subjects and those with biliary dilation, the 5.0 T group exhibited significantly higher numbers of biliary tree branches, along with greater total and maximum branch lengths, compared to the 3.0 T group (P0.05). Conclusions MRCP at 5.0 T offers superior biliary tree visualization compared to 3.0 T. The performance regarding SNR and image artifacts between the two is relatively comparable.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an imaging technique that has advanced over the past few years. It still plays a crucial role in the study of numerous pancreaticobiliary diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hematinic syrup, date syrup, and pineapple juice on MRCP image quality., Methodology: This study involved a total of 90 participants, distributed evenly among three groups, with each group comprising 30 patients. Negative oral contrast solutions containing paramagnetic substances like Mn+2 and Fe+3, such as pineapple juice, date syrup, and hematinic syrup were imaged by 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with T2-weighted (T2W) and MRCP sequences. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed. Ninety patients underwent MRCP 20-30 min after ingestion of 100 mL of date syrup, 30 ml of hematinic syrup diluted to 200 ml of water, and 200 mL of pineapple juice. MRCP images were taken to visualize various pancreaticobiliary structures (bile duct, stomach, and duodenum)., Results: The in vitro evaluation of the solutions showed that date syrup and hematinic syrup were hypointense in T2W sequences. The images obtained showed no significant difference in the CNR between the three solutions. However, the SNR was significantly higher for pineapple juice compared to date syrup and hematinic syrup in T2W and MRCP sequences. Images acquired post-administration of the oral contrast agents significantly improved the gastrointestinal tract signal suppression and increased visibility of the pancreaticobiliary structures (bile duct, stomach, and duodenum). No adverse events were observed among the participants., Conclusion: Pineapple juice was the best contrast agent. However, date syrup and hematinic syrup can also be used to improve the imaging quality., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, R K et al.)