Search

BACKGROUND. The use of high-throughput technologies has enabled rapid advancement in the knowledge of host immune responses to pathogens. Our objective was to compare the repertoire, protection, and maternal factors associated with human milk antibodies to infectious pathogens in different economic and geographic locations. METHODS. Using multipathogen protein microarrays, 878 milk and 94 paired serum samples collected from 695 women in 5 high and low-to-middle income countries (Bangladesh, Finland, Peru, Pakistan, and the United States) were assessed for specific IgA and IgG antibodies to 1,607 proteins from 30 enteric, respiratory, and bloodborne pathogens. RESULTS. The antibody coverage across enteric and respiratory pathogens was highest in Bangladeshi and Pakistani cohorts and lowest in the U.S. and Finland. While some pathogens induced a dominant IgA response (Campylobacter, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, Cryptosporidium, and pertussis), others elicited both IgA and IgG antibodies in milk and serum, possibly related to the invasiveness of the infection (Shigella, enteropathogenic E. coli 'EPEC', Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Group B Streptococcus). Besides the differences between economic regions and decreases in concentrations over time, human milk IgA and IgG antibody concentrations were lower in mothers with high BMI and higher parity, respectively. In Bangladeshi infants, a higher specific IgA concentration in human milk was associated with delayed time to rotavirus infection, implying protective properties of antirotavirus antibodies, whereas a higher IgA antibody concentration was associated with greater incidence of Campylobacter infection. CONCLUSION. This comprehensive assessment of human milk antibody profiles may be used to guide the development of passive protection strategies against infant morbidity and mortality. FUNDING. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant OPP1172222 (to KMJ); Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant OPP1066764 funded the MDIG trial (to DER); University of Rochester CTSI and Environmental Health Sciences Center funded the Rochester Lifestyle study (to RJL); and R01 AI043596 funded PROVIDE (to WAP)., Introduction In 2019, 5.3 million liveborn children died before 5 years of age worldwide, nearly half of whom died from infectious diseases, including lower respiratory infections and diarrhea (1). The [...]

Background As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transitions to endemicity and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza reestablish their seasonal circulation patterns, understanding their comparative burden on infants and children can guide health system responses and funding priorities. Methods This was a population-based cohort study of children aged <5 years in Ontario, Canada, from September 2018 to August 2023 using linked health administrative databases. Results Seasonal cohorts comprised 731 838 to 763 660 children. RSV- and influenza-related hospital admission rates immediately decreased in March 2020. In 2021–2022, RSV-related admissions rebounded but remained 8%–11% lower than prepandemic seasons, whereas 2022–2023 RSV-related admissions increased 105%–113% versus prepandemic seasons and peak admissions occurred in November versus December. Influenza did not rebound until 2022–2023, when admissions were 28%–37% higher than prepandemic seasons. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related admissions remained low until 2021–2022 and were lower than RSV-related admissions across all age groups during prepandemic and pandemic seasons. By contrast, 2021–2022 COVID-19-related admissions exceeded prepandemic influenza-related admissions by 30%–40% but decreased by 45% in 2022–2023 and were lower than prepandemic influenza-related admissions, except among infants aged <12 months who remained at highest risk. There was no distinct seasonal pattern for COVID-19–related admissions during the study. Conclusions RSV remains a major cause of childhood hospitalization. Although COVID-19 appears to be receding, its disease burden as it transitions to endemicity remains to be established. The unprecedented peaks in RSV-related hospital admissions during 2022–2023, together with the return of influenza and ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, underscore the need to strengthen systems for real-time surveillance and to proactively prepare for critical healthcare scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Southeast Asia is undergoing an epidemiological transition with non-communicable illnesses becoming increasingly important, yet infectious diseases (tuberculosis, HIV, hepatitis B, malaria) remain widely prevalent in some populations, while emerging and zoonotic diseases threaten. There are also limited population-level estimates of many important heath conditions. This restricts evidence-based decision-making for disease control and prevention priorities. Cross-sectional surveys can be efficient epidemiological tools to measure the prevalence of a wide range of diseases, but no systematic assessment of their coverage of different health conditions has been produced for the region. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Global Index Medicus, and additionally Google Scholar. Our inclusion criteria were cross-sectional surveys conducted with community-based recruitment, in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand, published between January 1, 2010 and January 27, 2021, and reporting the prevalence of any health condition. Results: 542 publications from 337 surveys were included. Non-communicable conditions (n = 205) were reported by more surveys than infectious conditions (n = 124). Disability (n = 49), self-report history of any disease or symptoms (n = 35), and self-perceived health status (n = 34), which reflect a holistic picture of health, were studied by many fewer surveys. In addition, 45 surveys studied symptomatic conditions which overlap between non-communicable and infectious conditions. The most surveyed conditions were undernutrition, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, intestinal parasites, malaria, anemia, diarrhea, fever, and acute respiratory infections. These conditions overlap with the most important causes of death and disability in the Global Burden of Disease study. However, other high-burden conditions (e.g. hearing loss, headache disorder, low back pain, chronic liver and kidney diseases, and cancers) were rarely studied. Conclusion: There were relatively few recent surveys from which to estimate representative prevalences and trends of health conditions beyond those known to be high burden. Expanding the spectrum of health conditions in cross-sectional surveys could improve understanding of evolving disease patterns in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background : Parents are the primary decision makers for their children's vaccination, yet, we have limited knowledge on what influences their decision making related to COVID-19 vaccination. The study aimed to understand these different considerations that shape the decisions of parents of children aged 5–11 years old. Methods : We conducted a qualitative study that included online focus group discussions (FGDs) with parents of children aged 5–11 years old. Data was collected between July 26th, 2022, and February 15th, 2023. A total of eight FGDs were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted, and peer debriefing was used to ensure methodological rigor. Results : Findings revealed that parents of vaccinated and unvaccinated children employed language of risk-benefit analysis to inform their decision-making. Parents of vaccinated children highlighted concerns about spreading COVID-19, family member's health, and long COVID-19. For parents of unvaccinated children, they perceived potential vaccine side effects as more harmful than the risks associated with COVID-19. Participants contended that there was a lack of transparency from the government and public health agencies, highlighting inconsistent messaging which had fractured their trust in COVID-19-related recommendations and mandates. Conclusions : Our results indicate that improved transparency on how evidence is developed and why recommendations and mandates shift during the pandemic would foster trust in the government and public health agencies. Open communication with health providers on the potential risks and benefits would also improve caregivers confidence in the vaccine. • Parents undertook a risk-benefit analysis when deciding to vaccinate their child • Cultivating trust requires transparency on the impact of new scientific evidence • Parents desire open and individualized vaccination guidance from health providers [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]