Search

Lazertinib, a novel third‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI), demonstrates marked efficacy in EGFR‐mutant lung cancer. However, resistance commonly develops, prompting consideration of therapeutic strategies to overcome initial drug resistance mechanisms. This study aimed to elucidate the adaptive resistance to lazertinib and advocate novel combination treatments that demonstrate efficacy in preventing resistance as a first‐line treatment for EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC. We found that AXL knockdown significantly inhibited lung cancer cell viability in the presence of lazertinib, indicating that AXL activation contributes to lazertinib resistance. However, long‐term culture with a combination of lazertinib and AXL inhibitors led to residual cell proliferation and increased the MCL‐1 expression level, which was mediated by the nuclear translocation of the transcription factor YAP. Triple therapy with an MCL‐1 or YAP inhibitor in combination with lazertinib and an AXL inhibitor significantly reduced cell viability and increased the apoptosis rate. These results demonstrate that AXL and YAP/MCL‐1 signals contribute to adaptive lazertinib resistance in EGFR‐mutant lung cancer cells, suggesting that the initial dual inhibition of AXL and YAP/MCL‐1 might be a highly effective strategy in eliminating lazertinib‐resistant cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in anticancer drugs for lung cancer (LC) have improved the prognosis of LC. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a progressive and often exacerbating respiratory disease with a poor prognosis. To date, the prognosis of LC complicated by CPA has not been elucidated. This study investigated the clinical implications of concomitant CPA in patients with LC undergoing anticancer drug treatment. Methods: Between January 2010 and May 2020, we consecutively enrolled patients with LC complicated with CPA at five different institutions in Japan. We analyzed patients with LC complicated by CPA who received anticancer drug treatment. Results: A total of 10 patients with LC complicated by CPA received anticancer drug treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.57 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.37–21.67). The cause of death in all patients was LC. Six of the seven patients with LC did not show worsening pulmonary aspergillosis lesions during the anticancer drug treatment. Although two patients discontinued anticancer drug treatment due to pneumonitis, CPA complications did not interfere with the continuation of anticancer drug treatment. In univariate analyses, squamous histology (p = 0.01) and body mass index (<18.5 kg/m2) (p = 0.0008) were significantly associated with poorer OS. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the cause of death in LC patients with concomitant CPA who received anticancer drug treatments and effective antifungal treatment was LC progression. Further large‐scale studies are needed to identify the effect of CPA in patients with LC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Driver oncogenes are investigated upfront at diagnosis using multi‐CDx systems with next‐generation sequencing techniques or multiplex reverse‐transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Additionally, from 2019, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assays have been available in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who had completed or were expected to complete standard chemotherapy. These assays are expected to comprehensively detect the driver oncogenes, especially for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no reports of nationwide research on the detection of driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC who undergo CGP assays, especially in those with undetected driver oncogenes at diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the proportion of driver oncogenes detected in patients with advanced NSCLC with undetectable driver oncogenes at initial diagnosis and in all patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays. We retrospectively analyzed data from 986 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays between August 2019 and March 2022, using the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. The proportion of driver oncogenes newly detected in patients with NSCLC who tested negative for driver oncogenes at diagnosis and in all patients with NSCLC were investigated. Driver oncogenes were detected in 451 patients (45.7%). EGFR was the most common (16.5%), followed by KRAS (14.5%). Among the 330 patients with undetected EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF V600E mutations at diagnosis, 81 patients (24.5%) had newly identified driver oncogenes. CGP assays could be useful to identify driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC, including those initially undetected, facilitating personalized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) aberrations represent a targetable oncogene in several tumor types, with RET inhibitors displaying marked efficacy. However, some patients with RET-aberrant cancer are insensitive to RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, drug-tolerant mechanisms have attracted attention as targets for initial therapies to overcome drug resistance. The underlying mechanisms of drug-tolerant cell emergence treated with RET-TKIs derived from RET-aberrant cancer cells remain unknown. This study investigated the role of YAP-mediated HER3 signaling in the underlying mechanisms of adaptive resistance to RET-TKIs in RET-aberrant cancer cells., Experimental Design: Four RET-aberrant cancer cell lines were used to assess sensitivity to the RET-TKIs selpercatinib and pralsetinib and to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying adaptive resistance using RNA sequencing, phospho-RTK antibody arrays, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, and luciferase reporter assays. Clinical specimens from patients with RET-fusion-positive lung cancer were analyzed for pre-treatment YAP expression and correlated with treatment outcomes., Results: In high YAP-expressing RET-aberrant cancer cells, YAP-mediated HER3 signaling activation maintained cell survival and induced the emergence of cells tolerant to the RET-TKIs selpercatinib and pralsetinib. The pan-ErBB inhibitor afatinib and YAP/TEAD inhibitors verteporfin and K-975 sensitized YAP-expressing RET-aberrant cancer cells to the RET-TKIs selpercatinib and pralsetinib. Pre-treatment YAP expression in clinical specimens obtained from patients with RET-fusion-positive lung cancer was associated with poor RET-TKI treatment outcomes., Conclusion: The YAP-HER3 axis is crucial for the survival and adaptive resistance of high YAP-expressing RET-aberrant cancer cells treated with RET-TKIs. Combining YAP/HER3 inhibition with RET-TKIs represents a highly potent strategy for initial treatment.

In Japan, cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)has become a new treatment modality in cancer chemotherapy in the 2010s, and is now widely approved for many types of cancer. Today, combination cancer immunotherapy utilizing ICIs is being developed, with many cancer types. The first approved ICI combination in Japan consists of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 antibody. In the combination therapy, ipilimumab is administered at different doses, intervals, and frequencies depending on the cancer type. ICI combination therapy has been reported to be more effective than ICI monotherapy, but also be associated with more severe adverse events. Therefore, optimal dosing strategies for ipilimumab were explored considering both treatment efficacy and adverse event profiles. In the study of 64 cases with multiple cancer, higher efficacy of ICI combined therapy was expected in cases with irAEs, and there were cases with long-lasting efficacy even after early discontinuation of ipilimumab due to irAEs. And the high dose(3 mg/kg)of ipilimumab was suggested to be an independent risk factor for CTCAE Grade 3 or higher for severe irAEs.

Background: Tumor markers such as serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1) are utilized for assessing the effectiveness of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Yet, it remains uncertain whether these markers can reliably forecast responses to combined chemoimmunotherapy. Our study aimed to examine the significance and effectiveness of these markers in predicting responses among NSCLC patients undergoing combined chemoimmunotherapy., Methods: This two-part observational study involved patients with NSCLC who were treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy in Japanese hospitals. An initial retrospective study of these patients, with serum CEA and CYFRA 21-1 as prognostic factors for combined chemoimmunotherapy outcomes, served as a discovery cohort. Patients in a subsequent prospective study served as a validation cohort, where we assessed the prognostic accuracy of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 cut-off points determined by the discovery cohort., Results: In total, 121 patients treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy were included, with 44 and 77 patients in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. Serum CYFRA 21-1 levels >3.0 ng/mL were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in both the discovery and validation cohorts (P=0.01, P=0.04, respectively). PFS did not differ significantly by CEA levels (P=0.21)., Conclusions: After combined chemoimmunotherapy treatment, serum CYFRA 21-1 stands out as a potentially valuable biomarker for predicting the prognosis of NSCLC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-190/coif). Tadaaki Yamada serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research from October 2023 to September 2025. Tadaaki Yamada reports receiving research grants from Pfizer Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca PLC, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and personal fees from Eli Lilly. K.T. reports receiving research grants from Chugai-Roche Co., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., and personal fees from AstraZeneca Co., Chugai-Roche Co., MSD-Merck Co., Eli Lilly Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., and Daiichi-Sankyo Co. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

The nasopharyngeal tube (NT) is an effective interface for noninvasive ventilation (NIV). In cases of severe heart failure, assistance with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) effectively reduces afterload and alleviates respiratory effort. We present the case of a three-day-old male neonate diagnosed with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). In respiratory management, extubation was delayed due to increased respiratory effort and afterload, so this patient was extubated and managed with NPPV using an NT. An uncuffed endotracheal tube was inserted, initiating NIV with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 8 cmH 2 O. The patient exhibited stable vital signs post-extubation and was weaned off NPPV and transferred to the general ward. In this case of severe AS, the use of NT as an interface for NPPV demonstrated efficacy in respiratory and circulatory management. This approach could have shortened the duration of mechanical ventilation and facilitated safe postoperative care, highlighting the potential benefits of NT in managing severe heart failure., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Tanimura et al.)

Introduction: Several studies explored the association between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the effect of TTF-1 on the therapeutic efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor/chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq NSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or more who are highly susceptible to immunotherapy remains unresolved. Therefore, we evaluated whether TTF-1 has a clinical impact on this population., Methods: Patients with non-Sq NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment efficacy was compared after adjusting for baseline differences using propensity score matching., Results: Among the 446 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, 266 patients with non-Sq NSCLC were analyzed. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were observed between the TTF-1-positive and -negative groups in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Of chemoimmunotherapy, pemetrexed containing regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy without pemetrexed, regardless of TTF-1 expression (TTF1 positive; HR: 0.46 (95% Confidence interval: 0.26-0.81), p<0.01, TTF-1 negative; HR: 0.29 (95% Confidence interval: 0.09-0.93), p=0.02)., Discussion: TTF-1 expression did not affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-Sq NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. In this population, pemetrexed-containing chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy, irrespective of TTF-1 expression., Competing Interests: NN received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. HK received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. TY received research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the purview of the submitted work. MT received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Janssen, and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, Kyowa-Kirin, and Nippon Kayaku, outside the purview of the submitted work. AO has received personal fees from Chugai-Roshe, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Japan, Nippon Kayaku, and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the purview of the submitted work. TK received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. KCT received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD-Merck, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo outside the purview of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Nishioka, Kawachi, Yamada, Tamiya, Negi, Goto, Nakao, Shiotsu, Tanimura, Takeda, Okada, Harada, Date, Chihara, Hasegawa, Tamiya, Masui, Sai, Ishida, Katayama, Morimoto, Iwasaku, Tokuda, Kijima and Takayama.)

Introduction: The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching., Results: Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group., Conclusions: ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%., Competing Interests: HK received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. TY received research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, and has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly outside the purview of the submitted work. MT received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Janssen and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, Kyowa-Kirin, and Nippon Kayaku outside the purview of the submitted work. AO received personal fees from Chugai-Roshe, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, Nippon Kayaku, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the purview of the submitted work. TK received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. KT received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD-Merck, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo outside the purview of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Takei, Kawachi, Yamada, Tamiya, Negi, Goto, Nakao, Shiotsu, Tanimura, Takeda, Okada, Harada, Date, Chihara, Hasegawa, Tamiya, Katayama, Nishioka, Morimoto, Iwasaku, Tokuda, Kijima and Takayama.)

Few treatment options exist for pleural mesothelioma (PM), which is a progressive malignant tumor. However, the efficacy of molecular-targeted monotherapy is limited, and further therapeutic strategies are warranted to treat PM. Recently, the cancer cell-cycle checkpoint inhibitors have attracted attention because they disrupt cell-cycle regulation. Here, we aimed to establish a novel combinational therapeutic strategy to inhibit the cell-cycle checkpoint kinase, ATR in PM cells. The siRNA screening assay showed that anexelekto (AXL) knockdown enhanced cell growth inhibition when exposed to ATR inhibitors, demonstrating the synergistic effects of the ATR and AXL combination in some PM cells. The AXL and ATR inhibitor combination increased cell apoptosis via the Bim protein and suppressed cell migration when compared with each monotherapy. The combined therapeutic targeting of AXL and ATR significantly delayed regrowth compared with monotherapy. Thus, optimal AXL and ATR inhibition may potentially improve the PM outcome., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)