Search

Purpose of Review: Our escalating reliance on disposable products in the operating room has generated a large amount of waste, cost, and environmental pollution. Heath damages from the pollution caused by the US healthcare industry cause as much harm, as measured by disability-adjusted life years, as total medical errors. Our response to our own environmental impact should be proportional to that harm. Understanding the waste streams we create and the factors that contribute to our large waste generation in the operating room can help us target solutions to our most harmful practices., Recent Findings: Recent studies within the field of medical waste in ObGyn have included a systematic review analyzing most effective practices for waste reduction and environmental life cycle analyses of specific medical procedures., Summary: Operating room waste includes regulated medical waste, pathologic waste/chemotherapy, sharps, general municipal waste, recycling, linens, and anesthetic gases. The most effective way to reduce the environmental impact from medical waste is to reduce our use of disposable supplies in favor of durable reusable materials. Other important interventions include eliminating 'overage' of unused supplies, optimizing use of anesthetic gas, custom pack scale backs, and proper waste segregation. This review of operative waste is intended to aid healthcare facilities in understanding and addressing their own environmental impact., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The escalating generation of household medical waste, a byproduct of industrialization and global population growth, has rendered its transportation and logistics management a critical societal concern. This study delves into the optimization of routes for vehicles within the household medical waste logistics network, a response to the imperative of managing this waste effectively. The potential for environmental and public health hazards due to improper waste disposal is acknowledged, prompting the incorporation of contamination risk, influenced by transport duration, waste volume, and wind velocity, into the analysis. To enhance the realism of the simulation, traffic congestion is integrated into the vehicle speed function, reflecting the urban roads' variability. Subsequently, a Bi-objective mixed-integer programming model is formulated to concurrently minimize total operational costs and environmental pollution risks. The complexity inherent in the optimization problem has motivated the development of the Adaptive Hybrid Artificial Fish Swarming Algorithm with Non-Dominated Sorting (AH-NSAFSA). This algorithm employs a sophisticated approach, amalgamating congestion distance and individual ranking to discern optimal solutions from the population. It incorporates a decay function to facilitate an adaptive iterative process, enhancing the algorithm's convergence properties. Furthermore, it leverages the concept of crossover-induced elimination to preserve the genetic diversity and overall robustness of the solution set. The empirical evaluation of AH-NSAFSA is conducted using a test set derived from the Solomon dataset, demonstrating the algorithm's capability to generate feasible non-dominated solutions for household medical waste recycling path planning. Comparative analysis with the Non-dominated Sorted Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm (NSAFSA) and Non-dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) across metrics such as MID, SM, NOS, and CT reveals that AH-NSAFSA excels in MID, SM, and NOS, and surpasses NSAFSA in CT, albeit slightly underperforming relative to NSGA-II. The study's holistic approach to waste recycling route planning, which integrates cost-effectiveness with pollution risk and traffic congestion considerations, offers substantial support for enterprises in formulating sustainable green development strategies. AH-NSAFSA offers an eco-efficient, holistic approach to medical waste recycling, advancing sustainable management practices., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The Australian health care system contributes 7% of the national greenhouse gas emission footprint and generates massive waste streams annually. Operating rooms are a particular hotspot, generating at least 20% of the total hospital waste. A systematic search of several global academic databases was conducted in mid-2022 (articles from 1992 to 2022) for peer-reviewed research relevant to waste management in the operating rooms. We then used thematic analysis to enumerate and characterise the strategies and barriers to sustainable waste management in the operating room. The waste reduction strategies focused on avoidance of high carbon products; correct waste segregation and reduced overage; reusing, reprocessing, and repurposing devices; and improved recycling. The first barrier identified was a constrained interpretation of the concept of "first do not harm", ingrained in surgeons' practices, in prioritising single-use surgical products. The second barrier was ineffective or insufficient waste education. The third barrier was the immediate cost of implementing waste management compared with the long term realisation of environmental and economic benefits. The last barrier to implementing institutional practice change was the lack of policies and regulations at the local hospital, federal and international levels. We also evaluated the knowledge gaps in current surgical waste research, including lack of benchmarking data and standardised regulations concerning reusable or reprocessed devices, as well as the methods used to promote pro-sustainability behavioural change., (© 2024 The Author(s). Medical Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AMPCo Pty Ltd.)

Purpose of Review: This review aims to provide an update on the results of studies published in the last two years involving the development of sustainable practices in hospital and operating theaters (OT)., Recent Findings: Recently, many studies evaluated various initiatives to better understand the environmental impact of the OT but also to minimize its environmental impact. Many trials evidenced the positive impact of the instrument's reuse using an appropriate reprocessing procedure. Better waste segregation is associated with a reduction of produced waste and contributes to a significant reduction in CO 2 equivalent emissions. Regarding anaesthetic gas, Desflurane is known to have the worst environmental impact and the majority of the study evidenced that its reduction permits to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emission of the OT., Summary: Greening the OT necessitates climate-smart actions such as waste reduction, the improvement of reusable instruments, recycling of our waste and better anaesthetic gas management. Within the last two years, many efforts have been made to reduce and better segregate waste produced in the OT and also to better understand the environmental impact of disposable and reusable devices., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The healthcare sector has a substantial environmental footprint, and the delivery of anesthesia contributes significantly. Inhaled anesthetics themselves are potent greenhouse gases, unused intravenous medication exert toxic effects on the environment, and the increasing reliance on single-use devices has led to an ever-growing amount of solid waste produced in operating rooms. This review discusses many of these environmental impacts and suggests practices to mitigate the environmental footprint of anesthetic practice., Recent Findings: The choice of anesthesia maintenance has significant environmental implications, with nitrous oxide and desflurane having the highest carbon footprint of all anesthetic agents. Using low fresh gas flows and supplementing or replacing inhalational agents with propofol leads to a significant reduction in emissions. Many intravenous anesthetic agents pose a risk of environmental toxicity, and efforts should be made to decrease medication waste and ensure appropriate disposal of unused medications to minimize their environmental impacts. Additionally, consideration should be given to replacing single-use devices in the operating rooms with reusable alternatives that are often both environmentally and economically superior. And solid waste generated in the operating room should be segregated thoughtfully, as processing regulated medical waste is a highly energy-intensive process., Summary: Significant opportunities exist to improve the environmental footprint of anesthesia practice, and with the rapidly worsening climate crisis, the importance of implementing changes is greater than ever., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Climate change has immediate impacts on women's health. Hospitals and operating rooms are large contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste. This article will review current green initiatives designed to minimize environmental impact in the operating room and highlight areas for future improvement., Recent Findings: From a materials perspective, reusable goods result in less GHG emissions while being just as efficacious, well tolerated, and easy to use. Materials should be opened judiciously, only as necessary. Processing regulated medical waste produces greater GHG emissions, so waste should be properly sorted, and items which are not biohazard waste should be processed separately. Choosing appropriate anesthesia and utilizing an 'off' setting, in which operating rooms are shut down when not in use, can also drastically decrease the environmental impact of surgery. Further research is needed to determine effective implementation in hospitals., Summary: This article summarizes current attempts to make operating rooms more sustainable. Many practices result in a decreased carbon footprint and cost savings without adversely affecting patient outcomes. Gynecologic surgeons and the hospitals in which they practice need to focus on implementing these changes in a timely fashion., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)