Search

Context: In a clinical study, tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GIP/GLP-1RA), provided superior glycemic control vs the GLP-1RA semaglutide. The physiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood., Objective: This work aimed to evaluate treatment effects by model-based analyses of mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) data., Methods: A 28-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin was conducted at 2 clinical research centers in Germany. Interventions included tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1 mg, and placebo. Main outcome measures included glycemic control, model-derived β-cell function indices including insulin secretion rate (ISR) at 7.2-mmol/L glucose (ISR7.2), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-CGS), insulin sensitivity, and estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio., Results: Tirzepatide significantly reduced fasting glucose and MMTT total glucose area under the curve (AUC) vs semaglutide (P < .01). Incremental glucose AUC did not differ significantly between treatments; therefore, greater total glucose AUC reduction with tirzepatide was mainly attributable to greater suppression of fasting glucose. A greater reduction in total ISR AUC was achieved with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01), in the context of greater improvement in insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide (P < .01). ISR7.2 was significantly increased with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .05), showing improved β-CGS. MMTT-derived β-CGS was increased but not significantly different between treatments. Both treatments reduced fasting glucagon and total glucagon AUC, with glucagon AUC significantly reduced with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01). The estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio did not change substantially with either treatment., Conclusion: These results suggest that the greater glycemic control observed for tirzepatide manifests as improved fasting glucose and glucose excursion control, due to improvements in ISR, insulin sensitivity, and glucagon suppression., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. See the journal About page for additional terms.)

Aim: To comprehensively examine the range of co-morbidities among males and females with a diagnosis of obesity., Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study used US commercial and Medicare claims data from Merative MarketScan Research Databases to identify adults (age ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of obesity with continuous insurance coverage from 2018 to 2020. Co-morbidities were tabulated based on coded diagnoses, and prevalences were calculated in males and females across age groups. Age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) determined differences in co-morbidities between the sexes., Results: Of an eligible sample of 6.9 million, we identified 2 028 273 individuals with at least one obesity-related International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code. The proportions of males and females with obesity were 43.0% versus 57.0%. The most prevalent co-morbidities among males and females were hypertension (62.8% vs. 52.2%), dyslipidaemia (63.3% vs. 50.3%) and depression and/or anxiety (D/A; 29.7% vs. 48.5%). The prevalence of D/A was high in the younger age group, but steadily decreased with age in both sexes; however, hypertension and dyslipidaemia continued to increase with age. The presence of diagnosis of hypertension and dyslipidaemia was 6-8 years earlier in males than in females. Females had higher odds than males for osteoarthritis (OR 1.33), depression (OR 2.22) or osteoporosis (OR 7.10); all P < .0001., Conclusions: Males with obesity received a diagnosis of cardiovascular risk factors at an earlier age than females, which may have contributed to the higher prevalence of coronary heart disease. Understanding sex-specific variations in co-morbidities across ages can support early screening and diagnosis of risk clusters for optimal obesity management., (© 2024 Eli Lilly and Company. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Retatrutide is a novel triple agonist of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucagon receptors. A 48-week phase 2 obesity study demonstrated weight reductions of 22.8% and 24.2% with retatrutide 8 and 12 mg, respectively. The primary objective of this substudy was to assess mean relative change from baseline in liver fat (LF) at 24 weeks in participants from that study with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and ≥10% of LF. Here, in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants (n = 98) were randomly assigned to 48 weeks of once-weekly subcutaneous retatrutide (1, 4, 8 or 12 mg dose) or placebo. The mean relative change from baseline in LF at 24 weeks was -42.9% (1 mg), -57.0% (4 mg), -81.4% (8 mg), -82.4% (12 mg) and +0.3% (placebo) (all P < 0.001 versus placebo). At 24 weeks, normal LF (<5%) was achieved by 27% (1 mg), 52% (4 mg), 79% (8 mg), 86% (12 mg) and 0% (placebo) of participants. LF reductions were significantly related to changes in body weight, abdominal fat and metabolic measures associated with improved insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism. The ClinicalTrials.gov registration is NCT04881760 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: To evaluate the long-term effects of behavioral treatments on glycemic and psychological outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: Program ACTIVE II was a multicenter randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), exercise (EXER), combination treatment (CBT + EXER) and usual care (UC) for adults with MDD and T2D., Results: Primary outcomes: change in A1c and depressive symptoms at 6- (N = 87) and 12-months (N = 75) from baseline. In those with a baseline A1c ≥7.0 %, CBT + EXER showed lasting A1c benefit at 6- (-1.2 %; SE: 0.6; p = 0.032) and 12-months (-1.4 %; SE: 0.6; p = 0.025) compared to UC. All groups had clinically significant improvements in depressive symptoms. At 6 months, CBT + EXER had significant improvements in diabetes-related distress regimen burden (p = 0.005); and social support (CIRS, p = 0.043) compared to UC., Conclusions: The Program ACTIVE II CBT + EXER intervention demonstrated a sustained improvement in A1c for a subgroup of study participants with a baseline A1c ≥7.0 %. However, this finding should be considered preliminary because of small sample size. All 3 behavioral intervention groups demonstrated improvements in psychosocial outcomes one-year post-intervention. These findings point to the enduring benefits of community-based interventions to extend the availability of depression treatment for T2D patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Program ACTIVE II was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK092765 & R34DK071545). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The following conflicts of interest apply to the co-authors: Dr. Mary de Groot is a faculty consultant to Mediflix, Inc. Dr. Kieren Mather is an employee of Eli Lilly, Inc. No artificial intelligence was used in the creation or revision of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)