1. Healthcare resource utilization and costs in immunodeficient patients receiving subcutaneous Ig: Real-world evidence from France.
- Author
-
Lefèvre G, Borget I, Lefèvre C, Maherzi C, Nucit A, Hennaoui M, Schmidt A, Lennon H, Grenier B, Daydé F, and Mahlaoui N
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, France, Female, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Adult, Patient Acceptance of Health Care statistics & numerical data, Adolescent, Aged, Young Adult, Hospitalization economics, Health Resources economics, Health Resources statistics & numerical data, Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes drug therapy, Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes economics, Child, Injections, Subcutaneous, Child, Preschool, Health Care Costs
- Abstract
Background: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) replacement therapy is indicated for patients with hypogammaglobulinemia caused by primary (PID) and secondary immunodeficiencies (SID)., Objective: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and related direct medical costs of patients in France treated with weekly conventional SCIg (cSCIg) vs monthly hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIg (fSCIg)., Methods: This retrospective study of Ig-naïve patients with PID or SID newly receiving a SCIg between 2016 and 2018, extracted from the French National Healthcare reimbursement database (SNDS), analyzed the SCIg-related HCRU and reimbursed costs generated from in-hospital (hospitalizations and SCIg doses) or at-home (nurse visits [NV] and pump provider visits [PPV], drug doses) SCIg administration., Results: Overall, 2,012 patients (PID:534; SID:1,478) were analyzed. The follow-up duration varied between 7.5 and 8.7 months according to sub-groups. Compared with fSCIg-treated patients, monthly mean rates of NV and PPV were respectively 2.5 and 3.1 times higher in PID, and 1.6 and 3.1 times higher in SID cSCIg-treated patients. Monthly mean rates for SCIg administration-related hospitalizations were lower overall, while their costs were 1.6 and 1.8 times higher for cSCIg than fSCIg subgroups, in PIDs and SIDs respectively; these results are due to more frequent hospitalizations with fSCIg being mainly shorter, without stayover. Total HCRU costs from the French NHI's perspective were estimated to be lower with fSCIg vs cSCIg, in PIDs and SIDs., Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence of SCIg administration in a large French population. Patients with PID or SID treated with fSCIg had fewer at-home HCRU and lower overall costs for in-hospital or at-home SCIg administration compared with cSCIg-treated patients., Competing Interests: G. Lefèvre reports consulting or advisory fees from Shire-Takeda and research grant and travel and accommodation expenses from Octapharma, Shire-Takeda, CSL Behring, and LFB. I. Borget has no conflict of interest to declare. C. Maherzi, C. Lefèvre, A. Nucit, and M. Hennaoui are full-time employees of Takeda. A. Schmidt, H. Lennon, Benjamin. G, and Florent. D are full-time employees of HEVA, a consultancy company paid by Takeda to conduct data analyses. N. Mahlaoui reports consultancy and unrestricted financial support from the national reference center for PID (CEREDIH).” This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2025 Lefèvre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF