Search

Throughout life, animals must maintain homeostasis while coping with challenging events. The period after reproduction can be challenging for oviparous females to maintain homeostasis since they direct most of their energy stores to vitellogenesis, possibly increasing the vulnerability to stressors. Changes in glucocorticoids' (GC) secretion promote various behavioural and physiological adjustments daily and to restore balance after facing stressors. However, when GC are elevated for extended periods, which usually occurs in response to chronic exposure to stressors, they can affect feeding behaviour and suppress the immune function. We aim to elucidate the effects of chronic corticosterone (CORT) exposure on feeding behaviour, body condition and immune function in female lizards, Tropidurus catalanensis, in the post-reproductive period. Thirty animals were divided into three groups: 1. Control (no experimental procedure performed); 2. Empty Implant (animals implanted with empty silastic tube); and 3. CORT Implant (animals implanted with silastic tube filled with CORT, with a chronic continuous release for at least a week). CORT plasma levels feeding behaviour, body condition (body index [BI] and fat index [FI]), leukocyte count, and several immune function variables (bacterial killing ability [BKA], hemagglutination titer, phytohemagglutinin [PHA] immune challenge and leukocyte count) were evaluated. After implantation, CORT treated animals maintained stable body mass through the experiment, while Control and Empty Implant groups displayed weight loss. In the CORT treated animals, there was also a positive relation between BI and FI, and higher FI when compared to groups 1 and 2. No effects of CORT were observed on feeding behaviour nor on the immune function., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Researchers in the Global South (GS, developing countries) make valuable contributions to the field of comparative physiology, but face economic and scientific disparities and several unique challenges compared with colleagues in the Global North (developed countries). This Perspective highlights some of the challenges, knowledge gaps and disparities in opportunity faced by GS researchers, especially those at early-career stages. We propose collaborative solutions to help address these issues, and advocate for promoting investment and cultural and societal change for a more inclusive research community. Additionally, we highlight the role of GS researchers in contributing expert knowledge on local biodiversity and the environment; this knowledge can help to shape the future of comparative physiology, allowing us to achieve a better understanding of the evolution of physiological mechanisms and to develop innovative solutions to environmental and biomedical challenges. With this Perspective, we hope to highlight the need to foster a more diverse, equitable and inclusive research landscape in comparative physiology; one that empowers GS scientists to address the global challenges associated with biodiversity loss, climate change and environmental pollution., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2024. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted personal and professional life. For academics, research, teaching, and service tasks were upended and we all had to navigate the altered landscape. However, some individuals faced a disproportionate burden, particularly academics with minoritized identities or those who were early career, were caregivers, or had intersecting identities. As comparative endocrinologists, we determine how aspects of individual and species-level variation influence response to, recovery from, and resilience in the face of stressors. Here, we flip that framework and apply an integrative biological lens to the impact of the COVID-19 chronic stressor on our endocrine community. We address how the pandemic altered impact factors of academia (e.g., scholarly products) and relatedly, how factors of impact (e.g., sex, gender, race, career stage, caregiver status, etc.) altered the way in which individuals could respond. We predict the pandemic will have long-term impacts on the population dynamics, composition, and landscape of our academic ecosystem. Impact factors of research, namely journal submissions, were altered by COVID-19, and women authors saw a big dip. We discuss this broadly and then report General and Comparative Endocrinology (GCE) manuscript submission and acceptance status by gender and geographic region from 2019 to 2023. We also summarize how the pandemic impacted individuals with different axes of identity, how academic institutions have responded, compile proposed solutions, and conclude with a discussion on what we can all do to (re)build the academy in an equitable way. At GCE, the first author positions had gender parity, but men outnumbered women at the corresponding author position. Region of manuscript origin mattered for submission and acceptance rates, and women authors from Asia and the Middle East were the most heavily impacted by the pandemic. The number of manuscripts submitted dropped after year 1 of the pandemic and has not yet recovered. Thus, COVID-19 was a chronic stressor for the GCE community., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)