Search

Wearable electroencephalography devices emerge as a cost-effective and ergonomic alternative to gold-standard polysomnography, paving the way for better health monitoring and sleep disorder screening. Machine learning allows to automate sleep stage classification, but trust and reliability issues have hampered its adoption in clinical applications. Estimating uncertainty is a crucial factor in enhancing reliability by identifying regions of heightened and diminished confidence. In this study, we used an uncertainty-centred machine learning pipeline, U-PASS, to automate sleep staging in a challenging real-world dataset of single-channel electroencephalography and accelerometry collected with a wearable device from an elderly population. We were able to effectively limit the uncertainty of our machine learning model and to reliably inform clinical experts of which predictions were uncertain to improve the machine learning model's reliability. This increased the five-stage sleep-scoring accuracy of a state-of-the-art machine learning model from 63.9% to 71.2% on our dataset. Remarkably, the machine learning approach outperformed the human expert in interpreting these wearable data. Manual review by sleep specialists, without specific training for sleep staging on wearable electroencephalography, proved ineffective. The clinical utility of this automated remote monitoring system was also demonstrated, establishing a strong correlation between the predicted sleep parameters and the reference polysomnography parameters, and reproducing known correlations with the apnea-hypopnea index. In essence, this work presents a promising avenue to revolutionize remote patient care through the power of machine learning by the use of an automated data-processing pipeline enhanced with uncertainty estimation., (© 2024 European Sleep Research Society.)

Purpose: This brief report aims to summarize and discuss the methodologies of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and their potential applications in surgery., Methods: We briefly introduce explainability methods, including global and individual explanatory features, methods for imaging data and time series, as well as similarity classification, and unraveled rules and laws., Results: Given the increasing interest in artificial intelligence within the surgical field, we emphasize the critical importance of transparency and interpretability in the outputs of applied models., Conclusion: Transparency and interpretability are essential for the effective integration of AI models into clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To facilitate the stratification of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) for new treatment development and clinical trial recruitment, we created an automated machine learning (autoML) tool predicting the rapid progression of knee OA over a 2-year period., Methods: We developed autoML models integrating clinical, biochemical, X-ray and MRI data. Using two data sets within the OA Initiative-the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health OA Biomarker Consortium for training and hold-out validation, and the Pivotal Osteoarthritis Initiative MRI Analyses study for external validation-we employed two distinct definitions of clinical outcomes: Multiclass (categorising OA progression into pain and/or radiographic) and binary. Key predictors of progression were identified through advanced interpretability techniques, and subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex and ethnicity with a focus on early-stage disease., Results: Although the most reliable models incorporated all available features, simpler models including only clinical variables achieved robust external validation performance, with area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PRC) 0.727 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.728) for multiclass predictions; and AUC-PRC 0.764 (95% CI: 0.762 to 0.766) for binary predictions. Multiclass models performed best in patients with early-stage OA (AUC-PRC 0.724-0.806) whereas binary models were more reliable in patients younger than 60 (AUC-PRC 0.617-0.693). Patient-reported outcomes and MRI features emerged as key predictors of progression, though subgroup differences were noted. Finally, we developed web-based applications to visualise our personalised predictions., Conclusions: Our novel tool's transparency and reliability in predicting rapid knee OA progression distinguish it from conventional 'black-box' methods and are more likely to facilitate its acceptance by clinicians and patients, enabling effective implementation in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)