Search

Cervical cancer (CC) is still characterized by a poor prognosis despite the progress made in its treatment in recent years. Although immunotherapy has improved outcomes for advanced/recurrent disease, there is a significant gap in addressing patients' needs when they progress after platinum and immunotherapy treatments. In this setting, traditional chemotherapy showed limited effectiveness. In this context, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) emerged as a promising tool within targeted cancer therapies. Tisotumab vedotin (TV), an ADC targeting tissue factor, represents the first ADC approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic CC with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. In phase I–III published trials, TV has already demonstrated an advantage in terms of objective response rate (17.8%–54.4%) and progression-free survival (3.1–6.9 months) in patients who progressed to the first-line standard therapy. Data concerning the addition of TV to platinum/pembrolizumab first-line chemotherapy are still under analysis and strongly expected. However, several questions are still unresolved: (1) the identification of the most suitable timing for ADCs administration in the treatment sequence of advanced/recurrent CC; (2) the evaluation of combination therapies as a tool to minimize the emergence of resistant clones and to enhance overall effectiveness; and (3) the assessment of tolerability and correct management of special toxicities (e.g. ocular and neurological adverse events). In the near future, an improvement in patient selection via biomarker-driven strategies should be crucial for optimizing both treatment benefits and maintaining an acceptable toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cancer develops through a complex process involving genetic changes that can lead to uncontrolled cell growth and tumor formation. This research focuses on developing an advanced approach to classify tumors into meaningful subgroups based on somatic mutations. Using machine learning techniques, specifically a deep neural network, and integrating genetic data with known gene interaction networks, we propose a framework for tumor stratification, called D3NS (deep neural network integrated into network-based stratification). This framework identifies patient subtypes predictive for survival and significantly associated with several clinical outcomes (tumor stage, grade and treatment response). We applied D3NS to real-world data from the Cancer Genome Atlas for bladder, ovarian, and kidney cancers. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to improve cancer stratification, positioning it as a useful base model for cancer research and a promising tool in clinical settings. (1) Background: The identification of tumor subtypes is fundamental in precision medicine for accurate diagnoses and personalized therapies. Cancer development is often driven by the accumulation of somatic mutations that can cause alterations in tissue functions and morphologies. In this work, a method based on a deep neural network integrated into a network-based stratification framework (D3NS) is proposed to stratify tumors according to somatic mutations. (2) Methods: This approach leverages the power of deep neural networks to detect hidden information in the data by combining the knowledge contained in a network of gene interactions, as typical of network-based stratification methods. D3NS was applied using real-world data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for bladder, ovarian, and kidney cancers. (3) Results: This technique allows for the identification of tumor subtypes characterized by different survival rates and significant associations with several clinical outcomes (tumor stage, grade or response to therapy). (4) Conclusion: D3NS can provide a base model in cancer research and could be considered as a useful tool for tumor stratification, offering potential support in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plain Language Summary What is this summary about? This PLSP provides a short summary of an original scientific article that presented results from the PRIMA study after 3.5 years of follow-up time. The original article was published in the European Journal of Cancer in 2023. The PRIMA study included adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-risk ovarian cancer whose tumors shrunk or became undetectable after treatment with chemotherapy with or without surgery. The PRIMA study evaluated how well the drug niraparib, also known as Zejula, worked at delaying or preventing ovarian cancer from coming back (recurring) or getting worse (progressing) compared with placebo (a substance with no effects that a doctor gives to a patient instead of a drug). The first results from the PRIMA study were published in 2019, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 1.2 years. The article this PLSP is based on reports longer-term data from the PRIMA study, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 3.5 years. Patients were monitored (or followed) for a longer time to understand how well niraparib continued to work and to evaluate whether the safety of niraparib changed with additional time being monitored. What were the results? Patients who took niraparib had more time before their cancer came back or got worse than patients who took placebo. In terms of safety, no new types of side effects with niraparib treatment were observed with additional time being monitored as part of the PRIMA study. What do the results mean? These results support that niraparib remains an important treatment option to help delay the cancer from coming back or getting worse in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to initial treatment. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT02655016 (PRIMA study) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the management of mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer (EC). Initially investigated as monotherapy in phase I-II clinical trials for recurrent disease, immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable activity, yielding overall response rates (ORR) ranging from 27% to 58%. Based on these promising findings, phase III trials have explored the integration of immunotherapy into first-line treatment regimens for advanced/recurrent EC in combination with chemotherapy or other agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resulting in improved ORR, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to the standard chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin. As a result, the incorporation of ICIs with standard platinum-based chemotherapy is becoming a new standard of care in MMR-d/MSI-H EC. This review synthesizes literature from PubMed, Embase databases, and recent congress abstracts on gynecological cancers. It covers MMR-d/MSI-H EC incidence, molecular diagnostics, clinical trial outcomes, predictive biomarkers for ICIs, patient profiles likely to benefit, resistance mechanisms, and the future of immunotherapy in this setting. By offering a comprehensive overview, this review delineates the pivotal role of ICIs in the management of MMR-d/MSI-H EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality among gynecologic cancers, primarily because it typically is diagnosed at a late stage and because of the development of chemoresistance in recurrent disease. Improving outcomes in women with platinumresistant ovarian cancer is a substantial unmet need. Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) by cortisol has been shown to suppress the apoptotic pathways used by cytotoxic agents, limiting their efficacy. Selective GR modulation may be able to counteract cortisol's antiapoptotic effects, enhancing chemotherapy's efficacy. A previous phase 2 study has shown that adding intermittently dosed relacorilant, a selective GR modulator, to nab-paclitaxel improved outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with minimal added toxicity, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The ROSELLA study aims to confirm and expand on these findings in a larger population. Methods: ROSELLA is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, global multicenter study in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Eligible participants have received 1 to 3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy, including ≥1 prior line of platinum therapy and prior treatment with bevacizumab, with documented progressive disease or intolerance to the most recent therapy. There is no biomarker-based requirement for participant selection. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive intermittently dosed relacorilant in combination with nabpaclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary efficacy endpoints include OS, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks, and cancer antigen 125 response. The study is also evaluating safety and patient-reported outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer-associated thrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. This survey was aimed at gathering information regarding the management of thromboembolic prophylaxis within the MITO (Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer)-MaNGO (Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology) groups. We designed a self-administered, multiple-choice online questionnaire available only for MITO-MaNGO members for one month, starting in May 2022 and ending in June 2022. We processed one response form per center, and 50 responses were analyzed, with most of the respondents (78%) over 40 years old. We found that 82% of them consider thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology to be relevant. In 82% of the centers, a standardized protocol on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is used, which is applied to both patients undergoing surgery and those undergoing chemotherapy. In the remaining 18% of centers, prophylaxis is used exclusively for patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Prophylaxis of patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy treatment is managed in most cases by the surgeon (72%) and oncologist (76%), respectively. Only 26% of respondents use a thromboembolic risk assessment scale, and of these, those used are the Caprini Score (6%), Khorana Score (6%), and Wells Score (2%). The respondents have good knowledge of low-molecular-weight heparin (90%) and average knowledge of dicumarolics (40%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (68%), and antiplatelet agents (40%). The results of our survey indicate that there is a good awareness of thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology. Nevertheless, it is used less in outpatients than in patients undergoing surgery. Moreover, the thromboembolic risk assessment scores are barely used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Preventing venous thromboembolic complications in patient with gynecological cancers is a relevant issue and an unmet clinical need. Using a thorough literature search, we found that this problem is underestimated and preventative antithrombotic measures are underused. In addition, there are no specific validated risk assessment tools in this setting to help in clinical practice the identification of patients who are at highest thrombotic risk, who may most benefit from pharmacological anticoagulant prophylaxis, and avoid the anticoagulation-associated bleeding risk in those who are at low risk. We suggest that more research be done in this field to improve these patiens' care. The prevention and appropriate management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is of paramount importance. However, the literature data report an underestimation of this major problem in patients with gynecological cancers, with an inconsistent venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in this patient setting. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence regarding the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, focusing on the specific context of gynecological tumors, exploring the literature discussing risk factors, risk assessment, and pharmacological prophylaxis. We found that the current understanding and management of venous thromboembolism in gynecological malignancy is largely based on studies on solid cancers in general. Hence, further, larger, and well-designed research in this area is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) represents 3.4% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases and is responsible for 2.1% of all cancer-related deaths. Approximately 10%-15% of women with EC are diagnosed with advancedstage disease, resulting in a reported 5-year survival rate of only 17% for those with distant metastases. A better understanding of its molecular features has ushered in a new era of immunotherapy for the treatment of EC, allowing for alternative therapeutic approaches, even in cases of advanced disease. Methods: We administered a multi-choice online survey for Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) members. The questionnaire was available for 2 months, starting in October 2022. Our objective was to evaluate the current attitude of incorporating molecular characterization of EC into routine clinical practice, appraise the implementation of newly available therapies, and compare the outcomes with the previous survey conducted in April-May 2021 to ascertain the actual changes that have transpired during this recent time period. Results: The availability of molecular classification in Italian centers has changed in 1 year. Seventy-five percent of centers performed the molecular classification compared with 55.6% of the previous survey. Although this percentage has increased, only 18% performed all the tests. Significant changes have occurred in the administration of new treatments in EC patients in MITO centers. In 2022, 82.1% of the centers administrated dostarlimab in recurrent or advanced MMRdeficient (dMMR) EC experiencing disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, compared to only 24.4% in 2021. In 2022, 85.7% of the centers already administrated the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination as a second-line therapy for MMR-proficient (pMMR) patients with advanced or recurrent EC who had progressed from first-line platinumbased therapy. Conclusion: Both the therapeutic and diagnostic scenarios have changed over the last couple of years in MITO centers, with an increased prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors and use of the molecular classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) regardless of microsatellite instability status or histologic subtype, who had disease progression following prior platinum-based therapy, in Study-309/KEYNOTE-775. The safety profile of the combination was generally consistent with that of each monotherapy drug and of the combination in patients with endometrial cancer and other solid tumors. Given the medical complexity of patients with aEC, this paper aims to characterize key adverse reactions (ARs) of the combination treatment and review management strategies, providing a guide for AR management to maximize anticancer benefits and minimize treatment discontinuation. Materials and Methods In Study-309/KEYNOTE-775, patients received lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). The incidence and median time to the first onset of ARs, dose modifications, and concomitant medications are described. Key ARs characterized include hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, musculoskeletal disorders, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, stomatitis, weight decreased, proteinuria, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome. Results As expected, the most common any-grade key ARs included: hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal disorders. Grades 3-4 key ARs with incidence ≥10% included: hypertension, fatigue, and weight decreased. Key ARs first occurred within approximately 3 months of treatment initiation. AR management strategies consistent with the prescribing information and the study protocol are discussed. Conclusion Successful AR management strategies for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab include education of the patient and entire treatment team, preventative measures and close monitoring, and judicious use of dose modifications and concomitant medications. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03517449 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The standard treatment for advanced endometrial cancer (EC) includes platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT), regardless of the histology, molecular status and the patient's profile. However, EC patients are a particularly frail group of patients, often with co-morbidities. Tolerance of CT can be difficult and induce long-term toxicities. In advanced EC disease, anti-PD1 immunotherapy has shown impressive results amongst mismatch repair deficient (MMRd)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumors. However, the benefit of adding CT to anti-PD1 is still an opened question. The aim of DOMENICA is to address the question if PD-1 alone has superior efficacy to CT, so that therapy in 1L advanced/recurrent MMRd/MSI-H EC could be de-escalated to avoid CT related toxicities. Methods: DOMENICA is an academic international randomized open-label, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab versus carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with MMR deficient (MMRd/MSI-H) relapse or advanced / metastatic EC. Inclusion criteria for the study comprised patients with histologically confirmed EC exhibiting recurrent or advanced disease, including primary stage IIIA to C2 or Stage IV disease, or experiencing their first recurrence of EC without curative treatment, provided they had evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Additionally, patients with MMRd/MSI-H tumors, determined by institutional MMR immunohistochemistry testing, and those with a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1 were eligible. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1, assessed by the BICR (Blinded Independent Central Review). Secondary endpoints include overall survival as key secondary endpoint, progression-free survival 2, patients reported outcome, best objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response rate, safety and tolerability, time to first or second subsequent treatment (TFST, TSST), pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of dostarlimab. Exploratory objectives include predictive biomarkers, efficacy according to geriatric status. The Study is ongoing in France (GINECO), Spain (GEICO), Italy (MaNGO, MITO), Canada (PMC), Singapore (GCIG), South Korea (KGOG), Japan (GOTIC), Turkey (TRSGO), and UK (NRCI). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2–3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]