Search

Your search keyword '"Lin, G. L."' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Lin, G. L." Publication Year Range This year
9 results on '"Lin, G. L."'

1. Measurement of Electron Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency via Neutron Capture on Hydrogen at Daya Bay

Author

Daya Bay collaboration, An, F. P., Bai, W. D., Balantekin, A. B., Bishai, M., Blyth, S., Cao, G. F., Cao, J., Chang, J. F., Chang, Y., Chen, H. S., Chen, H. Y., Chen, S. M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. X., Chen, Z. Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y. -C., Cheng, Z. K., Cherwinka, J. J., Chu, M. C., Cummings, J. P., Dalager, O., Deng, F. S., Ding, X. Y., Ding, Y. Y., Diwan, M. V., Dohnal, T., Dolzhikov, D., Dove, J., Duyang, H. Y., Dwyer, D. A., Gallo, J. P., Gonchar, M., Gong, G. H., Gong, H., Gu, W. Q., Guo, J. Y., Guo, L., Guo, X. H., Guo, Y. H., Guo, Z., Hackenburg, R. W., Han, Y., Hans, S., He, M., Heeger, K. M., Heng, Y. K., Hor, Y. K., Hsiung, Y. B., Hu, B. Z., Hu, J. R., Hu, T., Hu, Z. J., Huang, H. X., Huang, J. H., Huang, X. T., Huang, Y. B., Huber, P., Jaffe, D. E., Jen, K. L., Ji, X. L., Ji, X. P., Johnson, R. A., Jones, D., Kang, L., Kettell, S. H., Kohn, S., Kramer, M., Langford, T. J., Lee, J., Lee, J. H. C., Lei, R. T., Leitner, R., Leung, J. K. C., Li, F., Li, H. L., Li, J. J., Li, Q. J., Li, R. H., Li, S., Li, S. C., Li, W. D., Li, X. N., Li, X. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, Z. B., Liang, H., Lin, C. J., Lin, G. L., Lin, S., Ling, J. J., Link, J. M., Littenberg, L., Littlejohn, B. R., Liu, J. C., Liu, J. L., Liu, J. X., Lu, C., Lu, H. Q., Luk, K. B., Ma, B. Z., Ma, X. B., Ma, X. Y., Ma, Y. Q., Mandujano, R. C., Marshall, C., McDonald, K. T., McKeown, R. D., Meng, Y., Napolitano, J., Naumov, D., Naumova, E., Nguyen, T. M. T., Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P., Olshevskiy, A., Park, J., Patton, S., Peng, J. C., Pun, C. S. J., Qi, F. Z., Qi, M., Qian, X., Raper, N., Ren, J., Reveco, C. Morales, Rosero, R., Roskovec, B., Ruan, X. C., Russell, B., Steiner, H., Sun, J. L., Tmej, T., Treskov, K., Tse, W. -H., Tull, C. E., Tung, Y. C., Viren, B., Vorobel, V., Wang, C. H., Wang, J., Wang, M., Wang, N. Y., Wang, R. G., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. M., Wei, H. Y., Wei, L. H., Wei, W., Wen, L. J., Whisnant, K., White, C. G., Wong, H. L. H., Worcester, E., Wu, D. R., Wu, Q., Wu, W. J., Xia, D. M., Xie, Z. Q., Xing, Z. Z., Xu, H. K., Xu, J. L., Xu, T., Xue, T., Yang, C. G., Yang, L., Yang, Y. Z., Yao, H. F., Ye, M., Yeh, M., Young, B. L., Yu, H. Z., Yu, Z. Y., Yue, B. B., Zavadskyi, V., Zeng, S., Zeng, Y., Zhan, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. Y., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J. L., Zhang, J. W., Zhang, Q. M., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, X. T., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. X., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. P., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, R. Z., Zhou, L., Zhuang, H. L., and Zou, J. H.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

This Letter reports the first measurement of the oscillation amplitude and frequency of reactor antineutrinos at Daya Bay via neutron capture on hydrogen using 1958 days of data. With over 3.6 million signal candidates, an optimized candidate selection, improved treatment of backgrounds and efficiencies, refined energy calibration, and an energy response model for the capture-on-hydrogen sensitive region, the relative $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ rates and energy spectra variation among the near and far detectors gives $\mathrm{sin}^22\theta_{13} = 0.0759_{-0.0049}^{+0.0050}$ and $\Delta m^2_{32} = (2.72^{+0.14}_{-0.15})\times10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ assuming the normal neutrino mass ordering, and $\Delta m^2_{32} = (-2.83^{+0.15}_{-0.14})\times10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ for the inverted neutrino mass ordering. This estimate of $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}$ is consistent with and essentially independent from the one obtained using the capture-on-gadolinium sample at Daya Bay. The combination of these two results yields $\mathrm{sin}^22\theta_{13}= 0.0833\pm0.0022$, which represents an 8% relative improvement in precision regarding the Daya Bay full 3158-day capture-on-gadolinium result.

Published
2024

2. Search for a sub-eV sterile neutrino using Daya Bay's full dataset

Author

An, F. P., Bai, W. D., Balantekin, A. B., Bishai, M., Blyth, S., Cao, G. F., Cao, J., Chang, J. F., Chang, Y., Chen, H. S., Chen, H. Y., Chen, S. M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. X., Chen, Z. Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y. C., Cheng, Z. K., Cherwinka, J. J., Chu, M. C., Cummings, J. P., Dalager, O., Deng, F. S., Ding, X. Y., Ding, Y. Y., Diwan, M. V., Dohnal, T., Dolzhikov, D., Dove, J., Dugas, K. V., Duyang, H. Y., Dwyer, D. A., Gallo, J. P., Gonchar, M., Gong, G. H., Gong, H., Gu, W. Q., Guo, J. Y., Guo, L., Guo, X. H., Guo, Y. H., Guo, Z., Hackenburg, R. W., Han, Y., Hans, S., He, M., Heeger, K. M., Heng, Y. K., Hor, Y. K., Hsiung, Y. B., Hu, B. Z., Hu, J. R., Hu, T., Hu, Z. J., Huang, H. X., Huang, J. H., Huang, X. T., Huang, Y. B., Huber, P., Jaffe, D. E., Jen, K. L., Ji, X. L., Ji, X. P., Johnson, R. A., Jones, D., Kang, L., Kettell, S. H., Kohn, S., Kramer, M., Langford, T. J., Lee, J., Lee, J. H. C., Lei, R. T., Leitner, R., Leung, J. K. C., Li, F., Li, H. L., Li, J. J., Li, Q. J., Li, R. H., Li, S., Li, S. C., Li, W. D., Li, X. N., Li, X. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, Z. B., Liang, H., Lin, C. J., Lin, G. L., Lin, S., Ling, J. J., Link, J. M., Littenberg, L., Littlejohn, B. R., Liu, J. C., Liu, J. L., Liu, J. X., Lu, C., Lu, H. Q., Luk, K. B., Ma, B. Z., Ma, X. B., Ma, X. Y., Ma, Y. Q., Mandujano, R. C., Marshall, C., McDonald, K. T., McKeown, R. D., Meng, Y., Napolitano, J., Naumov, D., Naumova, E., Nguyen, T. M. T., Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P., Olshevskiy, A., Park, J., Patton, S., Peng, J. C., Pun, C. S. J., Qi, F. Z., Qi, M., Qian, X., Raper, N., Ren, J., Reveco, C. Morales, Rosero, R., Roskovec, B., Ruan, X. C., Russell, B., Steiner, H., Sun, J. L., Tmej, T., Tse, W. -H., Tull, C. E., Tung, Y. C., Viren, B., Vorobel, V., Wang, C. H., Wang, J., Wang, M., Wang, N. Y., Wang, R. G., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. M., Wei, H. Y., Wei, L. H., Wei, W., Wen, L. J., Whisnant, K., White, C. G., Wong, H. L. H., Worcester, E., Wu, D. R., Wu, Q., Wu, W. J., Xia, D. M., Xie, Z. Q., Xing, Z. Z., Xu, H. K., Xu, J. L., Xu, T., Xue, T., Yang, C. G., Yang, L., Yang, Y. Z., Yao, H. F., Ye, M., Yeh, M., Young, B. L., Yu, H. Z., Yu, Z. Y., Yue, B. B., Zavadskyi, V., Zeng, S., Zeng, Y., Zhan, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. Y., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J. L., Zhang, J. W., Zhang, Q. M., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, X. T., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. X., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. P., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, R. Z., Zhou, L., Zhuang, H. L., and Zou, J. H.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

This Letter presents results of a search for the mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with three active neutrinos based on the full data sample of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, collected during 3158 days of detector operation, which contains $5.55 \times 10^{6}$ reactor \anue candidates identified as inverse beta-decay interactions followed by neutron-capture on gadolinium. The analysis benefits from a doubling of the statistics of our previous result and from improvements of several important systematic uncertainties. No significant oscillation due to mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with active neutrinos was found. Exclusion limits are set by both Feldman-Cousins and CLs methods. Light sterile neutrino mixing with $\sin^2 2\theta_{14} \gtrsim 0.01$ can be excluded at 95\% confidence level in the region of $0.01$ eV$^2 \lesssim |\Delta m^{2}_{41}| \lesssim 0.1 $ eV$^2$. This result represents the world-leading constraints in the region of $2 \times 10^{-4}$ eV$^2 \lesssim |\Delta m^{2}_{41}| \lesssim 0.2 $ eV$^2$., Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures, 1 table

Published
2024

3. First measurement of the yield of $^8$He isotopes produced in liquid scintillator by cosmic-ray muons at Daya Bay

Author

Daya Bay Collaboration, An, F. P., Bai, W. D., Balantekin, A. B., Bishai, M., Blyth, S., Cao, G. F., Cao, J., Chang, J. F., Chang, Y., Chen, H. S., Chen, H. Y., Chen, S. M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. X., Chen, Z. Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y. C., Cheng, Z. K., Cherwinka, J. J., Chu, M. C., Cummings, J. P., Dalager, O., Deng, F. S., Ding, X. Y., Ding, Y. Y., Diwan, M. V., Dohnal, T., Dolzhikov, D., Dove, J., Dugas, K. V., Duyang, H. Y., Dwyer, D. A., Gallo, J. P., Gonchar, M., Gong, G. H., Gong, H., Gu, W. Q., Guo, J. Y., Guo, L., Guo, X. H., Guo, Y. H., Guo, Z., Hackenburg, R. W., Han, Y., Hans, S., He, M., Heeger, K. M., Heng, Y. K., Hor, Y. K., Hsiung, Y. B., Hu, B. Z., Hu, J. R., Hu, T., Hu, Z. J., Huang, H. X., Huang, J. H., Huang, X. T., Huang, Y. B., Huber, P., Jaffe, D. E., Jen, K. L., Ji, X. L., Ji, X. P., Johnson, R. A., Jones, D., Kang, L., Kettell, S. H., Kohn, S., Kramer, M., Langford, T. J., Lee, J., Lee, J. H. C., Lei, R. T., Leitner, R., Leung, J. K. C., Li, F., Li, H. L., Li, J. J., Li, Q. J., Li, R. H., Li, S., Li, S. C., Li, W. D., Li, X. N., Li, X. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, Z. B., Liang, H., Lin, C. J., Lin, G. L., Lin, S., Ling, J. J., Link, J. M., Littenberg, L., Littlejohn, B. R., Liu, J. C., Liu, J. L., Liu, J. X., Lu, C., Lu, H. Q., Luk, K. B., Ma, B. Z., Ma, X. B., Ma, X. Y., Ma, Y. Q., Mandujano, R. C., Marshall, C., McDonald, K. T., McKeown, R. D., Meng, Y., Napolitano, J., Naumov, D., Naumova, E., Nguyen, T. M. T., Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P., Olshevskiy, A., Park, J., Patton, S., Peng, J. C., Pun, C. S. J., Qi, F. Z., Qi, M., Qian, X., Raper, N., Ren, J., Reveco, C. Morales, Rosero, R., Roskovec, B., Ruan, X. C., Russell, B., Steiner, H., Sun, J. L., Tmej, T., Tse, W. -H., Tull, C. E., Tung, Y. C., Viren, B., Vorobel, V., Wang, C. H., Wang, J., Wang, M., Wang, N. Y., Wang, R. G., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. M., Wei, H. Y., Wei, L. H., Wei, W., Wen, L. J., Whisnant, K., White, C. G., Wong, H. L. H., Worcester, E., Wu, D. R., Wu, Q., Wu, W. J., Xia, D. M., Xie, Z. Q., Xing, Z. Z., Xu, H. K., Xu, J. L., Xu, T., Xue, T., Yang, C. G., Yang, L., Yang, Y. Z., Yao, H. F., Ye, M., Yeh, M., Young, B. L., Yu, H. Z., Yu, Z. Y., Yue, B. B., Zavadskyi, V., Zeng, S., Zeng, Y., Zhan, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. Y., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J. L., Zhang, J. W., Zhang, Q. M., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, X. T., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. X., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. P., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, R. Z., Zhou, L., Zhuang, H. L., and Zou, J. H.

Subjects
Nuclear Experiment, High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

Daya Bay presents the first measurement of cosmogenic $^8$He isotope production in liquid scintillator, using an innovative method for identifying cascade decays of $^8$He and its child isotope, $^8$Li. We also measure the production yield of $^9$Li isotopes using well-established methodology. The results, in units of 10$^{-8}\mu^{-1}$g$^{-1}$cm$^{2}$, are 0.307$\pm$0.042, 0.341$\pm$0.040, and 0.546$\pm$0.076 for $^8$He, and 6.73$\pm$0.73, 6.75$\pm$0.70, and 13.74$\pm$0.82 for $^9$Li at average muon energies of 63.9~GeV, 64.7~GeV, and 143.0~GeV, respectively. The measured production rate of $^8$He isotopes is more than an order of magnitude lower than any other measurement of cosmogenic isotope production. It replaces the results of previous attempts to determine the ratio of $^8$He to $^9$Li production that yielded a wide range of limits from 0 to 30\%. The results provide future liquid-scintillator-based experiments with improved ability to predict cosmogenic backgrounds.

Published
2024

4. Charged-current non-standard neutrino interactions at Daya Bay

Author

Daya Bay collaboration, An, F. P., Bai, W. D., Balantekin, A. B., Bishai, M., Blyth, S., Cao, G. F., Cao, J., Chang, J. F., Chang, Y., Chen, H. S., Chen, H. Y., Chen, S. M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. X., Chen, Z. Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y. C., Cheng, Z. K., Cherwinka, J. J., Chu, M. C., Cummings, J. P., Dalager, O., Deng, F. S., Ding, X. Y., Ding, Y. Y., Diwan, M. V., Dohnal, T., Dolzhikov, D., Dove, J., Dugas, K. V., Duyang, H. Y., Dwyer, D. A., Gallo, J. P., Gonchar, M., Gong, G. H., Gong, H., Gu, W. Q., Guo, J. Y., Guo, L., Guo, X. H., Guo, Y. H., Guo, Z., Hackenburg, R. W., Han, Y., Hans, S., He, M., Heeger, K. M., Heng, Y. K., Hor, Y. K., Hsiung, Y. B., Hu, B. Z., Hu, J. R., Hu, T., Hu, Z. J., Huang, H. X., Huang, J. H., Huang, X. T., Huang, Y. B., Huber, P., Jaffe, D. E., Jen, K. L., Ji, X. L., Ji, X. P., Johnson, R. A., Jones, D., Kang, L., Kettell, S. H., Kohn, S., Kramer, M., Langford, T. J., Lee, J., Lee, J. H. C., Lei, R. T., Leitner, R., Leung, J. K. C., Li, F., Li, H. L., Li, J. J., Li, Q. J., Li, R. H., Li, S., Li, S. C., Li, W. D., Li, X. N., Li, X. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, Z. B., Liang, H., Lin, C. J., Lin, G. L., Lin, S., Ling, J. J., Link, J. M., Littenberg, L., Littlejohn, B. R., Liu, J. C., Liu, J. L., Liu, J. X., Lu, C., Lu, H. Q., Luk, K. B., Ma, B. Z., Ma, X. B., Ma, X. Y., Ma, Y. Q., Mandujano, R. C., Marshall, C., McDonald, K. T., McKeown, R. D., Meng, Y., Napolitano, J., Naumov, D., Naumova, E., Nguyen, T. M. T., Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P., Olshevskiy, A., Park, J., Patton, S., Peng, J. C., Pun, C. S. J., Qi, F. Z., Qi, M., Qian, X., Raper, N., Ren, J., Reveco, C. Morales, Rosero, R., Roskovec, B., Ruan, X. C., Russell, B., Steiner, H., Sun, J. L., Tmej, T., Tse, W. -H., Tull, C. E., Tung, Y. C., Viren, B., Vorobel, V., Wang, C. H., Wang, J., Wang, M., Wang, N. Y., Wang, R. G., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. M., Wei, H. Y., Wei, L. H., Wei, W., Wen, L. J., Whisnant, K., White, C. G., Wong, H. L. H., Worcester, E., Wu, D. R., Wu, Q., Wu, W. J., Xia, D. M., Xie, Z. Q., Xing, Z. Z., Xu, H. K., Xu, J. L., Xu, T., Xue, T., Yang, C. G., Yang, L., Yang, Y. Z., Yao, H. F., Ye, M., Yeh, M., Young, B. L., Yu, H. Z., Yu, Z. Y., Yue, B. B., Zavadskyi, V., Zeng, S., Zeng, Y., Zhan, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. Y., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J. L., Zhang, J. W., Zhang, Q. M., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, X. T., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. X., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. P., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, R. Z., Zhou, L., Zhuang, H. L., and Zou, J. H.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

The full data set of the Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment is used to probe the effect of the charged current non-standard interactions (CC-NSI) on neutrino oscillation experiments. Two different approaches are applied and constraints on the corresponding CC-NSI parameters are obtained with the neutrino flux taken from the Huber-Mueller model with a $5\%$ uncertainty. For the quantum mechanics-based approach (QM-NSI), the constraints on the CC-NSI parameters $\epsilon_{e\alpha}$ and $\epsilon_{e\alpha}^{s}$ are extracted with and without the assumption that the effects of the new physics are the same in the production and detection processes, respectively. The approach based on the weak effective field theory (WEFT-NSI) deals with four types of CC-NSI represented by the parameters $[\varepsilon_{X}]_{e\alpha}$. For both approaches, the results for the CC-NSI parameters are shown for cases with various fixed values of the CC-NSI and the Dirac CP-violating phases, and when they are allowed to vary freely. We find that constraints on the QM-NSI parameters $\epsilon_{e\alpha}$ and $\epsilon_{e\alpha}^{s}$ from the Daya Bay experiment alone can reach the order $\mathcal{O}(0.01)$ for the former and $\mathcal{O}(0.1)$ for the latter, while for WEFT-NSI parameters $[\varepsilon_{X}]_{e\alpha}$, we obtain $\mathcal{O}(0.1)$ for both cases., Comment: 25 pages, 16 figures, 6 tables; 36 pages, format changed, references added

Published
2024

5. Charged-current non-standard neutrino interactions at Daya Bay

Author

An, F. P., Bai, W. D., Balantekin, A. B., Bishai, M., Blyth, S., Cao, G. F., Cao, J., Chang, J. F., Chang, Y., Chen, H. S., Chen, H. Y., Chen, S. M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y. X., Chen, Z. Y., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y.-C., Cheng, Z. K., Cherwinka, J. J., Chu, M. C., Cummings, J. P., Dalager, O., Deng, F. S., Ding, X. Y., Ding, Y. Y., Diwan, M. V., Dohnal, T., Dolzhikov, D., Dove, J., Dugas, K. V., Duyang, H. Y., Dwyer, D. A., Gallo, J. P., Gonchar, M., Gong, G. H., Gong, H., Gu, W. Q., Guo, J. Y., Guo, L., Guo, X. H., Guo, Y. H., Guo, Z., Hackenburg, R. W., Han, Y., Hans, S., He, M., Heeger, K. M., Heng, Y. K., Hor, Y. K., Hsiung, Y. B., Hu, B. Z., Hu, J. R., Hu, T., Hu, Z. J., Huang, H. X., Huang, J. H., Huang, X. T., Huang, Y. B., Huber, P., Jaffe, D. E., Jen, K. L., Ji, X. L., Ji, X. P., Johnson, R. A., Jones, D., Kang, L., Kettell, S. H., Kohn, S., Kramer, M., Langford, T. J., Lee, J., Lee, J. H. C., Lei, R. T., Leitner, R., Leung, J. K. C., Li, F., Li, H. L., Li, J. J., Li, Q. J., Li, R. H., Li, S., Li, S., Li, S. C., Li, W. D., Li, X. N., Li, X. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, Z. B., Liang, H., Lin, C. J., Lin, G. L., Lin, S., Ling, J. J., Link, J. M., Littenberg, L., Littlejohn, B. R., Liu, J. C., Liu, J. L., Liu, J. X., Lu, C., Lu, H. Q., Luk, K. B., Ma, B. Z., Ma, X. B., Ma, X. Y., Ma, Y. Q., Mandujano, R. C., Marshall, C., McDonald, K. T., McKeown, R. D., Meng, Y., Napolitano, J., Naumov, D., Naumova, E., Nguyen, T. M. T., Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P., Olshevskiy, A., Park, J., Patton, S., Peng, J. C., Pun, C. S. J., Qi, F. Z., Qi, M., Qian, X., Raper, N., Ren, J., Morales Reveco, C., Rosero, R., Roskovec, B., Ruan, X. C., Russell, B., Steiner, H., Sun, J. L., Tmej, T., Tse, W.-H., Tull, C. E., Tung, Y. C., Viren, B., Vorobel, V., Wang, C. H., Wang, J., Wang, M., Wang, N. Y., Wang, R. G., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. M., Wei, H. Y., Wei, L. H., Wei, W., Wen, L. J., Whisnant, K., White, C. G., Wong, H. L. H., Worcester, E., Wu, D. R., Wu, Q., Wu, W. J., Xia, D. M., Xie, Z. Q., Xing, Z. Z., Xu, H. K., Xu, J. L., Xu, T., Xue, T., Yang, C. G., Yang, L., Yang, Y. Z., Yao, H. F., Ye, M., Yeh, M., Young, B. L., Yu, H. Z., Yu, Z. Y., Yue, B. B., Zavadskyi, V., Zeng, S., Zeng, Y., Zhan, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. Y., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J. L., Zhang, J. W., Zhang, Q. M., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, X. T., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. X., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. P., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, R. Z., Zhou, L., Zhuang, H. L., and Zou, J. H.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. [Impacts of participation in surgical clinical trial on safety and survival outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer].

Author

Zhang HQ, Wang GQ, Wu B, Lin GL, Qiu HZ, Niu BZ, Lu JY, Xu L, Sun XY, Zhang GN, and Xiao Y

Abstract

Objective: To explore the impact on safety and prognosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer participating in surgical clinical research. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from a randomized controlled trial (RELARC study) conducted by the colorectal surgery group at Peking Union Medical College Hospital in which laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) was compared with D2 radical resection for the management of right-sided colon cancer. The eligibility criteria were age 18-75 years, biopsy-proven colon adenocarcinoma, tumor located between the cecum and right 1/3 of the transverse colon, enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT scans suggesting tumor stage T2-T4N0M0 or TanyN+ M0, and having undergone radical surgical treatment from January 2016 to December 2019. Exclusion factors included multiple primary colorectal cancers, preoperative stage T1N0 or enlarged central lymph nodes, tumor involving surrounding organs requiring their resection, definite distant metastasis or otherwise unable to undergo R0 resection, history of any other malignant tumors within previous 5 years, intestinal obstruction, perforation, or gastrointestinal bleeding requiring emergency surgery, and assessed as unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery. Patients who had participated in the RELARC study were included in the RELARC group, whereas those who met the inclusion criteria but refused to participate in the RELAEC study were included in the control group. The main indicators studied were the patient's baseline data, surgery and perioperative conditions, pathological characteristics, adjuvant treatment, and postoperative follow-up (including average frequency of follow-up within the first 3 years) and survival (including 3-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) and 3-year overall survival rate (OS). Differences in these indicators between the RELARC and control groups were compared. Results: The study cohort comprised 290 patients, 173 in the RELARC group (RELARC-CME group, 82; RELARC-D2 group, 91) and 117 in the control group (CME control group, 72; D2 control group, 45). There was a significantly higher proportion of overweight patients (BMI ≥24 kg/m 2 ) in the RELARC-CME than in the CME control group (67.1% [55/82] vs. 33.3% [24/72], χ 2 =17.469, P <0.001). There were no other statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (all P >0.05). No significant disparities were found between the CME and D2 groups in terms of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery, combined organ resection, intraoperative blood transfusion, or intraoperative complications (all P >0.05). There was a trend toward Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher postoperative complications in the RELARC-CME group (24.4% [20/82]) than in the CME control group (18.1% [13/72]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (χ 2 =0.914, P =0.339). Similarly, the difference in this rate did not differ significantly between the RELARC-D2 group (25.3% [23/91]) and D2 control group (24.4% [11/45], χ 2 =0.011, P =0.916). The median duration of postoperative follow-up was significantly shorter in the RELARC groups than in the corresponding control groups. Specifically, the median duration of follow-up was 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) months in the RELARC-CME and 7.2 (6.0, 9.0) months in the CME control group ( Z =-10.608, P <0.001). Similarly, the median duration of follow-up was 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) months in the RELARC-D2 group as opposed to 8.3 (6.6, 9.0) months in the D2 control group ( Z =-10.595, P <0.001). The 3-year DFS rate (91.5%) and OS rate (96.3%) tended to be higher in the RELARC-CME group than in the CME control group (84.7% and 90.3%, respectively). The 3-year DFS rate (87.9%) and OS rate (96.7%) tended to be higher in the RELARC-D2 group than in the D2 control group (81.8% and 88.6%, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant (all P >0.05). Subgroup analysis according to pathological stage revealed that patients in the RELARC-D2 group with pN0 stage achieved a significantly superior 3-year OS rate than did those in the D2 control group (100% vs. 88.9%, P =0.008). We identified no statistically significant differences in survival rates between the remaining subgroups (all P >0.05). Conclusions: A high-quality surgical clinical trial with close follow-up can achieve perioperative safety and a trend toward improved survival outcomes.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Search for a Sub-eV Sterile Neutrino Using Daya Bay's Full Dataset.

Author

An FP, Bai WD, Balantekin AB, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen HY, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Chen ZY, Cheng J, Cheng YC, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deng FS, Ding XY, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Dugas KV, Duyang HY, Dwyer DA, Gallo JP, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Han Y, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Jaffe DE, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones D, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Langford TJ, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nguyen TMT, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Russell B, Steiner H, Sun JL, Tmej T, Tse WH, Tull CE, Tung YC, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wei W, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Wong HLH, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yuan CZ, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JL, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, and Zou JH

Abstract

This Letter presents results of a search for the mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with three active neutrinos based on the full data sample of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, collected during 3158 days of detector operation, which contains 5.55×10^{6} reactor ν[over ¯]&#95;{e} candidates identified as inverse beta-decay interactions followed by neutron capture on gadolinium. The analysis benefits from a doubling of the statistics of our previous result and from improvements of several important systematic uncertainties. No significant oscillation due to mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with active neutrinos was found. Exclusion limits are set by both Feldman-Cousins and CLs methods. Light sterile neutrino mixing with sin^{2}2θ&#95;{14}≳0.01 can be excluded at 95% confidence level in the region of 0.01  eV^{2}≲|Δm&#95;{41}^{2}|≲0.1  eV^{2}. This result represents the world-leading constraints in the region of 2×10^{-4}  eV^{2}≲|Δm&#95;{41}^{2}|≲0.2  eV^{2}.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. [Effects of tumor location and mismatch repair on clinicopathological features and survival for non-metastatic colon cancer: A retrospective, single center, cohort study].

Author

Sun Z, Zhou WX, Li KX, Wu B, Lin GL, Qiu HZ, Niu BZ, Sun XY, Lu JY, Xu L, and Xiao Y

Subjects
Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Female, Middle Aged, DNA Mismatch Repair, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Survival Rate, Cohort Studies, Prognosis, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Proportional Hazards Models, Colonic Neoplasms pathology
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the differences in clinicopathological features of colon cancers and survival between patients with right- versus left-sided colon cancers. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Information on patients with colon cancer from January 2016 to August 2020 was collected from the prospective registry database at Peking Union Medical College Hospital . Primary tumors located in the cecum, ascending colon, and proximal two-thirds of the transverse colon were defined as right-sided colon cancers (RCCs), whereas primary tumors located in the distal third of the transverse colon, descending colon, or sigmoid colon were defined as left-sided colon cancers (LCCs). Clinicopathological features were compared using the χ 2 test or Mann-Whitney U test. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Factors that differed significantly between the two groups were identified by multivariate survival analyses performed with the Cox proportional hazards function. One propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the effects of confounding factors. Results: The study cohort comprised 856 patients, with TNM Stage I disease, 391 (45.7%) with Stage II, and 336 (39.3%) with Stage III, including 442 (51.6%) with LCC and 414 (48.4%) with RCC and 129 (15.1%). Defective mismatch repair (dMMR) was identified in 139 patients (16.2%). Compared with RCC, the proportion of men (274/442 [62.0%] vs. 224/414 [54.1%], χ 2 =5.462, P =0.019), body mass index (24.2 [21.9, 26.6] kg/m 2 vs. 23.2 [21.3, 25.5] kg/m 2 , U =78,789.0, P <0.001), and well/moderately differentiated cancer (412/442 [93.2%] vs. 344/414 [83.1%], χ 2 =22.266, P <0.001) were higher in the LCC than the RCC group. In contrast, the proportion of dMMR (40/442 [9.0%] vs. 99/414 [23.9%], χ 2 =34.721, P <0.001) and combined vascular invasion (106/442[24.0%] vs. 125/414[30.2%], χ 2 =4.186, P =0.041) were lower in the LCC than RCC group. The median follow-up time for all patients was 48 (range 33, 59) months. The log-rank test revealed no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) ( P =0.668) or overall survival (OS) ( P =0.828) between patients with LCC versus RCC. Cox proportional hazards model showed that dMMR was significantly associated with a longer DFS (HR=0.419, 95%CI: 0.204‒0.862, P =0.018), whereas a higher proportion of T3-4 (HR=2.178, 95%CI: 1.089‒4.359, P =0.028), N+ (HR=2.126, 95%CI: 1.443‒3.133, P <0.001), and perineural invasion (HR=1.835, 95%CI: 1.115‒3.020, P =0.017) were associated with poor DFS. Tumor location was not associated with DFS or OS (all P >0.05). Subsequent analysis showed that RCC patients with dMMR had longer DFS than did RCC patients with pMMR (HR=0.338, 95%CI: 0.146‒0.786, P =0.012). However, the difference in OS between the two groups was not statistically significant (HR=0.340, 95%CI:0.103‒1.119, P =0.076). After propensity score matching for independent risk factors for DFS, the log-rank test revealed no significant differences in DFS ( P =0.343) or OS ( P =0.658) between patients with LCC versus RCC, whereas patient with dMMR had better DFS ( P =0.047) and OS ( P =0.040) than did patients with pMMR. Conclusions: Tumor location is associated with differences in clinicopathological features; however, this has no impact on survival. dMMR status is significantly associated with longer survival: this association may be stronger in RCC patients.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results