Search

Background: The health issues experienced by older people can often be severe and complex, and an increasing number are using residential aged care services to meet their care needs. High-quality nursing care is fundamental to the health and safety of aged care residents and is contingent on nurses' accurate assessment, informed decision-making, and delivery of timely interventions. However, the role of the aged care nurse is often challenging, impeded by factors such as understaffing, high workloads, and a lack of access to clinical infrastructure and resources. When these challenges mount, residents are put at greater risk of adverse outcomes, such as avoidable clinical deterioration and hospital transfers. This study describes the adaptation and implementation of the emergency nursing framework, HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red Flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, reassessment, communication and plan)—a tool to assist nurses' assessment, decision-making and care in residential aged care. Methods: The HIRAID® framework will be adapted for residential aged care using a real-time Delphi and panel of aged care and nursing experts. The co-designed HIRAID® Aged Care framework will be trialled in 23 residential aged care homes in Sydney, Australia, in a modified stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial design. All homes will be randomised into one of four clusters. Outcomes of interest include the rate of clinical deterioration events resulting from nurses' actions, the rate of hospital transfers determined to be inappropriate, performance against the national mandatory aged care quality indicators, resident satisfaction with care, nurse and medical staff satisfaction with communication, and the quality of nursing documentation. These outcomes will be evaluated using a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely collected resident data, expert assessments of facility documentation events against validated criteria, and pre- and post-intervention surveys of residents, family carers, nurses, and medical staff. Discussion: This protocol describes a pragmatic trial that aims to translate an evidence-based framework from the emergency care context into residential aged care. The adapted HIRAID® Aged Care framework will be the first of its kind to standardise and guide holistic nursing assessment, decision-making, and documentation in residential aged care in Australia. Ethics and dissemination: This research has been approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee: 2023/ETH00523. A waiver of consent has been approved to access resident health data and nursing documentation at each participating site. Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12623000481673. Registered 12 May 2023. Protocol version: Version 1.0 6 February 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Implementing evidence that changes practice in emergency departments (EDs) is notoriously difficult due to well-established barriers including high levels of uncertainty arising from undifferentiated nature of ED patients, resource shortages, workload unpredictability, high staff turnover, and a constantly changing environment. We developed and implemented a behaviour-change informed strategy to mitigate these barriers for a clinical trial to implement the evidence-based emergency nursing framework HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication, and reassessment) to reduce clinical variation, and increase safety and quality of emergency nursing care. Aim: To evaluate the behaviour-change-informed HIRAID® implementation strategy on reach, effectiveness, adoption, quality (dose, fidelity) and maintenance (sustainability). Methods: An effectiveness-implementation hybrid design including a step–wedge cluster randomised control trial (SW-cRCT) was used to implement HIRAID® with 1300 + emergency nurses across 29 Australian rural, regional, and metropolitan EDs. Evaluation of our behaviour-change informed strategy was informed by the RE-AIM Scoring Instrument and measured using data from (i) a post HIRAID® implementation emergency nurse survey, (ii) HIRAID® Instructor surveys, and (iii) twelve-week and 6-month documentation audits. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics to determine the level of each component of RE-AIM achieved. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis and used to understand the 'how' and 'why' of quantitative results. Results: HIRAID® was implemented in all 29 EDs, with 145 nurses undertaking instructor training and 1123 (82%) completing all four components of provider training at 12 weeks post-implementation. Modifications to the behaviour-change informed strategy were minimal. The strategy was largely used as intended with 100% dose and very high fidelity. We achieved extremely high individual sustainability (95% use of HIRAID® documentation templates) at 6 months and 100% setting sustainability at 3 years. Conclusion: The behaviour-change informed strategy for the emergency nursing framework HIRAID® in rural, regional, and metropolitan Australia was highly successful with extremely high reach and adoption, dose, fidelity, individual and setting sustainability across substantially variable clinical contexts. Trial registration: ANZCTR, ACTRN12621001456842. Registered 25 October 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To reduce perceived unnecessary resource use, we modified our tiered trauma response. If a patient was not physiologically compromised, surgical registrar attendance was not mandated. We investigated the effect of this change on missed injury, unplanned representation to ED, diagnostic imaging rates and staff satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective case series study assessing the 3‐month period before and after the intervention was conducted. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between ordering of computerised tomography (CT) and ED length of stay (LOS), injury severity (ISS), age, surgical review and admission. A staff survey was conducted to investigate staff perceptions of the practice change. Free text data were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results: There were 105 patients in the control and 166 in the intervention group and their mean (SD) ISS was the same (ISS [SD] = 4 [±4] [P = 0.608]). A higher proportion of the control group were admitted (56.3% vs 42.2% [P = 0.032]) and they had a shorter ED LOS (274 min [202–456] vs 326 min [225–560], P = 0.044). The rate of missed injury was unchanged. A surgical review resulted in a 26‐fold increase in receipt of a whole‐body CT scan (odds ratio = 26.89, 95% confidence interval = 3.31–218.17). Just over half of survey respondents felt the change was safe (54.4%), and more surgical (90%) than ED staff (69%) reported the change as positive. Conclusion: The removal of the surgical registrar from the initial trauma standby response did not result in any adverse events, reduced admissions, pathology and imaging, but resulted in an increased ED LOS and time to surgical review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01383-7.Correction: Implement Sci 19, 54 (2024)https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01383-7Following the publication of the Original Article [[1]], the authors identified errors in Table 2. In the Table 2, Cluster 3, commencement date should read 08/08/2022 instead of 08/08/2023.The Original Article has been corrected.By Kate Curtis; Belinda Kennedy; Julie Considine; Margaret Murphy; Mary K. Lam; Christina Aggar; Margaret Fry; Ramon Z. Shaban and Sarah KouroucheReported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author [Extracted from the article]

Objective Methods Results Conclusion To evaluate the use and impact of pathology tests in patients who present to the ED with mental health‐related complaints. The primary objective is to measure the proportion of patients undergoing pathology tests and assess whether these tests trigger a change in management.In this retrospective study, we reviewed all recorded mental health presentations to our regional ED between January and June 2021. Patient characteristics, pathology tests, subsequent change in management, treatment costs and time to Emergency Physician and Psychiatrist were extracted. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were used to explore associations between variables of interest, ED length of stay (LOS) and change in management.Of 37 900 ED visits, 1462 (3.9%) were mental health‐related presentations. Pathology tests were conducted in 47.7% of cases, with 3% leading to a change in management. Pathology tests were associated with increased treatment costs (45% increase for blood tests, 17% for urine), and increased ED LOS (48%). Patients with coexisting medical conditions were three times more likely to have a change in management.Pathology tests should be reserved for patients with high‐risk features and based on clinical assessment. Strategic use of pathology tests could avoid unnecessary delays and costs, enhancing patient care in mental health‐related ED presentations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Aim Design Methods Results Conclusions Impact Reporting Method Patient or Public Contribution Trial Registration To develop an evidence‐driven, behaviour change focused strategy to maximise implementation and uptake of HIRAID (History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) in 30 Australian rural, regional and metropolitan emergency departments.An embedded, mixed‐methods study.This study is the first phase of a step‐wedge cluster randomised control trial of HIRAID involving over 1300 emergency nurses. Concurrent quantitative and qualitative data were collected via an electronic survey sent to all nurses to identify preliminary barriers and enablers to HIRAID implementation. The survey was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, which is a synthesis of behavioural change theories that applies the science of intervention implementation in health care to effect change. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data with inductive content analysis. Data were then integrated to generate barriers and enablers to HIRAID implementation which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Corresponding intervention functions and Behaviour Change techniques were selected and an overarching implementation strategy was developed through stakeholder consultation and application of the APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness, Acceptability, Side‐effects/safety and Equity).Six barriers to HIRAID implementation were identified by 670 respondents (response rate ~58%) representing all 30 sites: (i) lack of knowledge about HIRAID; (ii) high workload, (iii) lack of belief anything would change; (iv) not suitable for workplace; (v), uncertainty about what to do and (vi) lack of support or time for education. The three enablers were as follows: (i) willingness to learn and adopt something new; (ii) recognition of the need for something new and (iii) wanting to do what is best for patient care. The 10 corresponding domains were mapped to seven intervention functions, 21 behaviour change techniques and 45 mechanisms. The major components of the implementation strategy were a scaffolded education programme, clinical support and environmental modifications.A systematic process guided by the behaviour change wheel resulted in the generation of a multifaceted implementation strategy to implement HIRAID across rural, regional and metropolitan emergency departments. Implementation fidelity, reach and impact now require evaluation. HIRAID emergency nursing assessment framework reduced clinical deterioration relating to emergency care and improved self‐confidence and documentation in emergency departments in pilot studies. Successful implementation of any intervention in the emergency department is notoriously difficult due to workload unpredictability, the undifferentiated nature of patients and high staff turnover. Key barriers and enablers were identified, and a successful implementation strategy was developed. This study uses theoretical frameworks to identify barriers and enablers to develop a data‐driven, behavioural‐focused implementation strategy to optimise the uptake of HIRAID in geographically diverse emergency departments which can be used to inform future implementation efforts involving emergency nurses. The CROSS reporting method (Supporting Information S3) was used to adhere to EQUATOR guidelines.No Patient or Public Contribution.Australian New Zealand; Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number: ACTRN12621001456842, registered 25/10/2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]