Search

This article, titled "EP05.12: Prenatal imaging and clinical outcomes in isolated congenital aqueductal stenosis: a single-centre retrospective cohort study," explores the prenatal imaging measures, clinical course, and outcomes associated with isolated congenital aqueductal stenosis (CAS). CAS is a known cause of obstructive hydrocephalus and can lead to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. The study included 22 patients with isolated CAS who were imaged prenatally and had at least one year of clinical follow-up. The findings indicate that there is a progressive increase in ventricular sizes from initial imaging to delivery, with most children requiring cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures and experiencing neurodevelopmental impairment. [Extracted from the article]

Fetal teratomas, though rare, represent a significant proportion of tumors arising during fetal development. These tumors arise from pluripotent cells and can present in varying degrees of severity, ranging from incidental findings to life-threatening conditions. Prenatal imaging, via ultrasound and MRI, is necessary for diagnosis and risk assessment. The management of fetal teratomas, particularly those associated with complications like hydrops or airway obstruction, often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Interventions such as ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedures and minimally invasive alternatives have emerged as critical tools to improve neonatal outcomes in severe cases. Despite advances in fetal therapies, careful prenatal monitoring and individualized management remain essential, especially for tumors with high vascularity or those that risk compromising cardiac output. This review explores the diagnostic methods, management strategies, and outcomes associated with fetal teratomas, highlighting recent advancements that contribute to improving survival and reducing morbidity in affected neonates.

Background: Obesity rates have significantly increased globally, affecting up to 40% of women of childbearing age in the United States. While prenatal repair of open fetal spina bifida has shown improved outcomes, most fetal surgery centers exclude patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m 2 based on criteria from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial. This exclusion raises concerns about healthcare equity and highlights a significant knowledge gap regarding the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Objective: To review the current state of knowledge regarding open fetal surgery for fetal spina bifida in patients with obesity, focusing on safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, covering articles from the inception of the databases to April 2024. Studies discussing fetal surgery for neural tube defects and documenting BMI measurements and their impact on surgical outcomes, published in peer-reviewed journals, and available in English were included. Quantitative data were extracted into an Excel sheet, and data synthesis was conducted using the R programming language (version 4.3.3). Results: Three retrospective studies examining outcomes of prenatal open spina bifida repair in a total of 43 patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2 were identified. These studies did not report significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes compared to patients with lower BMIs. Our pooled analysis revealed a perinatal mortality rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.76-18.92%), with 28.0% (95% CI: 14.0-48.2%) experiencing the premature rupture of membranes and 82.0% (95% CI: 29.2-98.0%) delivering preterm (<37 weeks). Membrane separation was reported in 10.3% of cases (95% CI: 3.3-27.7%), the mean gestational age at birth was 34.3 weeks (95% CI: 32.3-36.3), and the average birth weight was 2651.5 g (95% CI: 2473.7-2829.4). Additionally, 40.1% (95% CI: 23.1-60.0%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Conclusion: While current evidence suggests that fetal spina bifida repair may be feasible in patients with obesity, significant limitations in the existing body of research were identified. These include small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Such research is crucial for developing evidence-based guidelines, improving clinical outcomes, and addressing healthcare disparities in this growing patient population with obesity.

Objective: The objective was to examine the association between poor ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations in young patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including women aged 17-39 who underwent fresh embryo transfer and delivered a singleton neonate at a single center (pre-implantation genetic testing excluded) (2007-2022). Patients were classified as one of the following categories: poor responders-daily follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥ 150 IU yielding ≤ 3 retrieved oocytes; normal responders-4-15 oocytes; and high responders with ≥16 oocytes. The primary outcome was a composite of pre-eclampsia (mild or severe), small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm birth (<37 weeks). We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders. Results: Overall, 507 women met the inclusion criteria. Of them, there were 44 (8.68%) poor responders, 342 (67.46%) normal responders, and 121 (23.87%) high responders. Poor responders, compared to normal and high responders, were characterized by a higher maternal age (34.64 ± 4.01 vs. 31.4 ± 5.04 vs. 30.01 ± 4.93, p < 0.001, respectively) and total FSH dosage (3028.41 ± 1792.05 IU vs. 2375.11 ± 1394.05 IU vs. 1869.31 ± 1089.63 IU, p < 0.001). The perinatal outcomes examined, including cesarean delivery (CD) rate and the composite outcome, were comparable between groups. Using multivariable logistic regression and adjusting for ovarian response group, maternal age, nulliparity, and estradiol level and endometrial thickness before ovulation triggering, poor response was not associated with CD rate or the composite outcome, with maternal age associated with CD ( p = 0.005), and nulliparity with the composite outcome ( p = 0.007). Similar results were obtained when comparing poor responders to each other group separately or to all other responders. Conclusions: Poor ovarian response is not associated with increased adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the prenatal diagnosis of closed dysraphism (CD) and its correlation with postnatal findings and neonatal adverse outcomes., Methods: A retrospective cohort study including pregnancies diagsnosed with fetal CD by prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a single tertiary center between September 2011 and July 2021., Results: CD was diagnosed prenatally and confirmed postnatally in 12 fetuses. The mean gestational age of prenatal imaging was 24.2 weeks, in 17% the head circumference was ≤fifth percentile and in 25% the cerebellar diameter was ≤fifth percentile. US findings included banana sign in 17%, and lemon sign in 33%. On MRI, posterior fossa anomalies were seen in 33% of cases, with hindbrain herniation below the foramen magnum in two cases. Mean clivus-supraocciput angle (CSA) was 74°. Additional anomalies outside the CNS were observed in 50%. Abnormal foot position was demonstrated prenatally in 17%. Neurogenic bladder was present in 90% of patients after birth., Conclusion: Arnold Chiari II malformation and impaired motor function can be present on prenatal imaging of fetuses with CD and may be associated with a specific type of CD. Prenatal distinction of CD can be challenging. Associated extra CNS anomalies are frequent and the rate of neurogenic urinary tract dysfunction is high., (© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: There are limited data to guide the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Currently, what is known is largely based on case reports or series and cohort studies., Objective: This study aimed to systematically collect and classify expert opinions and achieve consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of vasa previa using focus group discussions and a Delphi technique., Study Design: A 4-round focus group discussion and a 3-round Delphi survey of an international panel of experts on vasa previa were conducted. Experts were selected on the basis of their publication record on vasa previa. First, we convened a focus group discussion panel of 20 experts and agreed on which issues were unresolved in the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. A 3-round anonymous electronic survey was then sent to the full expert panel. Survey questions were presented on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa, which the experts were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (from "strongly disagree"=1 to "strongly agree"=5). Consensus was defined as a median score of 5. Following responses to each round, any statements that had median scores of ≤3 were deemed to have had no consensus and were excluded. Statements with a median score of 4 were revised and re-presented to the experts in the next round. Consensus and nonconsensus statements were then aggregated., Results: A total of 68 international experts were invited to participate in the study, of which 57 participated. Experts were from 13 countries on 5 continents and have contributed to >80% of published cohort studies on vasa previa, as well as national and international society guidelines. Completion rates were 84%, 93%, and 91% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively, and 71% completed all 3 rounds. The panel reached a consensus on 26 statements regarding the diagnosis and key points of management of vasa previa, including the following: (1) although there is no agreement on the distance between the fetal vessels and the cervical internal os to define vasa previa, the definition should not be limited to a 2-cm distance; (2) all pregnancies should be screened for vasa previa with routine examination for placental cord insertion and a color Doppler sweep of the region over the cervix at the second-trimester anatomy scan; (3) when a low-lying placenta or placenta previa is found in the second trimester, a transvaginal ultrasound with Doppler should be performed at approximately 32 weeks to rule out vasa previa; (4) outpatient management of asymptomatic patients without risk factors for preterm birth is reasonable; (5) asymptomatic patients with vasa previa should be delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation; and (6) there was no agreement on routine hospitalization, avoidance of intercourse, or use of 3-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of vasa previa., Conclusion: Through focus group discussion and a Delphi process, an international expert panel reached consensus on the definition, screening, clinical management, and timing of delivery in vasa previa, which could inform the development of new clinical guidelines., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a protein kinase that plays a crucial role in regulating cellular growth, metabolism, and survival. Although there is no absolute contraindication for the use of mTOR inhibitors during pregnancy, the specific fetal effects remain unknown. Available data from the past 2 decades have examined the use of mTOR inhibitors during pregnancy in patients with solid organ transplantation, showing no clear link to fetal complications or structural abnormalities. Recently, a handful of case reports and series have described transplacental therapy of mTOR inhibitors to control symptomatic and complicated pathologies in the fetus. The effect of these agents includes a significant reduction in lesion size in the fetus and a reduced need for mechanical ventilation in neonates. In this context, we delve into the potential of mTOR inhibitors as in-utero therapy for fetal abnormalities, with a primary focus on lymphatic malformation (LM) and cardiac rhabdomyoma (CR). While preliminary reports underscore the efficacy of mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of fetal CR and fetal brain lesions associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, chylothorax, and LMs, additional investigation and clinical trials are essential to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of these medications., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)