Search

Anecdotal evidence from preliminary observations has noted multiple instances where osteoporosis is present in elderly patients before the clinical detection of bowel disease, even in the absence of overt gastrointestinal symptoms. However, any potential association between these conditions remains to be further investigated. This computed tomography (CT) study investigates whether patients with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than age and sex matched controls. BMD was measured by drawing 3D regions of interest in the bone marrow of the L1-L3 vertebral bodies on CT scans of each of 37 GI perforations and matched controls. Spectrometric calibration of Hounsfield units to the mineral scale was performed with density measurements in the paravertebral muscles (erector spinae) and subcutaneous adipose tissue. The mean BMD of patients with GI perforation (135.9 ± 24.3 mg/ml) was significantly lower than that of controls (96.9 ± 27.5 mg/ml, p < 0.05). The calculated T-and Z-scores of bone mineral density were also significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05 for each) and were - 2.9 (± 0.90) and - 0.8 (± 0.91) in patients with GI perforation and - 1.6 (± 0.83) and 0 (± 0.96) in the control group, respectively. The results imply that patients with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than age-and sex-matched controls, posing the question whether the screening and aggressive management of osteoporosis is high-risk populations for gastrointestinal perforation can prevent gastrointestinal complications in targeted populations., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: The Pipeline Embolization Device is a safe and effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. The newer Pipeline generations have received structural refinements and a surface modification to improve deliverability, procedural safety, and angiographic outcomes. This multicenter study evaluated the clinical safety and efficacy of the 2 surface-modified Pipeline iterations, Pipeline Vantage and Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology (PFS)., Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients treated between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed for aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic outcomes. The safety end point was the rate of procedural and postprocedural major neurologic events occurring during the hospital stay. The efficacy end point was the rate of complete occlusion at last follow-up., Results: One hundred forty-one patients underwent 112 Pipeline Vantage procedures and 32 PFS procedures for 147 aneurysms with a mean size of 8.0 (SD, 5.9) mm (11% ruptured, 16% posterior circulation, 18% nonsaccular morphology). All procedures were technically successful with a mean of 1.2 devices implanted. Balloon angioplasty was required in 20/144 (13.9%) procedures. Major neurologic adverse events occurred in 6/144 (4.2%) procedures (all ischemic stroke), resulting in death in 2 (1.4%) patients. There were no hemorrhagic complications. At a mean of 11 months, complete occlusion was achieved in 85/112 (75.9%) aneurysms, 15/112 (13.4%) had an entry remnant, and 12/112 (10.7%) had an aneurysm remnant., Conclusions: The results demonstrate high feasibility, procedural safety, and efficacy of the surface-modified Pipeline flow diverters., (© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background: Diagnosing myocarditis relies on multimodal data, including cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), clinical symptoms, and blood values. The correct interpretation and integration of CMR findings require radiological expertise and knowledge. We aimed to investigate the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), a large language model, for report-based medical decision-making in the context of cardiac MRI for suspected myocarditis., Methods: This retrospective study includes CMR reports from 396 patients with suspected myocarditis and eight centers, respectively. CMR reports and patient data including blood values, age, and further clinical information were provided to GPT-4 and radiologists with 1 (resident 1), 2 (resident 2), and 4 years (resident 3) of experience in CMR and knowledge of the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria. The final impression of the report regarding the radiological assessment of whether myocarditis is present or not was not provided. The performance of Generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4) and the human readers were compared to a consensus reading (two board-certified radiologists with 8 and 10 years of experience in CMR). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated., Results: GPT-4 yielded an accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 78%, which was comparable to the physician with 1 year of experience (R1: 86%, 90%, 84%, p = 0.14) and lower than that of more experienced physicians (R2: 89%, 86%, 91%, p = 0.007 and R3: 91%, 85%, 96%, p < 0.001). GPT-4 and human readers showed a higher diagnostic performance when results from T1- and T2-mapping sequences were part of the reports, for residents 1 and 3 with statistical significance (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively)., Conclusion: GPT-4 yielded good accuracy for diagnosing myocarditis based on CMR reports in a large dataset from multiple centers and therefore holds the potential to serve as a diagnostic decision-supporting tool in this capacity, particularly for less experienced physicians. Further studies are required to explore the full potential and elucidate educational aspects of the integration of large language models in medical decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Maintz received speaker’s honoraria from Philips Healthcare. Jan Borggrefe received speaker’s honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Simon Lennartz is a member of Editorial Board of Radiology and a Senior Deputy Editor of Radiology in Training. Otherwise, the authors declare no conflicts of interest and had full control over all data, and guarantee correctness., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (PVED) is a novel coated flow diverter with reduced wire diameters to improve neoendothelialization and stent porosity. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of the PVED based on the current literature., Methods: Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The random effects model was used to calculate estimates with major neurological complications within 30 days of treatment as the primary safety endpoint and ≤1-year complete occlusion rate as the primary efficacy endpoint., Results: Six single-arm studies (5 retrospective, 1 prospective) with 392 patients and 439 aneurysms (6.8% ruptured) were included. Antiplatelet regimens varied, but dual antiplatelet therapy was administered in the majority. The pooled technical success rate was 99.0% (95%CI, 98.0%-100%) with an average of 1.2 devices implanted per procedure. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 17.0% (95%CI, 6.4-27.6%) and adjunctive coiling in 28.0% (95%CI, 17.8-38.2%), with significant heterogeneity for both variables. Pooled estimates for major neurological complications were 3.5% (95%CI, 1.7%-5.2%) with total ischemic events in 4.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-6.6%) and hemorrhagic events in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-1.9%). The rate of complete angiographic occlusion was 75.7% (95%CI, 70.7%-80.6%) at a mean follow-up of 7 months, with in-stent stenoses in 8.1% (95%CI, 4.5%-11.8%)., Conclusions: The safety and efficacy profile of the PVED appears comparable to competing devices, with potentially fewer complications than first-generation flow diverters. Long-term and comparative studies are needed to further confirm these results., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestSH received travel support by Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). DZ is on the speaker's bureau of Philips (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and lecturer for Amboss GmbH (Cologne, Germany). TL serves or previously served as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), CERUS Endovascular (Fremont, CA, USA), Phenox (Bochum, Germany), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). CK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Background: To investigate the feasibility of the large language model (LLM) ChatGPT for classifying liver lesions according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) based on MRI reports, and to compare classification performance on structured vs. unstructured reports., Methods: LI-RADS classifiable liver lesions were included from German written structured and unstructured MRI reports with report of size, location, and arterial phase contrast enhancement as minimum inclusion requirements. The findings sections of the reports were propagated to ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), which was instructed to determine LI-RADS scores for each classifiable liver lesion. Ground truth was established by two radiologists in consensus. Agreement between ground truth and ChatGPT was assessed with Cohen's kappa. Test-retest reliability was assessed by passing a subset of n  = 50 lesions five times to ChatGPT, using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: 205 MRIs from 150 patients were included. The accuracy of ChatGPT at determining LI-RADS categories was poor (53% and 44% on unstructured and structured reports). The agreement to the ground truth was higher ( k  = 0.51 and k  = 0.44), the mean absolute error in LI-RADS scores was lower (0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.7, p  < 0.05), and the test-retest reliability was higher (ICC = 0.81 vs. 0.50), in free-text compared to structured reports, respectively, although structured reports comprised the minimum required imaging features significantly more frequently (Chi-square test, p  < 0.05)., Conclusions: ChatGPT attained only low accuracy when asked to determine LI-RADS scores from liver imaging reports. The superior accuracy and consistency throughout free-text reports might relate to ChatGPT's training process., Clinical Relevance Statement: Our study indicates both the necessity of optimization of LLMs for structured clinical data input and the potential of LLMs for creating machine-readable labels based on large free-text radiological databases., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Fervers, Hahnfeldt, Kottlors, Wagner, Maintz, Pinto dos Santos, Lennartz and Persigehl.)

Purpose: Radiological reporting is transitioning to quantitative analysis, requiring large-scale multi-center validation of biomarkers. A major prerequisite and bottleneck for this task is the voxelwise annotation of image data, which is time-consuming for large cohorts. In this study, we propose an iterative training workflow to support and facilitate such segmentation tasks, specifically for high-resolution thoracic CT data., Methods: Our study included 132 thoracic CT scans from clinical practice, annotated by 13 radiologists. In three iterative training experiments, we aimed to improve and accelerate segmentation of the heart and mediastinum. Each experiment started with manual segmentation of 5-25 CT scans, which served as training data for a nnU-Net. Further iterations incorporated AI pre-segmentation and human correction to improve accuracy, accelerate the annotation process, and reduce human involvement over time., Results: Results showed consistent improvement in AI model quality with each iteration. Resampled datasets improved the Dice similarity coefficients for both the heart (DCS 0.91 [0.88; 0.92]) and the mediastinum (DCS 0.95 [0.94; 0.95]). Our AI models reduced human interaction time by 50 % for heart and 70 % for mediastinum segmentation in the most potent iteration. A model trained on only five datasets achieved satisfactory results (DCS > 0.90)., Conclusions: The iterative training workflow provides an efficient method for training AI-based segmentation models in multi-center studies, improving accuracy over time and simultaneously reducing human intervention. Future work will explore the use of fewer initial datasets and additional pre-processing methods to enhance model quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Multi-sac aneurysms (MSAs) are not uncommon, but studies on their management are scarce. This study aims to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MSAs treated with either clipping or coiling after interdisciplinary case discussion at our center., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MSAs treated by microsurgical clipping, coiling, or stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Treatment modalities, complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Major neurological events were defined as a safety endpoint and complete occlusion as an efficacy endpoint., Results: Ninety patients (mean age, 53.2±11.0 years; 73 [81.1%] females) with MSAs met our inclusion criteria (clipping, 50; coiling, 19; SAC, 21). Most aneurysms were located in the middle cerebral artery (48.9%). All clipping procedures were technically successful, but endovascular treatment failed in 1 coiling case, and a switch from coiling to SAC was required in 2 cases. The major event rates were 4.0% after clipping (1 major stroke and 1 intracranial hemorrhage) and 0% after endovascular therapy (P=0.667). At mid-term angiographic follow-up (mean 12.0±8.9 months), all 37 followed clipped aneurysms were completely occluded, compared to 8/17 (41.7%) after coiling and 11/15 (73.3%) after SAC (P<0.001). Coiling was significantly associated with incomplete occlusion in the adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 11.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-52.6; P=0.001)., Conclusion: Both endovascular and surgical treatment were feasible and safe for MSAs. As coiling was associated with comparatively high recanalization rates, endovascular treatment may be preferred with stent support.

Objective: There are few studies on flow diverters with diameters >5 mm. We present our preliminary experience with the 5.5-8 mm Derivo Embolization Device (DED) implants for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms., Methods: A consecutive series of 26 patients (median age: 60 years) treated for 32 aneurysms in 26 procedures was retrospectively analyzed for procedural characteristics, complications, and mid-term angiographic results., Results: The median aneurysm size was 10.5 mm, 2 of 30 (6%) aneurysms were ruptured and 9 (28%) had a fusiform or dissecting morphology. DED implantation was performed in the internal carotid artery in 18 of 26 (69%) procedures and in the vertebrobasilar artery in 8 (31%). Device deployment failed in 1 (4%) procedure. The 7 and 8 mm implants were successfully deployed in 5 cases. Additional balloon angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in 3 (12%) cases to improve wall apposition. Complications included 1 (4%) major stroke and 2 (8%) minor strokes. Angiographic follow up at a mean of 6 months showed complete occlusion in 8 of30 (27%) aneurysms and favorable occlusion in 14 (47%)., Conclusions: The use of large diameter DEDs was safe and feasible. The mid-term occlusion rates are acceptable considering the complex subset of aneurysms studied. Further studies are warranted to define the indications for large-diameter DEDs and to evaluate their long-term efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsCK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). DZ is on the speaker’s bureau of Philips (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and lecturer for Amboss GmbH (Cologne, Germany). The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: This multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters (cFDs) for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms., Methods: Consecutive patients treated with different cFDs for ruptured aneurysms under tirofiban at eight neurovascular centers between 2016 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of patients were loaded with dual antiplatelet therapy after the treatment. Aneurysm occlusion was determined using the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale. Primary outcome measures were major procedural complications and aneurysmal rebleeding during hospitalization., Results: The study included 60 aneurysms (posterior circulation: 28 (47%)) with a mean size of 5.8±4.7 mm. Aneurysm morphology was saccular in 28 (47%), blister-like in 12 (20%), dissecting in 13 (22%), and fusiform in 7 (12%). Technical success was 100% with a mean of 1.1 cFDs implanted per aneurysm. Adjunctive coiling was performed in 11 (18%) aneurysms. Immediate contrast retention was observed in 45 (75%) aneurysms. There was 1 (2%) major procedural complication (a major stroke, eventually leading to death) and no aneurysmal rebleeding. A good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was achieved in 40 (67%) patients. At a mean follow-up of 6 months, 27/34 (79%) aneurysms were completely occluded (OKM D), 3/34 (9%) had an entry remnant (OKM C), and 4/34 (12%) had residual filling (OKM A or B). There was 1 (3%) severe in-stent stenosis during follow-up that was treated with balloon angioplasty., Conclusions: Treatment of ruptured aneurysms with cFDs was reasonably safe and efficient and thus represents a valid treatment option, especially for complex cases., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). TL previously served as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), CERUS Endovascular (Fremont, CA, USA), Phenox (Bochum, Germany), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). DZ is on the speaker’s bureau of Philips (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and lecturer for Amboss GmbH (Cologne, Germany). FD serves as consultant/ proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical, Balt (Irvine, CA, USA), Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson (Irvine, CA, USA); received speakers honoraria from Cerenovus/ Johnson&Johnson, Acandis, Asahi (Tokyo, Japan), Q Apel (Fremont, CA, USA), Penumbra (Alameda, CA, USA), Medtronic, Stryker; received scientific grants from Cerenovus/ Johnson&Johnson. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background Errors in radiology reports may occur because of resident-to-attending discrepancies, speech recognition inaccuracies, and large workload. Large language models, such as GPT-4 (ChatGPT; OpenAI), may assist in generating reports. Purpose To assess effectiveness of GPT-4 in identifying common errors in radiology reports, focusing on performance, time, and cost-efficiency. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 200 radiology reports (radiography and cross-sectional imaging [CT and MRI]) were compiled between June 2023 and December 2023 at one institution. There were 150 errors from five common error categories (omission, insertion, spelling, side confusion, and other) intentionally inserted into 100 of the reports and used as the reference standard. Six radiologists (two senior radiologists, two attending physicians, and two residents) and GPT-4 were tasked with detecting these errors. Overall error detection performance, error detection in the five error categories, and reading time were assessed using Wald χ 2 tests and paired-sample t tests. Results GPT-4 (detection rate, 82.7%;124 of 150; 95% CI: 75.8, 87.9) matched the average detection performance of radiologists independent of their experience (senior radiologists, 89.3% [134 of 150; 95% CI: 83.4, 93.3]; attending physicians, 80.0% [120 of 150; 95% CI: 72.9, 85.6]; residents, 80.0% [120 of 150; 95% CI: 72.9, 85.6]; P value range, .522-.99). One senior radiologist outperformed GPT-4 (detection rate, 94.7%; 142 of 150; 95% CI: 89.8, 97.3; P = .006). GPT-4 required less processing time per radiology report than the fastest human reader in the study (mean reading time, 3.5 seconds ± 0.5 [SD] vs 25.1 seconds ± 20.1, respectively; P < .001; Cohen d = -1.08). The use of GPT-4 resulted in lower mean correction cost per report than the most cost-efficient radiologist ($0.03 ± 0.01 vs $0.42 ± 0.41; P < .001; Cohen d = -1.12). Conclusion The radiology report error detection rate of GPT-4 was comparable with that of radiologists, potentially reducing work hours and cost. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Forman in this issue.

Intra-arterial nimodipine administration is a widely used rescue therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although it is known that its effect sets in with delay, there is little evidence in current literature. Our aim was to prove that the maximal vasodilatory effect is underestimated in direct angiographic controls. We reviewed all cases of intra-arterial nimodipine treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage-related cerebral vasospasm between January 2021 and December 2022. Inclusion criteria were availability of digital subtraction angiography runs before and after nimodipine administration and a delayed run for the most affected vessel at the end of the procedure to decide on further escalation of therapy. We evaluated nimodipine dose, timing of administration and vessel diameters. Delayed runs were performed in 32 cases (19 patients) with a mean delay of 37.6 (± 16.6) min after nimodipine administration and a mean total nimodipine dose of 4.7 (± 1.2) mg. Vessel dilation was more pronounced in delayed vs. immediate controls, with greater changes in spastic vessel segments (n = 31: 113.5 (± 78.5%) vs. 32.2% (± 27.9%), p < 0.0001) vs. non-spastic vessel segments (n = 32: 23.1% (± 13.5%) vs. 13.3% (± 10.7%), p < 0.0001). In conclusion intra-arterially administered nimodipine seems to exert a delayed vasodilatory effect, which should be considered before escalation of therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose:  Due to the increasing number of COVID-19 infections since spring 2020 the patient care workflow underwent changes in Germany. To minimize face-to-face exposure and reduce infection risk, non-time-critical elective medical procedures were postponed. Since ultrasound examinations include non-time-critical elective examinations and often can be substituted by other imaging modalities not requiring direct patient contact, the number of examinations has declined significantly. The aim of this study is to quantify the baseline number of ultrasound examinations in the years before, during, and in the early post-pandemic period of the COVID-19 pandemic (since January 2015 to September 2023), and to measure the number of examinations at different German university hospitals., Materials and Methods:  The number of examinations was assessed based on a web-based database at all participating clinics at the indicated time points., Results:  N = 288 562 sonographic examinations from four sites were included in the present investigation. From January 2020 to June 2020, a significantly lower number of examinations of n = 591.21 vs. 698.43 (p = 0.01) per month and included center was performed. Also, excluding the initial pandemic period until June 2020, significantly fewer ultrasound examinations were performed compared to pre-pandemic years 648.1 vs. 698.4 (p < 0.05), per month and included center, while here differences between the individual centers were observed. In the late phase of the pandemic (n = 681.96) and in the post-pandemic phase (as defined by the WHO criteria from May 2023; n = 739.95), the number of sonographic examinations returned to pre-pandemic levels., Conclusion:  The decline in the number of sonographic examinations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was initially largely intentional and can be illustrated quantitatively. After an initial abrupt decline in sonographic examinations, the pre-pandemic levels could not be reached for a long time, which could be due to restructuring of patient care and follow-up treatment. In the post-pandemic phase, the pre-pandemic level has been achieved again. The reasons for a prolonged reduction in ultrasound examinations are discussed in this article., Key Points:   · During the pandemic, significantly fewer ultrasound examinations were performed in the included centers.. · The number of examinations could not be reach the pre-pandemic level for a long time, which could be due to restructuring of patient care and follow-up treatment.. · Identifying causes for sonographic exam reduction is crucial in pandemic preparedness to uphold healthcare quality and continuity for all patients.. · The prolonged decline in sonographic examinations during the pandemic does not represent a lasting trend, as evidenced by the return to pre-pandemic levels.., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device is a fourth-generation flow diverter with an antithrombotic coating and a reduced profile compared to previous Pipeline versions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the procedural feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this device., Methods: The Pipe-VADER study was designed as a retrospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated with the Vantage at 3 neurovascular centers. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, early complications, and extent of postinterventional contrast retention were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis., Results: Twenty-eight patients with 31 aneurysms (median size: 5.0 mm, posterior circulation: 4 [12.9%], ruptured: 5 [16.1%]) were included. The technical success rate was 100%, with multiple stents used in 4/30 (13.3%) procedures. Of the 30 procedures, adjunctive coiling was performed in 3 (10.0%) and balloon angioplasty in 2 (6.7%). Median procedure time was 62 minutes. Procedural ischemic stroke occured in 4 (13.3%) cases, whereof 2 were major strokes (6.6%). There were no hemorrhagic complications. Initial contrast retention was observed in 29/31 (93.5%) aneurysms. All 27 overstented side vessels were patent at the end of the procedure. Short-term follow-up (median: 5 months) showed complete and favorable occlusion rates of 70% (14/20) and 80% (16/20), respectively., Conclusions: The new Pipeline Vantage appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and warrants further evaluation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

CT protocols that diagnose COVID-19 vary in regard to the associated radiation exposure and the desired image quality (IQ). This study aims to evaluate CT protocols of hospitals participating in the RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network) project, consolidating CT protocols to provide recommendations and strategies for future pandemics. In this retrospective study, CT acquisitions of COVID-19 patients scanned between March 2020 and October 2020 (RACOON phase 1) were included, and all non-contrast protocols were evaluated. For this purpose, CT protocol parameters, IQ ratings, radiation exposure (CTDI vol ), and central patient diameters were sampled. Eventually, the data from 14 sites and 534 CT acquisitions were analyzed. IQ was rated good for 81% of the evaluated examinations. Motion, beam-hardening artefacts, or image noise were reasons for a suboptimal IQ. The tube potential ranged between 80 and 140 kV p , with the majority between 100 and 120 kV p . CTDI vol was 3.7 ± 3.4 mGy. Most healthcare facilities included did not have a specific non-contrast CT protocol. Furthermore, CT protocols for chest imaging varied in their settings and radiation exposure. In future, it will be necessary to make recommendations regarding the required IQ and protocol parameters for the majority of CT scanners to enable comparable IQ as well as radiation exposure for different sites but identical diagnostic questions.