Search

Background: Patients with thoracic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) often undergo extensive surgical decompression to avoid functional decline. Though limited in scope, scales including the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) are used to stratify surgical risk to predict perioperative morbidity. This study uses the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) to predict outcomes following transpedicular decompression/fusion for high-grade MESCC., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent transpedicular decompression and fusion for MESCC (baseline demographics, spinal instability neoplastic score, preoperative and postoperative Bilsky scores, primary cancer type, and RCRI). Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), intraoperative estimated blood loss, readmission/reoperation within 90 days of index surgery, 90-day mortality, and posthospitalization disposition., Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in our study. Ninety percent of patients' lesions were Bilsky 2 or greater. Increasing frailty, measured by mFI-5, was a significant predictor of increased LOS (P < 0.01) and 90-day mortality (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis adjusting for sex, body mass index , and age still showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). MFI-5 was not a significant predictor of readmission/reoperation within 90 days or estimated blood loss. Age - not mFI-5 or RCRI - was a significant predictor for posthospitalization nonhome disposition (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: The mFI-5 can serve as a useful predictor of outcomes after transpedicular decompression and fusion for thoracic MESCC as it can account for the patient's frailty. Our study demonstrated the mFI-5 as a predictor of LOS and 90-day mortality. These results provide a background to both understanding and integrating frailty into decision-making in MESCC., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While the indication for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may influence the expected postoperative course, there is limited data comparing how length of stay (LOS) and disposition for patients with myelopathy differ from those with radiculopathy. This study aimed to compare LOS and discharge disposition, in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy versus those for myelopathy., Methods: A retrospective review of all adult ACDF cases between 2013 and 2019 was conducted analyzing sex, age, race, comorbidities, level of surgery, myelopathy measures when applicable, complications, dysphagia, hospital LOS, and discharge disposition., Results: A total of 157 patients were included in the study with 73 patients undergoing an ACDF for radiculopathy and 84 for myelopathy. Univariate analysis determined older age (p < 0.01), male sex (p = 0.03), presence of CKD (p < 0.01) or COPD (p = 0.01), surgery at C3/4 level (p = 0.01), and indication (p < 0.01) as predictors for a discharge to either acute rehabilitation or a skilled nursing facility rather than to home. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated age and indication as the only independent predictors of disposition, with home disposition being more likely with decreased age (OR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.86-0.98) and radiculopathy as the diagnosis (OR 6.72, 95 % CI 1.22- 37.02)., Conclusions: Myelopathic patients, as compared to those with radiculopathy at presentation, had significantly longer LOS, increased dysphagia, and were more often discharged to a facility. Understanding these two distinct populations as separate entities will streamline the pre and post-surgical care as the current DRG codes and ICD 10 PCS do not differentiate the expected post-operative course in patients undergoing ACDF for myelopathy versus radiculopathy., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Thoracic disc herniations (TDH) are uncommon compared to cervical and lumbar disc herniations. Surgical treatment of TDH can be challenging due to the anatomical constraints and the high risk of morbidity due to proximity to the thoracic spinal cord. Moreover, the selection of appropriate surgical approach depends on various factors such as the size and location of disc herniation within the spinal canal, spinal level, presence or absence of calcification, degree of spinal cord compression, and familiarity with various approaches by the treating surgeon. While there is agreement that posterolateral approaches can be used to treat posterolateral and central soft disc herniation, there is a lack of consensus on the best surgical approach for central calcified and giant calcified TDH where an anterior approach is perceived as the best option. There is increasing evidence that support the safety and efficacy of posterolateral approaches even for central calcified and giant calcified TDH. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management for TDH based on the past and current literature and the author's experience at his institution., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)