Search

Purpose: Transatlantic guidelines endorse quality metrics for timely reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Compliance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown., Study Design: We prospectively evaluated 2928 STEMI patients in Kerala, India, across 16 PCI-capable hospitals who received reperfusion with either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or fibrinolysis. Primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or readmission for heart failure at 1-year., Results: Among reperfused STEMI patients, 320 (10.9%) received timely reperfusion with either PPCI or fibrinolysis, 1985 (67.8%) received delayed PPCI, and 623 (21.3%) received delayed fibrinolysis. Timely reperfusion had lower unadjusted MACE rates than delayed PCI or fibrinolysis (timely reperfusion: 11.9%, delayed PPCI: 13.6%, delayed fibrinolysis: 23.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality was lowest in the timely reperfusion group (timely reperfusion: 6.3%, delayed PPCI: 7.8%, delayed fibrinolysis 18.8%, P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, delayed fibrinolysis had a higher MACE rate (HR 1.52 95% CI 1.04-2.21) and mortality (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.18-3.25) compared to timely reperfusion. Total ischemic time > 3 h and delayed first medical contact-to-needle time predicted MACE at 1 year., Conclusions: Among STEMI patients in Kerala, India, only one in 10 eligible patients received timely reperfusion. Longer total ischemic times and delayed fibrinolysis were associated with 1-year MACE. Improving timely reperfusion is critical to enhancing STEMI outcomes in LMICs. What is already known on this topic Given the established link between delay to reperfusion and worse major adverse cardiac events (MACE), global efforts have concentrated on minimizing different components of the total ischemic time to improve ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes. Compliance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. What this study adds In this cohort of STEMI patients in Kerala, India, total ischemic time and first medical contact-to-needle time correlated with long-term MACE rates, whereas other timeliness indicators did not. How this study might affect research, practice or policy Our study highlights the significant barriers to accessing STEMI care that are prevalent in LMICs despite incremental growth in the number of PCI-capable hospitals. The pre-hospital phase within total ischemic time is the most important quality improvement metric of STEMI care in LMICs, especially for patients chosen for fibrinolysis., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.)

Survival outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) based on their disease etiology are not well described. Here, we provide one-year mortality outcomes of 10850 patients with HF (mean age = 59.9 years, 31% women) in India. Ischemic heart disease (71.9%), dilated cardiomyopathy (17.3), rheumatic heart disease (5.4), non-rheumatic valvular heart disease (1.9), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (0.8), congenital heart disease (0.7), peri-partum cardiomyopathy (0.5), restrictive cardiomyopathy (0.4), and infective endocarditis (0.1) were the main disease etiologies. Mortality rate per 100-person years of follow-up varied from 13.8 (95% CI: 6.2-30.7) in peri-partum cardiomyopathy to 92.9 (46.5-185.9) in infective endocarditis. Compared to ischemic heart disease, the mortality was two to five times higher in rheumatic heart disease (HR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.6-2.4), congenital heart disease (2.9; 1.9-4.2), and infective endocarditis (4.8; 2.4-9.8). The wide variations in mortality rate in HF patients may bring possible clinical applicability of risk stratification., Competing Interests: Competing interests: P.J. is supported by a Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Clinical and Public Health Senior Fellowship (IA/CPHS/20/1/505229). P.J. received research funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council—Australia (1160283 and 1169766), the Medical Research Council—UK (MR/T037822/1), the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR 204871 and 201815), and the Indian Council of Medical Research., (© 2024. The Author(s).)