Search

Background: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is commonly associated with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and frailty. Yet there are no specific tools to predict outcomes of CLTI in ESKD, particularly those that incorporate frailty. We aimed to assess the utility of the medical record-based Hospital Frailty Risk (HFR) score in predicting outcomes of CLTI in ESKD., Methods and Results: We identified patients with ESKD diagnosed with CLTI from the US Renal Data System from 2015 to 2018. These patients were categorized into 3 frailty risk groups on the basis of their HFR scores: low (<5), intermediate (5-10), high-risk (>10), and on the basis of whether they underwent revascularization (endovascular revascularization [ER]/surgical revascularization [SR]) or not (no revascularization). Primary outcomes of interest included in-hospital composite of death or major amputation and in-hospital death. We included 49 454 eligible patients, with ER/SR cohort including 19.8% (n=9777). A total of 88.4% (ER/SR) and 90.0% (no revascularization) were frail on the HFR scale. We found a nonlinear association between HFR score and in-hospital adverse outcomes. In both cohorts, intermediate and high-risk HFR scores were associated with greater risk of in-hospital death (high-risk, ER/SR: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.6-4.8]; P <0.0001; no revascularization: odds ratio, 7.8 [95% CI, 5.3-11.6]; P <0.01) and composite of in-hospital major amputation or death (high-risk, ER/SR: odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.9-3.1]; P <0.0001; no revascularization: odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.5-1.9]; P <0.0001)., Conclusions: The HFR score can predict risk of in-hospital death and composite of death or major amputation in patients with ESKD and CLTI. Further data are needed to determine the utility of the HFR score in this population.

Background: To examine the influence of liver function on patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), we classified patients with CLTI after revascularization according to their modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed single-center data of patients who underwent revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2020. Patients were classified with ALBI grades 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 according to the ALBI score, which was calculated, based on serum albumin and total bilirubin levels. The endpoints were the 2-year amputation-free survival (AFS) and 1-year wound healing rates., Results: We included 190 limbs in 148 patients, and 50, 54, and 86 cases were assigned as grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3, respectively. The 2-year AFS rates for the grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 groups were 79 ± 6%, 66% ± 7%, and 45 ± 6%, respectively (P < 0.01). One-year cumulative wound healing rates for grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 groups were 68 ± 7%, 69% ± 6%, and 48% ± 5%, respectively (P = 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses identified age (≥75 years), dependent ambulatory status, and modified ALBI grades 2b and 3 compared with grades 1 and 2a as significant independent predictors of AFS. The dependent ambulatory status and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification stage 4 were significant negative predictors of wound healing., Conclusions: Many patients with CLTI had high modified ALBI grades, and impaired liver function classified as modified ALBI grade 2b and 3 is a robust negative predictor of AFS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study is to present short- and long-term outcomes after lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD), differentiated by peripheral artery disease (PAD) Fontaine stage III and IV., Methods: Retrospective analysis of anonymized data from a nationwide German health insurance company (AOK). Data from 22,633 patients (14,523 men) who underwent LEB from 2010 to 2015 were analyzed, presenting 18,271 with CKD stage 1/2, 2,483 patients with CKD stage 3, and 1,879 with CKD stage 4/5., Results: Perioperative mortality (60-day mortality) was 7.2% for CKD stage 1/2, 12.4% for CKD stage 3, and 19.8% for CKD stage 4/5. Patients with PAD stage IV had significantly higher perioperative mortality (10.3%) than patients with PAD stage III (4.5%). The perioperative major amputation rate depended significantly on PAD stage IV (odds ratio [OR]: 2.57 confidence interval [CI]: 2.16-3.05, P < 0.001), the LEB level below the knee and crural/pedal (OR: 2.49 CI: 2.14-2.90, P < 0.001), CKD stage 4/5 (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.06-1.54, P = 0.009), and the presence of diabetes mellitus type 2 (OR: 1.19, CI: 1.05-1.36, P = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier estimated long-term survival of up to 9 years after surgery was 31.7% for patients with CKD stage 1 and 2, 14.3% for CKD stage 3, and only 10.1% for CKD stage 4 and 5 (P < 0.001). PAD Fontaine stage IV versus III (hazard ratio: 1.64, CI: 1.56-1.71, P < 0.001), but not bypass level, had an independent adverse influence on long-term survival., Conclusion: CKD and PAD stage were equally significant independent predictors of patient survival and major adverse cardiovascular events with higher PAD and CKD stages associated with less favorable long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The recent publication of randomized trials comparing open bypass surgery to endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, namely, Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) and Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg-2 (BASIL-2), has resulted in potentially contradictory findings. The trials differed significantly with respect to anatomical disease patterns and primary end points. We performed an analysis of patients in BEST-CLI with significant infrapopliteal disease undergoing open tibial bypass or endovascular tibial interventions to formulate a relevant comparator with the outcomes reported from BASIL-2., Methods: The study population consisted of patients in BEST-CLI with adequate single segment saphenous vein conduit randomized to open bypass or endovascular intervention (cohort 1) who additionally had significant infrapopliteal disease and underwent tibial level intervention. The primary outcome was major adverse limb event (MALE) or all-cause death. MALE included any major limb amputation or major reintervention. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional regression models., Results: The analyzed subgroup included a total of 665 patients with 326 in the open tibial bypass group and 339 in the tibial endovascular intervention group. The primary outcome of MALE or all-cause death at 3 years was significantly lower in the surgical group at 48.5% compared with 56.7% in the endovascular group (P = .0018). Mortality was similar between groups (35.5% open vs 35.8% endovascular; P = .94), whereas MALE events were lower in the surgical group (23.3% vs 35.0%; P<.0001). This difference included a lower rate of major reinterventions in the surgical group (10.9%) compared with the endovascular group (20.2%; P = .0006). Freedom from above ankle amputation or all-cause death was similar between treatment arms at 43.6% in the surgical group compared with 45.3% the endovascular group (P = .30); however, there were fewer above ankle amputations in the surgical group (13.5%) compared with the endovascular group (19.3%; P = .0205). Perioperative (30-day) death rates were similar between treatment groups (2.5% open vs 2.4% endovascular; P = .93), as was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (5.3% open vs 2.7% endovascular; P = .12)., Conclusions: Among patients with suitable single segment great saphenous vein who underwent infrapopliteal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, open bypass surgery was associated with a lower incidence of MALE or death and fewer major amputation compared with endovascular intervention. Amputation-free survival was similar between the groups. Further investigations into differences in comorbidities, anatomical extent, and lesion complexity are needed to explain differences between the BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 reported outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has evolved over the last several decades with the availability of several new treatment modalities. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contemporary presentation and outcomes of ALLI patients., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospectively collected database of all patients who presented to our tertiary referral hospital with acute ischemia of the lower extremity between May 2016 and October 2020. The cause of death was obtained from the Michigan State Death Registry., Results: During the study period, 233 patients (251 lower limbs) were evaluated for ALLI. Seventy-three percent had thrombotic occlusion, 24% had embolic occlusion, and 3% due to a low flow state. Rutherford classification of ischemia severity was 7%, 49%, 40%, and 4% for Rutherford grade I, IIA, IIB, and III, respectively. Five percent underwent primary amputations, and 6% received medical therapy only. The mean length of stay was 11 ± 9 days. Nineteen percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. At 30 days postoperatively, mortality was 9% and limb loss was 19%. On multivariate analysis, 1 or no vessel runoff to the foot postoperatively was associated with higher 30-day limb loss. Patients with no run-off vessels postoperatively had significantly higher 30-day mortality. Cardiovascular complications accounted for most deaths (48%). At 1-year postoperatively, mortality and limb loss reached 17% and 34%, respectively., Conclusions: Despite advances in treatment modalities and cardiovascular care, patients presenting with ALLI continue to have high mortality, limb loss, and readmission rates at 30 days., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains a vascular emergency with high morbidity and mortality. While the JETi Hydrodynamic Thrombectomy System (Abbott) offers a percutaneous approach to fragment and aspirate the thrombus in patients with arterial occlusions, data on its efficacy and safety are limited. This study reports our early experience using the JETi device to treat ALI at our institution., Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients with ALI treated with the JETi device between September 2020 and December 2022. Patients were included if the JETi device was used either as a primary intervention or as an adjunct procedure. The primary endpoint was technical success defined as <50% residual thrombus after intervention. Secondary endpoints included achieving complete resolution of the thrombus on angiogram, acute kidney injury (AKI), major bleeding, 30-day major amputation, and 30-day mortality., Results: A total of 59 JETi procedures for ALI (median age 62 years [interquartile range: 56-71 years]) were performed on 39 male and 20 female patients. The median time from onset of symptoms to hospitalization was 24 hours (interquartile range: 4-168 hours). Rutherford classifications were I (10), IIa (27), IIb (14), and undocumented (8). Etiology of ALI was native vessel thrombosis (27), embolism (16), graft/stent thrombosis (14), and iatrogenic (2). A total of 124 vessels were treated, with an average of 2.1 vessels per procedure. The primary outcome was achieved in 86% (107/124) of the arteries, with 82% (102/124) successfully opened using the JETi device alone without the need for any adjunctive therapy. Complete resolution of the thrombus using JETi was achieved in 81% (101/124) arteries, with or without the use of adjunctive therapy. A total of 6.7% (4/59) patients required a major limb amputation within 30 days despite successful recanalization, and one 30-day mortality was recorded. Complications included distal embolization (5), access site hematoma (2), and AKI (4). No major bleeding, hemolysis-induced AKI, or vessel dissection or perforation was observed., Conclusions: The JETi device appears to be a safe and effective percutaneous treatment option in the management of ALI. It provides definitive treatment with a high technical success rate of 86% and a good safety profile., Competing Interests: Disclosures L.K. and K.O. report a speaker/consultant disclosure with Abbott. The remaining authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute limb ischemia is a vascular emergency associated with high rates of limb loss and mortality. As the use of endovascular techniques increases, estimation of rates and predictors of adverse outcomes remains needed., Objectives: This study sought to assess contemporary outcomes and predictors of adverse events following endovascular treatment of acute limb ischemia in a nationwide, multicenter registry., Methods: Patients who had peripheral vascular intervention performed for the indication of acute limb ischemia in National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Intervention Registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major amputation during index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of the composite outcome., Results: There were 3,541 endovascular procedures performed during the study period. Of these, 132 (3.7%) resulted in death, and 77 (2.2%) resulted in amputation during hospitalization. Thrombolysis catheters were used in 27.7% (n = 981) and thrombectomy catheters in 3.9% (n = 138). Independent predictors of death or amputation included severe lung disease (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.17-2.52), Rutherford Class IIb (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.62-3.65), and end-stage renal disease (OR: 3.94; 95% CI: 0.73-0.85), and preprocedure hemoglobin (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73- 0.85). Complications included bleeding within 72 hours of intervention (6.7%) and thrombosis (2.8%)., Conclusions: Patients with pre-existing medical comorbidities and those with diminished limb viability were more likely to suffer adverse outcomes. Adverse event rates remain high for patients affected by acute limb ischemia despite its declining incidence., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/objectives: Recent trends indicate a rise in the incidence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) among younger adults. This study examines trends in CLI hospitalization and outcomes among young adults with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the United States., Methods: Adult hospitalizations (18-40 years) for PAD/CLI were analyzed from the 2016-2020 nationwide inpatient sample database using ICD-10 codes. Rates were reported per 1000 PAD or 100,000 cardiovascular disease admissions. Outcomes included trends in mortality, major amputations, revascularization, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital costs (THC). We used the Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for trend analysis and adjusted costs to the 2020 dollar using the consumer price index., Results: Approximately 63,045 PAD and 20,455 CLI admissions were analyzed. The mean age of the CLI cohort was 32.7 ± 3 years. The majority (12,907; 63.1 %) were female and white (11,843; 57.9 %). Annual CLI rates showed an uptrend with 3265 hospitalizations (227 per 1000 PAD hospitalizations, 22.7 %) in 2016 to 4474 (252 per 1000 PAD hospitalizations, 25.2 %) in 2020 (Ptrend<0.001), along with an increase in PAD admissions from 14,405 (188 per 100,000, 0.19 %) in 2016 to 17,745 (232 per 100,000, 0.23 %%) in 2020 (Ptrend<0.0001). Annual in-hospital mortality increased from 570 (2.8 %) in 2016 to 803 (3.9 %) in 2020 (Ptrend = 0.001) while amputations increased from 1084 (33.2 %) in 2016 to 1995 (44.6 %) in 2020 (Ptrend<0.001). Mean LOS increased from 5.1 (SD 2.7) days in 2016 to 6.5 (SD 0.9) days in 2020 (Ptrend = 0.002). The mean THC for CLI increased from $50,873 to $69,262 in 2020 (Ptrend<0.001). The endovascular revascularization rates decreased from 11.5 % (525 cases) in 2016 to 10.7 % (635 cases) in 2020 (Ptrend = 0.025). Surgical revascularization rates also increased from 4.9 % (225 cases) in 2016 to 10.4 % (600 cases) in 2020 (Ptrend = 0.041)., Conclusion: Hospitalization and outcomes for CLI worsened among young adults during the study period. There is an urgent need to enhance surveillance for risk factors of PAD in this age group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The recent Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) study showed that bypass was superior to endovascular therapy (ET) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) deemed suitable for either approach who had an available single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV). However, the superiority of bypass among those lacking GSV was not established. We aimed to examine comparative treatment outcomes from a real-world CLTI population using the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database., Methods: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database for patients with CLTI who underwent first-time lower extremity revascularization (2010-2019). We performed two one-to-one propensity score matchings (PSMs): ET vs bypass with GSV (BWGSV) and ET vs bypass with a prosthetic graft (BWPG). The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. Secondary outcomes were freedom from amputation and overall survival (OS)., Results: Three cohorts were queried: BWGSV (N = 5279, 14.7%), BWPG (N = 2778, 7.7%), and ET (N = 27,977, 77.6%). PSM produced two sets of well-matched cohorts: 4705 pairs of ET vs BWGSV and 2583 pairs of ET vs BWPG. In the matched cohorts of ET vs BWGSV, ET was associated with greater hazards of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.43; P < .001), amputation (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.17-1.44; P < .001), and amputation/death (HR = 1.32, 95% CI, 1.24-1.40; P < .001) up to 4 years. In the matched cohorts of ET vs BWPG, ET was associated with greater hazards of death up to 2 years (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.00-1.22; P = .042) but not amputation or amputation/death., Conclusions: In this real-world multi-institutional Medicare-linked PSM analysis, we found that BWGSV is superior to ET in terms of OS, freedom from amputation, and amputation-free survival up to 4 years. Moreover, BWPG was superior to ET in terms of OS up to 2 years. Our study confirms the superiority of BWGSV to ET as observed in the BEST-CLI trial., Competing Interests: Disclosures A.F. is a consultant for Sanifit, LeMaitre, BiogenCell, and DilaysisX. M.T.M. is a member of the advisory board for Janssen, Inc. M.S.C. is a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Abbott Vascular and is a consultant for Medistim and BioGenCell. The remaining authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is one of the main treatments for acute limb ischaemia. Urokinase is still a widely used thrombolytic drug in some regions. However, there needs to be a clear consensus on the protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis using urokinase for acute lower limb ischaemia., Methods: A single-centre protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis with low-dose urokinase (20,000 IU/hour) lasting 48-72 h for acute lower limb ischaemia was proposed based on our previous experiences. A retrospective study from June 2016 to December 2020 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol. The target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were also monitored during follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for the subgroup analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for reinterventions and death., Results: 90 lower limbs were involved, including 51 Rutherford Grade I, 35 Grade IIa and four Grade IIb. During a 60.8-h thrombolysis, 86 cases (95.5%) were considered effective according to the angiogram. No major bleeding complication occurred during thrombolysis, and one amputation occurred after. Freedom from target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were 75.6%, 94.4% and 91.1% during a mean 27.5-month follow-up, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier estimator, aortoiliac lesions had lower reintervention rates than femoropopliteal lesions (Log-rank p = 0.010), and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had a lower reintervention rate (Log-rank p = 0.049). Age was an independent risk factor for death ( p = 0.038, hazard ratio 1.076, 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.153)., Conclusions: The single-centre protocol of catheter-directed thrombolysis we proposed for acute lower limb ischaemia was effective and safe. Strict blood pressure control during catheter-directed thrombolysis ensured safety. Aortoiliac lesions and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had lower reintervention rates during follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world use of the system and whether it predicts outcomes accurately after open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes., Methods: Using data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 and 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages 1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on postrevascularization outcomes., Results: In the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n = 14,529) had WIfI stage documented. PVIs were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization. Of the patients, 49.5% were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3, and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent open surgical revascularization, whereas stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (P < .001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (P < .001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (P < .001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates., Conclusions: The SVS WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI after lower extremity revascularization. Because nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within 1 year of intervention, this finding study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision-making for patients with CLTI., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its unique pathology and poor treatment outcomes. This review calls for a tailored classification and risk assessment for these patients to guide better revascularization choices with early minor amputation as a first-line strategy in advanced stages., Methods: This review consolidates key findings from recent literature on CLTI in ESRD, focusing on disease mechanisms, treatment options, and patient outcomes. It evaluates the literature to clarify the decision-making process for managing CLTI in ESRD., Results: CLTI in ESRD patients often results in worse clinical outcomes, such as nonhealing wounds, increased limb loss, and higher mortality rates. While the literature reveals ongoing debates regarding the optimal revascularization method, recent retrospective studies and meta-analyses suggest potential benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) over open bypass surgery (OB) in reducing mortality and wound complications, with comparable amputation-free survival rates., Conclusions: The selection of revascularization methods in ESRD patients with CLTI is complex, necessitating individualized strategies. The importance of early detection and timely intervention is critical to decelerate disease progression and improve revascularization outcomes. There is a shift in these treatment strategies toward less invasive endovascular procedures, acknowledging the limitations these patients face with open revascularization surgeries. Considering early minor amputations after revascularization could prevent worse consequences, reflecting a shift in the approach to managing CLTI in ESRD patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: For chronic limb-threatening ischemia, revascularization has been reported for occlusions but not for stenosis in the inframalleolar (IM) lesions. We investigated the clinical outcomes of balloon dilation for stenotic IM lesions distal to the treatment target in the infrapopliteal (IP) legion., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had chronic limb-threatening ischemia and underwent revascularization of stenotic IM lesions distal to the target IP lesions between January 2015 and August 2022. The outcome measures were amputation-free survival, wound healing rate, and freedom from target IM reintervention., Results: The 87 patients had a mean age of 72.7 ± 10.7 years and comprised 67.8% men, 74.7% with diabetes mellitus, 55.2% on dialysis, 33.3% who had Rutherford six classification. The amputation-free survival (AFS), wound healing, and freedom from target IM reintervention rates at 1 year were 82.9%, 53.3%, and 58.4%, respectively. On Cox proportional multivariate analysis, the predictors were Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) ≥3 and diffuse stenosis in the target IM vessels for delayed wound healing and Global Limb Anatomic Staging System stage Ⅲ and ≥3 diseased IM vessels before endovascular therapy for target IM reintervention. At the time of reintervention, the lesion morphology had progressed from stenosis to occlusion in 50% of cases., Conclusions: In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, revascularization of stenosis in IM lesions showed a high reintervention rate and progression of lesion morphology, although AFS and wound-healing rates were acceptable., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Lower extremity acute limb ischemia (LE-ALI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, and a burden on patient quality of life (QoL). There is limited medium- to long-term evidence on mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (MT) in patients with LE-ALI. The STRIDE study was designed to assess safety and efficacy of MT using the Indigo Aspiration System in patients with LE-ALI. Thirty-day primary and secondary endpoints and additional outcomes were previously published. Here, we report 365-day secondary endpoints and QoL data from STRIDE., Methods: STRIDE was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study that enrolled 119 patients across 16 sites in the United States and Europe. Patients were treated first-line with MT using the Indigo Aspiration System (Penumbra, Inc). The study completed follow-up in October 2023. Secondary endpoints at 365 days included target limb salvage and mortality. Additionally, the VascuQoL-6 questionnaire, developed for evaluating patient-centered QoL outcomes for peripheral arterial disease, was assessed at baseline and follow-up through 365 days., Results: Seventy-three percent of patients (87/119) were available for 365-day follow-up. Mean age of these patients was 65.0 ± 13.3 years, and 44.8% were female. Baseline ischemic severity was classified as Rutherford I in 12.6%, Rutherford IIa in 51.7%, and Rutherford IIb in 35.6%. In general, baseline and disease characteristics (demographics, medical history, comorbidities, target thrombus) of these patients are similar to the enrolled cohort of 119 patients. The secondary endpoints at 365 days for target limb salvage was 88.5% (77/87) and mortality rate was 12.0% (12/100). VascuQoL-6 improved across all domains, with a median total score improvement from 12.0 (interquartile range, 9.0-15.0) at baseline to 19.0 (interquartile range, 16.0-22.0) at 365 days., Conclusions: These 365-day results from STRIDE demonstrate that first-line MT with the Indigo Aspiration System for LE-ALI portray continued high target limb salvage rates and improved patient-reported QoL. These findings indicate Indigo as a safe and effective therapeutic option for LE-ALI., Competing Interests: Disclosures T.M. is the principal investigator for STRIDE and a consultant for Penumbra. P.M. is a speaker/consultant for Penumbra. F.A. is a speaker/consultant for Penumbra., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases. Treatments primarily targeting limb-related outcomes may not improve overall life prognosis. We aimed to describe in-hospital mortality and the underlying etiologies in Japanese patients with CLI. We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from approximately 1200 Japanese acute-care hospitals between April 2018 and March 2020. The definition of patients with CLI was based on the diagnostic codes listed as the most resource-intensive diagnosis and information regarding invasive procedures (endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation). The DPC database provides information on whether in-hospital death was caused by the most resource-intensive diagnosis. Among 15,228 distinct patients with CLI, we identified 18,970 records, including 5,378 amputations. In-hospital death occurred in 1238 (6.5%) patients. Among them, 811 (65.5%) were due to causes unrelated to CLI. In patients who underwent amputation (n = 5378), causes unrelated to CLI accounted for 70.0% of in-hospital deaths, whereas among patients who did not undergo amputation (n = 13,592), this proportion was 60.1%. When compared to patients who died due to causes related to CLI, the prevalence of male patients was higher (62.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.001), and amputation was more frequently performed (58.0% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001) in those who died due to causes unrelated to CLI. The majority of in-hospital deaths among patients with CLI necessitating endovascular treatment, bypass, or amputation were attributable to factors unrelated to the primary condition of CLI. Managing systemic cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases beyond the affected limb is crucial to improve the prognosis of these patients., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.)

For patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI), endovascular approaches to revascularization are often employed as a component of multimodality care aimed at limb preservation. However, patients with CLTI are also prone to treatment failure, particularly following balloon angioplasty alone. Drug-coated devices utilizing Paclitaxel were developed to decrease restenosis but have been primarily studied in patients presenting with claudication. In recent years, data have emerged which describe the efficacy of drug-coated devices in the treatment of patients with CLTI. Concurrently, there has been major controversy surrounding the use of drug-coated devices in peripheral arterial disease. A historical narrative of the development and use of drug-coated devices for peripheral arterial disease is presented, along with discussion of major trials. Evidence argues that paclitaxel-based therapies for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) do not increase mortality risk compared to nondrug-coated devices. In CLTI patients, paclitaxel-based balloons and stents provide superior patency and freedom reintervention compared to nondrug-coated devices when treating femoropopliteal disease. However, the use of Paclitaxel-based therapies for below-the-knee (BTK) interventions has not been shown to provide clinically meaningful outcomes compared to nondrug-based therapies. Newer generation antiproliferative agents (Sirolimus, Everolimus) and delivery systems (bioabsorbable scaffolds) hold promise for BTK interventions with early data suggesting decreased rates of major amputation or major adverse limb events., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Endovascular revascularization is the preferred treatment to improve perfusion of the lower extremity in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI often present with stenotic-occlusive lesions involving the infrapopliteal arteries. Although the frequency of treating infrapopliteal lesions is increasing, the reintervention rates remain high. This study aimed to determine the outcomes and patency of infrapopliteal endovascular reinterventions., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 3 Dutch hospitals included patients who underwent an endovascular infrapopliteal reintervention in 2015 up to 2021 after a primary infrapopliteal intervention for CLTI. The outcome measures after the reintervention procedures included technical success rate, the mortality rate and complication rate (any deviation from the normal postinterventional course) at 30 days, overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation, major adverse limb event (MALE), and recurrent reinterventions (a reintervention following the infrapopliteal reintervention). Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk factors for AFS and freedom from major amputation or recurrent reintervention., Results: Eighty-one patients with CLTI were included. A total of 87 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal reintervention in which 122 lesions were treated. Technical success was achieved in 99 lesions (81%). The 30-day mortality rate was 1%, and the complication rate was 13%. Overall survival and AFS at 1 year were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-79%) and 54% (95% CI, 37%-67%), respectively, and those at 2.5 years were 45% (95% CI, 33%-56%) and 21% (95% CI, 11%-33%), respectively. Freedom from major amputation, MALE, and recurrent reinterventions at 1 year and 2.5 years were 59% (95% CI, 46%-70%) and 41% (95% CI, 25%-56%); 54% (95% CI, 41%-65%) and 36% (95% CI, 21%-51%); and 68% (95% CI, 55%-78%) and 51% (95% CI, 33%-66%), respectively. A Global Limb Anatomic Staging System score of III showed an increased hazard ratio of 2.559 (95% CI, 1.078-6.072; p=0.033) for freedom of major amputation or recurrent reintervention., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, outcomes and patency were moderate to poor, with low AFS, high rates of major amputations, and recurrent reinterventions., Clinical Impact: This multicenter retrospective study evaluating outcome and patency of endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions for CLTI, shows that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, the short- and mid-term outcomes of the infrapopliteal reinterventions were moderate to poor, with low rates of AFS and a high need for recurrent reinterventions. While the frequency of performing infrapopliteal reinterventions is increasing with additional growing complexity of the disease, alternative treatment options such as venous bypass grafting or deep venous arterialization may be considered and should be studied in randomized controlled trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Although femoropopliteal-specific stents have durable patency, stent thrombosis (ST) may occur, which can lead to acute limb ischaemia (ALI)., Aims: We aimed to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of ALI caused by femoropopliteal ST in patients with lower extremity artery disease., Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 499 patients with ALI - of whom 108 patients had ALI caused by femoropopliteal ST (ST-ALI) and 391 patients had ALI caused by other aetiologies (de novo ALI) - who underwent treatment between September 2011 and March 2023. Clinical features and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome measure was 12-month amputation-free survival; factors associated with amputation or death were investigated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: Patients with ST-ALI were significantly more likely to exhibit conventional atherosclerotic risk factors, including diabetes mellitus (63% vs 26%) and haemodialysis (51% vs 10%) compared to patients with de novo ALI, whereas patients with de novo ALI were older (80 years vs 74 years) and more likely to have atrial fibrillation (49% vs 18%) than patients with ST-ALI. The 12-month amputation-free survival rate was significantly lower in the ST-ALI group than that in the de novo ALI group (51% vs 76%; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ST-ALI, older age, haemodialysis, atrial fibrillation, the presence of a wound, peak C-reactive protein level, and non-ambulatory status all have an independent, positive association with death or major amputation., Conclusions: The current study revealed that patients with ST-ALI had worse clinical outcomes than those with de novo ALI, highlighting the need to maximise ST prevention.

Objective: Inframalleolar disease is present in most diabetic patients presenting with tissue loss. Inframalleolar (pedal) artery disease and pedal medial arterial calcification (pMAC) are associated with major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). This study aimed to examine the impact of pMAC on the outcomes after isolated inframalleolar (pedal artery) interventions., Methods: A database of lower extremity endovascular intervention for patients with tissue loss between 2007 and 2022 was retrospectively queried. Patients with CLTI were selected, and those undergoing isolated inframalleolar intervention on the dorsalis pedis and medial and lateral tarsal arteries and who had foot x-rays were identified. X-rays were assessed blindly for pMAC and scored on a scale of 0 to 5. Patients with concomitant superficial femoral artery and tibial interventions were excluded. Intention to treat analysis by the patient was performed. Amputation-free survival (survival without major amputation) was evaluated., Results: A total of 223 patients (51% female; 87% Hispanic; average age, 66 years; 323 vessels) underwent isolated infra-malleolar intervention for tissue loss. All patients had diabetes, 96% had hypertension, 79% had hyperlipidemia, and 63% had chronic renal insufficiency (55% of these were on hemodialysis). Most of the patients had Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage 3 disease and had various stages of pMAC: severe (score = 5) in 48%, moderate (score = 2-4) in 31%, and mild (score = 0-1) in 21% of the patients. Technical success was 94%, with a median of one vessel treated per patient. All failures were in severe pMAC. Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events was 0.9% at 90 days after the procedure. Following the intervention, most patients underwent a planned forefoot amputation (single digit, multiple digits, ray amputation, or trans-metatarsal amputation). WIfI ischemic grade was improved by 51%. Wound healing at 3 months was 69%. Those not healing underwent below-knee amputations. The overall 5-year amputation-free survival rate was 35% ± 9%. The severity of pMAC was associated with decreased AFS., Conclusions: Increasing severity of pMAC influences the technical and long-term outcomes of infra-malleolar intervention in diabetes. Severe pMAC is associated with amputation and should be considered as a variable in the shared decision-making of diabetic patients with CLTI., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The frequency of distal lower extremity bypass (LEB) for infrapopliteal critical limb threatening ischemia (IP-CLTI) has significantly decreased. Our goal was to analyze the contemporary outcomes and factors associated with failure of LEB to para-malleolar and pedal targets., Methods: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal database from 2003 to 2021 to identify LEB to para-malleolar or pedal/plantar targets. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events [vascular reintervention, above ankle amputation] (MALE), and amputation-free survival at 2 years. Standard statistical methods were utilized., Results: We identified 2331 LEB procedures (1,265 anterior tibial at ankle/dorsalis pedis, 783 posterior tibial at ankle, 283 tarsal/plantar). The prevalence of LEB bypasses to distal targets has significantly decreased from 13.37% of all LEB procedures in 2003-3.51% in 2021 (P < 0.001). The majority of cases presented with tissue loss (81.25. Common postoperative complications included major adverse cardiac events (8.9%) and surgical site infections (3.6%). Major amputations occurred in 16.8% of patients at 1 year. Postoperative mortality at 1 year was 10%. On unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 2 years, primary patency was 50.56% ± 3.6%, MALE was 63.49% ± 3.27%, and amputation-free survival was 71.71% ± 0.98%. In adjusted analyses [adjusted for comorbidities, indication, conduit type, urgency, prior vascular interventions, graft inflow vessel (femoral/popliteal), concomitant inflow procedures, surgeon and center volume] conduits other than great saphenous vein (P < 0.001) were associated with loss of primary patency and increased MALE. High center volume (>5 procedures/year) was associated with improved primary patency (P = 0.015), and lower MALE (P = 0.021) at 2 years., Conclusions: Despite decreased utilization, open surgical bypass to distal targets at the ankle remains a viable option for treatment of IP-CLTI with acceptable patency and amputation-free survival rates at 2 years. Bypasses to distal targets should be performed at high volume centers to optimize graft patency and limb salvage and minimize reinterventions., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Considering a patient's anatomy and vascular conditions, aorto-femoral bypass is a treatment approach for the open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aimed at evaluating changes in the remnant iliac artery and their correlation with the preservation state of retrograde flow from femoral anastomosis., Methods: Of 221 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2007 and 2022 in Pusan National University Hospital, 29 patients who underwent aorto-femoral bypass were included in this retrospective cohort study. Of these patients, 21 underwent aortobifemoral bypass and 8 underwent aortoiliac-and-femoral bypass. The change in size of the iliac artery from preoperative to postoperative and whether this difference in size depended on the status of postoperative retrograde flow were investigated. Additionally, factors affecting overall mortality and ischemic complications were identified., Results: The median duration from operation to the last follow-up was 2069.5 days (about 5.7 years). The average age of the patients was 78.1 years, and the proportion of males was 75.9%. In cases of disappearance of postoperative retrograde flow from the femoral anastomosis, the postoperative iliac artery size was significantly reduced compared to its preoperative size (18.4 ± 18.9 mm vs. 13.2 ± 7.9 mm, respectively; P = 0.04). The group with maintained retrograde flow had significantly larger residual common iliac artery size than the group with disappearance of flow. (20.0 ± 28.0 mm vs. 14.6 ± 8.5 mm, respectively; P = 0.02). Disappearance of retrograde flow was a significant factor in the iliac artery size reduction after surgery (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.3; P = 0.02). Three patients with maintained retrograde flow (18.8%) required intervention owing to an increase in the size of the iliac artery. The factors that significantly influenced overall death as analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 36.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-870.0; P = 0.03), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (hazard ratio, 12.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-115.8; P = 0.02), and disappearance of retrograde flow (hazard ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-63.9; P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Among the open repair methods for abdominal aortic aneurysms, if retrograde flow was not maintained through femoral anastomosis when aorto-femoral bypass was performed, the size of the remaining iliac artery decreased. However, loss of retrograde flow increased long-term mortality. When aorto-femoral bypass is performed, regular imaging follow-up is necessary at appropriate intervals to check the remnant iliac artery and retrograde flow., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients aged ≥ 80 years and < 80 years., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of 789 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2021. The end points were 2-year overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications., Results: A total of 90 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 200 patients aged < 80 years underwent bypass surgery (BSX), and 205 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 294 patients aged < 80 years underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). Before the propensity score matching, multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 80 years, lower body mass index and serum albumin levels, nonambulatory status, and end-stage renal disease were independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in the BSX and EVT groups. After propensity score matching, the 2-year OS was better in the < 80 years cohort than in the ≥ 80 years cohort in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.018 and P = 0.035, respectively). There was no difference in the 2-year LS rates between the < 80 years and the ≥ 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.621 and P = 0.287, respectively). According to the number of risk factors, except for age ≥ 80 years, there was no difference in the 2-year AFS rates between the < 80 years and ≥ 80 years cohorts for the BSX and EVT groups with 0-1 risk factor (P = 0.957 and P = 0.655, respectively). However, the 2-year AFS rate was poor, especially in the ≥ 80 years cohort in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.015). The Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complication rates tended to be higher in the ≥ 80 years cohort than in the < 80 years cohort only in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.056)., Conclusions: Patients with CLTI aged ≥ 80 years had poorer OS than those aged < 80 years. However, there was no difference in LS between the ≥ 80 years and < 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups. Although age ≥ 80 years was associated with poorer OS, patients with 0-1 risk factor may benefit from revascularization, including BSX, because no difference was observed in AFS or Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complications., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular deep vein arteriaization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This study aims to review contemporary literature on the efficacy, safety, and durability of DVA on patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI)., Methods: The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using predefined search terms of "percutaneous deep vein arterialization" or "percutaneous deep venous arterialization" in PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and Embase. Only studies with 5 or more patients were included, and studies involving open or hybrid DVA were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success and primary amputation rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound healing, complication, reintervention, and all-cause mortality., Results: Ten studies encompassing a total of 233 patients were included. Patients were primarily those deemed to have NO-CLI. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 1-63 months). The technical success rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2%-97.9%) and the major amputation rate was 21.8% (95% 21.1%-22.4%). The wound healing rate was 69.5% (95% CI 67.9-71.0%), complication rate was 13.8% (95% CI 11.7%-15.9%), reintervention rate was 37.4% (95% CI 34.9%-39.9%), and all-cause mortality rate was 15.7% (95% CI 14.1%-17.2%)., Conclusions: Our study showed that endovascular DVA is safe for patients with NO-CLI. Nonetheless, studies were small with follow-up period of less than 1 year. There is currently lack of level 1 evidence to recommend routine use in patients with NO-CLI., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The underlying difference between intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) still remains unclear. This prospective multicenter observational study aimed to clarify differences in clinical features and prognostic outcomes between IC and CLTI, and prognostic factors in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT)., Materials and Methods: A total of 692 patients with 808 limbs were enrolled from 20 institutions in Japan. The primary measurements were the 3-year rates of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and reintervention., Results: Among patients, 79.0% had IC and 21.0% had CLTI. Patients with CLTI were more frequently women and more likely to have impaired functional status, undernutrition, comorbidities, hypercoagulation, hyperinflammation, distal artery disease, short single antiplatelet and long anticoagulation therapies, and late cilostazol than patients with IC. Aortoiliac and femoropopliteal diseases were dominant in patients with IC and infrapopliteal disease was dominant in patients with CLTI. Patients with CLTI underwent less frequently aortoiliac intervention and more frequently infrapopliteal intervention than patients with IC. Longitudinal change of ankle-brachial index (ABI) exhibited different patterns between IC and CLTI (pinteraction=0.002), but ABI improved after EVT both in IC and in CLTI (p<0.001), which was sustained over time. Dorsal and plantar skin perfusion pressure in CLTI showed a similar improvement pattern (pinteraction=0.181). Distribution of Rutherford category improved both in IC and in CLTI (each p<0.001). Three-year MACE rates were 20.4% and 42.3% and 3-year reintervention rates were 22.1% and 46.8% for patients with IC and CLTI, respectively (log-rank p<0.001). Elevated D-dimer (p=0.001), age (p=0.043), impaired functional status (p=0.018), and end-stage renal disease (p=0.019) were independently associated with MACE. After considering competing risks of death and major amputation for reintervention, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.003) and infrainguinal intervention (p=0.002) were independently associated with reintervention. Patients with CLTI merely showed borderline significance for MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 1.700, 95% confidence interval 0.950-3.042, p=0.074) and reintervention (adjusted hazard ratio 1.976, 95% confidence interval 0.999-3.909, p=0.05)., Conclusions: The CLTI is characterized not only by more systemic comorbidities and distal disease but also by more inflammatory coagulation disorder compared with IC. Also, CLTI has approximately twice MACE and reintervention rates than IC, and the underlying inflammatory coagulation disorder per se is associated with these outcomes., Clinical Impact: The underlying difference between intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) still remains unclear. This prospective multicenter observational study, JPASSION study found that CLTI was characterized not only by more systemic comorbidities and distal disease but also by more inflammatory coagulation disorder compared to IC. Also, CLTI had approximately twice major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and reintervention rates than IC. Intriguingly, the underlying inflammatory coagulation disorder per se was independently associated with MACE and reintervention. Further studies to clarify the role of anticoagulation and anti-inflammatory therapies will contribute to the development of post-interventional therapeutics in the context of peripheral artery disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: O.K. has received a research grant and consulting fees from Terumo and has received lecture fees from Medicon, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Kowa Pharmaceutical. H.O. has received lecture fees from Bayer Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eisai, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer, Towa Pharmaceutical, and Toa Eiyo. S.Y. has received remuneration for lecture from Bristol-Meyers, Bayer, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received trust research/joint research funds from Takeda, NEC, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, and Abbott; and is affiliated with endowed department sponsored by Abbott, Terumo, Nihon-Kohden, Medtronic, Japan Lifeline, Otsuka, Ono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Kowa, Zeon, Shionogi, Nippon-Shinyaku, Mochida, and Tesco. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Purpose: Studies on outcomes related to endovascular treatment (EVT) in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among hospitalizations with acute limb ischemia (ALI) are limited., Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was quarried from October 2015 to December 2017 to identify the hospitalizations with ALI and undergoing EVT. The study population was subdivided into 3 groups based on their CKD stages: group 1 (No CKD, stage I, stage II), group 2 (CKD stage III, stage IV), and group 3 (CKD stage V and ESRD). The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality., Results: A total of 51 995 hospitalizations with ALI undergoing EVT were identified. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group 2 (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.32, p =0.009) and group 3 (OR = 3.18; 95% CI 2.74-3.69, p <0.0001) compared with group 1. Odds of minor amputation, vascular complication, atherectomy, and blood transfusion were higher among groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1. Group 2 had higher odds of access site hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 3, whereas group 3 had higher odds of major amputation, postprocedural infection, and postoperative hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 2. Besides, groups 2 and 3 had lower odds of discharge to home compared with group 1. Finally, the length of hospital stay and cost of care was significantly higher with the advancing CKD stages., Conclusion: Advanced CKD stages and ESRD are associated with higher mortality, worse in-hospital outcomes and higher resource utilization among ALI hospitalizations undergoing EVT., Clinical Impact: Current guidelines are not clear for the optimum first line treatment of acute limb ischemia, especially in patients with advanced kidney disease as compared to normal/mild kidney disease patients. We found that advanced kidney disease is a significant risk factor for worse in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with acute limb ischemia and advanced kidney disease is associated with significantly higher resource utilization as compared to patients with normal/mild kidney disease. This study suggests shared decision making between treating physician and patients when considering endovascular therapy for the treatment of acute limb ischemia in patients with advanced kidney disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, comparative effectiveness data are limited for lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with CLTI and CKD. We aimed to evaluate (1) 30-day all-cause mortality and amputation and (2) 5-year all-cause mortality and amputation for LEB vs PVI in patients with comorbid CKD., Methods: Individuals who underwent LEB and PVI were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative with Medicare claims-linked outcomes data. Propensity scores were calculated using 13 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was used. The mortality risk at 30 days and 5 years in LEB vs PVI by CKD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with interaction terms added for CKD. For amputation, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray models were used to account for the competing risk of death, with interaction terms for CKD added., Results: Of 4084 patients (2042 per group), the mean age was 71.0 ± 10.8 years, and 69.0% were male. Irrespective of CKD status, 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.42, P = .78) was similar for LEB vs PVI, but LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation (sub-HR [sHR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P = .04). CKD status, however, did not modify these results. Similarly, LEB vs PVI was associated with a lower risk of 5-year mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < .001) but no difference in 5-year amputation (sHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.20, P = .67). CKD status did not modify these results., Conclusions: Regardless of CKD status, patients had a lower risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day amputation with LEB vs PVI. Results may help inform preference-sensitive treatment decisions on LEB vs PVI for patients with CLTI and CKD, who may commonly be deemed too high risk for surgery., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave, and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Terumo. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson, and she is a consultant for Terumo, Cook, and Twill Inc. All other authors have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the end-stage of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) posing a high risk for limb loss and mortality. This study aims to evaluate and list possible predictors of major adverse limb events (MALEs) in CLTI patients with tissue loss., Methods: This retrospective study included all Rutherford-Becker stage 5 or 6 patients who required foot debridement and revascularization in our department from January 2016 to December 2018. The limbs were classified according to the TASC II, GLASS and WiFI grading systems. The primary composite outcome was MALEs at 2 years. The secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, primary patency, freedom from reintervention, and major amputation. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the event rates, and Cox proportional hazards model with the index MALE as a time-dependent covariate was used to search for MALEs predictors., Results: Of 241 included patients, 19 underwent open surgeries (7.9 %) 207 had endovascular interventions (85.9 %) and 15 required a hybrid approach (6.2 %). On univariate analysis, patients who experienced MALEs (n = 111) more often required hemodialysis (25 vs 15; p = .02), presented with more complex lesions (TASC D on femoropopliteal (p = .05) or below the knee (BTK) arteries (p = .006) with increasing infra-inguinal GLASS Stage (p < .0001)), a history of index limb open (p = .009) or endovascular (p = .049) revascularization, an occluded tibial artery (p = .002 for the posterior tibial and p = .052 for the anterior tibial), or a "desert foot" (p = .02). The CRP level was also higher at admission (p = .001). Technical success of BTK revascularization significantly reduced MALEs (p < .0001) along with the number of patent BTK vessels (p = .0007). Independent predictors of MALEs included hemodialysis (HR = 2.00; 95%CI: 1.14 to 3.39), pulsatile arterial pressure (HR = 1.01; 95%CI: 1.00 to 1.03) and the infra-inguinal GLASS Stage (HR = 2.50; 95%CI: 1.17 to 5.82). We could not correlate our results with the WiFI scores for amputation risk and revascularization benefit., Conclusion: For patients with CLTI at the stage of trophic disorders, with or without a history of index limb revascularization, the GLASS successfully predicted MALEs. Hemodialysis and high pulsatile arterial pressure increased the risk of MALEs. The WiFI score did not demonstrate its interest in this subgroup of patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes after bypass surgery or endovascular therapy (EVT) in average- and high-risk patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. A high-risk patient was defined as one with estimated 30-day mortality rate ≥5% or 2-year survival rate ≤50%, as determined by the Surgical Reconstruction vs Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (SPINACH) calculator. The amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), wound healing, and 30-day mortality were compared separately for the average- and high-risk patients between the bypass and EVT with propensity score matching., Results: We analyzed 239 and 31 propensity score-matched pairs in the average- and high-risk patients with CLTI. In the average-risk patients, the 2-year AFS and LS rates were 78.1% and 94.4% in the bypass group and 63.0% and 87.7% in the EVT group (P < .001 and P = .007), respectively. The 1-year wound healing rates were 88.6% in the bypass group and 76.8% in the EVT group, respectively (P < .001). The 30-day mortality was 0.8% in the bypass surgery and 0.8% in the EVT group (P = .996). In the high-risk patients, there was no differences in the AFS, LS, and wound healing between the groups (P = .591, P = .148, and P = .074). The 30-day mortality was 3.2% in the bypass group and 3.2% in the EVT group (P = .991)., Conclusions: Bypass surgery is superior to EVT with respect to the AFS, LS, and wound healing in the average-risk patients. EVT is a feasible first-line treatment strategy for high-risk patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization, based on the lack of significant differences in the 2-year AFS rate, between the bypass surgery and EVT cohorts., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) comprises the current standard-of-care for symptomatic common femoral artery occlusive disease. Although it provides effective inflow revascularization via a single incision, it remains an invasive procedure in an often-frail patient population. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the morbidity and mortality of CFE in a contemporary cohort., Methods: Consecutive CFEs performed at a large, urban hospital were reviewed. Six-month mortality, local complications (hematoma, lymphatic leak, pseudoaneurysm, wound infection, and/or dehiscence), and systemic complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: A total of 129 isolated CFEs were performed over 7 years for claudication (36%), rest pain (16%), tissue loss (29%), or acute on chronic limb ischemia (21%). Mean age was 75 ± 9 years, and 68% of patients were male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including coronary artery disease (54%), diabetes (41%), chronic pulmonary disease (25%), and congestive heart failure (22%). The majority of CFEs were performed under general anesthesia (98%) with patch angioplasty using bovine pericardium (73% vs 27% Dacron). Twenty-two patients (17%) sustained local complications following the procedure; their occurrence was significantly associated with obesity (P = .002) but no technical or operative factors. Nineteen patients (15%) sustained serious systemic complications; their occurrence was significantly associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P < .001), and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (P = .002). By 6 months, 17 patients (13%) had died. Being on dialysis, presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and being in a high ASA class at the time of operation were all associated with 6-month mortality; a high ASA class at the time of operation was independently predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-9.24; P = .044)., Conclusions: Although commonly performed, CFE is not a benign vascular procedure. Disease presentation, anesthetic risk, and expected longevity play an important role in clinical outcomes. Evolving endovascular approaches to the common femoral artery could serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future., Competing Interests: Disclosure L.S. is a founding member of Efemoral Medical, Inc., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Approximately one-quarter of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) present with concomitant malperfusion of coronary arteries, mesenteric circulation, lower extremities, kidneys, brain, and/or coma. It is generally accepted that TAAD patients who present with malperfusion experience higher mortality rates than patients without, although how specific malperfusion syndromes, alone or in combination, affect mortality is not well described., Methods: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection database was queried for patients who underwent surgical repair of TAAD. Patients were stratified according to the presence/absence of malperfusion at presentation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate in-hospital mortality according to malperfusion type. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate 30-day postoperative survival., Results: Six thousand four hundred thirty-seven patients underwent surgical repair of acute TAAD, of whom 2642 (41%) had 1 or more preoperative malperfusion syndromes. Mesenteric malperfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.84; P < .001) was associated with the highest odds of in-hospital mortality, followed by coma (AOR, 1.88; P = .007), limb ischemia (AOR, 1.73; P = .008), and coronary malperfusion (AOR, 1.51; P = .02). Renal malperfusion (AOR, 1.37; P = .24) and neurologic deficit (AOR, 1.35; P = .28) were not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In patients who survived to discharge, there was no difference in 1-year postdischarge survival in the malperfusion and no malperfusion cohorts (P = .36)., Conclusions: Survival during the index admission after TAAD repair varies according to the presence and type of malperfusion syndromes, with mesenteric malperfusion being associated with the highest odds of in-hospital death. Not only the presence of malperfusion but rather specific malperfusion syndromes should be considered when assessing a patient's risk of undergoing TAAD repair., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is characterized by rest pain and tissue loss, with an annual mortality rate of 20% and amputation rate of 40%, if not treated. Open bypass surgery is recommended in CLTI, depending on the availability of good quality venous material, outflow artery patency, and surgical expertise. The aim of the study is to analyze primary patency, limb salvage, and survival rate in patients undergoing popliteal-to-distal bypass., Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent popliteal-to-distal bypass surgery between January 2016 and December 2021 were enrolled in the study. Primary outcomes were primary patency, limb salvage, and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included amputation-free survival and secondary patency., Results: Forty-nine patients were included during the study. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Target outflow artery was in 27% (n. 13) of cases the anterior tibial artery, in 27% (n. 13) the dorsalis pedis, in 2% (n. 1) the peroneal artery, in 30% (n. 15) the retromalleolar tibial artery, in 10% (n. 5) the medial plantar artery, and in 4% (n. 2) the tarsal artery. Two-year primary patency was 85% ± 5. Secondary patency rates were 86% ± 3 at 2 years. The overall survival was 81% ± 6 at 2 years, the amputation-free survival was 70% ± 9, and the limb salvage rate was 81% ± 6., Conclusions: Popliteal-to-distal bypass requires high technical expertise to be performed. When a good autologous vein and adequate outflow artery are present, they can be feasible with good patency rates and overall survival., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cilostazol is used for the treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact of cilostazol on the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) remains controversial. This study assesses the use and impact of cilostazol on patients undergoing PVI for peripheral arterial disease (PAD)., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database files for PVI were reviewed. Patients with PAD who underwent PVI for chronic limb threatening-ischemia or claudication were included and divided based on the use of cilostazol preoperatively. After propensity matching for patient demographics and comorbidities, the short-term and long-term outcomes of the 2 groups (preoperative cilostazol use versus no preoperative cilostazol use) were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine outcomes., Results: A total of 245,309 patients underwent PVI procedures and 6.6% (N = 16,366) were on cilostazol prior to intervention. Patients that received cilostazol were more likely to be male (62% vs 60%; P < 0.001), White (77% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), and smokers (83% vs. 77%; P < 0.001). They were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (50% vs. 56%; P < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (14% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patient on cilostazol were more likely to be treated for claudication (63% vs. 40%, P < 0.001), undergo prior lower extremity revascularization (55% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have undergone prior minor and major amputation (10% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive cilostazol. After 3:1 propensity matching, there were 50,265 patients included in the analysis with no differences in baseline characteristics. Patients on cilostazol were less likely to develop renal complications and more likely to be discharged home. Patients on cilostazol had significantly lower rates of long-term mortality (11.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001 and major amputation (4.0% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in rates of reintervention, major adverse limb events, or patency after PVI. Amputation-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients on cilostazol, after 4 years of follow up (89% vs. 87%, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Cilostazol is underutilized in the VQI database and seems to be associated with improved amputation-free survival. Cilostazol therapy should be considered in all patients with PAD who can tolerate it prior to PVI., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Postoperative limb infection is associated with a poor prognosis and a low amputation-free survival rate after surgical revascularization in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia. The Global Vascular Guidelines 2019 recommend antibiotic therapy for patients with deep space foot infection or wet gangrene; however, no study is cited as evidence for this recommendation. The present study was performed to offer new evidence supporting the use of perioperative therapeutic antibiotics in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing surgical revascularization., Methods: This single-center retrospective study was performed in Kyushu University Hospital and involved patients with CLTI who underwent surgical revascularization from 2003 to 2021. Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefazolin were defined as preventive antibiotics, and other types were defined as therapeutic antibiotics. Postoperative limb-associated infection was defined as an increased foot infection (fI) score in the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system after surgical revascularization. The association between perioperative antibiotic therapy and postoperative limb-associated infection was assessed., Results: Among 286 limbs of 263 patients with CLTI, 27 (9%) limbs developed postoperative limb-associated infection after surgical revascularization. The fI scores were significantly higher in the patients with than without postoperative limb-associated infection (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 0.4 ± 0.1, respectively; p = 0.0033), indicating that an fI score of ≥1 was a risk factor for postoperative limb-associated infection. Perioperative therapeutic antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative limb-associated infection compared with preventive antibiotics (0.0% vs. 44.8%, respectively; p = 0.0028) in the patients with CLTI who had an fI score of ≥1 after bypass surgery, although perioperative therapeutic antibiotics were not effective for patients with an fI score of 0., Conclusion: Perioperative therapeutic antibiotics for patients with an fI score of ≥1 are beneficial for reducing the incidence of postoperative limb-associated infection after surgical revascularization., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: Patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia experience a high burden of target limb reinterventions. We analyzed data from the Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) randomized trial comparing initial open bypass (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) treatment strategies, with a focus on reintervention-related study endpoints., Methods: In a planned secondary analysis, we examined the rates of major reintervention, any reintervention, and the composite of any reintervention, amputation, or death by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1 with suitable single-segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], n = 1434; cohort 2 lacking suitable SSGSV, n = 396). We also compared the cumulative number of major and all index limb reinterventions over time. Comparisons between treatment arms within each cohort were made using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models., Results: In cohort 1, assignment to OPEN was associated with a significantly reduced hazard of a major limb reintervention (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.49; P < .001), any reintervention (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75; P < .001), or any reintervention, amputation, or death (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78; P < .001). Findings were similar in cohort 2 for major reintervention (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84; P = .007) or any reintervention (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P = .04). In both cohorts, early (30-day) limb reinterventions were notably higher for patients assigned to ENDO as compared with OPEN (14.7% vs 4.5% of cohort 1 subjects; 16.6% vs 5.6% of cohort 2 subjects). The mean number of major (mean events per subject ratio [MR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.58; P < .001) or any target limb reinterventions (MR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; P < .001) per year was significantly less in the OPEN arm of cohort 1. The mean number of reinterventions per limb salvaged per year was lower in the OPEN arm of cohort 1 (MR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.35-0.57; P < .001 and MR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.79; P < .001 for major and all, respectively). The majority of index limb reinterventions occurred during the first year following randomization, but events continued to accumulate over the duration of follow-up in the trial., Conclusions: Reintervention is common following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Among patients deemed suitable for either approach, initial treatment with open bypass, particularly in patients with available SSGSV conduit, is associated with a significantly lower number of major and minor target limb reinterventions., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.C. is on the DSMB for Abbott Vascular. M.M. is an advisor for Janssen. K.R. receives income as a consultant or member of a scientific advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Althea Medical, Angiodynamics, Auxetics, BectonDickinson, Boston Scientific, Contego, Crossliner, Innova Vascular, Inspire MD, Janssen/Johnson and Johnson, Magneto, Mayo Clinic, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Neptune Medical, Penumbra, Philips, Surmodics, Terumo, Thrombolex, Truvic, Vasorum, and Vumedi; owns equity or stock options in the following entities: Access Vascular, Aerami, Althea Medical, Auxetics, Contego, Crossliner, Cruzar Systems, Endospan, Imperative Care/Truvic, Innova Vascular, InspireMD, JanaCare, Magneto, MedAlliance, Neptune Medical, Orchestra, Prosomnus, Shockwave, Skydance, Summa Therapeutics, Thrombolex, Vasorum, and Vumedi; serves as a member of the board of directors of the following organization: The National PERT ConsortiumTMA; and K.R. or his institution (on his behalf) receive research grants from the following entities: NIH, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Penumbra, and Gettinge-Atrium. A.F. received a grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation; is a consultant with Sanifit, LeMaitre, and BioGenCell; and is on the advisory board for Dialysis-X and iThera Medical. E.A. is a consultant with Philips and is participating in clinical trials with Inari Medical. C.M. is a consultant with Cook, Abbott, Penumra, and Optum Labs; and received a research grant from Shockwave and Philips., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Acute lower extremity ischemia is one of the most common emergencies in vascular surgery and is a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia and to determine factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality., Methods: A total of 354 patients underwent urgent revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia at an academic medical center between 2014 and 2019. A retrospective review of patients' demographics, comorbidities, etiology and severity of limb ischemia, and procedural characteristics was recorded. Outcomes, including postoperative complications, perioperative limb loss, and mortality, were analyzed., Results: The mean patient age was 69 ± 17 years, and 52% were females. 50% of patients presented with Rutherford Class IIb ischemia. Arterial embolization was the most common cause of limb ischemia, seen in 33% of cases. Open surgical revascularization was performed in 241 (68%) patients, while endovascular and hybrid approaches were utilized in 53 (15%) and 60 (17%) cases, respectively. Postoperative adverse events occurred in 44% of patients, including wound complications (11%), cardiac (5%) and pulmonary (16%) complications, strokes (4%), UTIs (10%), renal failure (14%), bleeding (5%), and compartment syndrome (3%). The rate of unplanned return to the operating room was 21%. Major adverse cardiovascular events were seen in 103 (29%) patients and major adverse limb events were seen in 57 (16%) patients. The median length of stay was 10 days (IQR = 4); 49% patients were discharged to skilled nursing facility and 19% were readmitted within 30 days.The rate of amputation during index admission was 10%, and perioperative mortality was 20%. Gender, tibial runoff, and etiology of limb ischemia were independent predictors of limb loss. Women had lower risk of limb loss than men (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.023, 0.38). Poor tibial runoff (one-vessel or absence of flow below the knee) was a significant predictor of limb loss as compared to three-vessel runoff (OR, 14.92; 95% CI, 1.92, 115.88). Aneurysmal disease (OR, 38.35; 95% CI, 3.54, 42.45) and traumatic injuries (OR, 108.08; 95% CI, 8.21, 159.06) were the strongest predictors of amputation as compared to other etiologies of limb ischemia. Multivariate model identified ESRD (OR, 9.2; 95% CI, 1.8-46.3), degree of ischemia (class IIb or higher vs class IIa; OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6), and age (OR, 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.0 for every 10 years) as independent predictors of perioperative mortality., Conclusions: Urgent revascularization for management of acute limb ischemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Elderly patients with ESRD presenting with severely threatened limbs have especially high risk of perioperative mortality and may not be ideal candidates for limb salvage., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Portugal has one of the highest prevalence of patients on a regular dialysis program. This population has a higher incidence of peripheral arterial disease with higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Our goal was to compare outcomes between dialysis and non-dialysis patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) submitted to infrapopliteal bypass., Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-center study of infrapopliteal bypass for CLTI was performed between 2012 and 2019. Patients were divided in two groups based on dialysis status (group 1 incorporated patients on dialysis). Primary end point was 1-year freedom from CLTI. Secondary end points were limb-salvage, survival and primary (PP) and tertiary patency (TP) rates at 3 years of follow-up., Results: A total of 352 infrapopliteal bypasses were performed in 310 patients with CLTI. Fourteen percent of the revascularizations were performed on dialysis patients (48/352). Median age was 73 years (interquartile range - IQR 15) and 74% (259/352) were male. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR 42). Overall, 92% (325/352) had tissue loss and 44% (154/352) had some degree of infection. The majority of revascularization procedures were performed with vein grafts (61%, 214/352). The 30-day mortality was 4% (11/310), with no difference between groups (p = 0.627). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between groups regarding freedom from CLTI (76% vs. 79%; HR 0.96, CI 0.65-1.44, p=0.857), limb-salvage (70% vs. 82%; HR 1.40, CI 0.71-2.78, p=0.327) and survival (62% vs. 64%; HR 1.08, CI 0.60-1.94, p=0.799). PP rates were 39% in group 1 and 64% in group 2 (HR 1.71, CI 1.05-2.79, p=0.030). TP rates were not different between groups (57% and 78%; HR 1.79, CI 0.92-3.47, p=0.082)., Conclusion: Infrapopliteal bypass for CLTI, on dialysis patients, resulted in lower PP rates. No differences were observed in freedom from CLTI, TP, limb salvage and survival.

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients take too many medications because they are elderly and frail patients with multiple comorbidities. Polypharmacy is associated with frailty, although its prognostic significance in CLI patients is unknown. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of hyperpolypharmacy among adults with CLI and its effect on 1-year amputation and mortality., Methods: A total of 200 patients with CLI who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) for below-knee (CTC) lesions were included in this study. Hyperpolypharmacy was defined as using ≥10 drugs. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of hyperpolypharmacy., Results: We detected hyperpolypharmacy in 66 patients. The incidence of 1-year amputation [24 (36.4) versus 12 (9), p <.001] and mortality [28 (42.4) versus 12 (9), p <.001] were higher in patients with hyperpolypharmacy. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were used to determine the independent predictors of amputation and mortality. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value was defined as 10 or more drug use was able to detect the presence of 1-year mortality with 67.5% sensitivity and 79.4% specificity. The Kaplan-Meier method showed a significant difference (rank p <.001 between log groups), and hyperpolypharmacy was associated with 1-year amputation and mortality., Conclusion: Hyperpolypharmacy was significantly associated with 1-year mortality and major amputation in CLI patients. Hyperpolypharmacy can be a valuable aid in patient risk assessment in the CLI., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The increasing aging and frailty of the population make the management of acute limb ischemia (ALI) more difficult, with decision-making far from being guided by evidence. The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristics and results of ALI treatment in nonagenarians., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of nonagenarian patients with ALI attended at our institution between 2008 and 2021. The primary outcomes of the study were 1-year limb salvage and survival rates., Results: A total of 102 patients were included (mean age 92.38, 78.4% women). In 83 cases (81.4%) ALI was attributed to embolism, and 19 (18.6%) to acute arterial thrombosis. One-month overall survival was 70.6%. Fifteen patients (14.7%) were treated palliatively, including 8 (53.3%) irreversible ALI with associated malignancy/advanced dementia, 5 (33.3%) with associated cerebral/intestinal ischemia and 2 (13.3%) with aortic occlusion and poor medical condition. None of these patients survived after 10 days. The remaining 87 patients (85.3%) were treated with isolated anticoagulation (n = 8, 9.1%), primary major amputation (n = 1, 1.1%) or revascularization (n = 78, 89.6%), including 69 (67.6%) embolectomies, 6 (5.9%) bypass and 3 (2.9%) endovascular techniques. One-year limb salvage and survival rates were 96% and 48%, respectively. Predictive factors of lower survival included anemia (HR = 1.81, p = 0.014) and ALI severity (HR = 1.73, p = 0.032), but not cognitive or functional status. Patients surviving the ALI episode had a 1-year survival rate significantly below that of a similar matched population., Conclusion: Although nonagenarians with an ALI are often functionally and cognitively impaired and have a limited life expectancy, most patients need revascularization for limb salvage and this can be done successfully with a low invasive surgery., (© 2023 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).)