Search

Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is highly recommended to prevent the onset and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Japan. However, the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the manifestations or presenting symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in daily clinical practice remains unclear., Methods: This retrospective single-center study was conducted from April 2021 to July 2022 in Japan. We compared the clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 636 COVID-19-positive patients who visited our outpatient fever clinic, both COVID-19-vaccinated and unvaccinated., Results: During the study period, the COVID-19 vaccination rate at the time of infection was 77.2% (n=491/636), with a median of two doses. Most manifestations, including fever, were reduced in the vaccinated group (n=196) compared to the non-vaccinated group (n=142). The temperature at the clinic decreased significantly as the number of vaccinations increased. Fever was the most common manifestation in the non-vaccinated group (76%, n=108/142), while only 30% (n=59/196) of those who received three or more COVID-19 vaccinations experienced fever. However, sore throat and cough were observed more frequently in the vaccinated group compared to the non-vaccinated group., Conclusion: Fever may not be a reliable indicator of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated individuals, as its frequency is significantly reduced by vaccination. However, since sore throat and cough are more frequently observed in vaccinated individuals, these symptoms could be useful for recommending COVID-19 testing even in the absence of fever, aiding in the prevention of infectious outbreaks., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine issued approval #2201006. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Inaba et al.)

Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility of a model-based iterative reconstruction technique (MBIR) tuned for the myocardium on myocardial computed tomography late enhancement (CT-LE)., Methods: Twenty-eight patients who underwent myocardial CT-LE and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 1 year were retrospectively enrolled. Myocardial CT-LE was performed using a 320-row CT with low tube voltage (80 kVp). Myocardial CT-LE images were scanned 7 min after CT angiography (CTA) without additional contrast medium. All myocardial CT-LE images were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), conventional MBIR (MBIR&#95;cardiac), and new MBIR tuned for the myocardium (MBIR&#95;myo). Qualitative (5-grade scale) scores and quantitative parameters (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were assessed as image quality. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of myocardial CT-LE were evaluated at the segment level using an American Heart Association (AHA) 16-segment model, with LGE-MRI as a reference standard. These results were compared among the different CT image reconstructions., Results: In 28 patients with 448 segments, 160 segments were diagnosed with positive by LGE-MRI. In the qualitative assessment of myocardial CT-LE, the mean image quality scores were 2.9 ± 1.2 for HIR, 3.0 ± 1.1 for MBIR&#95;cardiac, and 4.0 ± 1.0 for MBIR&#95;myo. MBIR&#95;myo showed a significantly higher score than HIR (P < 0.001) and MBIR&#95;cardiac (P = 0.018). In the quantitative image quality assessment of myocardial CT-LE, the median image SNR was 10.3 (9.1-11.1) for HIR, 10.8 (9.8-12.1) for MBIR&#95;cardiac, and 16.8 (15.7-18.4) for MBIR&#95;myo. The median image CNR was 3.7 (3.0-4.6) for HIR, 3.8 (3.2-5.1) for MBIR&#95;cardiac, and 6.4 (5.0-7.7) for MBIR&#95;myo. MBIR&#95;myo significantly improved the SNR and CNR of CT-LE compared to HIR and MBIR&#95;cardiac (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of myocardial CT-LE were 70%, 92%, and 84% for HIR; 71%, 92%, and 85% for MBIR&#95;cardiac; and 84%, 92%, and 89% for MBIR&#95;myo, respectively. MBIR&#95;myo showed significantly higher image quality, sensitivity, and accuracy than the others (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: MBIR tuned for myocardium improved image quality and diagnostic performance for myocardial CT-LE assessment., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Shota Nakano is an employee of Canon Medical Systems Corporation. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) stabilizes hemodynamics in an electrical storm leading to cardiogenic shock. However, adverse effects of VA-ECMO are increased left ventricular (LV) afterload and LV end-diastolic pressure due to retrograde blood return. These adverse effects could be ameliorated by LV unloading with Impella insertion. This case illustrates the possible efficacy of adjunctive Impella insertion for a refractory electrical storm that is resistant to defibrillation under mechanical support with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Akazawa et al.)