Search

Background and Purpose This study comprised a post hoc analysis of the Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke (ATAMIS) trial aiming to determine whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy compared with that of monotherapy on preventing early neurological deterioration (END) differed according to the time from stroke onset to antiplatelet therapy (OTT). Methods In the ATAMIS trial, patients were divided into two subgroups: OTT from 0 to 24 hours (0–24 h group) and OTT from 24 to 48 hours (24–48 h group). We conducted multivariate regression analysis with continuous and categorical OTT to detect the effect of antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was END at 7 days, defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of more than two points compared with the baseline. The safety outcomes were bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days. Results A total of 2,915 patients were included. With respect to END at 7 days, clopidogrel plus aspirin showed a lower proportion than aspirin alone across continuous OTT (4.8% vs. 6.7%; adjusted risk difference, -1.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.6% to -0.2%; P=0.03), and was lower in the 0–24 hours group (5.7% vs. 9.2%; adjusted risk difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -5.5% to -2.0%; P

Abstract We conducted a post hoc analysis of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS) to investigate whether red blood cell (RBC) indices are associated with efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), and whether the association is affected by age. In this post hoc analysis, patients with RBC indices at admission were enrolled. RBC indices including RBC count, hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hemoglobin (HB), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were analyzed. According to the median of these RBC indices, eligible patients were divided into high and low groups, which were further subdivided into RIC and control subgroups. Primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1 at 90 days, which was used to evaluate RIC efficacy. RIC efficacy as well as effect of age on RIC efficacy were analyzed across the high and low groups of different RBC indices, and the interaction effects of RBC indices on RIC efficacy were evaluated. A total of 1640 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In overall patients, no significant interaction effects of RIC intervention by all RBC indices were found, although there was a trend in interaction effect of RIC intervention by MCH (p = 0.116). However, we found an effect of age on the association of MCH with RIC efficacy. In patients over 60 years old, MCH significantly affected RIC efficacy (p = 0.006) and RIC significantly produced a higher proportion of primary outcome in high MCH (72.6% vs. 59.1%, P

Abstract Objective We performed a post hoc exploratory analysis of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS) to determine whether hypertension history and baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) affect the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC). Methods Based on the full analysis set of RICAMIS, patients were divided into hypertension versus non‐hypertension group, or

Abstract Systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) is associated with outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has been demonstrated to be effective in stroke and may affect blood pressure. Relationship between SBPV and RIC treatment after stroke warrants investigation. A total of 1707 patients from per-protocol analysis set of RICAMIS study were included. The SBPV was calculated based on blood pressure measured at admission, Day 7, and Day 12. (I) To investigate the effect of SBPV on efficacy of RIC in stroke, patients were divided into High and Low categories in each SBPV parameter. Primary outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days. Compared with Control, efficacy of RIC in each category and interaction between categories were investigated. (II) To investigate the effect of RIC treatment on SBPV, SBPV parameters were compared between RIC and Control groups. Compared with Control, a higher likelihood of primary outcome in RIC was found in high category (max–min: adjusted risk difference [RD] = 7.2, 95% CI 1.2–13.1, P = 0.02; standard deviation: adjusted RD = 11.5, 95% CI 1.6–21.4, P = 0.02; coefficient of variation: adjusted RD = 11.2, 95% CI 1.4–21.0, P = 0.03). Significant interaction of RIC on outcomes were found between High and Low standard deviations (adjusted P

Background We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to investigate whether the priority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was consistent between patients with and without stroke pathogenesis of large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA). Methods and Results Patients with stroke classification randomized to a clopidogrel‐plus‐aspirin group and aspirin‐alone group in a modified intention‐to‐treat analysis set of ATAMIS were classified into LAA and non‐LAA subtypes. The primary outcome was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as a >2‐point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage. We compared treatment effects in each stroke subtype and investigated the interaction. Among 2910 patients, 225 were assigned into the LAA subtype (119 in the clopidogrel‐plus‐aspirin group and 106 in the aspirin‐alone group) and 2685 into the non‐LAA subtype (1380 in the clopidogrel‐plus‐aspirin group and 1305 in the aspirin‐alone group). Median age was 66 years, and 35% were women. A lower proportion of early neurologic deterioration was found to be associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, −10.4% [95% CI, −16.2% to −4.7%]; P=0.001) but not in the non‐LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, −1.4% [95% CI, −2.6% to 0.1%]; P=0.06). No significant interaction was found (P=0.11). Conclusions Compared with the non‐LAA subtype, patients with stroke of the LAA subtype may get more benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin with respect to early neurologic deterioration at 7 days. Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov; UnIque identifier: NCT02869009.

Background and Purpose: Sex differences in acute ischemic stroke have been widely investigated, but the difference in acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis is not well understood. The current study was to investigate the issue based on a prospective cohort. Methods: From the Intravenous Thrombolysis Registry for Chinese Ischemic Stroke within 4.5h onset (INTRECIS) cohort, a total of 953 eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled in final analysis. Based on 3-month modified Rankin scale score (mRS), patients were classified into good outcome group (mRS 0–1) and poor outcome group (mRS 2–6). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors for clinical outcome in male or female patients. Results: Of the 953 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 314 (32.9 %) were women. At day 90, we found no significant gender differences in good outcome (72.5 % vs 65.6 %, adjusted p = 0.414). We got the same results after propensity score matching (69.5 % vs 63.4 %, adjusted p = 0.637). Furthermore, we found that initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (odd ratio [OR] 0.877; 95 % CI 0.847–0.909, p

Rationale/AimIntracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke in Asia and is significantly associated with stroke recurrence. The Balloon angiopLasty for intracranial Atherosclerotic minor Stroke/TIA (BLAST) study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of early submaximal balloon angioplasty (SBA) combined with standard medical therapy vs. standard medical therapy alone in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) due to ICAS.MethodsThe BLAST study is a multicenter prospective cohort study which will enroll patients with minor stroke or TIA due to symptomatic ICAS within 1 week of symptom onset from 20 centers in China. Eligible patients will receive either SBA with standard medical therapy or standard medical therapy alone based on the decision of the patient or legal representative. Participants will be followed up for 1 year.Study outcomesThe primary outcome is a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or ischemic stroke in the culprit artery territory from 30 days to 1 year. Secondary outcomes include stroke or death within 30 days, ischemic stroke in the culprit artery territory from 30 days to 1 year, restenosis rate of the culprit artery at 1 year, and neurological improvement at 90 days (assessed by mRS score). Safety outcomes include intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days and endovascular complications.Sample size estimateAccording to previous studies, the incidence of the composite clinical outcomes is 15% in the group receiving medical therapy alone. We assumed the incidence would decrease to 5% in the SBA combined with the medical therapy group. The target sample size is 416 patients (208 per group), with 90% power and 5% type I error, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.ImplicationsThe BLAST study will provide evidence regarding whether early SBA can reduce stroke recurrence and mortality in patients with minor stroke/TIA due to ICAS compared with medical therapy alone.Clinical trial registration:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06014723.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a nomogram tool to predict cerebral white matter lesions (WMLs) in elderly men.MethodsBased on a retrospective cohort from January 2017 to December 2019, a multivariate logistic analysis was performed to construct a nomogram for predicting WMLs. The nomogram was further validated using a follow-up cohort between January 2020 and December 2022. The calibration curve, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, and the decision curves analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate discrimination and calibration of this nomogram.ResultA total of 436 male patients were enrolled in this study, and all 436 patients were used as the training cohort and 163 follow-up patients as the validation cohort. A multivariate logistic analysis showed that age, cystatin C, uric acid, total cholesterol, platelet, and the use of antiplatelet drugs were independently associated with WMLs. Based on these variables, a nomogram was developed. The nomogram displayed excellent predictive power with the area under the ROC curve of 0.951 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.929–0.972] in the training cohort and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.864–0.966) in the validation cohort. The calibration of the nomogram was also good, as indicated by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test with p-value of 0.594 in the training cohort and 0.178 in the validation cohort. The DCA showed that the nomogram holds good clinical application value.ConclusionWe have developed and validated a novel nomogram tool for identifying elderly men at high risk of WMLs, which exhibits excellent predictive power, discrimination, and calibration.

Background Remote ischemic conditioning has been found to be effective in improving functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the RICAMIS (Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to determine whether long‐term remote ischemic conditioning duration after stroke onset is associated with better clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke. Methods and Results Patients from the full analysis set were included in this secondary analysis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1. Among the 1776 patients, there were 55 patients in the 1 to 7 days remote ischemic conditioning group, 345 in the 8 to 10 days group, 412 in the 11 to 13 days group, 51 in the 14 to 16 days group, and 913 in the control group. Compared with the control group, a significantly higher proportion of excellent functional outcomes at 90 days was found in the 11 to 13 days remote ischemic conditioning group (adjusted absolute difference, 9.1% [95% CI, 3.7%–14.5%]; P =0.001), which was attenuated in the other groups (adjusted absolute difference in the 8–10 days group, 2.0% [95% CI, −4.0% to 8.0%]; P=0.51; adjusted absolute difference in the 14–16 days group, 7.4% [95% CI, −5.8% to 20.5%]; P=0.27), but compared to the control group, there was lower proportion of excellent functional outcomes in the 1 to 7 days group (adjusted absolute difference, −14.4% [95% CI, −27.8% to 0.0%]; P=0.05). Conclusions Among patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke, a higher likelihood of excellent clinical outcome was found in patients with longer duration of remote ischemic conditioning.

Background Ischemic conditioning‐induced cardioprotection was attenuated by dyslipidemia in some animal and clinical studies, which is not investigated in patients with stroke. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the RICAMIS (Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to investigate the association of dyslipidemia on admission with the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC). Methods and Results In this analysis, eligible patients were divided into dyslipidemia and normal‐lipid groups according to the levels of 4 blood lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglycerides, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol), which were further subdivided into RIC and control subgroups. We analyzed the differences in functional outcome between RIC and control subgroups in dyslipidemia and normal‐lipid patients, respectively, and the interaction effects of RIC treatment with blood lipid levels were evaluated. Among 1776 patients from intention‐to‐treat analysis, 1419 patients with data of blood lipid profiles were included in the final analysis. A significantly higher proportion of modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 was identified in the RIC versus control subgroup across the normal‐total cholesterol group (69.9% versus 63.5%; P=0.04), normal‐triglycerides group (68.1% versus 60.5%; P=0.016), high–low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol group (65.7% versus 57.7%; P=0.025), and normal–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol group (68.3% versus 60.5%; P=0.005). Similar statistical trends were found in the high‐total cholesterol group (62.8% versus 55.5%; P=0.059), high‐triglycerides group (67.8% versus 60.1%; P=0.099), normal–low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol group (69.8% versus 63.7%; P=0.105), but no statistical significance was found in the low–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol group (63.4% versus 61%; P=0.705). Furthermore, no significant interaction effect of RIC intervention by blood lipid profiles was found. Similar results were obtained for lipids as continuous variables. Conclusions Blood lipids on admission was not associated with the neuroprotective effect of RIC.