Search

Hormone receptor expression is a known positive prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer; however, limited evidence exists on its prognostic impact on prognosis of young patients harboring a pathogenic variant (PV) in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included young patients (aged ≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and harboring germline PVs in BRCA genes. We investigated the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer. Outcomes of interest [disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)] were first investigated according to hormone receptor expression (positive versus negative), and then according to breast cancer subtype [luminal A-like versus luminal B-like versus triple-negative versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer]. From 78 centers worldwide, 4709 BRCA carriers were included, of whom 2143 (45.5%) had hormone receptor-positive and 2566 (54.5%) hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Median follow-up was 7.9 years. The rate of distant recurrences was higher in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (13.1% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001), while the rate of second primary breast cancer was lower (9.1% versus 14.7%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. The 8-year DFS was 65.8% and 63.4% in patients with hormone receptor-positive and negative disease, respectively. The hazard ratio of hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease changed over time for DFS, BCSS, and OS (P < 0.05 for interaction of hormone receptor status and survival time). Patients with luminal A-like breast cancer had the worst long-term prognosis in terms of DFS compared to all the other subgroups (8-year DFS: 60.8% in luminal A-like versus 63.5% in triple-negative versus 65.5% in HER2-positive and 69.7% in luminal B-like subtype). In young BRCA carriers, differences in recurrence pattern and second primary breast cancer among hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease warrant consideration in counseling patients on treatment, follow-up, and risk-reducing surgery. • In young BRCA carriers, hormone receptor status did not appear to be a strong positive prognostic factor. • Patients with luminal A-like disease seem to have the worst DFS compared to all the other subtypes. • Treatment, surveillance, and prevention strategies based on disease biology are recommended in young BRCA carriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.

In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between dietary carotenoids and breast cancer (BC) risks were inconsistent. Therefore, this study investigated the association between dietary carotenoid and BC risks among Korean women. We recruited participants from the National Cancer Centre of Korea. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a logistic regression model. There was an inverse association between dietary carotenoid subclasses and BC risks; in particular, a higher intake of β-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin was associated with reduced BC risks. After subgroup analysis with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status, there was similar trend among ER-/PR- women. We further investigated which foods contribute to the carotenoid intake. A higher intake of radish leaves, kale, and bracken was associated with lowered BC risks. Accordingly, dietary carotenoid, particularly β-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin, appears to be associated with a lower risk of BC among Korean women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) characteristics are known to influence patients survival. Social differences have been reported by previous studies for those characteristics but questions persist because of inconsistent conclusions. We aimed to investigate the impact of education on BC stage, grade, and hormone receptor (HR) status, while adjusting for potential confounders including a broad set of health behaviors, anthropometric measures, and reproductive factors. Methods: In the French E3N cohort, 5236 women developed a primary invasive BC for which there was available information on stage, grade, and HR status. No multivariate analyses was performed for BC stage based on the lack of association in bivariate analyses. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models for BC grade or binomial logistic regression models for HR status of BC. Results: Women with a lower education were diagnosed with higher grade BC compared to women with a higher education (1.32 [1.12; 1.57]). This association was slightly attenuated after adjustment for covariates independently and more strongly affected in the fully adjusted model (1.20 [0.99; 1.45]). A significant association was observed between lower education and HR- status of BC (1.20 [1.02; 1.42]) attenuated after adjustment for age at first childbirth (1.12 [0.95; 1.33]). Conclusion: In this cohort, education was associated with BC grade and HR status but not stage at diagnosis. The link between education and BC grade was not entirely explained by the different adjustments. A specific mechanism could be at play and deserves further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Physical activity is associated with lower breast cancer risk, especially in postmenopausal women. Associations in premenopausal women are less well established. Methods: We evaluated recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII (187,278 women; n = 12,785 breast cancers; follow-up: NHS = 1986–2016, NHSII = 1989–2017) by menopausal status and estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor status. Physical activity was evaluated as updated cumulative average of metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-h/week. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Recreational physical activity was inversely associated with breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women. Higher activity levels were associated with lower risk of ER+/PR + breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women (e.g., total recreational activity, ≥ 27 vs < 3 MET-h/week, premenopausal HR = 0.83, 95%CI = (0.70–0.99), postmenopausal HR = 0.86 (0.78–0.95); pheterogeneity = 0.97). Results were attenuated with adjustment for current body mass index (BMI) among postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women (e.g., ≥ 27 vs < 3 MET-h/week, premenopausal HR = 0.83 (0.69–0.98); postmenopausal HR = 0.95 (0.85–1.05); pheterogeneity = 0.99). In analyses of moderate-vigorous activity and breast cancer risk, no heterogeneity by menopausal status was observed (phet ≥ 0.53; e.g., ≥ 27 vs < 3 MET-h/week, ER+/PR+, premenopausal HR = 0.88 (0.69–1.11); postmenopausal HR = 0.71 (0.58–0.88). No associations were observed for ER−/PR− disease. Conclusions: Recreational physical activity was associated with lower breast cancer risk in both pre- and postmenopausal women, supporting recreational physical activity as an accessible, modifiable exposure associated with reduced breast cancer risk regardless of menopausal status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recurrence after a mastectomy occurs locally or at distance. These recurrences are of importance as they have a marked impact on the survival, psychology, and morbidity of the subject who underwent the mastectomy. Aim: The present trial was carried out to evaluate distant and local recurrence after mastectomy in subjects with breast cancer, and the effect of PMRT on recurrence. Also, the impact of nodal status, hormone status, and status of margins on this recurrence was assessed. Methods: The status of the nodes including the number of nodes evaluated, number of positive nodes, and nodal grade, hormone receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and Herceptin, along with the number of Herceptin was assessed in the study. The data collected were subjected to statistical evaluation and results were formulated. Results: PMRT was received by 26 subjects (83.8%) in recurrence cases and 6 subjects (54.5%) in the non-recurrence group with a p-value of 0.380. In invasive group, the hormone receptor status was positive in 58% (n=18), 64.5% (n=20), and 16.12% (n=5) for progesterone, estrogen, and Herceptin respectively. In invasive tumors, positive margins after surgery were seen in 2 subjects (6.89%), negative, equal, close, and were seen in 65.5%, 3.44%, and 6.89% subjects respectively. Concerning node status, 0 staging was in 5% noninvasive recurrence cases, 14% invasive recurrence cases who received radiation therapy, and in 4% subjects with invasive tumors with recurrence who did not receive radiation therapy. Conclusion: The present study suggests that subjects who undergo radiation therapy after mastectomy shows lesser rates of recurrence compared to those without any post-mastectomy radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We explored characteristics and clinical outcomes of HER2‐negative and HER2‐low metastatic breast cancers using real‐world data. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify MBC patients that were HER2‐low or HER2‐negative per immunohistochemical staining. A binomial regression analysis identified demographic and clinical correlates of each subtype. A Cox multivariable regression analysis (MVA) and propensity‐match analysis were performed to identify correlates of survival. Results: Excluding missing data, 24,636 MBC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified; 27.9% were HER2‐negative and 72.1% were HER2‐low. There were no relevant demographic differences between the groups. HER2‐low tumors were half as likely to have concomitant hormone receptor‐positive status (p < 0.01). The 3‐year survival rate among hormone receptor‐negative patients was 33.8% for HER2‐low and 32.2% for HER2‐negative (p < 0.05), and 60.9% and 55.6% in HER2‐low and HER2‐negative cases among hormone receptor‐positive patients (p < 0.05), respectively. HER2‐low cases were associated with better survival on MVA (HR =0.95, 95% CI 0.91–0.99) and remained superior with propensity‐matching (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.96). In a subset analysis isolated to hormone receptor‐positive cases, HER2‐low remained correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.98) with propensity‐matched MVA. Correlates of worse survival include older age as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.02–1.02) and Black race (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20–1.32) [all p < 0.01]. Conclusions: In the largest such analysis performed to date, our study demonstrates a small but statistically significant association with improved survival for HER2‐low tumors compared to HER2‐negative tumors in MBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women, with significant mortality. Mammography is a routine investigation for breast disease. A known risk factor for breast cancer is increased breast density. Here, we tried to observe if mammographic density also affects the hormone receptor status of breast cancer, which will help in the understanding of the biological mechanisms of breast cancer development., Material and Methods: Suspected breast cancer patients at Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, underwent mammography in the Department of Radiodiagnosis. The density of breast contralateral to the mass was assessed using Hologic Quantra software version 2.1.1 [Area Breast Density(ABD)]. The hormone receptor status of all the tumours was recorded on histopathology. Of these, 100 confirmed cases were included in the study., Results: ER-positive, PR-positive, and HER2-positive tumours were seen in 41%, 33%, and 34% patients, respectively. Regarding ER receptor status, the mean ABD for positive and negative tumours was 27% and 23%, respectively, p -value = 0.01, showing significant relation between them. Mean ABD for HER2-positive and -negative tumours was 25% and 24%, respectively, p -value = 0.75. Mean ABD for PR-positive and PR-negative tumours was 23% and 25%, respectively, p -value = 0.42 (not significant)., Conclusions: We found that ER-positive tumours were common in dense breasts, which was statistically significant. However, this was not true for PR and HER2 receptor status. Limited studies have been done to study MD using computerised software and its effect on hormone receptor status, with conflicting results. Further, large, multicentric studies can be useful in understanding the mechanism and providing better treatment for breast cancer patients., (© Pol J Radiol 2024.)

Background/objective: Hormone receptor (HR) status is one of the key factors in determining the treatment of breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that HR status may change in metastatic tissue. However, available studies focused mainly on primary biopsies and there are only few trials comparing HR status in the primary tumour and the metastasis using material from complete resection. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of HR alterations in metastatic breast cancer., Materials and Methods: The study retrospectively examines a total of 50 patients who underwent brain, lung, or liver metastasectomy for metastatic breast cancer between January 2000 and January 2019., Results: HR conversion was observed in a total of 30 cases (60.0%), while HER-2/neu (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) discrepancy surprisingly occurred only in one case (2.0%). A change in immunophenotype occurred in 28% of cases. Triple-negativity was more frequent in brain metastases (p = 0.039)., Conclusions: We have confirmed that HR conversion between the primary tumour and its metastases occurs in a significant number of cases, which has important implications for further treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.)