Search

Background Antibiotics for bacteriuria and urinary tract infection are commonly prescribed during pregnancy to avoid adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between significant bacteriuria in pregnancy and any of the four pregnancy outcomes: preterm delivery; low birth weight; small for gestational age; and preterm labour. Methods Systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL library, and Web of Science for observational studies published before 1 March 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Study identification, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment was performed by two independent authors. We combined the included studies in meta-analyses and expressed results as ORs with 95% CIs (Prospero CRD42016053485). Results We identified 58 studies involving 421 657 women. The quality of the studies was mainly poor or fair. The pooled, unadjusted OR for the association between any significant bacteriuria and: (i) preterm delivery was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.30–2.01; 27 studies; I2 = 61%); (ii) low birth weight was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30–1.72; 47 studies; I2 = 74%); (iii) preterm labour was 2.29 (95% CI: 1.53–3.43; 3 studies; I2 = 0%); and (iv) small for gestational age was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.88–2.02; 7 studies; I2 = 54%). Four studies provided an adjusted OR, but were too diverse to combine in meta-analysis. Conclusions This systematic review identified an association between significant bacteriuria in pregnancy and the three complications: preterm delivery; low birth weight; and preterm labour. However, the quality of the available evidence is insufficient to conclude whether this association is merely due to confounding factors. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support active identification and treatment of bacteriuria in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

People with dementia have an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality due to infections. We aimed to explore decision-making processes and interventions for detecting and managing suspected infections in people with dementia and involved actors and determinants. We conducted a scoping review, searching CINAHL and PubMed, and synthesized data through mapping and narratively. We identified 22 studies, based mostly on nursing homes and US data. Decision-making processes included recognition of infections based on observations of early signs and symptoms, actions when suspecting infections, and proxy/family involvement. Interventions included antimicrobial stewardship and other decision-support tools. Determinants included healthcare staff perceptions, and other system/person-related factors. Healthcare staff were the main actors, proxy/family were mentioned scarcely, and people with dementia only once. Our findings show scarcity of evidence on people with dementia and outside of the nursing homes. We highlight knowledge gaps and inform research shaping interventions for improving infection detection and management. • Identified gaps in infection detection and management for people with dementia. • Highlighted specifics of the complexity of detecting infections in dementia. • Need for dementia-specific infection detection and management strategies. • Lack of evidence on practices outside of the nursing home setting. • Lack of evidence on the involvement of people with dementia and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim in radiotherapy treatment planning is to have sufficient target coverage and as low a dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs) as possible, adhering to the relevant guidelines. A high and consistent radiotherapy plan quality is vital when treatment plans are used as the foundation for patient selection in clinical trials. Proton therapy, being a substantially newer treatment modality than conventional photon therapy, is at risk of having a steeper learning curve in treatment planning. This inequality is important to investigate in a clinical study comparing the two, as this could influence the trial results. This study aims to evaluate the development of radiotherapy treatment plan quality for head and neck cancer patients receiving photon and proton therapy over time in the context of the DAHANCA 35 trial. From May 2019 to June 2023,189 patients were included in the ongoing DAHANCA 35 trial, with 63 patients in the pilot phase and 126 in the subsequent randomisation phase. In the pilot phase, all included patients were offered proton treatment, and in the randomisation phase, patients were randomised 1:2 (photon:proton). Patients were first seen at a local treatment centre, where a photon and comparative proton plan were prepared. If patients were offered proton treatment, a new clinical proton plan was made at the proton treatment centre and subsequently used for treatment. This study analysed 189 photon plans, 189 comparative proton plans, and 140 clinical proton plans. The treatment plans were prepared conforming to the DAHANCA guidelines [1] to ensure the clinical relevance of all treatment plans The plan quality was assessed separately for photon plans, comparative proton plans, and clinical proton plans in three time intervals. The mean dose was investigated individually for 13 OARs relevant for head and neck cancer: oesophagus, glottic larynx, supraglottic larynx, mandible, extended oral cavity, left and right parotid glands, upper-, middle-, and lower pharyngeal constrictor muscles, left and right submandibular glands, and thyroid gland. Furthermore, treatment plan quality was analysed using a new metric called Normalised Toxicity Index (NTI), calculated as a normalised average of the mean dose to the OARs compared to the threshold mean dose recommended by the DAHANCA guidelines. An NTI > 1 indicated that the OARs, on average, received a dose higher than the recommended thresholds, and an NTI < 1 indicated that the OARs received a dose below the thresholds. Hence, a lower NTI indicated better plan quality concerning OAR doses. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to investigate a potential difference in the intervals for mean dose and NTI for each treatment type. The significance level was Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple testing. The three time intervals were defined with 63 patients in the pilot phase constituting one interval (Pilot phase), the subsequent 64 patients from the randomisation phase in the next interval (Randomisation 1), and the remaining 62 patients from the randomisation phase in the third interval (Randomisation 2). The periods were 22 months for the Pilot phase, 19 months for Randomisation 1, and 14 months for Randomisation 2. Across the 13 OARs, the mean dose to individual OARs did not show a general time-dependent change, except for the right parotid gland in the clinical proton plans. Figure 1 shows a box plot with samples overlaid for the mean dose to the extended oral cavity as an example of the OARs. [Display omitted] The NTI was not significantly different for the photon plans, comparative proton plans, and clinical proton plans in the three consecutive intervals, as shown in Figure 2. The median NTI for the clinical proton plans was 0.88 (interquartile range [0.70,1.00]) for the Pilot phase, 0.83 [0.75,0.89] for Randomization 1, and 0.79 [0.67,0.98] for Randomization 2. The plan quality of the clinical proton plans appears stable from this new NTI metric. [Display omitted] The analyses conducted in this study did not show a general time-dependent change in plan quality in any of the three types of plans. This could be caused by the nationally developed proton treatment planning template. A stable treatment plan quality can help ensure a consistent selection for clinical trials, thus providing transparency for analysis of the outcome of the trials. The plan quality will continuously be followed to ensure consistency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women are among the most common bacterial infections in primary care. Given the health threats related to the overuse of antibiotics, alternative options are of increasing importance. Patient-reported outcome measures are valuable tools for including the patients' perspective when evaluating the efficacy of these strategies. Aiming to identify a suitable instrument to measure the severity and bothersomeness of UTI symptoms in women, we performed a systematic review of the literature and identified the Holm and Cordoba Urinary Tract Infection Score (HCUTI), which measures the severity, bothersomeness, and impact of uncomplicated UTIs on daily activities. This instrument showed sufficient content validity but needs translation and further validation before it can be used in German research., Objective: For use in the German setting, we aim (1) to perform translation and linguistic validation of the HCUTI and (2) to evaluate content validity and psychometric properties of the German version of the HCUTI in a population of women with uncomplicated UTIs., Methods: The HCUTI will be translated and linguistically validated using the dual-panel method. This process involves a bilingual translation panel and a lay panel to check the comprehensibility of the translation. Content validity of the translated questionnaire will be assessed using cognitive interviews according to the criteria for good content validity as recommended by the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) group involving women with uncomplicated UTIs and health care professionals. Subsequent psychometric validation of the German version of the HCUTI in a population of women with uncomplicated UTIs will include the assessment of structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability., Results: Results of the translation and linguistic validation process and the results of the content validity study were obtained in September 2023 and will be published separately. Data on the psychometric properties of the German version of the HCUTI are anticipated in mid-2024., Conclusions: We expect that data from the content validity study will provide important suggestions for potential modifications of the HCUTI for use in the German setting. The final version of the questionnaire will be used for the assessment of its psychometric properties in a large population of women with uncomplicated UTIs., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/49903., (©Katharina Piontek, Sophie Nestler, Anne Holm, John Brandt Brodersen, Christian Apfelbacher. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.05.2024.)