Search

Objective: Accurate measurement of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) remains a significant clinical challenge. The Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) convened an Activity Index (AI) Working Group (WG) to develop a novel measure of disease activity (SCTC-AI)., Methods: Using consensus methodology, we developed a conceptual definition of disease activity. Literature review and expert consensus generated provisional SCTC-AI items, which were reduced by Delphi survey. Provisional items were weighted against a combined endpoint of morbidity and mortality, using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) (n = 1,254). External validation of the SCTC-AI was performed using data collected from 1,103 Canadian Scleroderma Research Group Study participants., Results: Disease activity in SSc was defined using consensus methodology as "aspects of disease that are reversible, or can be arrested, with time and, or effective therapy." One-hundred and forty-one provisional SCTC-AI items were generated and reduced using three rounds of Delphi survey and statistical reduction and weighting, against mortality and quality of life measures, yielding a final 24-item index with a maximum possible score of 140. Survival analysis in an external cohort showed a graded relationship between disease activity scores and survival (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: We present a novel instrument to quantify the burden of disease activity in SSc. We have employed a rigorous consensus-based process in combination with data-driven methods to develop an instrument that has face, content, and criterion validity. Further work is required to fully validate and confirm the construct and discriminative validity of the SCTC-AI., (© 2024 The Author(s). Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Assessment of gastrointestinal and autonomic symptoms in patients with systemic sclerosis, and possible associations with gastric emptying rate., Methods: Participant and patient disease-related characteristics were collected. Gastrointestinal and autonomic symptoms were assessed by the UCLA-SCTC GIT 2.0 and COMPASS-31 questionnaires, respectively. Potentially confounding gastrointestinal medications were discontinued where possible. Gastric emptying was assessed using a non-radioactive 13 C sodium acetate isotope, end-expiratory breath samples collected at baseline and then serial timepoints up to 120 min., Results: In total, 49 participants were studied: 17 with systemic sclerosis with variable gastrointestinal involvement, and healthy matched (n = 17) and non-matched controls (n = 15), the last to control for the impact of age rather than disease on gastric emptying and autonomic function. The total mean (range) UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire for patients with systemic sclerosis was 0.63 (0.0-1.5) and for both healthy matched and non-matched controls was 0.04 (0.0-0.2), and was higher in patients with systemic sclerosis across all domains. The total mean (range) COMPASS-31 score for patients with systemic sclerosis patients was 32.2 (0.0-54.9) and for healthy matched- and non-matched controls: 7.45 (0.0-24.9) and 4.25 (0.0-2.1), respectively, again higher for patients with systemic sclerosis across all domains. No association was observed between patients' UCLA GIT 2.0 total score (s = -0.039, p = 0.38), total COMPASS 31 score (s = -0.108, p = 0.68), or COMPASS-31 GI domain (s = -0.051, p = 0.85) and gastric emptying rates., Conclusion: Gastrointestinal and autonomic symptoms are overrepresented in patients with systemic sclerosis but did not associate with gastric emptying rates., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M.H. received none. E.H. was funded by the Raynaud’s and Scleroderma Association. A.L.H. received consultancy fees from Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Camurus, Galderma and Gesynta Pharma, speaker fees from Janssen and research funding from Gesynta Pharma. S.L. and J.T.M. received none., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the Patient self-Assessment of Skin Thickness in Upper Limb questionnaire (PASTUL) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and assess impact of skin involvement on health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Methods: Participants were included in four UK centres. PASTUL specifies a grading of skin at 8 sites corresponding to the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Construct validity was assessed by comparing PASTUL scores with mRSS. HRQoL was evaluated with EQ5D5L and Leeds SSc HRQoL questionnaires. Additionally, correlation between PASTUL and Scleroderma Skin Patient reported Outcome (SSPRO) was explored. Follow-up was 12 months., Results: In total, 196 participants were included, mean age was 56.4 years (SD 13.9), 80.6% female (n = 158), mean disease duration 11.9 years (SD 9.9), 110 (56.1%) had limited cutaneous (lcSSc) and 81 (41.3%) diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). PASTUL and upper limb mRSS were well correlated at baseline, 6 and 12 months (ICC = 0.67, 0.78 and 0.62, p< 0.001). Test-retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.83, p< 0.001). There was a stronger correlation between PASTUL and upper limb mRSS in dcSSc compared with lcSSc (0.69 vs 0.51, p< 0.001). In participants with early disease (< 4 years) PASTUL was moderately correlated with HRQoL (r = 0.53, p< 0.001), correlations were weaker in the whole group. Mean time to do the PASTUL self-assessment was 5.0 min (SD 3.7)., Conclusion: PASTUL is a feasible outcome tool that adds to assessments as SSPRO. Skin thickening is correlated with HRQoL, particularly in early disease., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Classification criteria aim to identify a homogenous population of patients for research. We aimed to quantify how well phase-III trials in connective tissue diseases (CTDs) represent a real-world cohort., Methods: A comprehensive review of all major published phase-III trials in CTDs was performed (clinicaltrials.gov). Classification criteria utilised most commonly in clinical trials were applied to a multicentre unselected CTD cohort., Results: There were 42 CTD trials identified, with no trials in mixed (MCTD) or undifferentiated CTD (UCTD). The majority of trials (N = 38, 90 %) required patients to meet classification criteria for their respective disease. Eight (19.0 %) excluded patients with overlapping CTDs and a further two (4.8 %) excluded specific overlapping features, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension. One study explicitly allowed overlap syndromes. Our real-world CTD cohort included 391 patients. Patients with UCTD or MCTD (91/391, 23.3 %) would be excluded from participation in clinical trials for not having an eligible diagnosis. Of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), SLE, systemic sclerosis (SSc) or idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), 211/300 (70.3 %) met the classification criteria for their respective diagnosis and 24/211 (11.4 %) met criteria for >1 CTD. In total, 187/391 (47.8 %) would be eligible for recruitment, based upon their physician diagnosis, and most stringent trial eligibility criteria., Conclusion: In an unselected, real-world CTD cohort, up to half of patients are ineligible for clinical trials due to not meeting classification criteria, overlapping features or a lack of trials within their primary disease. To address this inequality in access to novel therapies, clinical trial design should evolve eligibility criteria in CTDs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest S.D. has received grant support from Novartis and UCB. A.M. has received grant support from Janssen and UCB. MR has received grant support from UCB. A.L.H. has received grant support from Gesynta, consultancy fees from Arena, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Camurus, CSL-Behring, Galderma and Gesynta, and speaker fees from Janssen, H.C. has received grant support from Eli Lilly and UCB; consulting fees from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca; speaker for UCB, Biogen. I.N.B. has received grant support from Genzyme/Sanofi, GSK, Roche and UCB; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GSK, Merck Serono, UCB and ILTOO; and was a speaker for AstraZeneca, GSK and UCB. BP has received grant support from Genzyme/Sanofi and GSK, honoraria from Fresenius-Kabi and AbbVie and was a speaker for Eli Lilly and Roche., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that photographs (in addition to self-reported data) can be collected daily by patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) using a smartphone app designed specifically for digital lesions, and could provide an objective outcome measure for use in clinical trials., Methods: An app was developed to collect images and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) including Pain score and the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) questionnaire. Participants photographed their lesion(s) each day for 30 days and uploaded images to a secure repository. Lesions were analysed both manually and automatically, using a machine learning approach., Results: 25 patients with SSc-related digital lesions consented of whom 19 completed the 30-day study, with evaluable data from 27 lesions. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) baseline Pain score was 5.7 (2.4) and HDISS-DU 2.2 (0.9), indicating high lesion and disease-related morbidity. 506 images were used in the analysis (mean number of used images per lesion 18.7, SD 8.3). Mean (SD) manual and automated lesion areas at day 1 were 11.6 (16.0) and 13.9 (16.7) mm2 respectively. Manual area decreased by 0.08mm2 per day (2.4mm2 over 30 days) and automated area by 0.1mm2 (3.0mm2 over 30 days). Average gradients of manual and automated measurements over 30 days correlated strongly (r = 0.81). Manual measurements were on average 40% lower than automated, with wide limits of agreement., Conclusion: Even patients with significant hand disability were able to use the app. Automated measurement of finger lesions could be valuable as an outcome measure in clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To investigate the hypotheses that in patients with SSc, the temperature gradient between the dorsum of the foot and toes (distal-dorsal difference [DDD]) is 'more negative' (toes cooler) than in healthy controls, is greatest along the first (great) toe and that the severities of thermographic abnormalities in the feet and hands are correlated., Methods: Thermographic images of the dorsum of each hand and foot were captured using a thermal camera attached to an iPhone in 40 patients with SSc and 20 healthy controls. DDDs along the fingers (index, middle, ring and little) and toes (great toe and 'others') were measured., Results: There was a non-significant trend for the great toes to be colder in patients with SSc than in controls. The mean great toe DDD was more negative in patients (right: -2.89°C, left: -2.91°C, mean: -2.90°C) than in controls (right: -2.36°C, left: -2.42°C, mean: -2.39°C) ( P  = 0.37 for mean values). Patients' great toes were colder than 'other' (lesser) toes (right: -2.58°C, left: -2.63°C), although not significantly. In patients with SSc, finger and great toe temperature gradients were correlated ( r  = 0.406, ρ = 0.01)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the great toe is the coldest in patients with SSc and that patients with the coldest fingers tend to have the coldest toes. Severe RP symptoms in the hands should prompt podiatry assessment and foot care education. Mobile phone thermography is a convenient tool for assessing the digital vasculature but first requires validation in larger studies with a longitudinal component., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To evaluate whether in juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS), non-invasive imaging can differentiate affected from non-affected skin and whether imaging correlates with a validated skin score [Localised Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT)]., Methods: A total of 25 children with JLS were recruited into a prospective study and a single 'target' lesion was selected. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS, measuring skin thickness), infrared thermography (IRT, skin temperature), laser Doppler imaging (LDI, skin blood flow) and multispectral imaging (MSI, oxygenation) were performed at four sites: two of affected skin (centre and inner edge of lesion) and two of non-affected skin (1 cm from the edge of the lesion 'outer' and contralateral non-affected side) at four visits at 3 month intervals., Results: Differences between affected and non-affected skin were detected with all four techniques. Compared with non-affected skin, affected skin was thinner (P < 0.001), with higher temperature (P < 0.001-0.006), perfusion (P < 0.001-0.039) and oxygenation (P < 0.001-0.028). Lesion skin activity (LoSCAT) was positively correlated with centre HFUS [r = 0.32 (95% CI 0.02, 0.61), P = 0.036] and negatively correlated with centre LDI [r = -0.26 (95% CI -0.49, -0.04), P = 0.022]. Lesion skin damage was positively correlated with centre and inner IRT [r = 0.43 (95% CI 0.19, 0.67), P < 0.001 and r = 0.36 (95% CI 0.12, 0.59), P = 0.003, respectively] and with centre and inner LDI [r = 0.37 (95% CI 0.05, 0.69), P = 0.024 and r = 0.41 (95% CI 0.08, 0.74), P = 0.015, respectively]., Conclusion: Non-invasive imaging can detect differences between affected and non-affected skin in JLS and may help to differentiate between activity (thicker, less well-perfused skin) and damage (thinner, highly perfused skin)., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Assessment of construct validity and reliability of a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for assessing the severity and impact of RP in SSc., Methods: An international multicentre study validation study of the 27-item Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) and 10-item short-form (ASRAP-SF) questionnaires. The relationship between ASRAP questionnaires and demographics, clinical phenotype and legacy instruments for assessing SSc-RP severity, disability and pain was assessed. Repeatability was evaluated at 1 week. Anchor-based statements of health status facilitated assessment of ASRAP thresholds of meaning., Results: A total of 420 SSc subjects were enrolled. There was good correlation between ASRAP (and ASRAP-SF) with RP visual analogue scale (VAS) and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire RP VAS (rho range 0.648-0.727, P < 0.001). Correlation with diary-based assessment of SSc-RP attack frequency and duration was lower (rho range 0.258-0.504, P < 0.001). ASRAP questionnaires had good correlation with instruments for assessing disability, hand function, pain and global health assessment (rho range 0.427-0.575, P < 0.001). Significantly higher ASRAP scores were identified in smokers, patients with active digital ulceration (DU), previous history of DU and calcinosis (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There was excellent repeatability at 1 week among patients with stable SSc-RP symptoms (intra-class coefficients of 0.891 and 0.848, P < 0.001). Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for ASRAP and ASRAP-SF were 45.34 and 45.77, respectively. A preliminary Minimally Important Clinical Difference threshold of 4.17 (95% CI 0.53, 7.81, P = 0.029) was estimated., Conclusion: ASRAP and ASRAP-SF questionnaires are valid and reliable novel PRO instruments for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To explore, from patients' perspectives, the symptoms and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) on the feet of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc-RP), and to identify which foot-related domains are important to patients., Methods: Forty participants (34 women) with SSc-RP took part in one of six focus groups held in the United Kingdom or United States. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in disease type, duration, and ethnicity. The topic guide included questions on RP impact, self-management, and treatment expectations. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify key concepts in the data relating to foot-specific symptoms and their impact. Themes were organized by corresponding domains of potential importance., Results: Twenty-eight participants (70 %) reported experiencing RP in their feet. Five themes were identified corresponding to domains of potential importance: temperature changes, pain, cramping and stiffness, numbness, and color changes. These issues negatively affected participants' lives, impairing walking, driving, and socializing, and causing issues with footwear and hosiery., Conclusions: This large qualitative study exploring the experiences of patients with SSc-RP in the feet identified several key domains of high importance to patients. SSc-RP is common in the feet, presents in several patterns, and impacts multiple aspects of patients' lives. These findings indicate where future foot-specific interventions for RP could be targeted. Findings from this study improve understanding of what domains are important to patients with SSc-RP affecting the feet and will contribute to the development of a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our objective was to test the hypothesis, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study that vipoglanstat, an inhibitor of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) which decreases prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and increases prostacyclin biosynthesis, improves RP., Methods: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and ≥7 RP attacks during the last screening week prior to a baseline visit were randomised to four weeks treatment with vipoglanstat 120 mg or placebo. A daily electronic diary captured RP attacks (duration and pain) and Raynaud's Condition Score, with change in RP attacks/week as primary end point. Cold challenge assessments were performed at baseline and end of treatment. Exploratory endpoints included patients' and physicians' global impression of change, Assessment of Scleroderma-associated Raynaud's Phenomenon questionnaire, mPGES-1 activity, and urinary excretion of arachidonic acid metabolites., Results: Sixty-nine subjects received vipoglanstat (n = 33) or placebo (n = 36). Mean weekly number of RP attacks (baseline; vipoglanstat 14.4[SD 6.7], placebo 18.2[12.6]) decreased by 3.4[95% CI -5.8;-1.0] and 4.2[-6.5;-2.0] attacks per week (p= 0.628) respectively. All patient reported outcomes improved, with no difference between the groups. Mean change in recovery of peripheral blood flow after cold challenge did not differ between the study groups. Vipoglanstat fully inhibited mPGES-1, resulting in 57% reduction of PGE2 and 50% increase of prostacyclin metabolites in urine. Vipoglanstat was safe and well tolerated., Conclusion: Although vipoglanstat was safe, and well tolerated in a dose achieving full inhibition of mPGES-1, it was ineffective in SSc-related RP. Further development and evaluation of vipoglanstat will therefore be in other diseases where mPGES-1 plays a pathogenetic role., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Calcinosis is a well-described entity that occurs in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and dermatomyositis (DM). Calcinosis in SSc typically occurs over pressure points and is usually nodular. We present a case series of four patients with SSc with a much rarer, diffuse form of calcinosis to illustrate this poorly recognized pattern of extensive and debilitating disease., Methods: Four patients with SSc and extensive calcinosis were identified from patients attending a tertiary rheumatology centre in the preceding 3 years. Their electronic case notes, radiographic images and medical photographs were reviewed., Results: All four patients had the diffuse cutaneous subtype of SSc (dcSSc) and additionally a myositis overlap. This was in the context of 102 of 461 (22%) patients with SSc whose clinical details had been recorded in the preceding 3 years having dcSSc. Their ages at diagnosis ranged from 27 to 65 years. Three were female, two were anti-Scl70 antibody positive, and two were anti-PMScl antibody positive. Development of calcinosis occurred between 1 and 6 years after onset of SSc. Plain radiography showed very extensive calcinosis in various sites, distributed in a pattern akin to sheets of calcium-containing deposits in the skin and subcutaneous tissue., Conclusions: Although calcinosis is common in SSc, extensive sheet-like calcinosis is very rare. Our experience suggests that when this form of calcinosis does occur, this is in the context of the diffuse cutaneous subtype of disease and with myositis overlap. The four cases described should raise awareness of this unusual and extensive pattern of disease., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: Hand involvement is an early manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc), culprit of diagnosis and classification, and recognised major driver of disability. Impairment of hand function burdens both limited and diffuse cutaneous subsets and therefore could be targeted as 'basket' endpoint in SSc. Nevertheless, its natural history in current standard of care is not well characterised, limiting the design of targeted trials. The aim of this study is to describe prevalence, natural history and clinical factors associated with hand function deterioration in a longitudinal, multicentre, observational SSc cohort., Methods: Hand function was captured through the validated Cochin Hand Function Scale in patients consecutively enrolled in a multicentre observational study and observed over 24 months. Minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state were analysed as previously described., Results: Three hundred and ninety-six consecutive patients were enrolled from 10 centres; 201 with complete follow-up data were included in the analysis. Median (IQR) disease duration was 5 (2-11) years. One hundred and five (52.2%) patients reported clinically significant worsening. Accordingly, the proportion of patients reporting unacceptable hand function increased over 2 years from 27.8% to 35.8% (p<0.001). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis identified male gender, disease subset, Raynaud's Condition Score, tenosynovitis and pain, as some of the key factors associated with worsening hand involvement., Conclusions: Hand function deteriorates over time in more than 50% of SSc patients despite available therapies. The analysis of factors associated with hand function worsening supports the involvement of both inflammation, vascular and fibrotic processes in hand involvement, making it a hallmark clinical manifestation of SSc. Our data are poised to inform the design of intervention studies to target this major driver of disability in SSc., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Direct or indirect interests that might affect or be perceived to affect the conduct or reporting of this work. EDL: nothing to declare, VK; nothing to declare, SDD: nothing to declare, MW: nothing to declare, TB: nothing to declare, CPD: nothing to declare, EDS: nothing to declare, KD: nothing to declare, PW: nothing to declare, AH: nothing to declare, BS: nothing to declare, MN: nothing to declare, CM: nothing to declare, LG: nothing to declare, BAP: nothing to declare, FDG: nothing to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)