Search

Using the past to improve future predictions requires an understanding and quantification of the individual climate contributions to the observed climate change by aerosols and greenhouse gases (GHGs), which is hindered by large uncertainties in aerosol forcings and responses across climate models. To estimate historical aerosol responses, we apply detection and attribution methods to attribute a joint change in temperature and precipitation to forcings by combining signals of observed changes in tropical wet and dry regions, the interhemispheric temperature asymmetry, global mean temperature (GMT), and global mean land precipitation (GMLP). Fingerprints representing the climate response to aerosols (AERs) and the remaining external forcings (noAER; mostly GHG) are derived from large ensembles of historical single- and ALL-forcing simulations from three models in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project and selected using a perfect model study. Results from an imperfect model study and a hydrological sensitivity analysis support combining our choice of temperature and precipitation fingerprints into a joint study. We find that diagnostics including temperature and precipitation slightly better constrain the noAER signal than diagnostics based purely on temperature or GMT-only and allow for the attribution of AER cooling (even when GMT is not included in the fingerprint). These results are robust across fingerprints from different climate models. Estimated contributions for AER and noAER agree with other published estimates including those from the most recent IPCC report. Finally, we attribute the best estimate of 0.46 K ([−0.86, −0.05] K) of aerosol-induced cooling and 1.63 K ([1.26, 2.00] K) of noAER warming in 2010–19 relative to 1850–1900 using the combined signals of GMT and GMLP. Significance Statement: Aerosols are small liquid or solid airborne particles. They are predominantly the secondary result of emissions of aerosol precursor gases emitted via industrial or natural processes. While greenhouse gases warm the climate, aerosols can have a cooling effect on the climate system, thus offsetting some of the greenhouse gas–related warming. We expect greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere to continue to increase, while aerosol concentrations are likely going to decline due to their impacts on human health. Our study uses observed temperature and precipitation changes to quantify how much aerosols have offset warming from past greenhouse gas emissions. This can help constrain future predictions of global warming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Britain's power system has shifted towards a major contribution from wind energy. However, wind is highly variable, and exceptionally low wind events can simultaneously occur with cold conditions, which increase demand. These conditions can pose a threat for the security of energy supply. Here we use bias‐corrected wind supply data and the estimated temperature‐related part of demand to analyse events of potential weather‐related energy shortfall based on the historic meteorological record. We conduct sensitivity studies with varying scenarios of Britain's total wind energy capacity and the temperature sensitivity of national demand. These scenarios are estimates for present‐day conditions as well as potential future changes of the power system. We apply a new methodology to estimate the potential severity of an event for the power system, and analyse the atmospheric conditions associated with the most severe events. We find that events of potentially severe shortfall are relatively rare and short‐lived, and often occur with an atmospheric pattern broadly resembling a negative North Atlantic Oscillation. This broad tendency emerges from a wide range of individual daily weather patterns that cause cold and still conditions. With an increase in wind capacity, it is likely that severe events will become rarer, although the most severe days of the record are relatively insensitive to changes in wind supply and temperature sensitivity of demand under our assumptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With climate extremes hitting nations across the globe, disproportionately burdening vulnerable developing countries, the prompt operation of the Loss and Damage fund is of paramount importance. As decisions on resource disbursement at the international level, and investment strategies at the national level, loom, the climate science community's role in providing fair and effective evidence is crucial. Attribution science can provide useful information for decision makers, but both ethical implications and deep uncertainty cannot be ignored. Considering these aspects, we articulate a vision that integrates established attribution methods and multiple lines of evidence within a coherent logical framework., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.)