Search

Background and Objective: As the population and life expectancy of people with Down syndrome increases, identifying common skin conditions throughout the lifespan will help inform clinical care and research. We sought to evaluate dermatologic conditions diagnosed in pediatric and adult patients with Down syndrome., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed demographic and outpatient visit International Classification of Diseases codes of patients with Down syndrome evaluated at outpatient dermatology clinics in the United States or Canada between 2011 and 2021., Results: A total of 1529 patients with Down syndrome were identified from eight academic medical centers: 50.8% were children (0-12 years), 25.2% were adolescents (13-17 years), and 24% were adults (18 years and older). Eczematous dermatitis was the most common diagnosis overall (26%), followed by folliculitis (19.3%) and seborrheic dermatitis (15.6%). Other notable diagnoses included dermatophyte infections (13%), alopecia areata (11.6%), and psoriasis (6.7%). About 4.3% of visits included a code for high-risk medication use. Eczematous dermatitis, alopecia areata, and folliculitis were the most common diagnoses observed in children; folliculitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and eczematous dermatitis in adolescents; and seborrheic dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis, and folliculitis in adults., Conclusions: Dermatologic conditions in patients with Down syndrome vary by age, but are most often eczematous, adnexal, and cutaneous autoimmune disorders. This multicenter retrospective review identifies skin diseases that should be prioritized for clinical care guideline development and research in the Down syndrome community., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Systemic Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and dupilumab both have emerged as promising therapeutics for atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab has a favorable safety profile, but oral JAKi therapy has been established in other diseases that carry potential comorbid susceptibilities that influence safety., Objective: We sought to provide real-world evidence of the comparative safety of oral JAKi versus dupilumab in patients with AD., Methods: The study used observational data from multiple healthcare organizations in the US. Patients with AD treated with either oral JAKi (upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and baricitinib) or dupilumab were enrolled. The 2 treatment groups were propensity score matched 1:1 on the basis of demographics, comorbidities, and prior medications. Safety outcomes within 2 years after the initiation of medications were measured by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: A total of 14,716 patients were included, with 942 patients treated with oral JAKi and 13,774 with dupilumab. The 2 treatment groups respectively included 938 patients after matching. Treatment with oral JAKi was not associated with increased risks of mortality, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, renal events, or serious gastrointestinal events. However, patients receiving oral JAKi showed significantly higher risks of skin and subcutaneous tissue infection (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69), herpes infection (herpes simplex, HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.03-2.61; herpes zoster, HR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.14-5.52), acne (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.54-2.84), cytopenia (anemia, HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.39-2.41; neutropenia, HR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.91-8.47; thrombocytopenia, HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.08-2.89), and hyperlipidemia (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.09-1.92); the risk of ophthalmic complications was higher in those receiving dupilumab (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.03-2.17)., Conclusion: Oral JAKi did not exhibit concerning safety issues in treating patients with AD but increased the risk of infections and abnormalities in laboratory findings. Long-term follow-up data are required to validate these results., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement M.O. was supported by grants NIH/NIAID R01 AI142872, R01 AI172938, and R21 AI151591. W.P. was supported by grant NIH/NIAID K24 AI106822. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: E. B. Hawryluk is on the advisory board of Apogee; consults for Skin Analytics; and receives royalties from UpToDate as an author and reviewer. L. C. Schneider is an investigator for Regeneron and DBV Technologies; and is on the advisory boards of Sanofi, Triveni Bio, DBV, Alladapt Immunotherapeutics, BioThea Pharmaceuticals, Ukko, Leo Pharmaceuticals, DAIT/NIAID, and the National Eczema Association. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation and surgical management of cutaneous melanoma (CM) and atypical Spitz tumors (AST) and non-Spitz melanocytic tumors (melanocytomas) in pediatric (age 0-10 years) and adolescent (age 11-18 years) patients., Methods: A Children's Oncology Group-led panel with external, multidisciplinary CM specialists convened to develop recommendations on the basis of available data and expertise., Results: Thirty-three experts from multiple specialties (cutaneous/medical/surgical oncology, dermatology, and dermatopathology) established recommendations with supporting data from 87 peer-reviewed publications., Recommendations: (1) Excisional biopsies with 1-3 mm margins should be performed when feasible for clinically suspicious melanocytic neoplasms. (2) Definitive surgical treatment for CM, including wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), should follow National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in the absence of data from pediatric-specific surgery trials and/or cohort studies. (3) Accurate classification of ASTs as benign or malignant is more likely with immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing. (4) It may not be possible to classify some ASTs as likely/definitively benign or malignant after clinicopathologic and/or molecular correlation, and these Spitz tumors of uncertain malignant potential should be excised with 5 mm margins. (5) ASTs favored to be benign should be excised with 1- to 3-mm margins if transected on biopsy. (6) Re-excision is not necessary if the AST does not extend to the biopsy margin(s) when complete/excisional biopsy was performed. (7) SLNB should not be performed for Spitz tumors unless a diagnosis of CM is favored on clinicopathologic evaluation. (8) Non-Spitz melanocytomas have a presumed increased risk for progression to CM and should be excised with 1- to 3-mm margins if transected on biopsy. (9) Re-excision of non-Spitz melanocytomas is not necessary if the lesion is completely excised on biopsy.

Background: Dupilumab is the first and only biologic agent approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric patients aged from 6 months to 17 years. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of dupilumab on the occurrence of comorbidities in pediatric patients with AD., Methods: In this population-based cohort study, we utilized electronic health records from multiple healthcare organizations across the United States. Pediatric patients (<18 years of age) with a diagnosis of AD initiating dupilumab were propensity-score matched 1:1 to those initiating other systemic agents (azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or systemic corticosteroids). The primary outcomes were new-onset comorbidities emerging during the study period measured by the risk ratio (RR) and its confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were stratified by age (0-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-17 years), sex, and race., Results: A total of 3575 pediatric patients with AD treated with dupilumab were matched to 3575 patients treated with other systemic agents. The dupilumab cohort was associated with a lowered risk of new-onset atopic comorbidities (including asthma [RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89] and allergic rhinitis [RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74]), infections (e.g., skin and soft tissue infection [RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.76] and respiratory tract infection [RR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61]), psychiatric disorders (e.g., mood disorder [RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.70] and anxiety [RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70], sleep disturbance [RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.77]), neurologic and developmental disorders (e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.75]). Furthermore, the positive effects are found to be more pronounced in younger children (aged 0-5 years) with AD., Conclusions: Treatment with dupilumab compared to systemic agents resulted in reductions in AD-related comorbidities in pediatric patients., (© 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Hawryluk discloses unrelated conflicts of Apogee (advisory board), UpToDate (author/reviewer-honorarium), Skin Analytics (consultant, ended 2023). Authors Ugwu and Weiss have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Cutaneous BAP1-inactivated melanocytomas (BIM) are melanocytic proliferations defined histopathologically by an epithelioid, predominantly dermal melanocytic proliferation with loss of BAP1, and have been largely characterized in adult patients but less well-described in pediatric cohorts. BIM share overlapping histological features with those seen in Spitz nevi; however, unlike Spitz nevi, the majority of BIM carry both BAP1 and BRAF V600E mutations. This study investigated the potential overlap of BIMs with pediatric Spitz nevi by performing immunohistochemical staining of BAP1 and BRAF V600E on pediatric melanocytic tumors with banal Spitz and dermal features. None of the stained tumors in our study exhibited the concurrent BAP1 loss and BRAF V600E positivity that are characteristic of adult BIM, suggesting that this is a low-frequency mutation among banal tumors in the pediatric population., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Dermoscopy aids in the diagnosis and management of pigmented growths and disorders of pigmentation in children. However, there is limited literature on the dermoscopic appearance of café-au-lait macules (CALMs) and congenital melanocytic nevi in patients with dark skin. We report two cases of young children with dark skin and many hyperpigmented patches in whom dermoscopy was utilized to accurately diagnose CALMs and facilitate testing for neurofibromatosis., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Pediatric longitudinal melanonychia (LM) can exhibit atypical features that mimic red-flag signs for subungual melanoma in adults and lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Nail biopsy may be unnecessary if clinical inspection and dermoscopy suggest a benign nature., Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase from inception to February 2023 for studies of any design reporting either the number or proportion of clinical and dermoscopic features in at least five children (≤18 years) with LM. Non-English articles, reviews, and abstracts were excluded. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to collate all existing data., Results: A total of 1218 articles were screened and 24 studies with 1391 pediatric patients were included. Nevus was the most common diagnosis (86.3%). The most prevalent sites were fingernails (76.2%) and first digits (45.4%). Pooled proportions of common features were: dark-color bands (69.8%), multi-colored bands (47.6%), broad bandwidth (41.1%), pseudo-Hutchinson sign (41.0%), irregular patterns (38.1%), Hutchinson sign (23.7%), dots and globules (22.5%), nail dystrophy (18.2%), and triangular sign (10.9%). Outcomes included progression (widening or darkening, 29.9%), stability (23.3%), and spontaneous regression (narrowing or fading, 19.9%). Only eight cases of subungual melanoma in situ were reported, and no invasive melanomas were identified., Conclusion: Although atypical characteristics are common in pediatric LM, the probability of malignant transformation is exceedingly low. Appropriate evaluation and management of pediatric LM includes careful clinical and dermoscopic inspection with attention to benign features followed by long-term interval follow-up., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Pediatric melanoma presents with distinct clinical features compared to adult disease., Objective: Characterize risk factors and negative outcomes in pediatric melanoma., Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of patients under 20 years diagnosed with melanoma between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 2015 from 11 academic medical centers., Results: Melanoma was diagnosed in 317 patients, 73% of whom were diagnosed in adolescence (age ≥11). Spitzoid (31%) and superficial spreading (26%) subtypes were most common and 11% of cases arose from congenital nevi. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 68% of cases and positive in 46%. Fatality was observed in 7% of cases. Adolescent patients with melanoma were more likely to have family history of melanoma (P = .046) compared to controls., Limitations: Retrospective nature, cohort size, control selection, and potential referral bias., Conclusion: Pediatric melanoma has diverse clinical presentations. Better understanding of these cases and outcomes may facilitate improved risk stratification of pediatric melanoma., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest SH reports honorarium from Elsevier and past consulting for Novan Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Pediatric melanoma of the scalp has the highest mortality of any anatomic location. We describe five pediatric patients with a diagnosis of scalp melanoma receiving care at Massachusetts General Hospital and/or Boston Children's Hospital from 2018 through 2022. Melanoma presented in diverse contexts: cellular blue nevus-associated, compound nevus-associated, spitzoid, nodular, and superficial spreading subtypes. This study describes a range of melanoma presentations and emphasizes the need for additional compilation of data on pediatric scalp melanomas to promote their recognition and improve patient care., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) carry an increased risk of melanoma and may be disfiguring, and consensus regarding treatment recommendations is lacking. While clinical monitoring is the standard of care, many caregivers are interested in its removal to prevent psychosocial burden or to decrease risk. Although melanoma can occur regardless of CMN removal, there are a variety of treatments that may offer improved cosmesis or local symptom control, including surgical excision, laser therapy, and other superficially destructive techniques. Regardless of the selected management, these patients are monitored for ongoing melanoma risk. An extensive discussion with families regarding the risks and benefits of observation versus active intervention is essential. To facilitate these discussions, we herein summarize current CMN management strategies and considerations.