Search

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a common and effective treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Changes in systemic blood pressure after TAVI have been described, yet their prognostic value is not established. Thus, we aimed to examine the association of the periprocedural changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and in pulse pressure on clinical outcomes after the procedure. Methods: A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI procedure in our medical center. We assessed the effect of the periprocedural changes in blood pressure measurements on mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalizations at 1 year and on the combined outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke 1 year following the procedure. Results: Our cohort included 455 patients (44% males). Of them, 343 patients (75.4%) had raised SBP immediately after the procedure. Patients with raised SBP had a significantly higher rate of the 1-year composite outcome, compared to patients who did not have a raise in SBP following the procedure (43 [13%] vs. 6 [5.4%], respectively, p = 0.033). After adjustment for age and sex, the postprocedural increase in SBP was significantly associated with the composite outcome, with a hazard ratio of 2.42, 95% CI: 1.03–5.7. Conclusion: An immediate increase in SBP after TAVI is associated with worse 1-year clinical cardiovascular outcomes.

Background Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention are often considered to be at a high bleeding risk (HBR). Drug‐eluting stents have been shown to be superior to bare‐metal stents in patients with HBR, even when patients were given abbreviated periods of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Short DAPT has not been evaluated with the EluNIR ridaforolimus‐eluting stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a shortened period of DAPT following implantation of the ridaforolimus‐eluting stent in patients with HBR. Methods and Results This was a prospective, multicenter, binational, single‐arm, open‐label trial. Patients were defined as HBR according to the LEADERS‐FREE (Prospective Randomized Comparison of the BioFreedom Biolimus A9 Drug‐Coated Stent versus the Gazelle Bare‐Metal Stent in Patients at High Bleeding Risk) trial criteria. After percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT was given for 1 month to patients presenting with stable angina. In patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, DAPT was given for 1 to 3 months, at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis up to 1 year (Academic Research Consortium definite and probable). Three hundred fifteen patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled, and 56.4% presented with acute coronary syndrome; 33.7% were receiving oral anticoagulation. At 1 year, the primary end point occurred in 15 patients (4.9%), meeting the prespecified performance goal of 14.1% (P