Search

We effortlessly extract behaviorally relevant information from dynamic visual input in order to understand the actions of others. In the current study, we develop and test a number of models to better understand the neural representational geometries supporting action understanding. Using fMRI, we measured brain activity as participants viewed a diverse set of 90 different video clips depicting social and nonsocial actions in real-world contexts. We developed five behavioral models using arrangement tasks: two models reflecting behavioral judgments of the purpose (transitivity) and the social content (sociality) of the actions depicted in the video stimuli; and three models reflecting behavioral judgments of the visual content (people, objects, and scene) depicted in still frames of the stimuli. We evaluated how well these models predict neural representational geometry and tested them against semantic models based on verb and nonverb embeddings and visual models based on gaze and motion energy. Our results revealed that behavioral judgments of similarity better reflect neural representational geometry than semantic or visual models throughout much of cortex. The sociality and transitivity models in particular captured a large portion of unique variance throughout the action observation network, extending into regions not typically associated with action perception, like ventral temporal cortex. Overall, our findings expand the action observation network and indicate that the social content and purpose of observed actions are predominant in cortical representation.

The value of research articles is increasingly contingent on complex data analysis results which substantiate their claims. Compared to data production, data analysis more readily lends itself to a higher standard of transparency and repeated operator-independent execution. This higher standard can be approached via fully reexecutable research outputs, which contain the entire instruction set for automatic end-to-end generation of an entire article from the earliest feasible provenance point. In this study, we make use of a peer-reviewed neuroimaging article which provides complete but fragile reexecution instructions, as a starting point to draft a new reexecution system which is both robust and portable. We render this system modular as a core design aspect, so that reexecutable article code, data, and environment specifications could potentially be substituted or adapted. In conjunction with this system, which forms the demonstrative product of this study, we detail the core challenges with full article reexecution and specify a number of best practices which permitted us to mitigate them. We further show how the capabilities of our system can subsequently be used to provide reproducibility assessments, both via simple statistical metrics and by visually highlighting divergent elements for human inspection. We argue that fully reexecutable articles are thus a feasible best practice, which can greatly enhance the understanding of data analysis variability and the trust in results. Lastly, we comment at length on the outlook for reexecutable research outputs and encourage re-use and derivation of the system produced herein., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Ioanas, Macdonald and Halchenko.)

Cognitive neuroscience has advanced significantly due to the availability of openly shared datasets. Large sample sizes, large amounts of data per person, and diversity in tasks and data types are all desirable, but are difficult to achieve in a single dataset. Here, we present an open dataset with N = 101 participants and 6 hours of scanning per participant, with 6 multifaceted cognitive tasks including 2 hours of naturalistic movie viewing. This datasets' combination of ample sample size, extensive data per participant, more than 600 hours worth of data, and a wide range of experimental conditions - including cognitive, affective, social, and somatic/interoceptive tasks - positions it uniquely for probing important questions in cognitive neuroscience.

Neuroimaging research requires purpose-built analysis software, which is challenging to install and may produce different results across computing environments. The community-oriented, open-source Neurodesk platform ( https://www.neurodesk.org/ ) harnesses a comprehensive and growing suite of neuroimaging software containers. Neurodesk includes a browser-accessible virtual desktop, command-line interface and computational notebook compatibility, allowing for accessible, flexible, portable and fully reproducible neuroimaging analysis on personal workstations, high-performance computers and the cloud., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS., Competing Interests: Gaia Rizzo is an employee of Invicro. No other authors have competing interests to declare., (© 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.)