Search

Objective: Robotic thoracic surgery provides another minimally invasive approach in addition to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) that yields less pain and faster recovery compared with open surgery. However, robotic incisions are generally placed more inferiorly, which may increase the risk of intercostal nerve injury that affects the abdominal wall. We hypothesized that a robotic approach causes greater ipsilateral rectus muscle atrophy compared with open and VATS approaches. Methods: The cross-sectional area and density of bilateral rectus abdominis muscles were measured on computed tomography scans in patients who underwent lobectomy in 2018. The differences between the contralateral and ipsilateral muscles were compared between preoperative and 6-month surveillance scans. Changes were compared among the open, VATS, and robotic approaches through a mixed effects model after adjustments of correlation and covariates. Results: Of 99 lobectomies, 25 (25.3%) were open, 56 (56.6%) VATS, and 18 (18.1%) robotic. The difference between the contralateral and ipsilateral rectus muscle cross-sectional area was significantly larger at 6 months after robotic surgery compared with open (31.4% vs 9.5%, P = .049) and VATS (31.4% vs 14.1%, P = .021). There were no significant differences in the cross-sectional area between the open and VATS approach. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, there was greater ipsilateral rectus muscle atrophy associated with robotic thoracic surgery compared with open or VATS approaches. These findings should be correlated with clinical symptoms and followed to assess for resolution or persistence.

Introduction: There are no standard targeted treatment options for advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC beyond KRAS G12C inhibitors. A computational model identified regorafenib and low-dose methotrexate as synergistic in preclinical models of KRAS-mutant NSCLC. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Methods: This single-arm phase II study included regorafenib 80 to 120 mg oral daily and oral methotrexate dose escalated to tolerability from 10 to 20 mg twice weekly during the first cycle. Both agents were administered on weeks 1 to 3 of each 4-week cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Results: In total, 18 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC were enrolled. Five patients received regorafenib at a 120 mg starting dose with four discontinuing due to toxicity; subsequently, 13 patients were treated at an 80 mg starting dose, with eight dose-escalating to 120 mg after the first cycle. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval 1.8–8.6) and median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval 5.2–30.3). The objective response rate was 16.7% and the 8-week disease control rate was 66.7%. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 patients, most often oral mucositis (n = 2) and asymptomatic lipase increase (n = 2). One patient developed asymptomatic grade 4 lipase increase. Conclusions: Combination treatment of regorafenib and oral methotrexate in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC was limited due to toxicity, and the study did not meet its primary end point. Computational modeling may aid in repurposing therapeutic options though caution must be exercised with tolerability.