Search

Liver biopsies have consistently contributed to our understanding of the pathogenesis and aetiologies of acute liver disease. As other diagnostic modalities have been developed and refined, the role of biopsy in the management of patients with acute liver failure (ALF), acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) and acute hepatitis, including acute liver injury (ALI), has changed. Liver biopsy remains particularly valuable when first‐line diagnostic algorithms fail to determine aetiology. Despite not being identified as a mandatory diagnostic tool in recent clinical guidelines for the management of ALF or ACLF, many centres continue to undertake biopsies given the relative safety of transjugular biopsy in this setting. Several studies have demonstrated that liver biopsy can provide prognostic information, particularly in the context of so‐called indeterminate hepatitis, and is extremely useful in excluding conditions such as metastatic tumours that would preclude transplantation. In addition, its widespread use of percutaneous biopsies in cases of less severe acute liver injury, for example in the establishment of a diagnosis of acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis or confirmation of a probable or definite drug‐induced liver injury (DILI), has meant that many centres have seen a shift in the ratio of specimens they are receiving from patients with chronic to acute liver disease. Histopathologists therefore need to be equipped to deal with these challenging specimens. This overview provides an insight into the contemporary role of biopsies (as well as explant and autopsy material) in diagnosing acute liver disease. It outlines up‐to‐date clinical definitions of liver injury and considers recent recommendations for the diagnosis of AIH and drug‐induced, autoimmune‐like hepatitis (DI‐AIH). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histological subtyping of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging in the presence of histological heterogeneity, where distinctly different morphological patterns are present within the same tumor. Current approaches rely on percent cut-offs. We hypothesized that morphologic intratumor heterogeneity is a non-random biological feature and that incorporating recurrent patterns would improve histological subtyping of HCC. Resected HCC were studied and the overall frequency of morphologic intratumor heterogeneity was 45% in 242 specimens. Steatohepatitic HCC (SH-HCC) had the highest frequency of morphologic intratumor heterogeneity (91%); this was confirmed in additional cohorts of SH-HCC from different medical centers (overall frequency of 78% in SH-HCC). Morphologic intratumor heterogeneity in SH-HCC showed distinct and recurrent patterns that could be classified as early, intermediate, and advanced. Incorporating these patterns into the definition of SH-HCC allowed successful resolution of several persistent challenges: the problem of the best cut-off for subtyping SH-HCC, the problem of the relationship between SH-HCC and scirrhous HCC, and the classification for HCC with abundant microvesicular steatosis. This approach also clarified the relationship between SH-HCC and CTNNB1 mutations, showing that CTNNB1 mutations occur late in a subset of SH-HCC. In summary, there is a high frequency of morphologic intratumor heterogeneity in HCC. Incorporating this finding into histological subtyping resolved several persistent problems with the SH-HCC subtype., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)