Search

Background: Glofitamab monotherapy induces durable remission in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more previous therapies, but has not previously been assessed as a second-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of glofitamab plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Methods: The phase 3, randomised, open-label STARGLO trial was done at 62 centres in 13 countries in Asia and Australia, Europe, and North America. We recruited transplant-ineligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous therapies. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks (block size of six) via an interactive voice or web response system (2:1; stratified by 1 vs ≥2 previous lines of therapy and relapsed vs refractory status) to Glofit-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus glofitamab step-up dosing to 30 mg; for a total of eight cycles, plus four additional cycles of glofitamab monotherapy) or R-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus rituximab 375 mg/m 2 ; for a total of eight cycles). The trial independent review committee, which evaluated all response-based endpoints, was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients. We present results from both the primary analysis (cutoff: March 29, 2023) and updated analysis after all patients had completed study therapy (cutoff: Feb 16, 2024). Safety analyses included all patients who received any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04408638, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment)., Findings: From Feb 23, 2021, to March 14, 2023, 274 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive Glofit-GemOx (n=183) or R-GemOx (n=91). 158 (58%) patients were male and 116 (42%) were female; median age was 68 years (IQR 58-74). At the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 11·3 months (95% CI 9·6-12·7), overall survival was significantly improved with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median not estimable [NE; 95% CI 13·8 months-NE] vs 9·0 months [7·3-14·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·59 [95% CI 0·40-0·89]; p=0·011). At the updated analysis after a median follow-up of 20·7 months (19·9-23·3), a consistent improvement in overall survival was observed with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median 25·5 months [18·3-NE] vs 12·9 months [7·9-18·5]; HR 0·62 [0·43-0·88]). In the safety sets, 180 (100%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and 84 (96%) of 88 patients in the R-GemOx group had at least one adverse event during the study period. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 76 (44%) of 172 glofitamab-exposed patients and was predominantly low grade. Deaths related to glofitamab or rituximab occurred in five (3%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and in one (1%) patient in the R-GemOx group., Interpretation: Glofit-GemOx had a significant overall survival benefit compared with R-GemOx, supporting its use in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous lines of therapy., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JSA has received grants or contracts from BMS, Cellectis, Merck, Mustang Bio, Regeneron, and Seagen; consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Cellectar, Caribou Biosciences, Century Therapeutics, Celgene, Epizyme, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech, Gilead, Interius, Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Seagen, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Regeneron. MKu has received grants or contracts and consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche; a grant from BeiGene; and consulting fees from AbbVie. MH has received grants from Janssen and F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, Gilead, and Pfizer; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead. CPF has received grants or contracts from BeiGene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, and AbbVie; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, SOBI, and Takeda; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI. DHY has received grants or contracts from AbbVie, BeiGene, Boryung, Celltrion, Kyowa Kirin, Janssen, Samyang, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Antengene, BMS, Boryung, GSK, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, and Janssen; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio. HA has received grants or contracts from Morphosys, Genentech, Novartis, BMS, Epizyme, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Genentech; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie. WT has received grants or contracts and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, AbbVie, Sobi, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, Gilead, and AbbVie; and is grateful for and acknowledges funding and support from the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre. CH has received grants or contracts from Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JMZ has received consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pierre Fabre, Takeda, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and AbbVie; and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. CYC has received grants or contracts from BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, MSD, and Lilly; consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS. HG has received consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, AbbVie, and Takeda. SS is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from Genentech; and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. VO-N is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. RT is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JR is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MD is an employee of, has provided all support for the present manuscript for, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MKa is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has received grants or contracts from Roche Diagnostics International and F Hoffmann-La Roche. EM is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. HH is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche. LL is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received royalties or licences from, has patents planned, issued or pending with, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. GPG has received grants or contracts from BeiGene and Merck; consulting fees from Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Prelude Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead and F Hoffmann-La Roche; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche and Prelude Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Although broadly used, consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) has never been specifically investigated. Here, we have analyzed outcomes of auto-HCT for THRLBCL compared with diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL). Eligible for this retrospective registry study were adult patients with R/R THRLBCL and DLBCL, respectively, who underwent a first auto-HCT in a salvage-sensitive disease status as assessed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography between 2016 and 2021 and were registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) 2 years after transplantation. A total of 201 patients with THRLBCL and 5543 with DLBCL were included. There were no significant differences in terms of disease status at HCT, pretreatment lines, and interval from diagnosis to transplant between the cohorts, but patients with THRLBCL were significantly younger, contained a higher proportion of men, and had a better performance status. Compared with DLBCL, THRLBCL was associated with significantly better 2-year PFS (78% vs 59%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS, 81% vs 74%; P = .02) because of a significantly lower 2-year relapse incidence (16% vs 35%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, favorable relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.7) and PFS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) of patients with THRLBCL remained significant, whereas OS benefits (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.12) did not. These results were validated in a propensity score-matched analysis. These data prove auto-HCT as an effective treatment option for salvage-sensitive R/R THRLBCL., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) comprises three subtypes: extranodal MZL (EMZL), splenic MZL (SMZL) and nodal MZL (NMZL). Since clinical trials have limited representativeness, there is a need for real-world data (RWD) evidence in MZL. Real-world data in Lymphoma and survival in Adults (REALYSA) is a prospective multicentric French cohort of newly diagnosed lymphoma patients. This study consists of the first abstraction of MZL patients prospectively included in REALYSA between 12/2018 and 01/2021 with at least 1 year of follow-up. It provides a landscape description of clinical characteristics, initial workup, quality of life and first-line therapy performed in routine practice. Among 207 included patients, 122 presented with EMZL, 51 with SMZL and 34 with NMZL. At baseline, median age was 67 years (range 28-96), and patients reported a favorable global health status (75/100 (IQR 58,83)) - which was higher in NMZL and lower in SMZL patients (p = 0.006). 18 FDG-PET/CT was frequently performed at initial workup (EMZL 72%, SMZL 73%, NMZL 85%). Active surveillance was the initial management for 58 (28%) patients. The most prescribed therapies were rituximab-chlorambucil in the EMZL population (30%), rituximab monotherapy in the SMZL population (37%) and R-CHOP (24%)/bendamustine-rituximab (15%) in the NMZL population. At end of first line, overall response rate was 93% among treated patients with 75% of complete response. This French nationwide study provided for the first time prospective RWD on clinical characteristics, initial management and treatment response of MZL patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH (≥ 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To investigate the variation of interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels in the aqueous humor (AH) of patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) throughout therapy and follow-up and analyze the relation of these variations with VRL clinical course and relapse., Methods: This study retrospectively included consecutive patients diagnosed with VRL in a single center. AH IL-10 samples and patient clinical course were evaluated. The response to treatment was evaluated according to the criteria set by the International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group., Results: A total of 59 eyes of 34 patients were included. Interleukin-10 levels decreased significantly at first AH sample after therapy induction (median [IQR] 3.0 [2.8-3.6] months) among patients in complete clinical remission (P < 0.001). Among patients in complete clinical remission with residual detectable IL-10 in AH after therapy induction (85.3% systemic chemotherapy, 11.8% intravitreal methotrexate, 2.9% palliative care), 87.5% experienced ocular relapse within 5 years. The detection of IL-10 in AH at the first visit after induction for complete clinical remission obtained a sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI 0.45-0.96) and a specificity of 96.4% (95% CI 0.82-0.99) to predict ocular relapse. For relapsing eyes (N = 26), IL-10 significantly increased between the last IL-10 measurement and the time of the first ocular relapse (P < 0.001). In 76.0% of cases, an increase in IL-10 was detected earlier than clinical relapse with a mean (SD) of 4.0 (2.4) months., Conclusion: The present study suggested the usefulness of IL-10 in the prognosis of VRL. This study showed a relation between IL-10 in AH and tumoral activity, and for the first time with disease relapse.

Primary results (median follow-up, 10.7 months) from the pivotal EPCORE ® NHL-1 study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) demonstrated deep, durable responses with epcoritamab, a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, when used as monotherapy. We report long-term efficacy and safety results in patients with LBCL (N = 157; 25.1-month median follow-up). As of April 21, 2023, overall response rate was 63.1% and complete response (CR) rate was 40.1%. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 27.8% and 44.6%, respectively. An estimated 64.2% of complete responders remained in CR at 24 months. Estimated 24-month PFS and OS rates among complete responders were 65.1% and 78.2%, respectively. Of 119 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 45.4% had MRD negativity, which correlated with longer PFS and OS. CR rates were generally consistent across predefined subgroups: 36% prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 32% primary refractory disease, and 37% International Prognostic Index ≥3. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (51.0%), pyrexia (24.8%), fatigue (24.2%), and neutropenia (23.6%). These results underscore the long-term benefit of epcoritamab for treating R/R LBCL with deep responses across subgroups, including patients with hard-to-treat disease and expected poor prognosis (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03625037)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Results of conventional induction chemotherapies in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) need to be improved. Ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, and lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, have shown promising results at relapse, supporting to further assess their individual use in combination with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy., Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were randomized to receive four 28-day cycles of ibrutinib or lenalidomide in combination with R-MPV (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and prednisone) in a 3 + 3 design. Responders then received a consolidation with R-Cytarabine and an intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The objective of the phase IB study was to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring during the first induction cycle., Results: Twenty-six patients (median age 52) were randomized. Four DLTs were observed: one grade 5 aspergillosis and pneumocystosis, one grade 4 catheter-related infection and two grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels. RP2D of ibrutinib and lenalidomide were 560 mg daily (D3-14 and D17-28) and 15 mg daily (D1-21) respectively, in combination with R-MPV. In both arms, the most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic cytolysis, neutropenia and infections. One grade 4 Lyell's syndrome was reported at cycle 2 in the lenalidomide arm. After 4 induction cycles, the overall response rates were 76.9% and 83.3% in the lenalidomide and ibrutinib arm, respectively., Conclusion: Targeted induction therapies combining lenalidomide or ibrutinib with R-MPV are feasible for first-line PCNSL. The safety profile is consistent with the known safety profiles of R-MPV and both targeted therapies. The phase II part of the study is ongoing., Trial Registration: NCT04446962., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

COVID-19 has been associated with high mortality in patients treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Here, we investigated whether the outcome has improved over time with the primary objective of assessing COVID-19-attributable mortality in the Omicron period of 2022 compared to previous years. Data for this multicenter study were collected using the MED-A and COVID-19 report forms developed by the EBMT. One-hundred-eighty patients were included in the analysis, 39 diagnosed in 2020, 35 in 2021 and 106 in 2022. The median age was 58.9 years (min-max: 5.2-78.4). There was a successive decrease in COVID-19-related mortality over time (2020: 43.6%, 2021: 22.9%, 2022: 7.5%) and in multivariate analysis year of infection was the strongest predictor of survival (p = 0.0001). Comparing 2022 with 2020-2021, significantly fewer patients had lower respiratory symptoms (21.7% vs 37.8%, p = 0.01), needed oxygen support (25.5% vs 43.2%, p = 0.01), or were admitted to ICU (5.7% vs 33.8%, p = 0.0001). Although COVID-19-related mortality has decreased over time, CAR T-cell recipients remain at higher risk for complications than the general population. Consequently, vigilant monitoring for COVID-19 in patients undergoing B-cell-targeting CAR T-cell treatment is continuously recommended ensuring optimal prevention of infection and advanced state-of-the art treatment when needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Influenza vaccines are effective in decreasing hospitalizations and mortality related to influenza and its complications. However, the Vaccine Coverage Rate of influenza remains low and multifaceted efforts are required to improve it. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on influenza vaccine perception using a digital tool among outpatients and health care workers (HCWs)., Methods: A study was performed among outpatients and the HCWs of 23 hospital departments from 4 hospitals affiliated to Lyon university Hospitals (France), between October 2022 and February 2023. By scanning QR (Quick Response) codes, displayed on posters for patients, their companions, as well as in the letters sent to HCWs, users accessed anonymously to a web-application (ELEFIGHT®), which provided information on influenza and invited them to initiate a discussion on influenza prevention with their physicians during the consultation. Patients were also invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their perception of influenza vaccination before and after reading the information on ELEFIGHT®. The retention rate (RR = proportion of people who remain on the page for >2 s), the conversion rate (CR = proportion of people who click on the "Call-To-Action" button) and the absolute variation (difference in the perception before/after) and relative variation (absolute change as a percentage of the initial perception) in perception regarding influenza vaccination before and after consulting the application were calculated., Results: 3791 scans were performed by 3298 patients and/or their companions with a RR of 52% and a CR of 55.1% and 253 scans by 221 HCWs with a RR of 71.2% and a CR of 115.3%. Participants spent an average of 47 s on the application. The questionnaire on influenza vaccination perception was completed by 1533 participants (46.5%); 1390 (90.7%) maintained the same position (neutral, favorable or unfavorable) on this vaccination before and after consulting the application. The relative variations in favor of vaccination were + 7.2% (unfavorable then favorable) and + 19.8% (neutral then favorable)., Conclusion: This study suggests that a facilitated direct access to medical information through QR codes disseminated in health settings can help nudge people to foster their awareness of influenza and its prevention. Future deployments in a similar context or to other populations could be envisaged. Other vaccine-preventable and/or chronic diseases could also be the target of similar projects as part of public health programs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Nagham Khanafer, Florence Ader, Frédéric Berard, Françoise Bouhour, Roland Chapurlat, Sybil Charriere, Cyrille Confavreux, Gilles Devouassoux, Emmanuel Disse, Jean-Pierre Fauvel, Denis Fouque, Herve Ghesquieres, Sophie Hyvert, Anne Jolivot, Gilles Leboucher, Catherine Lombard, Géraldine Martin-Gaujard, Jean-Francois Mornex, Marc Nicolino, Nathalie Obadia, Gérald Raverot, Philippe Reix, Alain Ruffion, Pascal Seve, Eric Truy, Fabien Zoulim and Philippe Vanhems have no conflicts of interest related to this study to declare. Catherine Planckaert, Rym Bouhalila, Camille Mena and Nadège Trehet Mandel have been mandated and paid by the HCL. Sylvain Oudot, Margot Maligeay, Joséphine Clamens and Marie-Pierre Ayala are employed by Sanofi., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

An unmet need exists for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and high-risk disease features, such as progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) from first-line immunochemotherapy or disease refractory to both CD20-targeting agent and alkylator (double refractory), due to no established standard of care and poor outcomes. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an option in R/R FL after two or more lines of prior systemic therapy, but there is no consensus on its optimal timing in the disease course of FL, and there are no data in second-line (2L) treatment of patients with high-risk features. Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T cell product. The phase 2 TRANSCEND FL study evaluated liso-cel in patients with R/R FL, including 2L patients who all had POD24 from diagnosis after treatment with anti-CD20 antibody and alkylator ≤6 months of FL diagnosis and/or met modified Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria. Primary/key secondary endpoints were independent review committee-assessed overall response rate (ORR)/complete response (CR) rate. At data cutoff, 130 patients had received liso-cel (median follow-up, 18.9 months). Primary/key secondary endpoints were met. In third-line or later FL (n = 101), ORR was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6‒99.4), and CR rate was 94% (95% CI: 87.5‒97.8). In 2L FL (n = 23), ORR was 96% (95% CI: 78.1‒99.9); all responders achieved CR. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 58% of patients (grade ≥3, 1%); neurological events occurred in 15% of patients (grade ≥3, 2%). Liso-cel demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with R/R FL, including high-risk 2L FL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04245839 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Autologous(auto-) and allogeneic(allo-) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are key treatments for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although their roles are challenged by CAR-T-cells and other immunotherapies. We examined the transplantation trends and outcomes for DLBCL patients undergoing auto-/allo-HSCT between 1990 and 2021 reported to EBMT. Over this period, 41,148 patients underwent auto-HSCT, peaking at 1911 cases in 2016, while allo-HSCT saw a maximum of 294 cases in 2018. The recent decline in transplants corresponds to increased CAR-T treatments (1117 cases in 2021). Median age for auto-HSCT rose from 42 (1990-1994) to 58 years (2015-2021), with peripheral blood becoming the primary stem cell source post-1994. Allo-HSCT median age increased from 36 (1990-1994) to 54 (2015-2021) years, with mobilized blood as the primary source post-1998 and reduced intensity conditioning post-2000. Unrelated and mismatched allo-HSCT accounted for 50% and 19% of allo-HSCT in 2015-2021. Three-year overall survival (OS) after auto-HSCT improved from 56% (1990-1994) to 70% (2015-2021), p < 0.001, with a decrease in relapse incidence (RI) from 49% to 38%, while non-relapse mortality (NRM) remained unchanged (4%). After allo-HSCT, 3-year-OS increased from 33% (1990-1999) to 46% (2015-2021) (p < 0.001); 3-year RI remained at 39% and 1-year-NRM decreased to 19% (p < 0.001). Our data reflect advancements over 32 years and >40,000 transplants, providing insights for evaluating emerging DLBCL therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)