Search

The media landscape changes have resulted in significantly more people viewing content in shorter and skippable formats. There is limited evidence about the impact of these formats on anti-tobacco campaign effectiveness. This study examined the effect of anti-tobacco ad length and skippability on perceived message effectiveness (PME) and emotional responsiveness among people who smoke. Initially, 805 people who smoke were randomized to a message type (anti-tobacco vs. control) × message length (15 vs. 30 seconds) condition. A week later, participants saw the same message, but were randomized to a skippable or non-skippable version. Following ad exposure, outcomes were measured and examined in mixed-effects linear regression models. We found that at initial exposure, participants in the 30-second anti-tobacco condition reported significantly higher scores on personal relevance (75% cf. 68%), motivation to act (61% cf. 52%), action-oriented negative emotion (62% cf. 53%) and positive emotion (37% cf. 28%) relative to participants in the 15-second anti-tobacco condition. At repeated exposure, there was no effect of ad skippability on PME or emotional responsiveness regardless of message type condition. However, participants in the 30-second anti-tobacco condition reported significantly higher scores on action-oriented negative emotion (60% cf. 50%) and inaction-oriented negative emotion (54% cf. 46%) relative to participants in the 15-second anti-tobacco condition. Our findings suggest that initial exposure to non-skippable and longer novel anti-tobacco messages can lead to stronger personal relevance, motivation to act and emotional arousal, and ongoing negative emotional arousal, which may attenuate the negative effects of allowing individuals to skip later. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Campaigns highlighting the health harms of smoking have demonstrated success in motivating people who smoke to quit. Tobacco production and use also exert a toll on the environment, sustainable development and human rights. However, messages highlighting these harms of tobacco have been relatively unexplored as a cessation motivation strategy. In this study, we examined the extent to which a range of messages about climate, pollution and social justice harms of tobacco are perceived as motivating among people who smoke, overall and by sociodemographics., Data and Methods: Australian adults who smoke (n=395) aged 18-59 years reported the 'extent to which each of the following motivated them to quit smoking' and were then presented with messages about climate (four items), pollution (three items) and social justice (three items) harms of tobacco, which they rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 'Not at all' to 5 'Very much so' in this online cross-sectional survey. Differences by age, education, gender, socioeconomic status (SES) and geographical region were examined using prevalence ratios from generalised linear models with log-link (Poisson regression)., Results: For each of the 10 messages, between one-half and two-thirds of the overall sample perceived them as motivating (49-65%), particularly messages highlighting harms to human or animal life and welfare (all ≥60%). Across all message themes, younger adults (18-35 years) and those who completed tertiary education were more likely to perceive some messages as motivating. Perceived motivation did not vary significantly by gender, SES or geographical region., Conclusion: Findings suggest that value-based messaging featuring the environmental and social justice footprint of tobacco is perceived as motivating for smoking cessation, especially among younger people and those with higher education who may be more engaged with these issues. Inclusion of such messages as part of a comprehensive antitobacco communication strategy may provide an untapped opportunity by potentially providing people who smoke with additional compelling reasons to quit., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TT, EM, TN and SJD are employed by a non-profit organisation that conducts public health interventions and advocacy aimed at reducing the harms of tobacco in the community, especially those pertaining to cancer., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)