Search

Archean cratons are dominated by tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) suites, the products of crustal differentiation that formed early continental crust. These rocks may have been primarily generated by partial melting of hydrated basaltic crust in a variety of settings including subduction zones or the deep lithosphere. Sources are mainly inferred from examination of TTGs alone, as potential source rocks are rarely exposed. In the southern Superior Province, Canada, the Kapuskasing Uplift exposes an important crustal cross-section with upper- to middle-crustal TTGs and lower-crustal metabasites, which show evidence of having produced trondhjemitic anatectic melt. Here, we test the hypothesis that these metabasites were the source of the Mesoarchean to Neoarchean TTGs in the Kapuskasing Uplift by combining phase equilibrium and melt trace element modelling with whole-rock and zircon Lu–Hf isotope analysis and geochronology (garnet Lu–Hf and zircon U–Pb) of metabasic samples. By comparison of the results with existing data from TTGs in the Kapuskasing Uplift, we determined that the metabasites are plausible source rocks for the TTGs. The Lu–Hf systematics of the metabasites and TTGs are the most robust evidence of a genetic connection. Modelling results support an increase in TTG source depth over time. New geochronological data constrain partial melting of metabasite and crystallization of anatectic melt between ca. 2685 Ma and ca. 2600 Ma, coeval with crystallization of only the youngest TTGs. Overall, these results indicate a complex history of intracrustal differentiation in the Kapuskasing Uplift, with partial melting of two isotopically distinct lower-crustal metabasic sources at different times and depths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heat generated from the decay of K, Th, and U plays a fundamental role in the differentiation and stabilization of Earth's continental crust. This is particularly important in the construction of Archean cratons that form the nuclei of Earth's continents. The Kapuskasing uplift is a rare exposure of an Archean‐age crustal cross‐section that provides a snapshot of crustal melting, differentiation, and compositional stratification. We integrate field observations, whole‐rock compositions, thermodynamic equilibrium and accessory mineral modelling with heat production and latency time modelling to provide insights into the partitioning of heat‐producing elements between residue and melt during anatexis of metabasites as well as the resulting effects on metamorphic timescales and the production of tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) suites. We model six metabasite compositions ranging from relatively fertile greenschist facies metabasites to melt‐depleted residual mafic (upper‐)amphibolites to granulites. Heat‐producing elements are modelled to be partitioned between melt and residue; the dominant minerals in the residue that host these elements are apatite, hornblende, K‐feldspar, and epidote. At 800–850°C epidote is no longer stable, and the melt fraction is predicted to contain roughly half of the heat production capacity for the system. Apatite and melt are expected to be the dominant repositories for Th and U during anatexis; zircon is predicted to be completely consumed by 850°C, whereas apatite persists to higher temperatures and allanite is expected only in minor modal abundances at high‐P, low‐T conditions. The partitioning of heat‐producing elements into relatively low‐density melt decreases the heat production of the residual system during anatexis. Due to their high density and affinity for U and Th, epidote and apatite retain heat production capacity in the residue during metabasite melting. Thermal latency modelling of metamorphism suggests that enriched metabasite compositions require 38–46 My to increase the temperature from ~650 to 850°C (solidus temperature to peak metamorphic temperature of the Kapuskasing uplift), whereas estimates are considerably shorter for depleted compositions (7–25 My). Four of the six samples modelled require 60–70 My to reach 1000°C from the solidus. Our modelling of heat‐producing element partitioning and predicted proportions of melt suggest that enriched basaltic compositions are the most reasonable source of TTG magmas and our heating time modelling indicates the mantle as an equal to dominant source of heat for metabasite anatexis compared with radiogenic heat production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]