Search

Background: Vitamin K (VK) deficiency (VKD) impairs γ-carboxylation of VK-dependent factors (VKDFs), resulting in higher factor (F)II levels measured by Ecarin (FIIE) reagents (that convert des-γ-carboxylated FII to meizothrombin) than by prothrombin time (FII) reagents., Objectives: To evaluate FII/FIIE abnormalities among patients assessed for coagulopathies and identify findings predictive of coagulopathy improvement after VK., Methods: We retrospectively assessed consecutive cases from 2002 to 2021 with FII/FIIE tests and the sensitivity and specificity of FII/FIIE ratios and FIIE-FII differences for VKD defined as international normalized ratio correction/improvement of ≥0.5 after VK., Results: Two hundred ninety-two patients (males, 58.2%; adults, 85.6%; median age, 73 years) were evaluated (84.2% hospitalized, 48.3% in intensive care, 71.6% with active liver disease, and 28% deceased at discharge) and 25% to 38% had FII/FIIE findings suggestive of VKD. Among 170 patients assessed for response to VK, FII/FIIE ratios of ≤0.84 to 0.91 and FIIE-FII differences of >0.04 U/mL had similar modest sensitivity (47.7%-69.3%) and modest to good specificity (67.1%-91.5%) for VKD. FII/FIIE ratios of <0.86, suggestive of VKD (sensitivity, 47.7%; specificity, 90.2%), were more common in patients deficient in only VKDF (P = .0001), but were detected in 16% with non-VKDF deficiencies. Low FIIE was commonly associated with active liver disease (P = .0002). Patients with and without probable VKD (based on FII/FIIE ratios of <0.86) had similar mortality, bleeding, and rates of prothrombin complex concentrate and red cell transfusions (P ≥ .78), but fewer with probable VKD received plasma and fibrinogen replacement (P ≤ .024)., Conclusion: FII/FIIE comparison aids the diagnosis of VKD and predicts clinical responses to VK treatment among patients with coagulopathies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  With the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there is an urgent need for a rapid assay to exclude clinically relevant plasma levels. Accurate and rapid determination of DOAC levels would guide medical decision-making to (1) determine the potential contribution of the DOAC to spontaneous or trauma-induced hemorrhage; (2) identify appropriate candidates for reversal, or (3) optimize the timing of urgent surgery or intervention., Methods and Results:  The DOAC Dipstick test uses a disposable strip to identify factor Xa- or thrombin inhibitors in a urine sample. Based on the results of a systematic literature search followed by an analysis of a simple pooling of five retrieved clinical studies, the test strip has a high sensitivity and an acceptably high negative predictive value when compared with levels measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry or calibrated chromogenic assays to reliably exclude plasma DOAC concentrations ≥30 ng/mL., Conclusion:  Based on these data, a simple algorithm is proposed to enhance medical decision-making in acute care indications useful primarily in hospitals not having readily available quantitative tests and 24/7. This algorithm not only determines DOAC exposure but also differentiates between factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors to better guide clinical management., Competing Interests: J.H. is general manager and founder of DOASENSE GmbH, J.D. is CEO of Qualiblood SA. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The currently approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although serious bleeding risks are lower with DOACs than with vitamin K antagonists, bleeding remains the most frequent side effect. Andexanet alfa and idarucizumab are the currently approved specific reversal agents for oral factor (F)Xa inhibitors and dabigatran, respectively. Our prior guidance document was published in 2016, but with more information available on the utility and increased use of these reversal agents and other bleeding management strategies, we have updated this International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidance document on DOAC reversal. In this narrative review, we compare the mechanism of action of specific and nonspecific reversal agents, review the clinical data supporting their use, and provide guidance on when reversal is indicated. In addition, we briefly discuss the reversal of oral FXIa inhibitors, a new class of DOACs currently under clinical development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests J.H.L.: Participation on Advisory or Steering Committees for Grifols, Octapharma, Takeda, and Werfen. J.R.S.: In-kind laboratory support from Diagnostica Stago. L.A.C.: L.A.C.’s research institution has received honoraria from Bayer, BMS-Pfizer Alliance, The Academy for Continued Advancement in Healthcare Education, Amag Pharmaceutical, LEO Pharma, Sanofi, Valeo Pharma, and Servier. L.A.C. holds a Tier 2 Research Chair from the University of Ottawa. J.M.C.: Participation on Scientific Advisory Boards and consulting for Abbott, Anthos, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Werfen; research funding from CSL Behring to the institution. J.D.: Serves on advisory committees for Pfizer, Sanofi, Leo Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen. E.L-L.: Lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, CSL Behring, Norgine, Roche, Leo, AstraZeneca, and Aspen; institutional research support from Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Werfen, and CSL Behring. B.R.: Consultant for AbocaSRL on medical devices; Advisory Committee for Bayer AG. C.M.S.: Advisory for Norgine Pharma. D.S.: Honoraria for educational presentations and advisory fees paid indirectly to research institute from AstraZeneca, BMS-Pfizer, Roche, Servier. D.S. is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Anticoagulant Management of Cardiovascular Disease. J.I.W.: Consultant or member of Advisory Boards or Steering Committees for Anthos, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, and Regeneron., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a chronic disorder with a significant health and economic burden. Several VTE-specific clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to assist physicians in decision-making but have several limitations. This systematic review explores if machine learning (ML) can enhance CPMs by analyzing extensive patient data derived from electronic health records. We aimed to explore ML-CPMs' applications in VTE for risk stratification, outcome prediction, diagnosis, and treatment., Methods:  Three databases were searched: PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEE electronic library. Inclusion criteria focused on studies using structured data, excluding non-English publications, studies on non-humans, and certain data types such as natural language processing and image processing. Studies involving pregnant women, cancer patients, and children were also excluded. After excluding irrelevant studies, a total of 77 studies were included., Results:  Most studies report that ML-CPMs outperformed traditional CPMs in terms of receiver operating area under the curve in the four clinical domains that were explored. However, the majority of the studies were retrospective, monocentric, and lacked detailed model architecture description and external validation, which are essential for quality audit. This review identified research gaps and highlighted challenges related to standardized reporting, reproducibility, and model comparison., Conclusion:  ML-CPMs show promise in improving risk assessment and individualized treatment recommendations in VTE. Apparently, there is an urgent need for standardized reporting and methodology for ML models, external validation, prospective and real-world data studies, as well as interventional studies to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence in VTE., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate whether a focused, expert medication management intervention is feasible and potentially effective in preventing anticoagulation-related adverse events for patients transitioning from hospital to home., Design: Randomised, parallel design., Setting: Medical wards at six hospital sites in southern Ontario, Canada., Participants: Adults 18 years of age or older being discharged to home on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) to be taken for at least 4 weeks., Interventions: Clinical pharmacologist-led intervention, including a detailed discharge medication management plan, a circle of care handover and early postdischarge virtual check-up visits to 1 month with 3-month follow-up. The control group received the usual care., Outcomes Measures: Primary outcomes were study feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and cost per patient). Secondary outcomes included adverse anticoagulant safety events composite, quality of transitional care, quality of life, anticoagulant knowledge, satisfaction with care, problems with medications and health resource utilisation., Results: Extensive periods of restriction of recruitment plus difficulties accessing patients at the time of discharge negatively impacted feasibility, especially cost per patient recruited. Of 845 patients screened, 167 were eligible and 56 were randomised. The mean age (±SD) was 71.2±12.5 years, 42.9% females, with two lost to follow-up. Intervention patients were more likely to rate their ability to manage their OAC as improved (17/27 (63.0%) vs 7/22 (31.8%), OR 3.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.0)) and their continuity of care as improved (21/27 (77.8%) vs 2/22 (9.1%), OR 35.0 (95% CI 6.3 to 194.2)). Fewer intervention patients were taking one or more inappropriate medications (7 (22.5%) vs 15 (60%), OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.62))., Conclusion: This pilot randomised controlled trial suggests that a transitional care intervention at hospital discharge for older adults taking OACs was well received and potentially effective for some surrogate outcomes, but overly costly to proceed to a definitive large trial., Trial Registration Number: NCT02777047., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DMS has received honoraria paid indirectly to her research institute from AstraZeneca, BMS-Pfizer, Roche and Servier. DMS is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Anticoagulant Management of Cardiovascular Disease. The other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Lack of alignment of care protocols among providers in health care is a driver of increased costs and suboptimal patient outcomes. Perioperative anticoagulation management is a good example of a complex area where protocol creation is a clinical challenge that demands input from multiple experts. Questions regarding the need for anticoagulation interruptions are frequent. Yet, due to layers of complexity involving analysis of anticoagulation indication, surgical risk, and anesthesia-associated bleeding risk as well as institutional practices, there is heterogeneity in how these interruptions are approached. The recent perioperative anticoagulation guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians summarize extensive evidence for the management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications in patients who undergo elective interventions. However, implementation of these guidelines by individual clinicians is highly varied and often does not follow the best available clinical evidence. Against this background, anticoagulation stewardship units, which exist to improve safety and quality monitoring for the anticoagulated patient, are of growing interest. These units provide a bridge for the implementation of value-based, high-quality guidelines for patients who need perioperative anticoagulation interruption. We use a case to pragmatically illustrate the problem and tactics for change management and implementation science that may facilitate the adoption of perioperative anticoagulation guidelines., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).)