Search

Background: Advancements in digital cameras and the advent of smartphones have magnified the importance of clinical photography in facial plastic surgery. Here, we aim to examine the effect of different camera types, focal lengths, and distances from subjects on facial distortion. Methods: Twelve subjects underwent a series of frontal photographs using a smartphone camera and a full‐frame digital single‐lens reflex camera. Photos were captured at six distances from the subject. Seven focal lengths were used at each distance for the full‐frame camera. Measurements of facial landmarks were made for each photo, with those made at 60 inches using the full‐frame camera considered the gold standard and used for comparison. Results: Distortion of facial features using the full‐frame camera occurred when photos were captured 8 inches away using short focal lengths. A 12%–19% increase in vertical stretching of the midface occurred when using focal lengths of 24, 35, and 50 mm (p < 0.05 for all). The same features were distorted when a smartphone camera was used at 8 inches (18% increase, p < 0.01) and 12 inches (12% increase, p < 0.03). Conclusions: Distortion of midfacial features using both smartphones and full‐frame cameras occurs with short, 'selfie' distances between the camera and subject. Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1234–1238, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Facial filler is emerging as a nonsurgical alternative for addressing static asymmetry in facial paralysis (FP). Objectives: To elucidate the patient experience for facial filler and to facilitate preprocedure counseling and education. Materials and Methods: Patients receiving hyaluronic acid filler for FP at a tertiary academic medical center were prospectively recruited. Primary outcomes included patient-reported pain, facial symmetry (on a visual analog scale), and the results of quality-of-life surveys (FACE-Q satisfaction with facial appearance [SFA], FACE-Q psychosocial distress [PSD], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], and Euro Quality of Life 5-Dimension [EQ5D]) preprocedure and at 1 and 14 days postprocedure. Results: Twenty patients (90% women, average age 55 ± 11) completed the study. Sites of filler included the cheek, lower lip, nasolabial fold, chin, and temple regions. Patients reported minimal pain at postprocedure days (PPDs) 1 and 14. Patient-perceived symmetry scores improved significantly ( p  < 0.0001), as did FACE-Q SFA and FACE-Q PSD scores ( p  < 0.0001, <0.0001) when comparing preprocedure with PPD 14. Depression, assessed by PHQ-9, and the anxiety/depression domain of EQ5D, decreased after treatment ( p  = 0.016, 0.014) but no change was observed in the other domains of EQ5D. Conclusion: Facial filler for FP can be performed with minimal morbidity (pain, impact on daily routine, and complications) and leads to improvements across multiple psychosocial domains.