Search

Background: While surgery still remains the gold standard treatment for mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (MPVT) by many guidelines, the ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen has been reported as a promising alternative., Methods: In this prospective single-center cohort, patients with acute MPVT were treated with an ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen consisting of 25 mg infusion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) over 25 h. The regimen could be repeated in case of failure until resolution/occurrence of adverse events or a maximum cumulative dose of 150 mg. The primary outcome was the complete MPVT resolution rate; other outcomes included first-dose success rate, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, mortality, and total thrombolytic dose/duration., Results: Between April 2018 to January 2024, 135 episodes of acute MPVT were treated with an ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen in 118 patients. In 118/135 (87.4 %) episodes, right-sided prosthetic valve was involved. Complete success was achieved in 88.1 % of cases, with 39.5 % responding after the first dose. The median total dose was 50 mg over a median of 30 h. Only one fatal intracranial hemorrhage occurred (0.7 %), with no other bleeding or thromboembolic complications., Conclusion: The ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen appears to exhibit high efficacy and acceptable safety in treating acute MPVT. Further large clinical trials are essential for validating these preliminary findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, from incidental findings to sudden cardiac death. Management and treatment recommendations in currently available guidelines vary according to patient risk and haemodynamic profile. A clot-in-transit (CiT) in the right heart chambers may be occasionally identified and is, therefore, an under-recognised but challenging condition, often preceding an abrupt clinical deterioration, and associated with increased mortality. Data on the detection of a CiT are sparse but consistent in attributing negative prognostic relevance, and therefore the presence of CiT should be systematically investigated and recorded in the setting of PE.In this review, the challenges related to the identification of a CiT are highlighted. Here, we propose an algorithm where the role of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) is reinforced. The PERT should convene once the CiT is suspected, to define the timeline for the diagnostic steps and subsequent management on a case-by-case basis. A patient with PE and CiT requires close bedside monitoring and rapid escalation therapy in case of clinical deterioration. Beyond anticoagulation alone, more aggressive strategies can be considered, including systemic thrombolysis, surgical pulmonary embolectomy and the currently emerging catheter-directed therapies. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024493303., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-eg, "stable coronary artery disease" (CAD), "stable ischemic heart disease," and "chronic coronary syndromes" (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with "acute coronary syndromes" (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term "chronic coronary disease." An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms "coronary" and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of "acute myocardial ischemic syndromes" and "non-acute myocardial ischemic syndromes," which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischemia, and infarction., Competing Interests: None.

Background: The prospective, single-arm, observational, phase 4 ETNA-AF Europe study collected real-world data about safety, effectiveness and therapeutic adherence in European patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed with edoxaban and followed up for 4 years., Methods: Overall, 13 164 patients were included in the full-analysis set, which means that they had at least one documentation after baseline at 4 years. The current paper reports about the 3329 Italian patients out of the whole European population., Results: In the Italian cohort, median age was 76.0 (69.0-82.0) years, with 57.4% of the patients being ≥75 years old. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was >4 in 586 (18.1%) patients. At baseline, 670 (20.8%) patients were classified as frail by the investigators. Edoxaban 30 mg/day was prescribed to 1013 (31.8%) patients: these were older, with more comorbidities and a lower estimated creatinine clearance compared with those receiving 60 mg/day. All-cause mortality was 4.1%/year and there were very low yearly rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events: major bleeding, 0.9%; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.2%; ischemic stroke, 0.3%; systemic embolism, <0.1%. These events were more frequent in patients ≥75 years or in patients with renal impairment or treated with edoxaban 30 mg/day. Advancing age was not associated with an increased incidence of intracranial bleeding., Conclusions: These findings confirm the favorable long-term safety and effectiveness profile of edoxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated in routine clinical care in Italy.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disorder that affects the pulmonary vasculature. Although recent developments in pharmacotherapy have extended the life expectancy of PAH patients, their 5-year survival remains unacceptably low, underscoring the need for multitarget and more comprehensive approaches to managing the disease. This should incorporate not only medical, but also lifestyle interventions, including dietary changes and the use of nutraceutical support. Among these strategies, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) are emerging as promising agents able to counteract the inflammatory component of PAH. In this narrative review, we aim at analysing the preclinical evidence for the impact of n-3 PUFAs on the pathogenesis and the course of PAH. Although evidence for the role of n-3 PUFAs deficiencies in the development and progression of PAH in humans is limited, preclinical studies suggest that these dietary components may influence several aspects of the pathobiology of PAH. Further clinical research should test the efficacy of n-3 PUFAs on top of approved clinical management. These studies will provide evidence on whether n-3 PUFAs can genuinely serve as a valuable tool to enhance the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of PAH., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Andreotti has received speaker or consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Servier, outside the present work. Dr Capodanno has received personal honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Terumo; payment her the institution from Meditronic, outside the present work. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel/Department Klinische Forschung, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants from Terumo. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc., Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD, outside the submitted work; owns equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, and ControlRad (via spouse); has received no fees for roles served with the American Medical Association (Scientific Advisory Board), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); has served on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and has received honoraria: JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor), American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member, Steering Committee Member Clinical Trials Research Program). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura, outside the submitted work; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Galli has received consulting fees or honoraria from Terumo, outside the present work. Dr Andreotti has received speaker or consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Servier, outside the present work. Dr Capodanno has received personal honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Terumo; and payment to his institution from Medtronic, outside the present work. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel | Dept. Klinische Forschung, Bristol-Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Terumo. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc., Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD, outside the submitted work; owns equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, ControlRad (via her spouse); and has received no fees from the American Medical Association (Scientific Advisory Board) and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); has served on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and has received honoraria from JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor) and the American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member, Member Clinical Trials Research Program). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura, outside the submitted work; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the increasing burden of diabetes as a cause of macro- and microvascular disease linked to the epidemics of obesity, attention is being paid to dysglycaemic states that predict and precede the development of type 2 diabetes. Such conditions, termed pre-diabetes, are characterized by fasting plasma glucose, or plasma glucose levels on an oral glucose tolerance test, or values of glycated haemoglobin intermediate between 'normal' values and those characterizing diabetes. These last are by definition associated, in epidemiological terms, with a higher incidence of microvascular disease-mostly retinopathy. Pre-diabetes overlaps with the components of the 'metabolic syndrome'-among which are excess visceral adiposity; hypertension; hypertriglyceridaemia; high levels of small, dense low-density lipoproteins; and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. There is little doubt that pre-diabetes has important prognostic implications, especially for the occurrence of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. It is disputed, however, whether pre-diabetes is itself an actionable disease entity, in addition to the risk factors characterizing it. Because of this uncertainty, the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines chose not to include pre-diabetes as a treatment target for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, at variance from the three previous editions of such guidelines. This is spurring a debate, the Pro and Contra arguments featured in the present debate article., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies have emerged as a powerful tool for investigating causal relationships between modifiable risk factors and clinical outcomes, using genetic variants as instrumental variables. In the context of vitamin D research, MR is a promising approach to elucidate the effects of vitamin D on various health outcomes, including adverse cardiovascular events. However, the validity of MR analyses relies heavily on the strength of the genetic associations found. "Weak instrument bias", arising from instruments with low explanatory power for the exposure of interest, can lead to biased estimates and compromise causal inference. We have, herein, briefly reviewed the challenges posed by weak instrument bias in a large MR study on vitamin D [25(OH)D] and stroke, exploring implications for the study's validity and reliability of findings. We have then added an original meta-analysis stratified by 25(OH)D levels. By using aggregated data from a recent MR study, an original meta-analysis stratified by population mean levels of 25(OH)D has indicated that interventions based on vitamin D supplementations in population mean levels ranging from 50 to 70 nmol/L are likely to translate into a 13% reduction of stroke risk (pooled odds ratio=0.873, 95% CI: 0.764-0.997, p-value=0.04). MR studies are a valuable approach for discerning causal relationships between exposures, such as vitamin D, and health outcomes. However, the effectiveness of MR analyses depends on the robustness of the genetic instruments employed. By recognizing and addressing weak instrument bias in MR studies of vitamin D, researchers can enhance the credibility and utility of causal inference in understanding the health effects of this essential nutrient. A metaanalysis stratified by population mean levels of 25(OH)D has revealed the potential benefits of targeted interventions with vitamin D supplementations for stroke., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: No study has assessed myocardial T1 and T2 values in patients with beta-thalassemia intermedia (β-TI)., Purpose: To assess the prevalence of myocardial involvement in β-TI patients by T2* relaxometry and native T1 and T2 mapping and to determine the correlation of myocardial relaxation times with demographic and clinical parameters., Study Type: Prospective matched-cohort study., Subjects: 42 β-TI patients (27 females, 39.65 ± 12.32 years), enrolled in the Extension-Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassaemia Network, and 42 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (27 females, 40.01 ± 11.36 years) and thalassemia major (TM) patients (27 females, 39.27 ± 11.57 years)., Field Strength/sequence: 1.5 T/multi-echo gradient echo, modified Look-Locker inversion recovery, multi-echo fast-spin-echo, cine balanced steady-state-free precession, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences., Assessment: Hepatic, pancreatic, and left ventricular (LV) T2* values, LV native T1 and T2 values, biventricular ejection fractions and volumes, and presence and extent of replacement myocardial fibrosis., Statistical Tests: Comparisons between two groups were performed with two-sample t tests, Wilcoxon's signed rank tests, or χ 2 testing. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson's or Spearman's test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: β-TI patients had significantly higher LV T2 values than healthy subjects (56.84 ± 4.03 vs. 52.46 ± 2.50 msec, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher LV T1 values than TM patients (1018.32 ± 48.94 vs. 966.66 ± 66.47 msec, P < 0.0001). In β-TI, female gender was associated with significantly increased LV T1 (P = 0.041) and T2 values (P < 0.0001), while splenectomy and presence of regular transfusions were associated with significantly lower LV T1 values (P = 0.014 and P = 0.001, respectively). In β-TI patients, all LV relaxation times were significantly correlated with each other (T2*-T1: P = 0.003; T2*-T2: P = 0.003; T1-T2: P < 0.0001). Two patients with a reduced LV T2* also had a reduced LV T1, while only one had a reduced LV T2. Three patients had a reduced LV T1 but a normal LV T2*; 66.7% of the patients had an increased LV T2. All LV relaxation times were significantly correlated with pancreas T2* values (T2*: P = 0.033; T1: P < 0.0001; T2: P = 0.014). No LV relaxation time was associated (P > 0.05) with hepatic iron concentration, biventricular function parameters, or LGE presence., Conclusion: The combined use of all three myocardial relaxation times has potential to improve sensitivity in the detection of early/subclinical myocardial involvement in β-Tl patients., Level of Evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2., (© 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Background: Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and increased aortic stiffness are associated with higher mortality in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, while their prognostic significance after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is less known., Methods: We analyzed prevalence, clinical phenotypes and association of LEAD - assessed by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) - and increased aortic stiffness - assessed by the aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) - with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients admitted with an ACS., Results: Among 270 patients admitted for ACS (mean age 67 years, 80% males), 41 (15%) had an ABI ≤0.9, with 14 of them (34%) presenting with intermittent claudication (symptomatic LEAD). Patients with symptomatic LEAD, compared with those with asymptomatic LEAD or without LEAD, had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Patients with LEAD, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, more frequently presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and more frequently had multivessel coronary artery disease. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LEAD were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounders, including multivessel disease or carotid artery disease (hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.61-10.08, P  < 0.01), whereas PWV was not associated with the outcome in the univariable model. LEAD and PWV were not associated with a higher risk of MACE (myocardial infarction or unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack)., Conclusions: LEAD, either clinical or subclinical, but not increased aortic stiffness, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients admitted for ACS., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Multivessel coronary artery disease is present in ∼50% of patients with acute coronary syndrome and, compared with single-vessel disease, entails a higher risk of new ischaemic events and a worse prognosis. Randomized controlled trials have shown the superiority of 'complete revascularization' over culprit lesion-only treatment. Trials, however, only included patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and evidence regarding complete revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after culprit lesion-only PCI ('hybrid revascularization') is lacking. The CABG after PCI is an open, non-negligible therapeutic option, for patients with non-culprit left main and/or left anterior descending coronary artery disease where evidence in chronic coronary syndrome patients points in several cases to a preference of CABG over PCI. This valuable but poorly studied 'PCI first-CABG later' option presents, however, relevant challenges, mostly in the need of interrupting post-stenting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for surgery to prevent excess bleeding. Depending on patients' clinical characteristics and coronary anatomical features, either deferring surgery after a safe interruption of DAPT or bridging DAPT interruption with intravenous short-acting antithrombotic agents appears to be a suitable option. Off-pump minimally invasive surgical revascularization, associated with less operative bleeding than open-chest surgery, may be an adjunctive strategy when revascularization cannot be safely deferred and DAPT is not interrupted. Here, the rationale, patient selection, optimal timing, and adjunctive strategies are reviewed for an ideal approach to hybrid revascularization in post-acute coronary syndrome patients to support physicians' choices in a case-by-case patient-tailored approach., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: Dr Boden receives research grant support from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. He has received research funding from AbbVie, Amarin Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi-Aventis. In addition, he has received speaking honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Servier. Dr De Caterina reports honoraria and research funding from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Merck, Portola, Roche, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Guidotti, Milestone, Amarin, Noventure, Sanofi, and Amgen.

Background: Stroke prevention with direct-acting oral anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation confers a risk of bleeding and limits their use. Asundexian, an activated factor XI (XIa) inhibitor, is an oral anticoagulant that may prevent strokes with less bleeding., Methods: In a phase 3, international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to receive asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily or standard-dose apixaban. The primary efficacy objective was to determine whether asundexian is at least noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety objective was to determine whether asundexian is superior to apixaban with respect to major bleeding events., Results: A total of 14,810 randomly assigned patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 73.9±7.7 years, 35.2% were women, 18.6% had chronic kidney disease, 18.2% had a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, 16.8% had received oral anticoagulants for no more than 6 weeks, and the mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) was 4.3±1.3. The trial was stopped prematurely at the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 98 patients (1.3%) assigned to receive asundexian and in 26 (0.4%) assigned to receive apixaban (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46 to 5.83). Major bleeding occurred in 17 patients (0.2%) who received asundexian and in 53 (0.7%) who received apixaban (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.55). The incidence of any adverse event appeared to be similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, treatment with asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily was associated with a higher incidence of stroke or systemic embolism than treatment with apixaban in the period before the trial was stopped prematurely. There were fewer major bleeding events with asundexian than with apixaban during this time. (Funded by Bayer; OCEANIC-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05643573; EudraCT number, 2022-000758-28.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Empagliflozin (EMPA), a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure of different etiologies, although the underlying mechanism still remains unclear. Ponatinib (PON) is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor successfully used against myeloid leukemia and other human malignancies, but its cardiotoxicity remains worrisome. Cardiac connexins (Cxs) are both substrates and regulators of autophagy and responsible for proper heart function. Alteration in connexin expression and localization have been described in patients with heart failure., Aims: To assess whether EMPA can mitigate PON-induced cardiac dysfunction by restoring the connexin 43-autophagy pathway., Methods and Results: Male C57BL/6 mice, randomized into four treatment groups (CNTRL, PON, EMPA, PON+EMPA) for 28 days, showed increased autophagy, decreased Cx43 expression as well as Cx43 lateralization, and attenuated systo-diastolic cardiac dysfunction after treatment with EMPA and PON compared with PON alone. Compared with CNTRL (DMSO), cardiomyocyte-differentiated H9c2 (dH9c2) cells treated with PON showed significantly reduced cell viability to approximately 20 %, decreased autophagy, increased cell senescence and reduced DNA binding activity of serum response factor (SRF) to serum response elements (SRE), which were paralleled by reduction in cardiac actin expression. Moreover, PON induced a significant increase of Cx43 protein and its S368-phosphorylated form (pS368-Cx43), as well as their displacement from the plasma membrane to the perinuclear and nuclear cellular region. All these effects were reverted by EMPA., Conclusion: EMPA attenuates PON-induced cardiotoxicity by reducing senescence, enhancing the SRE-SRF binding and restoring the connexin 43-autophagy pathway. This effect may pave the way to use of SGLT2 inhibitors in attenuating tyrosine-kinase inhibitor cardiotoxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Balancing the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in patients with gastrointestinal disorders is challenging because of the potential for interference with the absorption of antithrombotic drugs and for an increased risk of bleeding. In this Review, we address considerations for enteral antithrombotic therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and gastrointestinal comorbidities. For those with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), we summarize a general scheme for risk stratification and clinical evidence on risk reduction approaches, such as limiting the use of concomitant medications that increase the risk of GIB and the potential utility of gastrointestinal protection strategies (such as proton pump inhibitors or histamine type 2 receptor antagonists). Furthermore, we summarize the best available evidence and potential gaps in our knowledge on tailoring antithrombotic therapy in patients with active or recent GIB and in those at high risk of GIB but without active or recent GIB. Finally, we review the recommendations provided by major medical societies, highlighting the crucial role of teamwork and multidisciplinary discussions to customize the antithrombotic regimen in patients with coexisting cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: To assess long-term effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in Europe., Methods and Results: ETNA-AF-Europe, a prospective, multinational, multi-centre, post-authorisation, observational study was conducted in agreement with the European Medicines Agency. The primary and secondary objectives assessed real-world safety (including bleeding and deaths) and effectiveness (including stroke, systemic embolic events and clinical edoxaban use), respectively. Median (interquartile range) age of the 13,164 patients was 75.0 (68.0-80.0) years; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.0 (2.0-4.0) and 2.0 (1.0-2.0), respectively. Follow-up duration was 3.98 (3.21-4.05) years. Patients on edoxaban 30 mg (n = 3042) at baseline were older (80.0 vs 73.0 years), more likely assessed as frail by investigators (27.0% vs 6.6%) and had more comorbidities than those on edoxaban 60 mg (n = 9617; missing dosing information for n = 505). Annualised event rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death in the overall population, edoxaban 60 mg and edoxaban 30 mg groups were 4.1%, 2.8% and 8.4%, and 1.0%, 0.7% and 2.0%, respectively. Annualised rates of stroke were relatively constant throughout the follow-up, transient ischaemic attack and systemic embolism were < 1% in the overall population. Rates of any major and major gastrointestinal bleeding were low, with slightly higher rates for edoxaban 30 vs 60 mg group. Intracranial haemorrhage was uncommon (0.2%)., Conclusions: In European patients with AF, long-term therapy with edoxaban is associated with low and relatively constant annualised rates of stroke and major bleeding. Differences in outcomes between the two approved doses are attributable to differences in clinical characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest P.K. receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union Big- Data@Heart (grant agreement EU IMI 116074) CATCH ME (grant agreement ID: 633196) AFFECT-EU (grant agreement ID: 847770); Leducq foundation, Medical Research Council (UK); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research; from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last three years. P.K. is listed as inventor on two patents held by University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). P.K. is employed as Director of the Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg and Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine (part-time), University of Birmingham, UK. He is Speaker of the board of AFNET, Germany, and Board member of the ESC. A.B. is founder and clinical trial design advisor of Amore Health Ltd., reports support from Daiichi Sankyo for attending meetings and advisory boards; receives honorarium from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, BMS, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Napp, Boehringer Ingelheim for lecturing and scientific advice outside the submitted work. C.d.A. has received compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, Atricure, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Acutus Medical and research grants on behalf of the centre from Biotronik, Medtronic Abbott, Microport, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Acutus Medical. J.R.d.G. reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; grants from Abbott, Atricure, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic; personal fees from Atricure, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Medtronic, Novartis, and Servier; and other from RhythmCARE outside the submitted work. J.C.D. has received honoraria for lectures from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol Myers Squibb. J.C.D. has also received research grants from Boston Scientific, Sorin Group, Biotronik, and Abbott. P.K. has received speaker's and committee membership from Daiichi Sankyo, and received consulting fee (<€5000) from Alexion and Novo Nordisk. He is the Lead Investigator of the HRB Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland, which has received grant funding from the Irish government, Irish Heart Foundation, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and A Menarini. E.L.-d.-S. reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; grants and personal fees from Servier, ZOLL Medical, and Becton Dickinson; grants from AstraZeneca, MedImmune LLC and Novartis, during the conduct of the study. P.M. is an ETNA-AF investigator and has received lecture and research fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer/BMS. E.-M.F., M.L., P.L., and R.S. are employees of Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany. J.S. has received consultant and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Alexion, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Medscape, Medtronic, Menarini, Merck/MSD, Organon, Pfizer, Saja, Servier, and WebMD. He reports ownership of Swiss EP and CorXL. J.W. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from Akzea, Bayer Vital, MSD, Berlin-Chemie and Siemens Healthineers, outside the submitted work. T.W.W. has received fees, honoraria and research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Menarini Pharma, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. R.D.C. reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study; and reports consulting fees, honoraria and other financial or non-financial interests: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Milestone, Novartis, Sanofi, Menarini, Guidotti, and Roche, outside the submitted work. Consultancy fees from Daiichi Sankyo Europe for the Chairing of the ETNA-AF Europe registry., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) remain often undertreated for multiple reasons, including treatment inertia, contraindications, and intolerance. The OPTIimal PHARMacological therapy for patients with Heart Failure (OPTIPHARM-HF) registry is designed to evaluate the prevalence of evidence-based medical treatment prescription and titration, as well as the causes of its underuse, in a broad real-world population of consecutive patients with HF across the whole ejection fraction spectrum and among different clinical phenotypes., Methods: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, national study of adult patients with symptomatic HF, as defined by current international guidelines, regardless of ejection fraction. Both outpatients and inpatients with chronic and acute decompensated HF will be recruited. The study will enroll up to 2500 patients with chronic HF at approximately 35 Italian HF centres. Patients will be followed for a maximum duration of 24 months. The primary objective of the OPTIPHARM-HF registry is to assess prescription and adherence to evidence-based guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF. The primary outcome is to describe the prevalence of GDMT use according to target guideline recommendation. Secondary objectives include implementation of comorbidity treatment, evaluation of sequence of treatment introduction and up-titration, description of GDMT implementation in the specific HF population, main causes of GDMT underuse, and assessment of cumulative rate of cardiovascular events., Conclusion: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry will provide important implications for improving patient care and adoption of recommended medical therapy into clinical practice among HF patients., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

The optimal antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who require oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Current guidelines recommend dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT; OAC plus P2Y 12 inhibitor - preferably clopidogrel) after a short course of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT; DAT plus aspirin). Although DAT reduces bleeding risk compared to TAT, this is counterbalanced by an increase in ischaemic events. Aspirin provides early ischaemic benefit, but TAT is associated with an increased haemorrhagic burden; therefore, we propose a 30-day dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin plus P2Y 12 inhibitor) strategy post-PCI, temporarily omitting OAC. The study aims to compare bleeding and ischaemic risk between a 30-day DAPT strategy following PCI and a guideline-directed therapy in AF patients requiring OAC. WOEST-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04436978) is an investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomised controlled trial (RCT). AF patients requiring OAC who have undergone successful PCI will be randomised within 72 hours after PCI to guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban plus P2Y 12 inhibitor plus limited duration of aspirin) or a 30-day DAPT strategy (P2Y 12 inhibitor plus aspirin, immediately discontinuing OAC) followed by DAT (edoxaban plus P2Y 12 inhibitor). With a sample size of 2,000 patients, this trial is powered to assess both superiority for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and non-inferiority for a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism or stent thrombosis. In summary, the WOEST-3 trial is the first RCT temporarily omitting OAC in AF patients, comparing a 30-day DAPT strategy with guideline-directed therapy post-PCI to reduce bleeding events without hampering efficacy.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an insidious condition with a highly variable clinical presentation that often mimics other diseases. Its diagnosis is particularly challenging, requiring a high index of suspicion and a comprehensive approach. Multimodality imaging plays a critical role in differentiating it from other conditions. We present a patient with cardiac sarcoidosis who also had concomitant coronary artery disease and colon cancer. The optimal therapeutic strategy for cardiac sarcoidosis remains uncertain. However, late gadolinium enhancement, a robust predictor of arrhythmic risk is crucial in guiding treatment decisions. This case report illustrates the risk of oversimplifying complex clinical scenarios by attributing signs and symptoms to a single disease, particularly in young, otherwise apparently healthy individuals. In such cases, clinicians must include rare diseases in their differential diagnosis., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Cardiovascular Echography.)

Background: Similar to procedures requiring general anesthesia, current guidelines recommend fasting for 6 hours for solids and for 2 hours for liquids prior to coronary angiography, but without data supporting such recommendation. The CORO-NF study aimed at assessing whether a shorter fasting period prior to elective coronary angiography associates with improved patient satisfaction without more complications compared with the standard fasting approach., Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized, prospective, pragmatic study in 2 sequential phases: a "conventional protocol phase," continuing the usual practice (F Group); and an "experimental phase" (NF Group), reducing minimum fasting duration to 2 hours. Patients received a questionnaire to express a satisfaction score ranging from 1 (maximum complain/no approval) to 5 (minimum or no complain/full approval). All patients admitted acutely were enrolled in a control A Group registry. Fasting time and every major complication and periprocedural complications were analyzed., Results: Fasting time was 821 ± 357 minutes in the F Group and 230 ± 146 minutes in the NF Group (P < .001). The satisfaction score was higher in the NF Group (4.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.9 ± 1.2, P < .001), even at multivariable analysis considering fasting time (P < .001). No intraprocedural food ingestion-related adverse events occurred in either of the 2 experimental groups, as well as in the parallel A Group, with no excess of peri- and postprocedural complications in the NF Group., Conclusions: The significantly higher satisfaction scores among patients undergoing a shorter-than-recommended fasting period prior to coronary angiography, not counterbalanced by decreased safety, underscores the potential benefits of revising the traditional 6-hour fasting protocols., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiovascular trials often use a composite end point and a time-to-first event model. We sought to compare edoxaban versus warfarin using the win ratio, which offers data complementary to time-to-first event analysis, emphasizing the most severe clinical events., Methods: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) was a double-blind, randomized trial in which patients with atrial fibrillation were assigned 1:1:1 to a higher dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg daily), a lower dose edoxaban regimen (30/15 mg daily), or warfarin. In an exploratory analysis, we analyzed the trial outcomes using an unmatched win ratio approach. The win ratio for each edoxaban regimen was the total number of edoxaban wins divided by the number of warfarin wins for the following ranked clinical outcomes: 1: death; 2: hemorrhagic stroke; 3: ischemic stroke/systemic embolic event/epidural or subdural bleeding; 4: noncerebral International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding; and 5: cardiovascular hospitalization., Results: 21 105 patients were randomized to higher dose edoxaban regimen (N=7035), lower dose edoxaban regimen (N=7034), or warfarin (N=7046), yielding >49 million pairs for each treatment comparison. The median age was 72 years, 38% were women, and 59% had prior vitamin K antagonist use. The win ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.18) for higher dose edoxaban regimen versus warfarin and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.18) for lower dose edoxaban regimen versus warfarin. The favorable impacts of edoxaban on death (34% of wins) and cardiovascular hospitalization (41% of wins) were the major contributors to the win ratio. Results consistently favored edoxaban in subgroups based on creatine clearance and dose reduction at baseline, with heightened benefit among those without prior vitamin K antagonist use., Conclusions: In a win ratio analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, both dose regimens of edoxaban were superior to warfarin for the net clinical outcome incorporating ischemic and bleeding events. As the win ratio emphasizes the most severe clinical events, this analysis supports the superiority of edoxaban over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00781391., Competing Interests: Dr Bergmark received grant support through the following institutions: Pfizer, Ionis, AstraZeneca, and Abbott and consulting fees/honoraria: Abiomed, Philips, Bain, Abbott, Terumo, CSI, Endovascular Engineering, and SpectraWAVE. Dr De Caterina received institutional grants from BMS/Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo and consultancy and speaker’s fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Portola, and Roche. Dr Antman received grants from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study. Dr Ruff received an institutional research grant to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, from Anthos, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and Novartis, and is a consultant for Anthos, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and Pfizer. Drs Rutman, Mercuri, and Lanz report being an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Braunwald received research grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Novartis and is consulting for Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb (MyoKardia), Cardurion, and Verve. Dr Giugliano received grants from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; grant support from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, and Ionis; honoraria for lectures/continuing medical education programs from Amgen, Centrix, Daiichi Sankyo, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Medical Education Resources, Medscape, Menarini, Merck, Pfizer, SAJA Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Shanghai Medical Telescope, and Voxmedia; is a consultant for Amarin, Amgen, Artivion, Inc, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Caladrius, CSL Behring, CVS Caremark, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Gilead, Hengrui, Inari, Janssen, Novartis, Paratek, Pfizer, PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals, and Samsung. Drs Bergmark, Park, Melloni, Antman, Ruff, Braunwald, and Giugliano are members of the TIMI Study Group, which has received grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA) from Abbott, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Intarcia, Ionis, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, The Medicines Company, and Zora Biosciences. The other authors report no conflicts.

The association between cardiac and kidney dysfunction has received attention over the past two decades. A putatively unique syndrome, the cardiorenal syndrome, distinguishing five subtypes on the basis of the chronology of cardiac and kidney events, has been widely adopted. This review discusses the methodologic and practical problems inherent to the current classification of cardiorenal syndrome. The term "disorder" is more appropriate than the term "syndrome" to describe concomitant cardiovascular and kidney dysfunction and/or damage. Indeed, the term disorder designates a disruption induced by disease states to the normal function of organs or organ systems. We apply Occam's razor to the chronology-based construct to arrive at a simple definition on the basis of the coexistence of cardiovascular disease and CKD, the chronic cardiovascular-kidney disorder (CCKD). This conceptual framework builds upon the fact that cardiovascular and CKD share common risk factors and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Biological changes set in motion by kidney dysfunction accelerate cardiovascular disease progression and vice versa . Depending on various combinations of risk factors and precipitating conditions, patients with CCKD may present initially with cardiovascular disease or with hallmarks of CKD. Treatment targeting cardiovascular or kidney dysfunction may improve the outcomes of both. The portfolio of interventions targeting the kidney-cardiovascular continuum is in an expanding phase. In the medium term, applying the new omics sciences may unravel new therapeutic targets and further improve the therapy of CCKD. Trials based on cardiovascular and kidney composite end points are an attractive and growing area. Targeting pathways common to cardiovascular and kidney diseases will help prevent the adverse health effects of CCKD., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Anticoagulation is the first-line approach in the prevention and treatment of pulmonary embolism. In some instances, however, anticoagulation fails, or cannot be administered due to a high risk of bleeding. Inferior vena cava filters are metal alloy devices that mechanically trap emboli from the deep leg veins halting their transit to the pulmonary circulation, thus providing a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation in such conditions. The Greenfield filter was developed in 1973 and was later perfected to a model that could be inserted percutaneously. Since then, this model has been the reference standard. The current class I indication for this device includes absolute contraindication to anticoagulants in the presence of acute thromboembolism and recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate therapy. Additional indications have been more recently proposed, due to the development of removable filters and of progressively less invasive techniques. Although the use of inferior vena cava filters has solid theoretical advantages, clinical efficacy and adverse event profile are still unclear. This review analyzes the most important studies related to such devices, open issues, and current guideline recommendations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Grant FOR READINGS/SPEECHES AT CONFERENCES: Chiesi, GSK, Firma, Guidotti, Sanofi, Astrazeneca. Project with drug development: Chiesi and Astrazeneca. Project without drug development: GSK., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aspirin has been known for a long time and currently stays as a cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy in cardiovascular disease. In patients with either acute or chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention aspirin is mandatory in a dual antiplatelet therapy regimen for prevention of stent thrombosis and/or new ischaemic events. Aspirin is also currently a first-option antithrombotic therapy after an aortic prosthetic valve replacement and is occasionally required in addition to oral anticoagulants after implantation of a mechanical valve. Presumed or demonstrated aspirin hypersensitivity is a main clinical problem, limiting the use of a life-saving medication. In the general population, aspirin hypersensitivity has a prevalence of 0.6%-2.5% and has a plethora of clinical presentations, ranging from aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease to anaphylaxis. Although infrequent, when encountered in clinical practice aspirin hypersensitivity poses for cardiologists a clinical dilemma, which should never be trivialized, avoiding-as much as possible-omission of the drug. We here review the epidemiology of aspirin hypersensitivity, provide an outline of pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations, and review management options, starting from a characterization of true aspirin allergy-in contrast to intolerance-to suggestion of desensitization protocols., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aim: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is a progressive condition caused by fibrotic thrombi and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary circulation despite prolonged anticoagulation. We evaluated clinical factors associated with CTEPD, as well as its impact on functional capacity, pulmonary haemodynamics at rest and after exercise, and right ventricle (RV) morphology and function., Methods: We compared 33 consecutive patients with a history of acute pulmonary embolism and either normal pulmonary vascular imaging (negative Q-scan, group 1, n = 16) or persistent defects on lung perfusion scan (positive Q-scan) despite oral anticoagulation at 4 months (group 2, n = 17). Investigations included thrombotic load, the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score, functional class, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and echocardiographic parameters at rest and after exercise (ESE), at 4 and at 24 months., Results: Compared with group 1, group 2 featured a higher PESI score (p = 0.02) and a higher thrombotic load (p = 0.004) at hospital admission. At 4 months, group 2 developed exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (Ex-PH) at CPET (p < 0.001) and ESE (p < 0.001). At 24 months group 2 showed higher NT-proBNP (p < 0.001), WHO-FC (p < 0.001), systolic (p<0.001) and diastolic (p = 0.037) RV dysfunction and worse RV-arterial coupling (p < 0.001) despite maintaining a low or intermediate echocardiographic probability of PH., Conclusions: This is the first "proof of concept" study showing that patients with a positive Q-scan frequently develop Ex-PH and RV functional deterioration as well as reduced functional capacity, generating the hypothesis that Ex-PH could help detect the progression to CTEPD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on platelet function is still unclear. We conducted a comprehensive ex vivo study aimed at assessing the effect of the four currently marketed NOACs on platelet function., Methods: We incubated blood samples from healthy donors with concentrations of NOACs (50, 150 and 250 ng/mL), in the range of those achieved in the plasma of patients during therapy. We evaluated generation of thrombin; light transmittance platelet aggregation (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), human γ-thrombin (THR) and tissue factor (TF); generation of thromboxane (TX)B 2 ; and expression of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and P-selectin on the platelet surface., Results: All NOACs concentration-dependently reduced thrombin generation compared with control. THR-induced LTA was suppressed by the addition of dabigatran at any concentration, while TF-induced LTA was reduced by factor-Xa inhibitors. ADP- and TRAP-induced LTA was not modified by NOACs. TXB 2 generation was reduced by all NOACs, particularly at the highest concentrations. We found a concentration-dependent increase in PAR-1 expression after incubation with dabigatran, mainly at the highest concentrations, but not with FXa inhibitors; P-selectin expression was not changed by any drugs., Conclusions: Treatment with the NOACs is associated with measurable ex vivo changes in platelet function, arguing for antiplatelet effects beyond the well-known anticoagulant activities of these drugs. There are differences, however, among the NOACs, especially between dabigatran and the FXa inhibitors.

The chromogranin-secretogranin secretory proteins-granins-are acidic proteins localized in granules of endocrine cells and neurons. The chromogranin family includes chromogranins A (CgA) and B, as well as secretogranin II (once called chromogranin C). Members of this family undergo catalytic proteolysis to produce active peptides. The CgA-derived peptides vasostatin-1 and vasostatin-2, in particular, appear to protect against atherosclerosis, suppressing the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, as well as exerting vasodilatory effects by enhancing nitric oxide bioavailability. Vasostatin-1 also suppresses vasoconstriction and abnormal angiogenesis. Vasostatin-1 and vasostatin-2 may be novel therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, also protecting the myocardium against ischaemic damage., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and worsening renal function (WRF) remains a clinical challenge due to the need of dose adjustment of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants., Objectives: To determine the incidence of WRF in patients with AF treated with edoxaban, the association of WRF with clinical outcomes, and predictors of WRF and clinical outcomes in these patients., Methods: This is a subanalysis of the Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice for patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Europe study (NCT02944019), an observational study of edoxaban-treated patients with AF. WRF was defined as a ≥25% reduction in creatinine clearance between baseline and 2 years., Results: Of the 9,054 patients included (69% of the total 13,133 enrolled), most did not experience WRF (90.3%) during the first 2 years of follow-up. WRF occurred in 9.7% of patients. Patients with WRF had significantly higher rates of all-cause death (3.88%/y vs 1.88%/y; P  < 0.0001), cardiovascular death (2.09%/y vs 0.92%/y; P  < 0.0001), and major bleeding (1.51%/y vs 0.98%/y; P  = 0.0463) compared with those without WRF. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage (0.18%/y vs 0.18%/y) and of any stroke/systemic embolic events were low (0.90%/y vs 0.69%/y; P  = 0.3161) in both subgroups. The strongest predictors of WRF were a high CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, high baseline creatinine clearance, low body weight, and older age. Most predictors of WRF were also predictors of clinical outcomes., Conclusions: WRF occurred in approximately 10% of edoxaban-treated AF patients. Rates of death and major bleeding were significantly higher in patients with WRF than without. Stroke events were low in both subgroups., Competing Interests: This study was funded by 10.13039/501100022274Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany. Dr Gwechenberger has received personal fees (lectures, advisory boards, research grants) and travel grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Abbott, Biotronik, Boston, Medtronic, and Sorin. Dr Barón-Esquivias has received honoraria for presentations and/or consultancy fees and/or research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer-Bristol-Myers-Squibb, and Biotronik. Dr de Vries has received nonfinancial support from Daiichi Sankyo for other research projects related to the ETNA-AF-Europe registry, and speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. He is also being considered for the adjudication committee of the LIMIT & DANCE trials, which are sponsored by the Population Health Research Institute (PHRI). Dr Siller-Matula has received speaker or consultant fees from Chiesi, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, P&F, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo not related to the submitted work. Dr de Groot reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; grants from Abbott, Atricure, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic; personal fees from Atricure, Bayer, berlin-Chemie, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Menarini, Novartis, and Servier; and other from RhythmCARE outside the submitted work. Dr Manu was an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany (at the time of development of the manuscript). Dr Souza is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany. Dr Wienerroither is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria. Dr Pecen has received fees and honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, SOTIO, and Beckman Coulter. Dr De Caterina reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study; and reports consulting fees, honoraria and research funding from: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Milestone, Novartis, Merck, Portola, Sanofi, Menarini, Guidotti, and Roche, outside the submitted work. Dr Kirchhof receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union Big-Data@Heart (grant agreement EU IMI 116 074); CATCH ME (grant agreement ID: 633 196); AFFECT-EU (grant agreement ID: 847 770); Leducq foundation, Medical Research Council (UK); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research; from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past but not in the last 3 years. He is listed as inventor on 2 patents held by University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2 015 140 571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2 016 012 783) and is employed as Director of the Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg and Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine (part-time), University of Birmingham, UK. He is also Speaker of the board of AFNET, Germany, and Board member of the ESC., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: This study reports prescribing patterns and the 1-year effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in an Asian cohort of Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice (ETNA)-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods and Results: The Global ETNA-AF program integrates prospective, observational, noninterventional regional studies, collecting data on characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with AF receiving edoxaban for stroke prevention. Baseline characteristics, medical history, and 1-year clinical event rates were assessed in patients from South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Clinically relevant events assessed at 12 months included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolic events (SEEs), bleeding, and net clinical outcome (NCO). Overall, 3,359 patients treated with edoxaban 60 or 30 mg once daily completed 1-year follow-up; 70.9% of patients received recommended dosing according to local labels. Baseline mean±standard deviation age was 71.7±9.6 years, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 3.1±1.5, and modified HAS-BLED score was 2.3±1.1. Mean age and sex were similar across countries/regions. The 1-year event rate for all-cause death was 1.8%; major bleeding, 1.3%; ischemic stroke, 1.1%; cardiovascular mortality, 0.7%; hemorrhagic stroke, 0.3%; SEEs, 0%; and NCO, 4.1%; with differences observed between countries/regions and dosing groups. Conclusions: Most Asian patients with AF were prescribed recommended edoxaban dosing in routine care settings. At 1-year follow-up, this analysis supports the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in these patients., Competing Interests: J.-I.C. reports consulting, speaker, and teaching fees or honoraria from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Chong Kun Dang, Daewoong, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Menarini, Novartis, Roche, Samjin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sanofi, and Yuhan; research grants from Chong Kun Dang, Medtronic, Samjin Pharmaceutical, and Sanofi; and a scholarship from the European Society of Cardiology. S.K., P.J., H.F.T., Y.O.Y.S., and C.H.L. declare no competing interests. C.-C.W. declares honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Pfizer. L.P. has received fees and honoraria from Beckman Coulter, Daiichi Sankyo, and SOTIO. M.U. is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. R.D.C. reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Menarini, Guidotti, Milestone, and Roche outside the submitted work. P.K. reports nonfinancial and other support from Daiichi Sankyo Europe during the conduct of the study; consulting fees and honoraria from 3M Medica, MEDA Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Siemens, and Takeda; research grants from 3M Medica, Cardiovascular Therapeutics, MEDA Pharmaceutical, Medtronic, OMRON, Sanofi, St. Jude Medical, German Federal Ministry for Education and Research, Foundation Leducq, German Research Foundation, and the European Union; and travel support from the European Heart Rhythm Association, the European Society of Cardiology, and the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork. In addition, P.K. is listed as an inventor on 2 patents held by the University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783)., (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Aims: We performed quality control of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with a view to proposing corrective actions., Methods and Results: Using a Define Measure Analysis Improve Control (DMAIC) approach applied to data from the ACS EuroPath IV survey, we measured attainment of two quality indicators (QIs) related to lipid-lowering treatment: (i) prescription of high-intensity statins (or equipotent treatment) before discharge, and (ii) proportion with LDL-cholesterol <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) during follow-up. A total of 530 European cardiologists responded and provided data for up to 5 patients from their centre, for acute and follow-up phases. Corrective measures are proposed to increase the rate of attainment of both QIs. Attainment of the first QI was measured in 929 acute-phase patients, 99% had LLT prescribed at discharge and 75% of patients fulfilled the first QI. Attainment of the second QI was assessed in 1721 patients with follow-up. The second QI was reached in 31% of patients. The DMAIC approach yielded 10 potential changes in prescription, 3 for the first and 7 for the second QI. The overall strategy is 'Fire to Target', i.e. early intensification of the LLT using statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors, and is presented as an algorithm for routine application., Conclusion: Quality control for LLT, based on the ACS EuroPath IV survey, detected 10 potential changes in prescription that could enhance attainment of 2 QIs. Whether the Fire to Target strategy will be adopted and effective needs to be assessed in further steps of the EuroPath Quality programme., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F.S. has received research grants from and/or was speaker (with or without lecture fees) on a.o. (CME accredited) meetings sponsored by Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis, Recordati, Servier, Mylan, and AstraZeneca. A.S. has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer, Getinge, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Zoll. A.L.C. has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from: AstraZeneca, Aegerion, Amryt, Amarin, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Medscape, Mylan, Merck, Menarini, Novartis, Peer Voice, Pfizer, Recordati, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, and The Corpus. The work of A.L.C. relevant to this publication is supported by Ministero della salute Ricerca corrente. R.D.C. has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Milestone, Menarini, Guidotti, Lilly, Merck, and Portola. U.L. has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Sanofi. A.Z. has received honoraria, consulting, or lecture fees from Sanofi, Amgen, and Novartis. J.W.J. and his department has received research grants from and/or was speaker (with or without lecture fees) on a.o. (CME accredited) meetings sponsored by Amarin, Amgen, Athera, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Dalcor, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck-Schering-Plough, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, The Netherlands Heart Foundation, CardioVascular Research The Netherlands (CVON), The Netherlands Heart Institute, and the European Community Framework KP7 Programme., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)