Search

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a crucial antiviral strategy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether combination mAbs offer a benefit over single-active mAb treatment. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalizations or death in the ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Certain SARS-CoV-2 variants are intrinsically resistant against romlusevimab, leading to only single-active mAb therapy with amubarvimab in these variants. We evaluated virologic outcomes in individuals treated with single- versus dual-active mAbs., Methods: Participants were nonhospitalized adults at higher risk of clinical progression randomized to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and targeted S-gene next-generation sequencing was performed on anterior nasal samples. We compared viral load kinetics and resistance emergence between individuals treated with effective single- versus dual-active mAbs depending on the infecting variant., Results: Study participants receiving single- or dual-active mAbs had similar demographics, baseline nasal viral load, symptom score, and symptom duration. Compared with single-active mAb treatment, treatment with dual-active mAbs led to faster viral load decline at study days 3 (P < .001) and 7 (P < .01). Treatment-emergent resistance mutations were more likely to be detected after amubarvimab plus romlusevimab treatment than with placebo (2.6% vs 0%; P < .001) and were more frequently detected in the setting of single-active compared with dual-active mAb treatment (7.3% vs 1.1%; P < .01). Single-active and dual-active mAb treatment resulted in similar decrease in rates of hospitalizations or death., Conclusions: Compared with single-active mAb therapy, dual-active mAbs led to similar clinical outcomes but significantly faster viral load decline and a lower risk of emergent resistance., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Immunogenetic studies have shown that specific HLA-B residues (67, 70, 97, and 156) mediate the impact of HLA class I on HIV infection, but the molecular basis is not well understood. Here we evaluate the function of these residues within the protective HLA-B ∗ 5701 allele. While mutation of Met67, Ser70, and Leu156 disrupt CD8 + T cell recognition, substitution of Val97 had no significant impact. Thermal denaturation of HLA-B ∗ 5701-peptide complexes revealed that Met67 and Leu156 maintain HLA-peptide stability, while Ser70 and Leu156 facilitate T cell receptor (TCR) interactions. Analyses of existing structures and structural models suggested that Val97 mediates HLA-peptide binding to inhibitory KIR3DL1 molecules, which was confirmed by experimental assays. These data thereby demonstrate that the genetic basis by which host immunity impacts HIV outcomes occurs by modulating HLA-B-peptide stability and conformation for interaction with TCR and killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR) molecules. Moreover, they indicate a key role for epitope specificity and HLA-KIR interactions to HIV control., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests B.D.W. and G.D.G have filed patent application PCT/US2020/022403. G.D.G. also reports research funding from Moderna and Merck., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)