Search

Hypertension increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Although treating hypertension can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and its related mortality, it is also challenging because these patients could have frailty, orthostatic hypotension (OH) and resistant hypertension (RHTN), which makes them more susceptible to treatment-related adverse events. Identifying such patients and tailoring the choice of drugs and blood pressure targets is crucial to balance the harms and benefits. The Clinical Frailty Scale is recommended to assess elderly patients with hypertension and frailty. For very frail patients, unnecessary medications should be deprescribed to avoid adverse events. Hypertension and OH frequently co-occur in the elderly, and recognizing and managing OH is essential to prevent falls and adverse events. The management of blood pressure in elderly patients with frailty, OH, and RHTN is complex, requiring the patients, their family and caregivers to be involved in decision-making to ensure that treatment plans are well-informed and aligned with the patient's needs., (Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the increased accessibility and availability of technology in recent years, equality and access to health-related technology remain limited to some demographics. In particular, patients who are older or from rural communities represent a large segment of people who are currently underusing mobile health (mHealth) solutions. System usability continues to hinder mHealth adoption among users with nontraditional digital literacy., Objective: This study aims to investigate if state-of-the-art mobile app interfaces from open-source libraries provide sufficient usability for rural patients with cancer, with minimal design changes and forgoing the co-design process., Methods: We developed Assuage (Network Reconnaissance Lab) as a research platform for any mHealth study. We conducted a pilot study using Assuage to assess the usability of 4 mobile user interfaces (UIs) based on open-source libraries from Apple's ResearchKit and CareKit. These UIs varied in complexity for reporting distress symptoms. Patients with cancer were recruited at the Markey Cancer Center, and all research procedures were conducted in person. Participants completed the distress assessment using a randomly selected UI in Assuage with little to no assistance. Data were collected on participant age, location, mobile app use, and familiarity with mHealth apps. Participants rated usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS), and usability issues were documented and compared. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the effect of the UIs on the SUS scores., Results: We recruited 30 current or postsurgery patients with cancer for this pilot study. Most participants were aged >50 years (24/30, 80%), from rural areas (25/30, 83%), had up to a high school education (19/30, 63%), and were unfamiliar with mHealth apps (21/30, 70%). General mobile app use was split, with 43% (14/30) of the patients not regularly using mobile apps. The mean SUS score across the UIs was 75.8 (SD 22.2), with UI 3 and UI 4 achieving an SUS score ≥80, meeting the industry standard for good usability of 80. Critical usability issues were related to data input and navigation with touch devices, such as scale-format questions, vertical scrolling, and traversing multiple screens., Conclusions: The findings from this study show that most patients with cancer (20/30, 67%) who participated in this study rated the different interfaces of Assuage as above-average usability (SUS score >68). This suggests that Apple's ResearchKit and CareKit libraries can provide usable UIs for older and rural users with minimal interface alterations. When resources are limited, the design stage can be simplified by omitting the co-design process while preserving suitable usability for users with nontraditional technical proficiency. Usability comparable to industry standards can be achieved by considering heuristics for interface and electronic survey design, specifically how to segment and navigate surveys, present important interface elements, and signal gestural interactions., (©Alyssa Donawa, Christian Powell, Rong Wang, Ming-Yuan Chih, Reema Patel, Ralph Zinner, Eliah Aronoff-Spencer, Corey E Baker. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 26.09.2024.)

To achieve a consensus on optimal blood pressure (BP) targets for older adults remains challenging, necessitating a trade-off between cardiovascular benefits and the risk of impaired organ perfusion. Evidence suggests that age and frailty have a minimal influence on the cardiovascular benefits of intensive BP control in community-dwelling elderly. Nonetheless, an increased incidence of acute kidney injury with intensive BP control has been observed in octogenarians. Therefore, it is recommended to maintain systolic BP below 130 mmHg for hypertensive patients aged 65-80 years. If well-tolerated, a systolic BP target below 120 mmHg can be recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, no conclusive evidence supports a stringent BP target for patients aged 80 years and older. The selection of antihypertensive medications for elderly patients requires consideration of their cardiovascular condition and potential contraindications. Combination therapy may be necessary to achieve the desired BP target. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers are the primary choices for patients with CKD. Newer generation mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may further reduce the risk of cardiovascular or renal events in this population. In conclusion, managing hypertension in elderly patients requires a personalized approach that balances cardiovascular benefits with potential risks, considering individual health profiles and tolerability., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None, (Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This paper reports the results of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial that systematically varied levels of human oversight required to support the implementation of a digital medicine intervention for persons with mild-to-moderate alcohol use disorder (AUD). Participants were randomly assigned to three groups representing possible digital health support models within a health system: self-monitored use (SM; n = 185), peer-supported use (PS; n = 186), or a clinically integrated model CI; (n = 187). Across all three groups, the percentage of self-reported heavy drinking days dropped from 38.4% at baseline (95% CI [35.8%, 41%]) to 22.5% (19.5%, 25.5%) at 12 months. The clinically integrated group showed significant improvements in mental health and quality of life compared to the self-monitoring group (p = 0.011). However, higher attrition rates in the clinically integrated group warrant consideration in interpreting this result. Results suggest that making a self-guided digital intervention available to patients may be a viable option for health systems looking to promote alcohol risk reduction. This study was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 7/03/2019 (NCT04011644)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Secondary hypertension in the elderly poses many challenges and requires a comprehensive diagnostic and management approach. This review explores the prevalence, diagnostic strategies, and treatment modalities for secondary hypertension in elderly patients, focusing on etiologies including primary aldosteronism, renal vascular disease, renal parenchymal disease, obstructive sleep apnea, thyroid disorders, Cushing's syndrome, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and drug-induced hypertension. Key considerations include age-related changes in physiology and atypical presentations of underlying conditions necessitating thorough screening with a combination of clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Collaboration among healthcare providers is essential to ensure a timely diagnosis and personalized management tailored to the unique needs of elderly patients. Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps and optimize clinical strategies for managing secondary hypertension in this population., (Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Context: Patient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment., Objectives: We developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets)., Methods: We elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation., Results: Partners agreed that the intervention-clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool-is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype., Conclusion: The palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)