Search

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, accounting for 15–20% of all lymphoma diagnoses. Although typically slow‐growing and responsive to frontline therapies, advanced‐stage FL remains incurable with current treatments and typically follows a chronic relapsing/remitting course with increasingly shorter responses to subsequent lines of therapy. Outcomes are highly variable; some patients experience prolonged first remissions that may approximate a 'functional cure'. By contrast, a significant minority of patients experience disease progression shortly after frontline treatment resulting in high rates of lymphoma‐related mortality. Reflecting on the heterogeneous natural history of FL, clinical practice varies widely, particularly in controversial areas, including appropriate disease staging, selection of management strategies and duration of clinical follow‐up. This position statement presents an evidence‐based synthesis of the literature for application in Australasian practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are a rare, indolent group of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas with different diagnostic, genetic and clinical features and therapeutic implications. The most common is extranodal MZL of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue, followed by splenic MZL and nodal MZL. Patients with MZL generally have good outcomes with long survival rates but frequently have a relapsing/remitting course requiring several lines of therapy. The heterogeneous presentation and relapsing course present the clinician with several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This position statement presents evidence‐based recommendations in the setting of Australia and New Zealand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies show the reach of the current drug overdose epidemic into the U.S.-Mexico border region, albeit with a unique border-specific wave pattern compared to national waves and a delayed onset of fentanyl involvement (Wave I: 2002–2011, Wave II: 2012–2016, and Wave III: since 2017). The objective of this study is to examine the community predictors and the progression of overdose deaths across the U.S-Mexico border-specific epidemic waves. Descriptive epidemiological profile of border communities across the unfolding of the opioid epidemic, integrated data from the CDC-WONDER multiple causes of death data set, the CDC SVI, Uniform Crime Report, and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Using spatially adjusted Bayes rates by border-specific epidemic waves, we provide a descriptive profile of the spatial unfolding of the drug overdose epidemic. Negative binomial regression models assessed community predictors of overdose deaths across waves. Spatial analysis identified moderate to steep increases in drug overdose deaths over the three waves along the border. The impact and unfolding of the epidemic in the U.S.-Mexico border region were not uniform and affecting communities with differing severity and timing. Our study also finds support for social vulnerability and community violence as predictors of overdose deaths over the current wave of the epidemic. Findings suggest that more disadvantaged U.S.-Mexico border communities may encounter increasing rates of overdose death over the coming years. Interventions need to target not only the supply side but also the underlying social root causes for sustainable overdose prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The optimal management of stage II follicular lymphoma (FL) is unclear. Radiation therapy (RT) alone has been the gold standard treatment, but a proportion of patients relapse. We sought to characterize outcomes and prognostic factors for stage II FL treated with RT alone to identify a high-risk subgroup of patients who may benefit from treatment intensification., Methods: This was a population-based, province-wide, retrospective study. Included patients had grade 1-3A, non-mesenteric, stage IIA or IIAE FL diagnosed between 1986 and 2016 and treated with curative-intent (≥20 Gy) RT alone., Results: 102 patients were included. Median follow-up was 10.4 years (range, 0.3-22.3). Median age was 59 years (range, 33-86). Median greatest disease diameter was 3.6 cm (range, 1.5-11.5). Freedom from progression (FFP) was 60.3% at 5 years and 40.7% at 10 years. Overall survival (OS) was 89.2% at 5 years and 81.8% at 10 years. Greatest disease diameter of >3.6 cm was associated with inferior FFP (10-year FFP 34% vs. 47%, p  = 0.013) on univariable analysis and inferior FFP (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, p  = 0.019) and inferior OS (HR 2.12, p  = 0.027) on multivariable analysis (MVA). Older age was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.08, unit = 1 year, p  < 0.001) on MVA., Conclusions: 40.7% of stage II FL patients treated with RT alone remained disease-free at 10 years. Greatest disease diameter >3.6 cm was associated with inferior FFP and OS, representing a novel prognostic indicator in this population that may help in the decision-making process on whether to complement RT with systemic therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David W. Scott has received grants from Roche. Alina S. Gerrie has received grants from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Roche Canada, consulting fees and honoraria from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, and Janssen, and support for travel expenses from Janssen. Diego Villa has received grants from Roche and AstraZeneca and honoraria from Roche, Merck, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, BeiGene, and Novartis. Laurie H. Sehn has received grants from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc., and Teva, and consulting fees and honoraria from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc., AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Incyte, Kite Pharma, Merck, Seagen, Teva, and TG Therapeutics. Kerry J. Savage has received grants from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb, has received consulting fees and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Seagen, participates on the data safety monitoring board of Regeneron, and participates on the steering committee of Beigene and AstraZeneca. Yi Xu, Belinda A. Campbell, Matthew Chan, Jessica Chan, Pedro Farinha, Christopher P. Venner, and Andrea C. Lo report no disclosures., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.)

Traditionally, Sezary syndrome (SS) has been associated with few therapeutic options and poor prognosis, with 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) less than one-third in historical cohorts. However, newer therapies and combinations are associated with impressive time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), particularly allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT) and combination therapies notably those including extracorporeal photopheresis. In this multicentre, international study, we explored the prognostic outcomes of 178 patients exclusively managed for SS, diagnosed between 2012 and 2020, and treated in the modern therapeutic era. In this cohort, 58 different therapies were delivered, with 13.5% of patients receiving AlloSCT. Long-term survival exceeded historical reports with 5-year DSS and OS of 56.4% and 53.4% respectively. In those receiving AlloSCT, prognosis was excellent: 5-year DSS and OS were 90.5% and 78.0% respectively. Confirming the results from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC), LDH and LCT had significant prognostic impact. Unlike earlier studies, stage did not have prognostic impact; we speculate that greater relative benefit favours patients with extensive lymphomatous nodal disease (Stage IVA2) compared to historical reports. For patients ineligible for AlloSCT, the prognosis remains relatively poor (5-year DSS 51.4% and OS 49.6%), representing ongoing unmet needs for more effective novel agents and investigation of improved therapeutic combinations., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)