Search

* Context.--Although the basic principles of intraoperative diagnosis in surgical neuropathology have not changed in the last century, the last several decades have seen dramatic changes in tumor classification, terminology, molecular classification, and modalities used for intraoperative diagnosis. As many neuropathologic intraoperative diagnoses are performed by general surgical pathologists, awareness of these recent changes is important for the most accurate intraoperative diagnosis. Objective.--To describe recent changes in the practice of intraoperative surgical neuropathology, with an emphasis on new entities, tumor classification, and anticipated ancillary tests, including molecular testing. Data Sources.--The sources for this review include the fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, primary literature on intraoperative diagnosis and newly described tumor entities, and the authors' clinical experience. Conclusions.--A significant majority of neuropathologic diagnoses require ancillary testing, including molecular analysis, for appropriate classification. Therefore, the primary goal for any neurosurgical intraoperative diagnosis is the identification of diagnostic tissue and the preservation of the appropriate tissue for molecular testing. The intraoperative pathologist should seek to place a tumor in the most accurate diagnostic category possible, but specific diagnosis at the time of an intraoperative diagnosis is often not possible. Many entities have seen adjustments to grading criteria, including the incorporation of molecular features into grading. Awareness of these changes can help to avoid overgrading or undergrading at the time of intraoperative evaluation. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024;148:649-658; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0097-RA), Nearly a century has passed since Louise Eisenhardt and Harvey Cushing published their experience in using the 'supravital technique,' or smear preparation, for the intraoperative diagnosis of brain tumors. (1) [...]

A 12-year-old boy developed acute headache and vomiting. MRI brain showed a partially cystic suprasellar mass. He underwent cyst fenestration, but the cyst regrew, so he underwent transcranial subtotal resection of the mass. The pathologic diagnosis was adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Residual tumor was treated with proton beam radiation therapy, and panhypopituitarism was treated with hormone replacement therapy, including growth hormone. Serial brain MRI scans over several years showed no evidence of tumor recurrence. But at four years after radiation, surveillance MRI showed a new focus of nonenhancing FLAIR hyperintensity in the left basal ganglia attributed to gliosis caused by radiotherapy. Seven months later, he developed progressive right hemiparesis, expressive aphasia, and blurred vision, prompting reevaluation. MRI brain showed new enhancing and T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions in the midbrain, basal ganglia, thalamus, anterior temporal lobe, and optic tract. The abnormal regions showed low diffusivity and relatively high regional blood flow. Stereotactic biopsy disclosed a WHO Grade 4 astrocytoma, likely radiation-induced. A germline ataxia telangiectasia mutation was found in the tumor tissue. The risk of radiation-induced pediatric brain malignancies is low but may have been increased by the mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]