Search

Introduction: Small cell transformation (SCT) is a typical mechanism of adaptive resistance to third generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) which have become the standard of care for EGFR-driven non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR+ NSCLC). Little is known about the optimal management of SCT patients. This study aimed to compare outcomes under platinum/etoposide chemotherapy alone (chemo) or in combination with EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi+chemo) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI+chemo). In addition, DLL3 expression was explored as potential novel therapeutic target., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with EGFR+ NSCLC and SCT treated at 19 centers in Europe and the United States. A total of 47 patients were included of whom 17 received chemo, 20 ICI+chemo, and 10 EGFRi+chemo. We analyzed DLL3 expression by immunohistochemistry., Results: In the entire cohort, median overall survival (OS) from start of first SCT therapy was 11 months (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 9.1-12.9) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95 %CI 4.2-5.8). Median PFS was similar in all three groups (chemo and ICI+chemo 4 months, EGFRi+chemo 6 months), and 12-months PFS was 12 % (95 %CI 2 %-31 %), 13 % (95 %CI 0 %-43 %), and 0 % for ICI+chemo, EGFRi+chemo, and chemo, respectively. Median OS in the ICI+chemo group was 13 months (95 %CI 5.5-20.5) compared to 10 months (95 %CI 7.6-12.4) with chemo and EGFRi+chemo (95 %CI 8.1-11.9), respectively. Before and after SCT, 0 % and 93 % of tumors were DLL3-positive., Conclusions: Our results suggest that ICI+chemo and DLL3-targeting agents are worth further exploration in EGFR+ NSCLC undergoing SCT., Presented Elsewhere: Part of this work has been presented at ESMO annual meeting in Madrid, Spain in October 2023 (Poster 1336 P)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Allgäuer, M received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Alt, J received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards by Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Daichii Sankyo, Roche, Amgen, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, BMS. Aust, DEA received honoraria from Roche, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis. Christopoulos. P received research funding from Roche, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, honoraria from Roche, Takeda, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Merck, Thermo Fisher, Janssen, Pfizer, and Novartis, travel support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen, Merck, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Novartis, Eli Lilly and compensation for advisory roles for Pfizer, Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Janssen, Novartis, astraZeneca, MSD, Roche. Griesinger, F received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Ariad, Abbvie, Tesaro/GSK, Siemens, Tesaro, Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Beigene. Grohé, C received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche, and has had consulting or advisory roles with Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. Hochmair, M received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche, and has had consulting or advisory roles with Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. Illini, O received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche and received research grants from Amgen and AstraZeneca outside of the submitted study. Jöhrens, K received compensation for advisory roles for BMS, GSK, Merck Sharp & Dohme, honoraria from AstraZeneca, Agilent, Boehringer Ingelheim, and DSO, and serves as medical advisor for QuIP. Kauffmann-Guerrero received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. Kirfel, J received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards, from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. König, D received a personal grant from Geistlich-Stucki-Stiftung, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, honoraria for presentations from Amgen, BMS, Mirati, Sanofi, Swiss Oncology in Motion, support for attending meetings from Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, MSD, PharmaMar, Roche. Michels, S received research grants from Novartis and Pfizer, personal fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Astra Zeneca as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly, and Janssen. Overbeck, T received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards by AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Tesaro/GSK, Lilly, Roche, travel reimbursement by AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, and Roche. Rohde, G received personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Atriva, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Sanofi, Novartis and Pfizer for consultancy during advisory board meetings and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Berlin Chemie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Essex Pharma, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Solvay, Takeda, Novartis, Pfizer and Vertex for lectures. Rothschild, S received honoraria (institutional) from, Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boheringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Amgen, Lilly, Eisai, Merck serono, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Otsuka, PharmaMar, and Sanofi, compensation for advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Boerhinger Ingelheim, BMS, Pfizer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, Takeda, Amgen, Otsuka, PharmaMar, serves for the speakers bureau of Roche Pharma AG, Sanodi/Aventis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Takeda, received research funding from Abbvie, BMS, AstraZeneca, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Merck Serono, Roche Pharma AG, and travel support, accomodation, expenses from Sanofi, Roche Pharma AG, BMS, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen. He serves at the Federal Drug Comission of the Federal Office of Public Health and the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Saalfeld, F received research funding from Roche, consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, Thieme, and GWT-TUD, travel support from Janssen and Eli Lilly, and compensation for advisory meetings with BMS, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, and Roche. Stenzinger, A received research grants from Bayer, BMS, Chugai, Incyte, and MSD, and compensation for advisory boards/speaker’s bureau: Agilent, Aignostics, Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Qlucore, QuiP, Roche, Sanofi, Seagen, Servier, Takeda, Thermo Fisher. Syrigos, K received honoraria for advisory boards from Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, BMS Amgen. Thomas, M received research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche, Takeda, speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda. Veluswamy, R served on advisory boards for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astrazeneca, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merus, Novocure, Regeneron, BerGenBio, and Serna Bio, on unbranded speaker’s bureau of Astrazeneca and EMD Serono, received consulting honorarium from Beigene, received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onconova, Astrazeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lung Cancer Research Foundation, Stand Up 2 Cancer. Wenzel, C received speaker fees from Astra Zeneca. Wermke, M received honorary from Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, SYNLAB, Janssen, Merck Serono, GWT, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS and has/had paid consulting or advisory positions for BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Immatics, Bayer, ImCheck, AstraZeneca, Tacalyx, Regeneron, Daiichi, Zymeworks, PharmaMar. He receive research funding (instution) from Roche and travel support from Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gemoab, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Immatics, Janssen, Iovance, Daiichi-Sankyo. Wesseler, C received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Chugai, BMS. Wiesweg, M received honoraria and Advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and travel costs from Amgen, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda. Klimova, A, Kulhvay, J, Möller, J, Pelusi, N, Rasokat, A, Schubart, C, Schütz, M, Wang, A, and Vathiotis, J have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Programmed death-ligand 1 expression currently represents the only validated predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic NSCLC in the clinical routine, but it has limited value in distinguishing responses. Assessment of KRAS and TP53 mutations (mut) as surrogate for an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment (TME) might help to close this gap., Methods: A total of 696 consecutive patients with programmed death-ligand 1-high (≥50%), nonsquamous NSCLC, having received molecular testing within the German National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer between 2017 and 2020, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 and pembrolizumab as first-line palliative treatment, were included into this retrospective cohort analysis. Treatment efficacy and outcome according to KRAS/TP53 status were correlated with TME composition and gene expression analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma cohort., Results: Proportion of KRASmut and TP53mut was 53% (G12C 25%, non-G12C 28%) and 51%, respectively. In KRASmut patients, TP53 comutations increased response rates (G12C: 69.7% versus 46.5% [TP53mut versus wild-type (wt)], p = 0.004; non-G12C: 55.4% versus 39.5%, p = 0.03), progression-free survival (G12C: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, p = 0.009, non-G12C: HR = 0.7, p = 0.047), and overall survival (G12C: HR = 0.72, p = 0.16, non-G12C: HR = 0.56, p = 0.002), whereas no differences were observed in KRASwt patients. After a median follow-up of 41 months, G12C/TP53mut patients experienced the longest progression-free survival and overall survival (33.7 and 65.3 mo), which correlated with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte densities in the TME and up-regulation of interferon gamma target genes. Proinflammatory pathways according to TP53 status (mut versus wt) were less enhanced and not different in non-G12C and KRASwt, respectively., Conclusions: G12C/TP53 comutations identify a subset of patients with a very favorable long-term survival with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, mediated by highly active interferon gamma signaling in a proinflammatory TME., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

EGFR exon 20 (EGFR Ex20) insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insensitive to traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Mobocertinib is the only approved TKI specifically designed to target EGFR Ex20. We performed an international, real-world safety and efficacy analysis on patients with EGFR Ex20-positive NSCLC enrolled in a mobocertinib early access program. We explored the mechanisms of resistance by analyzing postprogression biopsies, as well as cross-resistance to amivantamab. Data from 86 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median of two prior lines of treatment were analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 38% of patients and included diarrhea (22%) and rash (8%). In 17% of patients, therapy was permanently discontinued, and two patients died due to TRAEs. Women were seven times more likely to discontinue treatment than men. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate to mobocertinib was 34% (95% CI, 24-45). The response rate in treatment-naïve patients was 27% (95% CI, 8-58). The median progression-free and overall survival was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5) and 12 months (95% CI, 6.8-17.2), respectively. The intracranial response rate was limited (13%), and one-third of disease progression cases involved the brain. Mobocertinib also showed antitumor activity following EGFR Ex20-specific therapy and vice versa. Potential mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib included amplifications in MET, PIK3CA, and NRAS. Mobocertinib demonstrated meaningful efficacy in a real-world setting but was associated with considerable gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicity.

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Neuregulin 1 ( NRG1 ) fusions are oncogenic drivers that have been detected in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other solid tumors. NRG1 fusions are rare, occurring in less than 1% of solid tumors. Patients with NRG1 fusion positive (NRG1+) cancer have limited therapeutic options. Zenocutuzumab is a novel, bispecific IgG1 antibody that targets both HER2 and HER3 proteins and inhibits NRG1 binding through a 'Dock & Block ® ' mechanism of action. Here, we describe the rationale and design of the phase II component of the eNRGy trial, part of the overall, open-label phase I/II, multicenter trial exploring the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and antitumor activity of zenocutuzumab in patients with NRG1+ NSCLC, PDAC or other solid tumors.