Search

Abstract: We aimed to investigate the genetic associations of neuropathic pain in a deeply phenotyped cohort. Participants with neuropathic pain were cases and compared with those exposed to injury or disease but without neuropathic pain as control subjects. Diabetic polyneuropathy was the most common aetiology of neuropathic pain. A standardised quantitative sensory testing protocol was used to categorize participants based on sensory profile. We performed genome-wide association study, and in a subset of participants, we undertook whole-exome sequencing targeting analyses of 45 known pain-related genes. In the genome-wide association study of diabetic neuropathy (N = 1541), a top significant association was found at the KCNT2 locus linked with pain intensity (rs114159097, P = 3.55 × 10-8). Gene-based analysis revealed significant associations between LHX8 and TCF7L2 and neuropathic pain. Polygenic risk score for depression was associated with neuropathic pain in all participants. Polygenic risk score for C-reactive protein showed a positive association, while that for fasting insulin showed a negative association with neuropathic pain, in individuals with diabetic polyneuropathy. Gene burden analysis of candidate pain genes supported significant associations between rare variants in SCN9A and OPRM1 and neuropathic pain. Comparison of individuals with the "irritable" nociceptor profile to those with a "nonirritable" nociceptor profile identified a significantly associated variant (rs72669682, P = 4.39 × 10-8) within the ANK2 gene. Our study on a deeply phenotyped cohort with neuropathic pain has confirmed genetic associations with the known pain-related genes KCNT2, OPRM1, and SCN9A and identified novel associations with LHX8 and ANK2, genes not previously linked to pain and sensory profiles, respectively., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02010281., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Abstract: Phase 2a of the PUCCINI study was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, proof-of-concept study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the selective P2X3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP) ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04641273). Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus with painful distal symmetric sensorimotor neuropathy of >6 months' duration and neuropathic pain were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to 150 mg oral eliapixant twice daily or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in weekly mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at week 8. In total, 135 participants completed treatment, 67 in the eliapixant group and 68 in the placebo group. At week 8, the change from baseline in posterior mean 24-hour average pain intensity score (90% credible interval) in the eliapixant group was -1.56 (-1.95, -1.18) compared with -2.17 (-2.54, -1.80) for the placebo group. The mean treatment difference was 0.60 (0.06, 1.14) in favor of placebo. The use of a model-based framework suggests that various factors may contribute to the placebo-responder profile. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity and occurred in 51% of the eliapixant group and 48% of the placebo group. As the primary endpoint was not met, the PUCCINI study was terminated after completion of phase 2a and did not proceed to phase 2b. In conclusion, selective P2X3 antagonism in patients with DNP did not translate to any relevant improvement in different pain intensity outcomes compared with placebo. Funding: Bayer AG., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Abstract: We directly compared the analgesic effects of "superficial" and 'deep" repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex in patients with central neuropathic pain. Fifty-nine consecutive patients were randomly assigned to active or sham "superficial" (using a figure-of-8 [F8]-coil) or "deep" (using a Hesed [H]-coil) stimulation according to a double-blind crossover design. Each treatment period consisted of 5 daily stimulation sessions and 2 follow-up visits at 1 and 3 weeks after the last stimulation session. The primary outcome was the comparison of the mean change in average pain intensity over the course of the treatment (group × time interaction). Secondary outcomes included neuropathic symptoms (NPSI), pain interference, patient global impression of change (PGIC), anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing. In total, 51 patients participated in at least one session of both treatments. There was a significant interaction between "treatment" and "time" (F = 2.7; P = 0.0024), indicating that both figure-8 (F8-coil) and H-coil active stimulation induced significantly higher analgesic effects than sham stimulation. The analgesic effects of both types of coils had a similar magnitude but were only moderately correlated ( r = 0.39, P = 0.02). The effects of F8-coil stimulation appeared earlier, whereas the effects of H-coil stimulation were delayed, but tended to last longer (up to 3 weeks) as regards to several secondary outcomes (PGIC and total NPSI score). In conclusion, "deep" and "superficial" rTMS induced analgesic effects of similar magnitude in patients with central pain, which may involve different mechanisms of action., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.)