Search

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has improved outcomes for severe hematologic, malignant, and immune disorders, yet poses an increased risk of subsequent malignancies. This study aimed to examine the risk of skin cancer following HSCT and identify potential risk factors. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until December 2023. Cohort studies reporting standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for post-HSCT skin cancer or investigating risk factors were included. SIRs, or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using random-effects inverse-variance models. Outcome endpoints were SIRs of skin cancer post-HSCT and risk factors, including gender, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), voriconazole exposure, and total body irradiation (TBI). Twenty-six studies involving 164,944 HSCT recipients (allogeneic HSCT, n = 68,637; autologous HSCT, n = 95,435; mean age: 38.5 ± 13.8 years; 71,354 females [43.3%]) were analyzed. Overall, SIR for skin cancer post-HSCT was 7.21 (95% CI 3.98-13.08), with SIRs of 2.25 (95% CI: 1.37-3.68) for autologous HSCT, and 10.18 (95% CI 5.07-20.43) for allogeneic HSCT. Risk factors for skin cancer risk included cGVHD (HR = 2.86 [95% CI: 2.01-4.07]), specifically for basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (HR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.31-2.46] and HR = 3.68 [95% CI: 2.39-5.68], respectively), male gender (HR = 1.56 [95% CI: 1.15-2.13]), especially for SCC (HR = 1.70 [95% CI: 1.03-2.80]), and voriconazole exposure (HR = 2.01 [95% CI: 1.12-3.61]). TBI showed no statistically significant association with subsequent skin cancer (HR = 1.12 [95% CI: 0.73-1.71]). These findings highlight the importance of rigorous skin cancer surveillance and preventive strategies in HSCT recipients, particularly in male individuals undergoing allogeneic transplants and those with identifiable risk factors, to enable early detection and intervention., (© 2024 the International Society of Dermatology.)

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) has prognostic value and impacts therapy strategies in several malignancies. Data regarding MSI in melanoma are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess MSI through the analysis of MMR protein expression in patients with melanoma., Methods: An observational retrospective single-center study was designed based on patients with primary melanoma. We assessed MSI through immunohistochemical staining with anti-MLH1, anti-MSH2, anti-MSH6, and anti-PMS2 on full-thickness excision tissue., Results: Ninety-three patients were included in this study. The complete absence of nuclear staining in tumoral cells was extremely rare, with only one melanoma not expressing MSH6. Most melanomas showed an expression index for MLH1 (77.7%), MSH2 (87.2%), and PMS2 (78.6%) ≥ 75%. Most melanomas (57.8%) exhibited an MSH6 expression index in the range of 1%-74%. A low MSH6 expression index and a reduced combined MMR protein expression index (MMR-e) were significantly associated with higher melanoma-specific survival. A mild PMS2 staining intensity was significantly associated with a higher melanoma-specific survival. The patients with high MMR-e who received immunotherapy progressed and died more frequently than those with reduced MMR-e (75% vs. 33.3%)., Conclusion: More studies are needed to further define the role of MSI in melanoma prognosis and response to immunotherapy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Following the pivotal phase II trial BOLT, the Hedgehog (Hh) inhibitor sonidegib was approved in the EU to treat locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) in patients not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy. We report safety data from the interim analysis of the real-world NISSO study., Methods: NISSO is an ongoing non-interventional, multinational, post-authorization safety study (NCT04066504). Patients with laBCC are treated with sonidegib 200 mg orally once daily and followed for 3 years. Dose modifications were allowed according to the local prescribing information., Results: Between May 6, 2019, and March 15, 2022, 321 patients with laBCC were enrolled at 46 European sites (data cut-off: June 22, 2023). Treatment was discontinued in 241 (75.1%) patients, with the main reasons being the patient/guardian decision (n = 69, 28.6%), treatment success (n = 40, 16.6%) and the physician decision (n = 35, 14.5%). The median duration of sonidegib exposure was 8.8 months (4.4-13.7 months). Overall, 284 (88.5%) patients had ≥ one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most TEAEs were ≤ grade 2 and the most common were muscle spasms (n = 141; 43.9%), dysgeusia (n = 119; 37.1%), and alopecia (n = 97; 30.2%). After 3 months of treatment, the cumulative rates of muscle spasms, dysgeusia, and alopecia were 21.8%, 16.2%, and 3.7%, respectively. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 59 (18.4%) patients, while 149 (46.4%) patients had at least one TEAE leading to dose reduction or interruption. Serious drug-related TEAEs were reported in 13 (4.1%) patients., Conclusions: These results confirm the safety profile previously observed. Most patients experienced the onset of common TEAEs after 3 months of treatment, and the cumulative incidence of most common TEAEs was 10-20% lower compared to the BOLT study, except for dysgeusia and fatigue that had a similar incidence. The percentage of patients experiencing TEAEs requiring interruption or dose reduction was similar to the BOLT study, while the proportion of patients with TEAE leading to discontinuation of sonidegib was lower. This study demonstrates that the tolerability of sonidegib is manageable in routine clinical practice., Trial Registration: NCT04066504., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by ethics committees of participating study centers: Ethics Committee of the MHH Hannover; Ethics Committee of Westphalia-Lippe; Ethics Committee of the Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel; Ethics Committee of the Saxony-Anhalt Medical Association; Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Thuringia; Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen; Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen; Ethics Committee of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg; Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Lower Saxony; Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg; Ethics Committee of the University of Lübeck; Ethics Committee of the Rhineland-Palatinate Medical Association; Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Hesse; Ethics Committee of the North Rhine Medical Association; Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Ruhr University Bochum; Ethics Committee of the Goethe University Frankfurt; Ethics Committee Hamburg; Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm; Ethics Committee of the Technical University of Munich; Ethics Committee Bad Oeynhausen; Ethics Committee at the Technical University of Dresden; Ethics Committee Berne; Ethics Committee Zurich; Comitato Etico Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale"; Comitato Etico I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”; Comitato Etico Interaziendale Novara; Comitato Etico Università Federico II; Comitato Etico Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Comitato Etico ASL Avezzano/Sulmona/L’Aquila Teramo; Comitato Etico Regionale Liguria; Comitato Etico di Area Vasta Centro; Comitato Etico Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori”; Comitato Etico Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata – IRCCS; Comitato Etico di Brescia; Comitato Etico della Romagna (CEROM); Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona; Ethics Committee of Hospital of Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria; Ethics Committee of Hospital of Ramón y Cajal; Research Ethics Committee / Ethics Committee for Drug Research of the Dr. Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria; Ethics Committee of Galicia (SERGAS); Ethics Committee of the Hospital of Vall d'Hebron; Ethics Committee of University Hospital of La Paz; Ethics Committee of Hospital of Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Ethics Committee of Hospital of La Fe; Ethics Committee of University General Hospital of Valencia; Ethics Committee of Hospital of Germans Trias i Pujol; Ethics Committee of University Hospital of Vírgen de la Macarena (site was not initiated). Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests RG served as consultant for BristolMyers Squibb, MerckSharpDohme, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Almirall-Hermal, Pierre-Fabre, SUN Pharma, Immunocore, Delcath, Merck Healthcare, Sanofi/Regeneron. RG received honoraria for lectures from BristolMyers Squibb, MerckSharpDohme, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Healthcare, Almirall-Hermal, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi/Regeneron, SUN Pharma. RG received travel support from Pierre-Fabre, SUN Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim. RG received research grants from Sanofi/Regeneron, Merck Healthcare, Amgen, SUN Pharma, KyowaKirin, Almirall-Hermal. UL served as a consultant to MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, received travel support from Sun Pharma and Pierre Fabre, speakers’ fees from Sun Pharma, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis and institutional grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. PM received honoraria for lectures and presentations from MSD, Novartis, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Immunocore, Delcath, Almirall Hermal, Sun Pharma, Regeneron. PM received travel support from MSD, BMS, Sun Pharma, Novartis and served as consultant for Novartis, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Beiersdorf, MSD, Beiersdorf, Biotech, Regeneron, Sun Pharma. KCK serves as consultant to Philogen, BMS, MSD, Sanofi Aventis, Immunocore and received travel grants and speaker fees from Philogen, Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD, Sun Pharma, Sanofi Aventis, Novartis, Medac and has received research support from Novartis. PAA has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Sandoz, Immunocore, Italfarmaco, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Regeneron, Pfizer, Nouscom, Lunaphore, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, ValoTX, Replimmune, Bayer, Erasca, Philogen, Biontech, Anaveon. He also received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, Sanofi and travel support from Pfizer, Bio-Al Health, Replimmune, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Philogen. MS declares no conflicts of interest. KP reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi, Novartis, Abbvie, Almirall, Philogen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Janssen, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Galderma. KP received speaker fees from Lilly, Sanofi, Sun Pharma. GMPP has conflicts of interest with Sun Pharma, Almirall and La Roche-Posay. RFdM has/had a consultant/advisory role for Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Recordati, Sun Pharma and received travel support from Kyowa Kirin, Sun Pharma, Janssen, UCB. RBE and REH have no conflicts of interest to state. AH reports grants and personal fees from Agenus, Almirall, Amgen, BMS, CureVac, Dermagnostix, Eisai, Highlight Therapeutics, Huya Biosciences, IO Biotech, Immunocore, Incyte, Iovance, Kyowa Kirin, MerckPfizer, MSD/Merck, NeraCare, Novartis Pharma, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Replimune, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Seagen, Xenthera, and from Sun Pharma outside the submitted work. SM, NG, and RA are employees of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries and SUN Pharmaceuticals Germany GmbH., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite advances made in treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), information on its impact and interaction with atopic comorbidities, such as asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and ocular disease is limited. This study aims to assess the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with AD-treatment response included-while taking into consideration atopic comorbidities like these., Materials and Methods: Data were analyzed from the multicenter BIOBADATOP registry (a prospective cohort of AD patients initiating systemic treatment). We conducted a descriptive analysis of the main characteristics collected in the registry in relation to atopic comorbidity., Results: We included a total of 509 patients, mostly adults (81.9%) with severe AD (73.7%). Patients with personal atopic comorbidity (64%) more frequently exhibited flexural dermatitis (89.7% vs 81.5%), a higher mean of previous systemic treatments (1.6 vs. 1.3), and higher baseline values on the POEM scale (19.6 vs. 17.9). Patients with familial atopic comorbidity (40.7%) had a higher incidence of pediatric/adolescent patients (24.2% vs. 13.9%) and a history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (61.1% vs. 47.1%). No differences regarding treatment response were observed at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups based on the presence or absence of atopic comorbidities., Conclusions: Results suggest that a history of atopic comorbidity is associated with an early onset and persistent course of AD. Although no differences were reported in the short-term treatment response, further follow-up is required to better understand the impact of comorbidities on AD., Competing Interests: Conflicto de intereses M. Munera-Campos ha participado como investigadora en ensayos clínicos patrocinados por Sanofi, Abbvie, Lilly, Leo-Pharma, Pfizer, Almirall, Galderma y Novartis, y ha recibido honorarios como ponente y consultora de Sanofi, Lilly, Leo Pharma, Abbvie y Galderma. P. Chicharro ha participado en consultorías, coloquios y ensayos clínicos organizados por las siguientes compañías: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Almirall, Sanofi Genzyme, Lilly, Abbvie, Novartis, Leo-Pharma y Pfizer-Wyeth. A. González Quesada ha participado como consultora, como ponente y ha participado en ensayos clínicos de Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Boehringer, Bristol-Meyer, Leo-Pharma, Janssen. Á. Flórez Menéndez ha actuado como conferenciante y/o consultora y/o realizado ensayos clínicos y proyectos de investigación para Abbvie, ACELYRIN Inc, Alcedis GmbH, Almirall, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galderma, Incyte Corporation, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi-Aventis, Sun Pharma, Takeda y UCB Biosciences GmbH. P. de la Cueva Dobao ha actuado como asesor y/o investigador y/o ponente de: Abbvie, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi y UCB. AM. Giménez Arnau es o fue recientemente ponente y/o asesora y/o ha recibido financiamiento para la investigación de Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avene, Celldex, Escient Pharmaceutials, Genentech, GSK, Instituto Carlos III-FEDER, Leo Pharma, Menarini, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi–Regeneron, Servier, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uriach Pharma y Noucor. Y. Gilaberte-Calzada ha participado como asesora de Isdin y Roche Posay, Galderma, en conferencias para Almirall, Sanofi, Avene, Rilastil, Lylly, Uriage, Novartis, Cantabria Labs, y ha participado en proyectos de investigación de Almirall, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie y LEO Pharma. M. Rodríguez Serna ha participado en asesorías para Sanofi, Pfizer, Leo, Novartis y Abbie. M. Elosua-González ha participado como investigadora y/o ponente para AbbVie, Lilly, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, UCB Pharma y Sanofi Genzyme. J.F. Silvestre Salvador ha colaborado como ponente, asesor y/o investigador para: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Incyte, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron y Sanofi Genzyme. M. Elosua-González ha recibido honorarios/colaboración para actividades de formación, ponencias y/o como asesora de Abbvie, Lilly, Galderma, Novartis, GSK, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Ibérica, UCB Pharma y Sanofi Genzyme. E. del Alcázar-Viladomiu ha participado como ponente y/o investigadora principal y/o subinvestigadora en ensayos clínicos para Amgen, Almirall, Janssen, Lilly, LEO Pharma, Novartis, UCB y AbbVie. A. Batalla ha recibido honorarios/colaborado para actividades de formación, consultoría o participación en ensayos clínicos de Abbvie, Celgene, Faes pharma, Isdin, Janssen, Leopharma, Lethipharma, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre y Sanofi. H. J. Suh Oh ha colaborado como ponente, asesora y/o investigadora para: Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB Pharma. C. Couselo-Rodríguez ha participado como subinvestigadora o ponente en proyectos patrocinados por: Abbvie, Sanofi, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, UCB, Novartis, Pierre Fabre y Janssen. L. Curto-Barredo ha recibido honorarios por la realización de ponencias y/o como asesora por parte de Sanofi, Abbvie, Leo Pharma, Lilly y Novartis. M. Bertolín-Colilla ha recibido honorarios por la realización de ponencias y/o como asesora por parte de Sanofi y Leo Pharma. R. Botella Estrada es o ha sido miembro del consejo asesor y/o ponente y/o participante en ensayos clínicos para Pfizer, AbbVie, Almirall, Novartis, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Celgene, Roche, SunPharma. I. Betlloch-Mas ha participado como asesora en proyectos de Sanofi y Abbvie. G. Roustan Gullón ha recibido honorarios por la realización de ponencias y/o como asesora por parte de Sanofi, Abbvie, Leo Pharma, Lilly y Novartis. A. Rosell-Díaz ha recibido honorarios por la realización de ponencias y/o como asesora por parte de Sanofi, Abbvie, Leo Pharma. M. Loro-Pérez ha recibido honorarios/colaboración para actividades de formación, ponencias y/o como asesora de Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Galderma, Novartis, UCB Pharma y Sanofi Genzyme. J.M. Carrascosa ha participado como investigador principal/subinvestigador y/o recibido honorarios como ponente y/o miembro de comité de expertos o steering comitee para AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Sandoz, Amgen, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, UCB. El resto de los autores declara no tener ningún conflicto de intereses., (Copyright © 2024 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

In this original research, we present the results in terms of effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa in real clinical practice. Results indicated significant improvement in all activity scores and patient-reported outcomes at week 16, including a notable decrease in mean IHS4 from 27.1 to 15.6 (p < 0.001), HS-PGA from 5.1 to 3.2 (p < 0.001), VAS pain from 8.3 to 4.7 (p < 0.001) and DLQI from 21.6 to 12.6 (p < 0.001). Bimekizumab, administered every 2 or 4 weeks, was well-tolerated with no discontinuations and no new safety concerns identified. These findings corroborate the drug's effectiveness and favourable safety profile observed in phase 3 clinical trials, supporting its use in real-world clinical practice for treating HS., (© 2024 Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This case reports a 14-month-old child with Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome (SSSS). The child presented generalized scaling erythema accompanied by skin pain, and perioral crusts and fissures and she required hospital admission for antibiotic treatment with intravenous cloxacillin and hidroelectrolyte replacement.SSSS is a blistering skin disorder, mainly affecting children, caused by specific Staphylococcus aureus strains producing exfoliative toxins. It shows erythema in skin folds progressing to blisters within 48 h, often with perioral crusts and fissures. Its diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and it often requires intravenous antibiotics for its treatment., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Complete lymph node dissection (CLND) was the standard practice for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) until the results of 2 clinical trials published in 2016 and 2017 demonstrated that it did not improve melanoma-specific survival (MSS). However, it continues to be performed in some scenarios. No studies have ever been published on lymph node management after a positive SLNB in the routine clinical practice in our setting., Objectives: To determine the evolution of the indication for CLND in patients with a positive SLNB, as well as the characteristics associated with its performance., Material and Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study with patients with skin melanoma and positive sentinel lymph nodes diagnosed from 2017 through 2022 at 8 Spanish centers and 1 Italian center., Results: A total of 430 patients were included, 54% men, with 358 (75.1%) aged between 45 and 80 years. A total of 133 cases (31%) exhibited Breslow thickness > 4mm, 206 cases (49.1%) were ulcerated, and in 213 cases (55.7%), lymph node metastasis was > 1mm. Isolated lymphadenectomy or followed by adjuvant therapy was performed in 146 patients (34.1%). After multivariate logistic regression, the factors associated with the performance of CLND were the acral lentiginous melanoma histological subtype, lymph node metastasis size > 1mm, extracapsular spread, and the participant hospital. Age > 80 years was inversely associated., Conclusion: While the frequency of CLND in patients with melanoma and positive SLNB has decreased, the indication for systemic adjuvant therapy in these patients has increased. However, CLND is still indicated in patients with high-risk characteristics., (Copyright © 2024 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Consensus is lacking on adequate deep histological margins in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Deep clearance for tumours located on the scalp is limited by anatomic constraints., Objective: To determine whether clear but close deep histological margins (<1 mm) confer a higher risk of recurrence in cSCCs of the scalp treated by wide local excision, compared to deep histological margins ≥1 mm., Methods: Multicentre retrospective observational cohort study and multivariate competing risk analysis to evaluate risk factors for recurrence., Results: In total, 295 patients with 338 cSCCs were included. Close deep histological margins were not associated with an increased cumulative incidence of recurrence (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.96 [95% CI 0.87-4.41]). However, an increased risk of recurrence was observed for those tumours that presented concurrent invasion of the galea aponeurotica and close deep margins, as opposed to patients without these factors (SHR 3.52 [1.24-10.01]). Tumours with clear but close peripheral margins (<1 mm) also had higher risk of recurrence (SHR 5.01 [1.68-14.97])., Limitations: Retrospective observational study based on pathology reports., Conclusion: Deep histological margins <1 mm do not confer a greater risk of recurrence as long as the tumour is completely excised and the galea aponeurotica is not involved. Surgical excision of cSCC on the scalp should include the galea to ensure proper assessment of deep margins., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Immunosuppressed (IS) patients, particularly solid organ transplant recipients and those on immunosuppressive therapy, face a higher incidence and recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the preferred treatment for high-risk NMSC due to its high cure rate and margin examination capabilities. However, IS patients may experience more complications, such as surgical site infections, and a greater risk of recurrence, making their outcomes a subject of interest., Objectives: This study aimed to compare IS and immunocompetent (IC) patients undergoing MMS for NMSC in terms of baseline characteristics, intra- and post-surgical complications, and postoperative recurrence rates., Methods: The study utilized data from the REGESMOHS registry, a 7-year prospective cohort study in Spain. It included 5226 patients, categorizing them into IC (5069) and IS (157) groups. IS patients included solid organ transplant recipients, those on immunosuppressive treatments, individuals with haematological tumours and HIV-positive patients. Patient data, tumour characteristics, surgical details and outcomes were collected and analysed., Results: IS patients demonstrated a higher proportion of SCC, multiple synchronous tumours and tumours invading deeper structures. Complex closures, unfinished MMS and more surgical sections were observed in the IS group. Although intra-operative morbidity was higher among IS patients, this difference became non-significant when adjusted for other variables such as year of surgery, antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment or type of closure. Importantly, IS patients had a substantially higher recurrence rate (IRR 2.79) compared to IC patients., Conclusions: This study suggests that IS patients may be at a higher risk of development of AE such as bleeding or tumour necrosis and are at a higher risk of tumour recurrence. Close follow-up and consideration of the specific characteristics of NMSC in IS patients are crucial. Further research with extended follow-up is needed to better understand the long-term outcomes for this patient group., (© 2024 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases., Material and Method: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort., Results: We analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001)., Conclusion: Drug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry., (Copyright © 2023 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)