Search

One of the most common complications of tricuspid valve replacement is atrioventricular block (AVB), often requiring permanent pacing. The endocardial pacemaker lead, placed in the right ventricle, may sometimes interfere with the implanted prosthesis, causing its early dysfunction and the need for alternative sites of pacing. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case of a successful combined percutaneous procedure consisting of the implantation of two leads in the coronary sinus for univentricular bifocal pacing and a transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation in a young patient with severe dysfunction of the tricuspid bioprosthesis, requiring permanent pacing for a postsurgical complete atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve replacement with surgery can often lead to cardiac rhythm disorders requiring a permanent pacemaker. This device may occasionally damage the tricuspid prosthesis. We present the first case of a combined procedure of tricuspid valve replacement and device implantation distant from the prosthesis without the need for a surgical approach in a young patient with severe tricuspid prosthesis malfunctioning and permanent pacing. Article highlights Right-sided infective endocarditis in young patients may be caused by intravenous drug use, leading to tricuspid valve injury and the need for valve replacement with a prosthesis. Complete atrioventricular block represents an important postoperative complication of valve surgery requiring, frequently, the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. The endocardial pacemaker lead in the right ventricle may sometimes interfere with the implanted bioprosthesis, causing its early degeneration with the need for prosthesis replacement and research of other sites of pacing. Surgical replacement of a malfunctioning tricuspid prosthesis is among the highest-risk procedures. A combined percutaneous implantation of two pacing leads in the coronary sinus for univentricular bifocal pacing and a transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients requiring a permanent pacing site. In the case of pacemaker dependency, the use of actively fixating leads should be preferable to passive ones in order to minimize the risk of lead dislocation. Other strategies such as pacing with epicardial leads, the use of his-bundle pacing, or leadless pacemakers were taken into account but not deemed suitable. The Heart Team plays a critical role in decision-making in these particular conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives : To date, data regarding the characteristics and management of obstructive, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) encountered in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are sparse. The aim of the study was to analyze granular details, treatment, and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive, stable CAD from real-world practice. Methods : REVASC-TAVI (Management of myocardial REVASCularization in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with coronary artery disease) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry, which collected data from patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive stable CAD found during the pre-TAVI work-up. Results : A total of 2025 patients from 30 centers worldwide with complete follow-up were included in the registry. Most patients had single-vessel CAD (56.1%). An involvement of proximal coronary tracts was detected in 62.5% of cases, with 12.0% of patients having CAD in left main (LM). Most patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 1617, 79.9%), especially those with proximal CAD (90.4%). At 2 years, the rates of all-cause death [Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates 20.1% vs. 18.8%, p log-rank = 0.86] and of the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure (KM estimates 29.7% vs. 27.5%, p log-rank = 0.82) did not differ between patients undergoing PCI and those who were not. Conclusions : Patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive CAD more commonly had a single-vessel disease and an involvement of proximal coronary tracts. They were commonly treated with PCI, with similar outcomes compared to those treated conservatively., Competing Interests: Thomas Pilgrim received research grants to the institution from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; and speaker/consultancy fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and HighLifeSAS. Ole De Backer received institutional research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Lars Sondergaard received consultant fees and/or institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and SMT. Maurizio Taramasso is a consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, CoreMedic, MEDIRA, 4tech, Simulands, Occlufit, and MTEX. Corrado Tamburino is a consultant for Medtronic. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Background and Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the fluoroscopy time (FT), procedure time (PT) safety and efficacy when using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in comparison to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance for transcatheter closure of Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect (OS-ASD)., Method: Ninety patients (n = 90) diagnosed with OS-ASD underwent transcatheter closure between March 2006 and October 2021. Fifty-seven patients were treated under ICE guidance, while 33 patients were treated under TEE guidance., Results: Mean age was 43 ± 15 years and 42 ± 10 years in the ICE and TEE groups, respectively. The majority of patients had a centrally placed defect. Median FT was 8.40 min versus 11.70 min (p < .001) in the ICE group compared to the TEE group, respectively. Median PT was 43 min versus 94 min (p < .001) in the ICE group compared to the TEE group, respectively. Both ICE and TEE provided high quality images. All interventions were completed successfully, except for one patient in the ICE group who experienced a device migration, the development of atrial tachycardia in one patient and atrial fibrillation in two patients in the ICE group which spontaneously cardioverted. There were no other complications., Conclusion: This study on a consistent cohort of patients with OS-ASD undergoing percutaneous closure suggests that use of ICE is safe and efficacious. Compared to TEE, ICE demonstrated significantly shorter FT and PT, decreasing the entire duration of the procedure and x-ray exposure. No relevant differences were observed in terms of success rate and complications., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)